How to Let Google Know I am a new Site Owner and to Remove or De-value all backlinks?
-
I am looking to buy a new domain for a brand.
Problem is the domain has was registered in 1996 and has around 6k backlinks (according to ahrefs) that I need removed as the old content will have no relevance to my new site.
Should I just disavow all of them? Is there anything "special" I can do to let Google know that it will be new site owner/content and to remove/discount the current links?
-
A three letter, brandable EMD-- Sounds like the kind of thing someone would want to keep and use or sell for a bunch of money. But then when you add the "6K junk links" it sound like the kind of thing someone would just want to sell and hope to get a bunch of money. Playing games with the registrar isn't going to help help you in the matter. Did you try offering them half price? It still may not be worth it.
-
Hey Thanks for the responses.
The site in question does not have any manual penalty. It just has a bunch of junk links that I need to get rid of before I start building an authority site.
I would like to avoid using this domain name but it is a 3 letter EMD thats brandable.
What if I transferred the domain to a new owner that does not have the whois blocked? Thereby maybe letting google know that there is a new owner. Anyone have experience with this?
-
I think that it is imposible to know every back link you have to disavow. I had a site that i tried to disavow everything and always keep appearing new links that i did not found.
although if the domain have a manual action, and you want to focus on other words, maybe it won't heart you.
-
Do you know if there is a manual action against the site? If so, in some cases, you can show Google evidence that you are the new owner and they will lift the action. If they don't lift the action then you have to go through the full process of cleaning up the backlink profile (trying to remove as many bad links as possible and then disavowing the remaining unnatural links) and then filing for reconsideration. This is usually what happens.
If there is no manual action on the site then disavowing the bad links will probably do the trick. The problem is that there are so many unknowns surrounding the disavow tool.
If this is a site that is going to be important to you, and if the domain currently has an unnatural links problem then I wouldn't risk trying to clean it up. I'd probably buy a different domain name.
With all of that being said, are the links to the site actually bad ones? If they are primarily self made, low quality links then everything I said above still applies. If it's just that the links are not relevant to your content then I wouldn't worry about that and I'd just go ahead and create my new site.
-
You have to watch out for that, Richard. Here is video from Matt Cutts on the issue. Basically, you're putting yourself in deep water by purchasing such a domain. As Matt says, it can be "a little bit difficult" (that's Matt-speak for "next to impossible") to pull the domain out of a penalty because of it's back links. There is often good reason to pass on buying such a domain and you really need to do your homework before you make the decision to buy.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Backlink quality vs quantity: Should I keep spammy backlinks?
Regarding backlinks, I'm wondering which is more advantageous for domain authority and Google reputation: Option 1: More backlinks including a lot of spammy links Option 2: Fewer backlinks but only reliable, non-spam links I've researched this topic around the web a bit and understand that the answer is somewhere in the middle, but given my site's specific backlink volume, the answer might lean one way or the other. For context, my site has a spam score of 2%, and when I did a quick backlink audit, roughly 20% are ones I want to disavow. However, I don't want to eliminate so many backlinks that my DA goes down. As always, we are working to build quality backlinks, but I'm interested in whether eliminating 20% of backlinks will hurt my DA. Thank you!
Technical SEO | | LianaLewis1 -
How to Make my Site Appear in google search like the attached image?
Whenever I search for my website, All of the pages appears as different search results. However, I want my website to appear as most of the website out there appears. I have attached an image for your understanding (that's what exactly I want to get). I Shall be very thankful! Oycm2Kd
Technical SEO | | primecoursesfree1 -
Why google does not remove my page?
Hi everyone, last week i add "Noindex" tag into my page, but that site still appear in the organic search. what other things i can do for remove from google?
Technical SEO | | Jorge_HDI0 -
Does Google distinguish between core content and accessory, 3rd party widgets when considering how slow or fast a site is?
Our site's Facebook Plugin is really slowing page speed down. As far as users are concerned, the page loads fast enough and they can already start interacting with the page before the last sidebar widget has loaded. But the FB widget is really slow to load and is dragging the performance down in Google Analytics Page Speed for example. Any thoughts on whether this should be an SEO concern, and whether Google differentiates between different elements of the page when deciding whether a page is a bad user experience? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | etruvian0 -
Would removing or making non relevant links no follow boost a site?
Hi, I have just been checking out the backlinks for a prospective new client. It appears they have a number of links that are totally irrelevant to their nature of business and I was wondering if they would improve in the rankings etc if I removed them or made them no follow instead? Or would I simply just be throwing away crucial link juice? Thanks in advance
Technical SEO | | Benjamin3790 -
Google not visiting my site
Hi my site www.in2town.co.uk which is a lifestyle magazine has gone under a major refit. I am still working on it but it should be ready by the end of this week or sooner but one problem i have is, google is not visiting the site. I took a huge gamble to redo the site, even though before the refit i was getting a few thousand visitors a day, i wanted to make the site better as i was getting google webmaster errors. But now it seems google is not visiting the site. for example i am using sh404sef and i have put friendly url in the site and on the home page it has its name and meta tag but when you look at google it is not giving the site a name. Also it has not visited the site since october 13th Can anyone advise how to encourage google to visit the site please.
Technical SEO | | ClaireH-1848860 -
Removing a site from Google's index
We have a site we'd like to have pulled from Google's index. Back in late June, we disallowed robot access to the site through the robots.txt file and added a robots meta tag with "no index,no follow" commands. The expectation was that Google would eventually crawl the site and remove it from the index in response to those tags. The problem is that Google hasn't come back to crawl the site since late May. Is there a way to speed up this process and communicate to Google that we want the entire site out of the index, or do we just have to wait until it's eventually crawled again?
Technical SEO | | issuebasedmedia0 -
Redirect Flash Site for Google Only - Is this against TOS?
A photographer client has a flash website, purchased as from a (well respected) template company. The main site is at the root domain, and the HTML version is at www.example.com/?load=html If I visit the site on a browser without Flash installed, I am re-directed automatically to the HTML version. I'm concerned as the site has some great links and the HTML version is well optimised, but doesn't appear anywhere in Google for chosen keywords (ranks perfectly for brand related searches). Google is indexing the Flash version of the site, but I would rather it didn't (there's no real content (just Javascript to load the SWF) and all of the pages load under one URL). How can I block the Flash version from Google but still make the incoming links count towards the HTMl version of the site? If I re-direct Google to the HTML version, is this cloaking, and is it frowned upon? Thanks for any advice you can offer.
Technical SEO | | cmaddison0