Site as one page - SEO implications
-
We may be inheriting a site and will be asked to do SEO for it. We will have control over the development of the site, so this structure is what it is. My question is - how significant of an impact do you think this is going to have and can you think of any workarounds that may help?
Basically, the user experience of the site will feel similar to multiple pages. However, this site will, in essence be one page and pull various content through javascript from different locations. I have not seen the site yet (and believe it is still in development), but this is how it has been explained to me. Any thoughts?
My first thought was to add a blog to add page depth to the site and expand the content. Any other thoughts are welcome and appreciated. Thanks.
(I know this is limited information, I'm sorry. It's just about all I have to work with right now, and I was a little concerned and was hoping for a second opinion)
-
Wow, thanks so much everyone. Sorry, emails didn't come through indicating that there were responses or I would have gotten back sooner.
I do not have a URL yet - site is still in development by another agency. The structure is pretty set, but I do want to be able to manage expectations. We will work on creating a blog that we can use for additional pages (possibly part blog, part full pages to target keywords).
So, it looks like it's not going to kill us, but it's not going to do us any favors either. thanks so much for your help.
-
I'd suggest to create several landing pages that are optimized for particular keywords, this way each page has a real focus.
-
So that video from Matt Cutts really just says the 1 page solution isn't optimal. At least that's my interpretation.
Google is having trouble keeping up with the new design paradigm of single page with dynamic content reveal using css and javascript.
Still too much reliance on meta title and URL keyword inclusions rather than ranking the content of a site and working out the relevance and usefulness for a particular search term.
-
Unfortunately, to successfully do decent SEO on a one-page site you will need to make alternate landing pages for the keywords you are targeting as you will only be able to really target a couple of keywords on that page.
This has a number of benefits, as you can usually put more information on the site that you cannot fit onto the "one-page" homepage. I have successfully done this on a "one page" parrallax site, and even linked back from the front page content to the keyword pages.
On a negative side, the whole point of the "one-page" is to wow the user and maximise conversion. If 90% of your search traffic bypasses that page... well it may well defeat the purpose of it to an extent, and you may want to consider an alternative.
-
Do a site:examplesite.com to see if Google is able to identify individual sections of content on the site. If not, you need to create pages to have something to work with.
-
Hey Adam
There are a lot of these one page sites around at the moment - I guess they are kind of cool! I am too old to get cool but... we have to work with what we have eh.
Well, I have seen a few ways these sites can work and Google handling them in different ways so let me give you my take.
- This kind of approach is not ideal
- You have to get everything else right
- You are losing out on some of the SEO easy wins
It's pretty much impossible to comment in detail without a link but here is some food for thought:
- No page titles
- No meta descriptions
- No breadcrumbs
- No page names / directories
So, you are losing much of what gives a site it's shape and context.
Now, Google do have a go at this and they seem to be indexing page anchors for many of these pages so we need to ensure each section has really well structured code so we are working with what we do have.
- H1 tags
- Text Navigation
- Copy / images etc
You are likely looking at something that works something like this:
http://uat.itrelateservices.com/Matt Cutts did a webmaster video on this a while back which is worth a watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mibrj2bOFCUThe answer, as ever is it depends. You need to see the site, talk to the developers and ideally crawl it to see what it looks like. Google will do their best but the results may not be optimal.
Pretty vague answer but I hope that helps in some way!
Marcus
-
With only one landing page you can really only target a couple keywords. I think you should definitely focus on building out landing pages for the content, rather than having it all display at one URL. Without landing pages you really can't target a variety of keywords.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Retina Sites
What's the best way to make a site retina ready? Just code one site with retina resolution graphics or rather serve up two different sets of graphics depending on what comp is being used on the other end? Thanks in advance. I appreciate the input. Stephan
Web Design | | stephanwb0 -
URL Designing and Site Architecture
Hi, 1. At the end of the URL, should we have "/" or not (for e.g. my website www.example.com/abc/) 2. What is the optimum level of site depth 3. Google crawler will go through the breadcrumb or url (If a page is at 6th level through breadcrumb and at 4th level through URL, at which level will google crawler recognize this.
Web Design | | adiez12340 -
Is there something fundamentally wrong with our site architecture?
Hi everyone! Could a few of you brilliant people take a look at the architecture of this site http://www.ccisolutions.com, and let me know if you see any obvious problems? I have run the site through XENU, and all of our most important pages, including categories and products, are no deeper than level 3. Everything deeper than that is, in most cases, an image, a pdf or an orphaned page (of which we have thousands). Could having thousands upon thousands of orphaned pages be having a more hurtful effect on our rankings than our site architecture? I have made loud noises and suggested that duplicate content, site speed and dilution of page authority due to all those orphaned pages are some of the primary reasons we don't rank as well as we could. But, I think those suggestions just aren't sexy or dramatic enough, so there is much shaking of heads and discussion that it must be something fundamentally wrong with site architecture. I know re-arranging the furniture is more fun than scrubbing the floors, but I think our problems are more about fundamental cleanup than moving things around What do you think?
Web Design | | danatanseo0 -
Image sliders & site speed
We are having a new website designed using WordPress and the Genesis framework. We wanted to include header image sliders on a number of internal site pages, but our designer says that sliders on more than just the home page will slow down the site significantly. How much could they slow down the site, and what can be done to minimize their effect on site speed?
Web Design | | GordyH0 -
Branding site
We are starting a new used car site in latam, and we are in the process of developing the brand, part of the team would like to have the "auto" (spanish for car" in the name and some no. The question is, form a SEO point of view, how strong signal is to have the string auto as part as the URL, and can you have a complete unrelated url and have several URLs with the auto string on it pointing in a 301 way to the non unrelated brand name as a way around? (sorry about my english, I hope you can understand the question) PS, yes, there are a lot of queries involving auto in our target market.
Web Design | | Bligoo0 -
Given the lastest Google update, should I rewrite my Flash site or try to present an alternative HTML/CSS site?
I have a site that was created using Flash. The reasoning behind this was, at the time, that I didn't care if the site ranked or not (portfolio site). Now I would like to drive traffic to the site from SE's. Given the Penguin update, should I rewrite my Flash site in HTML/CSS or present an alternative site for bots and browsers that don't support Flash? My concern is that by presenting an alternative site to bots and non Flash supporting browsers that the SE's will see potentially see this as cloaking. Thoughts and advice would be much appreciated.
Web Design | | mj7750 -
How serious is duplicate page content?
We just launched our site on a new platform - Magento Enterprise. We have a wholesale catalog and and retail catalog. We have up to 3 domains pointing to each product. We are getting tons of duplicate content errors. What are the best practices for dealing with this? Here is an example: mysite.com/product.html mysite.com/category/product.html mysite.com/dynamic-url
Web Design | | devonkrusich0 -
SEO ethical practice in question
A family friend asked me to take a look at her website. www.designsbymaida.com First thing i noticed is what seemed a 301 redirect or a forward to http://funktionaldesignstudios.com/dbm-old/ So her site is hosted with what it looks like, in his site(funktonaldesigns). What does this means in terms of how google sees her site and in terms of SEO. My thought is that he is boosting his domain name. He is getting the link juice. Thanks for the insight and help.
Web Design | | QualityHosting1