Publishing Articles + Plagiarism
-
Everybody at some point will write a feature rich article and publish it on their website.
What is stopping your competitors from blatantly stealing your article and publishing it on their own website virtually word for word.
If your competitors website gets indexed by Google before yours than surely Google will see your hard work and cost as duplicate content.Question:
Should site owners be worried about this type of practice?
How do we safeguard ourselves from this type of practice?Any other good advice would be appreciated...
Thanks Mark
-
Doug,
You are the man, nailed it!
Robert
-
Mark, just thought I'd add to responses comments Robert and Devanur have left with some personal experience.
Content from one of my sites was being copied and republished on multiple sites, and then re-copied/re-published on more! (Some niches are worse than others!)
What I started to do was to make a concious effort to make sure I included links to other content on my site within my articles. These links were to relevant content and were referenced in such a way that editing the link out would make parts of the article meaningless.
If they leave the links in unedited (and the kind of people scraping your content aren't the kind of people who want to take time to carefully edit the content) then you'll get a link from their site back to your own.
Make sure that you use the full URL (nor just the relative path) in links within your content. This way they'll point to your site when the article is copied.
You can also add images and other media (that you reference in your article) which has your banding and/or site name on. This increases the cost in time/effort required if someone wants to pass your content off as their own.
Since I started doing this I get a small trickle of referrals who have become repeat visitors on my site. I can also find people using my content by looking at my back links profiles and analytics.
The only caveat here is that you need to be aware of where you content is being republished. You may not want to get lots of low value links or links from spammy pages.
Doug.
-
You are most welcome Mark. At some point or the other, we all (at least people who come up with original content) would have faced the content scraping or stealing issue. Its all the part of the game. Being the rightful owners of the content, we should not leave any stone unturned while trying to protect our rights for our content. Personally, I have seen the copyright notice work well with manual content stealers but, for those who use automated tools to scrape and publish content, there is no definite method to stop them. Wish you all the very best for all your endeavors.
Best,
Devanur Rafi.
-
Robert and Devanur,
Thank you for taking the time in writing a detailed summary on how to safe guard oneself.In particular, I warm to the idea that we can protect our content using rel=author, **rel=publisher **and https://plus.google.com/authorship
I suppose all our best attempts may never safeguard our content 100%. However, at least Google, etc will know where the article originated from. Maybe Google have some mechanics in place, to place on there radar those sites that steal content.
Thanks Mark
-
Hi Mark,
Your concerns are very much true and unfortunately there is no absolute solution for this issue.However, the following might help you face and handle the issue:
1. Use Google authorship.
This will help the search engines recognize the correct or the rightful owner of the content. Here you go for more:
http://www.google.com/insidesearch/features/authorship/index.html
2. Have the copyright notices published along with the content. Give clear syndication guidelines like, an attribution in the form of a link pointing to your webpage (that the content resides on) if someone wants to publish on their website.
3. You can always file DMCA complaints right from the Google webmaster tools account.
4. You can use Google Alerts to watch out for any of your content being stolen and published elsewhere.
Here you go for more in this regard:
http://blog.kissmetrics.com/find-remove-stolen-content/
Hope the above help.
Best,
Devanur Rafi.
-
Mark
I like the question and am going to handle it sentence by sentence: "What is stopping your competitors from blatantly stealing your article and publishing it on their own website virtually word for word."
Nothing can stop anyone from doing this. Frankly, I could copy your question and put it on Moz as mine. It would probably take at least a few minutes for someone at Moz to catch it and take it down. But, nothing can stop me from doing it if I care less about the consequences.
"If your competitors website gets indexed by Google before yours than surely Google will see your hard work and cost as duplicate content."
First, this is an assumption many make and I do not necessarily agree with it. Second, within copyright law there are work products you can save over time that can assist you (but they are not foolproof) with a claim against someone, there are timestamps in many CMS systems that show when a doc was written, published, etc., You could resubmit a sitemap as soon as you publish, you could fetch as Google as soon as you publish (not the intent of fetch as Google, but you could), you can submit for copyright for $35US if you are in the U.S. (and if you had ten articles on the same site you could submit them all for the same $35), that submission to register would protect you, etc.
**Should site owners be worried about this type of practice? **Only if they care about:
- their site(s),
- their work,
- their client's work,
- the fact that until someone stands up to a bully, he keeps on being a bully.
_How do we safeguard ourselves from this type of practice?_rel=author, rel=publisher
By utilizing these correctly, the moment you publish to the Internet, this is your article. Yes, someone else could take it and rewrite it, etc and then use rel=author (I know this because with the syndication services/news agencies "sharing content" we have had their authors take our content and place their byline on it - no we are not members of any syndication service so I call that theft even though the person is so used to being able to do that with articles written by others in the service they think they can do it to anyone.) but, in the end you have a record of being the one who first put it on the web and that you are the author.
Next, I think if your piece is valuable enough to you, you will copyright it. Value is your definition. With that copyright, you can report them to Google or Bing or Yahoo, etc. as taking copyrighted content and Google will eventually take action. REMEMBER - I am not talking about a copyright where you stuck a circle with a 'C' in it on your page; I am talking about a registered copyright. If they are hit with enough reports they are doing this the penalties for violating TOS can be severe.
Hope this helps you out,
Robert
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Rel=Canonical Vs. 301 for blog articles
Over the last few years, my company has acquired numerous different companies -- some of which were acquired before that. Some of the products acquired were living on their previous company's parent site vs. having their own site dedicated to the product. The decision has been made that each product will have their own site moving forward. Since the product pages, blog articles and resource center landing pages (ex. whitepapers LPs) were living on the parent site, I'm struggling with the decision to 301 vs. rel=canonical those pages (with the new site being self canonicaled). I'm leaning toward take-down and 301 since rel=canonicals are simply suggestions to Google and a new domain can get all the help it can to start ranking. Are there any cons to doing so?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mfcb0 -
An article that is part of a larger content: canonical, noindex or nothing?
Hi everyone! I have a big and complete content about something and my team did a new post with part of this content (to send to prospects and use in email automation). Which one is my best option: Canonical from the post to the complete (and oldest) content - thats my personal choice Noindex in the new post Remove this part from de big and complete content (and put a link to the new content) Do nothing Other option (tell me please) PS: Both contents are ranking for the same keyword, but Search Console dont present issue like duplicate content Best regards!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ewerton.RD0 -
Google blocks certain articles on my website ... !
Hello I have a website with more than 350 unique articles, Most of them are crawled by Google without a problem, but I find out certain articles are never indexed by Google. I tried to rewrite them, adding fresh images and optimizing them but it gets me nowhere. Lately, I rewrite an article of those and tried to (fetch and render) through Google Webmasters, and I found this result, can you tell me if there is anything to do to fix that? BMVh4
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Evcindex0 -
Low Page Authority in existing article in blog Any Ideas to improve it?
Im managing a blog that has a lot of articles with Page Authority 1.I have already checked with On-page Grader that these articles are Grade A, so they have the SEO structure perfect and would like to know any ideas to get this Page Authority rise in existing articles that are already written, like changes that can effectively be made this page authority get higher. Thanks in advance and regards, Jorge Pascual
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | goperformancelabs0 -
Can changing G+ authorship on a well-ranking article drop its search ranking?
We have an article that ranks #1 in Google SERP for the keyword we want it to rank for. We decided to revise the article because although it's performing well, we knew it could be better and more informative for the user. Now that we've revised the content, we're wondering: Should we update the article author (and the G+ authorship markup) to reflect that the revisor authored the content, or keep the original author listed? Can changing G+ authorship on an article impact its search ranking, or is that an issue that's a few Google algorithm updates down the road?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | pasware0 -
Best to Spend Marketing Budget on High Quality Articles OR Link Building Services?
Greeting MOZ Community: My site has 400 domains linking to it of which about 180 are toxic and 180 are suspicious according to a site audit from a reputable SEO firm. The SEO firm is offering link removal and link building services to remedy the situation. My question is this: if I can create and post high quality blog articles on a very regular basis, will this in and of itself create high quality links to my site? If the articles are of exceptional quality can I post them elsewhere to earn quality links? Does it make more sense to use my budget on paying a PR agency to create high quality articles and posting them on my blog or elsewhere rather than spending on an SEO link building campaign? Should I do both? I plan on having the SEO firm remove toxic links and optimize content using Yoast. But I want to be careful about not wasting my budget if the links will develop naturally if I post the content online myself. I am more inclined to have an SEO pro work on creating links but why pay if I can do it myself. Any thoughts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan1
Alan0 -
Duplicating an article I wrote on an external blog
Hi, I wrote a blog article on another site. I would like to add the article to my site as well and would like to know the best way to do it. If I duplicate the article that I wrote would I then risk getting a penalty for duplicate content? If so, then what is the best way for me to include the article on my site for the benefit of my readers, but not lead to the duplicate content problem? Would it be better to use a canonical tag? Or to noindex the page? If I use the canonical tag, am I helping to make the article on the external blog stronger? Where is I use the noindex tag I am not helping my site nor that article I think, is that right? Last question, if I offer the copy of the article on my site and use the canonical or noindex tag then my site does not receive any direct benefit from the article for SEO. In other words the article wont appear in the search index with a link to my site. What about the comments that people write on the article on my site? That is unique content which may have great questions or points. I want to ensure those can be indexed properly. If I noindex the page I lose out. If I canonicalize (is that a word?) the page then I don't know if will send search results based on those comments to the external blog where that information (the comments from my site) does not exist. Thank you for any help to better understand this part of seo.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | NikkiGaul0 -
Xml sitemap advice for website with over 100,000 articles
Hi, I have read numerous articles that support submitting multiple XML sitemaps for websites that have thousands of articles... in our case we have over 100,000. So, I was thinking I should submit one sitemap for each news category. My question is how many page levels should each sitemap instruct the spiders to go? Would it not be enough to just submit the top level URL for each category and then let the spiders follow the rest of the links organically? So, if I have 12 categories the total number of URL´s will be 12??? If this is true, how do you suggest handling or home page, where the latest articles are displayed regardless of their category... so I.E. the spiders will find l links to a given article both on the home page and in the category it belongs to. We are using canonical tags. Thanks, Jarrett
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jarrett.mackay0