How do i determine if an SEO person i hired is good and should continue on
-
I know SEO is important and i am hiring an SEO person, as well as company. however, they both seem to contradict each other and so im lost as to know who is good and bad. what should i look for in their work report, and what questions should i ask.
Background:
i have tried to read alot (100+ articles) on the new panda and penguin so at least i know what people are talking about without being clueless. So my site got hit recently with the updates and got penalised, and i think that is predominantly because of the backlink profiles, before being built too much around keywords. so my understanding is that backlinking now should be natural, diverse (many alt tags instead of a few), concentrate on branding and less on keywords.
The person: she believes in branding, and acknowledge the problem with my previous backlink profile. so now she said the backlink ratio should be around 40-50% based on the brand. so she has been doing alot of backlinks wtih alt tags for my website url, name, as well as my name. She said once that ratio is close to that target of 40-50% i should see a jump in ranking, which woudl be in around a month of work. but here is my concern
1 - the other company said she is spamming, which kinda scarred me already
2 - while in principle, what she has said is backed up by my reading materials, it seems she only concentrate on three alt texts so far, my url, my business name, and my name. i thought they need to be diversified
3 - the links seem to come from alot of places. she said it does not need to be high quality now as we just need to get that ratio/profile correct, and then we can concentrate on the high quality links later. she is doing around 40 links per day. which apparently take 8 hours per day.
4 - i guess i worry that that if all these new links suddenly become spams later, does that mean i woudl need to either build more links to offset the more spam links, or have to spend more time removing bad links
Please advise. is she performing spamming. how do i check her links/works. is there a tool. is it wise to build more links, or is it better to identify previous bad links and remove them?
Thank you for your help.
-
Thank you so much Lynn. it has helped so much for my understanding of reading these data, as well as seo. I will definitely take these knowledge to my future sites as well. loosk like natural linkings is the way to go
-
Hi,
Well you have started on the right track with moz and the other tools! Personally I would take a step back from the link building and get a good grounding in the basics first. The moz beginner guide is a great place to start.
In regards your link profile, the moz metrics can be a bit deceptive if you have done a lot of link building in comparison to your competitors, the authority numbers can be somewhat inflated even though the links are not high value (and indeed are even hurting you). Your link profile to me looks problematic, especially the non www which has quite a few linking texts which seem completely unrelated to your site (check the anchors cloud in the ahrefs links above). Is this the reason for your ranking problems? Maybe and there is a good chance you will need to try to get rid of some of those links if possible. Might be worth asking whoever built these links if it is possible to unwind some of them, but this is a whole different conversation and worth a separate qa question where someone with more experience in getting rid of bad links might jump in with more specific advice.
What I can certainly say now is I would stop the link building you are currently doing as it looks problematic and there is no point in making it even worse. Then go through the moz guide, get a good grounding in the basics and in the first instance concentrate on building links from relevant sources from your offline world. What I mean is incorporate your real world contacts and actions with your site, register your business/site with relevant local business directories or local photography groups for example. Be a normal business with normal business activities in other words and incorporate these when relevant to a link here or there. There is no 'acceptable' rate of link building, but honestly for a local wedding photography site a 'natural' rate could be only a link or two a week! 40 a day is simply asking for a penalty, why would a site like this be getting so many links if not to try and game the search engines?
Hope that helps!
-
thank you lynn.
so i have joined up seomoz, and other places to get reports on the backlinking profile. so my page authority is much higher than the competition, im no where on the first page on a lot of keywords, so im just trying to figure out what is the problem.
1- according to cognitiveseo, i have 39% links that are unnatural, and my domain alt tags is only 23%. but then
but everything else seems ok. so does mean my link profile is the main problem here? what woudl be an acceptable rate of link building per days. i assume if i was to concentrate on natural link buildings from now on, targeting on high quality backlinks only, it will be safer in the long run and results would eventually shown?
-
Hmm thats a point re the non www vs www. That being said, there are still a fair amount of new domains linking to the non www version also. Generally, I would not like the looks of that link profile one little bit. In all honesty, I would pause that link building until you get a better handle on what is being done vs what you need to be getting done. As Maximise points out, you might well have a real slog to get rid of the bad links later on, so don't make it any worse now.
In regards ahrefs generally backlinks are individual linking pages and domains are individual linking domains (could be one or more pages on that domain linking, its still one domain). I would look at the new/lost domains and then click on a day and look underneath to see the newly found linking domain. If most of the domains are crap directories, spam comments and generally low value links, then you do not want them.
-
oh right, thank you kindly for clearing that up. its great to know.
-
No this isn't a problem because all the www requests for your site are being correctly 301 redirected to the non www version. But all the links being built for the www version will also count for the non www version.
-
interesting. so you are saying i need to remove one or the other right? this is bad as google is splitting my ranking juice across the two sites?
-
Lynn posted a link where lit looks like you are losing links but have a look at this version:
https://ahrefs.com/site-explorer/overview/subdomains/www.ppp.net.nz
It looks like your SEO is building links to www.ppp.net.nz instead of ppp.net.nz and the link acquisition rate shown above is definitely going to look unnatural.
Low quality links are not worth the hassle. if you are building 40 a day that is most likely going to end up in links that you have to try remove in the future which is much, much harder work. I've spent months cleaning up a link profile before Google lifted the penalty.
-
Hi Lynn thank you for your reply. ok in all honesty, i am not an seo person. i do try to educate as much as i can so i can say seomthing here and there, but not im not an expert.
i have tried to use ahrefs, but i dont know what the data means. if i may, what is domains, in comparison to backlinks? and i looked at the new/lost for backlinks and i seem to be loosing lots of backlinks as well. but coudl this be spam comments via Wordpress?
i know we have not been getting rids of bad links at all. she said in order to change the backlink profile to about 50% ratio of brand link to others, she tries to get that number of brandlinks up with the alt tag targetting the url and brand name. so is that true? to get that ratio correct first before I can see any movement in the ranking in seo? i do lots of blogs, my social media linking seems to be ok, but the backlinks is what killing me, because of what previously has been done. so she is determined that we need to fix this profile first. i have read in several places the the alt tag distribution must now be less on keywords and more on brands. so i guess in principle she seems correct. but i just worry she is building brand profile through more badlinks, which might give me short term benefits, but probablywill kill my page later on.
-
Hi,
As the others say I would be concerned. You can get an idea of what is going on by using ahrefs, the free account will give you some basic data on new links so you have a rough idea. Check here: https://ahrefs.com/site-explorer/overview/subdomains/ppp.net.nz
That being said, the link profile does not look like what you would expect with a link building campaign like you describe going on, both total links and linking domains seems to have a significant downward trend, unless at the same time as building your links you are actively trying to get rid of previous bad links? Either way, if you have a look at the newly obtained domains report here: https://ahrefs.com/site-explorer/refdomains-new/subdomains/ppp.net.nz you are not going to see very much quality in there! Directories from all over the world, some comment links etc.... thats not a good link profile, watch out!
-
hi doug, this is what I am afraid of as well. especially with the new updates which seems to only want quality and natural linkings, hence my fear. my website is ppp.net.nz.
-
Would it be useful to post up the excel sheet as to what has been done?
my website is www.ppp.net.nz. thank you.
-
From what you've said it I'd be concerned.
40 links / day sounds aggressive and almost certainly low value (and potentially risky) links. If your site has been penalised in some way I strongly suspect that this is more likely to be digging you a bigger hole than helping you to recover.
You've got to understand the reason why you've been penalised and what's caused it. (Have you had any Google Webmaster tools warnings?)
Looking at you backlink profile and making assumptions that you can fix things by throwing more links at it doesn't say "robust recovery strategy" to me.
If the other company are saying she's "spamming" what do they suggest you do?
If you're happy to tell us your website then I'm sure someone would take a look. (If you'd rather, I'd be happy to take a quick look if you want to send me a private message with your site details in.)
-
I would be very concerned with this strategy. If they are building 40 links per day then these are almost certainly going to be low quality and artificial looking links. The anchor text of a link is not the only way that Google judges if a link is artificial or not. You could be digging yourself into a much bigger hole. I also think the general consensus is that branding should be higher than 50%, maybe around the 70% - 80% mark.
Personally I would focus on obtaining some high quality, authoritative links and at the same time try to remove as many of the spam links as possible.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Are charity/sponsorship links good, bad or just useless?
Some facts: We will probably only doe this 2-3 times a year (we have hundreds of links coming in each year from organic sources). This is for a really prestigious charity website with very nice link profile from other non-profits, news organizations, and even government websites. We will get a logo on their sponsorship page, with a link back to our site. Some articles say Google considers this "buying a link" and will therefore penalize you. Or at best, this will have no effect. And here's a Search Engine Land article saying the exact opposite. $1,500 is a lot of money. So I just want to make sure I'm not wasting it -- or worse -- getting penalized.
Link Building | | Brand_Psychic0 -
Domain vs. page SEO
Hi I'm new to SEO and trying to optimize one of my pages. However this page that I'm trying to optimize is not the homepage. Does it mean that since I have collected links from other pages to my homepage that the specific page I'm trying to SEO doesn't get any "link juice"? And how could this situation be corrected? Is the only way to get direct links to the page I'm trying to optimize?
Link Building | | agentti0 -
Are sites that "smell of SEO" being demoted?
I'm working with a site owner who recently hired an SEO to work on just one particular type of keyword. It seems like the more work the SEO did, the lower the keyword gradually dropped. Granted, the "work" is pretty low quality - anchor texted bookmarks, comments and low quality articles. We're doing an experiment where we are going to disavow those links and see if the previous rankings return. Another site that I am consulting with has a lot of good natural links and then some anchor texted links, but from decent sources - some guest posts (on good sites - not a spammy site that exists only for guest posts) and some places where decent websites have agreed to link to the site. The anchor texted links do not make up very much of the overall anchor text. There is good diversity and lots of brand and url anchored links. It seems like the more the SEO does for this site, the more the rankings drop. And it's not all about anchor text. The SEO placed a link in a relevant directory, using the url as anchor...rankings dropped a little. They obtained an expired domain with relevant and very natural links and 301'd it to the new domain...rankings dropped several places. And so on. Occasionally the rankings will pop up a little, but overall it's a downward spiral. Check out this post by Gary Taylor. He did an experiment where he took an established site that was ranking well and threw some spammy links at it. To quote the article, 'every day goes by my ranking for the term “domains” is getting harder to maintain.' He recently tweeted that he has been removing and disavowing links and the rankings are returning. I was looking at searches for real estate related terms in different cities. In some cities, the top sites are ones that have ZERO obvious SEO done to them. There are sites ranking on page 3 that have been SEO'd, and not all of them have poor SEO. Many are what I would consider really well done. Some of the sites ranking on page 1 have under 10 links. There was one with 2 followed links and they were not from super authoritative sites! To complicate matters though, if you look at searches like "Toronto Real Estate Agents" some of the top sites have lots of keyword anchor texted links. Perhaps this should be a blog post rather than a Q&A, but I would love to hear some of your thoughts. My personal thought is that Google's main goal with Penguin and the unnatural links warnings is to make it so that not only is it not profitable to try to manipulate the SERPS, but that every time you try to do so, you potentially do your rankings harm. I used to say that Penguin could only affect a site on the date of a Penguin refresh, but I am thinking now that Google has managed to roll Penguin into the algorithm to some extent so that it can demote the majority of any work that smells of SEO. Thoughts?
Link Building | | MarieHaynes0 -
Is blog commenting still useful for SEO, post Panda and Penguin?
One website I checked is ranking well on Google. Upon checking its backlinks, I found that most of them are blog comments. Is blog commenting still valuable? Anyone encountered any recent problem (ranks gone down, etc)? Are there any specific strategy to blog commenting these days? Thanks!
Link Building | | AgentsofValue0 -
Good and Bad of Comment Hut?
Hi All, A new client in a competitive market (international car hire - Car Trawler affiliate) is using Comment Hut to gain links to his site. I have not used this service so am wondering, with the latest google stuff, what the good the bad and the ugly is on the comment hut service. Does it work? Should we avoid it? Thanks in advance Steve
Link Building | | stevecounsell0 -
Blog comments good for SEO
Does anyone use/recommend the use of anchor text links in blog comments (on sites relevant to your sites market)? Thanks, Mark
Link Building | | DenverKelly0 -
SEO Agencies
I'm eager to hear peoples experiences both good and bad with SEO Agencies. I have tried many. I'm particularly interested in hearing experiences of types of link building. In my experience many SEO agencies build low quality links, that at least in my view are unlikely to stand the test of time, with one or two expections.
Link Building | | PeterM220 -
Ecommerce websites' SEO strategy
Hi, Can you please make a short list how to make ecommerce websites SEO strategy?
Link Building | | Netkreativ
I am working on ecommerce websites and I curiuos how You professional think this. Now I am: Optimizing the website Build few relavant links Regards, Misi0