Getting mixed signals regarding how Google treats subdomains
-
All the posts I've read here and elsewhere regarding subdomains come to a similar conclusion, avoid using them because they are treated as a separate site -- and everything that goes along with that.
But on my site we have a subdomain on a separate server and it's treated as internal. Also this from Hubspot -
"**Use a subdomain of your website like Blog.HubSpot.com. **This is a great idea and this is what we do currently at HubSpot. Many companies have their blog on a subdomain, and it seems to be starting to be somewhat of a standard. The search engines are treating subdomains more and more as just portions of the main website, so the SEO value for your blog is going to add to your main website domain."
Any help clarifying this would be greatly appreciated!
-
I don't know. I have been making websites for a long time. I've seen google treat subdomains like gold and stack them in the SERPs so that subdomains on a single domain will fill the top ten and push all competitors down. Then I've seen google treat subdomains like crap, then like gold again.
So, don't bet on today's flavor. Keep in mind that lots of domains have subdomains managed by other people. Do you think that the actions of those "other people" should make the rest of the domain stink if they are crappy? If you think that your subdomain should not stink if the rest of the domain is populated by idiots then go ahead and place your big bet on subdomains being treated equally. I'm not going to do it. Do you think that blogspot blogs are treated like a single site? I vote NO on that. Do you agree?
If you want your collection of content to be guaranteed support for your main site then you better put it in a folder. I am putting my good content in a folder and staying away from hosts, shopping carts, software, platforms and any service that can't handle putting my content in a folder.
Google changes their mind on this type of stuff all of the time. So bet on what you think is long-term certain and not on what you hear people sayin' even if Matt Cutts is the one who is sayin'. I remember him posting right here on moz (SEOmoz then) that you could sculpt pagerank with nofollow. Then Google changed their mind on that and didn't tell anybody.
Do what makes long term sense, not what people are sayin'. I think that smart people are still saying put your content in a folder.
-
Here's a video from Matt Cutts on the topic. He says that subdomains and subdirectories are "roughly equivalent".
SEE: Should I structure my site using subdomains or subdirectories? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MswMYk05tk
"Roughly equivalent" is a big woolly, but what matters more is how you use these subdomains (or subdirectories)
If you're talking about a blog, then what really matters is the value of the content that you create on your blog and how you interlink your blog content with the rest of your site - both in your main navigation and and relevant on-page links.
If your blog articles earn links and social shares then you want to make sure that your linking on to your relevant "money pages" on your site to pass authority and relevance to the target pages.
The main thing you want to do is give your readers, the ones that are interested and engaged, somewhere to go to find out more about your products and services. A nice juicy compelling call to action or a useful next step...
Where subdomains can be useful is where you want part of your site to be hosted on a particular third-party tool. Sub directories are a lot easier to set up and maintain.
-
This is correct. There is more and more use of subdomains and I make great use of these myself. I use just a single page design for my site, so have 8 other subdomains, each with a unique site and content on them. I find that I am able to get the sites ranked well within about a week to 10 days.
Look at www.inetseo.co.uk and then at linkbuilding.inetseo.co.uk.
Google certainly don't treat a subdomain like a new site any more.
-Andy
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Canonical error from Google
Moz couldn't explain this properly and I don't understand how to fix it. Google emailed this morning saying "Alternate page with proper canonical tag." Moz also kinda complains about the main URL and the main URL/index.html being duplicate. Of course they are. The main URL doesn't work without the index.html page. What am I missing? How can I fix this to eliminate this duplicate problem which to me isn't a problem?
Technical SEO | | RVForce0 -
What about a No-record backlink in the eye of Google
I have an uncertainty - when I make a backlink as a piece of SEO in some site when I reviewed similar couple of days after. It hasn't filed and I checked its robots record. It appearing Client specialist: Mediapartners-Google Disallow: User-Agent: * Disallow: However, is this make any backlink uphold or only this with the end goal of not ordering in google. I make it straightforward - "Is this sort of backlink creation my site My Music Goals uphold my SEO action or Not?" In this No-record site.
Technical SEO | | Hadia7680 -
Getting error in webmasters
My site was running perfectly from last one year... I don't know what happened now google is showing error while I am trying to use fetch option in webmasters. http://prntscr.com/6mtud5
Technical SEO | | Srinu0 -
Help regarding updated content
Hi, Some time back we created tutorials on a test tool Quality Center (http://www.guru99.com/quality-center-tutorials.html) which now needs upgrading.
Technical SEO | | Riya8520
Currently the tool has been renamed to HP ALM.
Our dilemma is whether we should create new pages for the new tutorials or update the existing tutorials itself ? To add to our pain, most of the end users still refer the new ALM with its old name Quality Center. Also we here hit by penguin 2.1 and since then have been very precautions from SEO standpoint.
Please help
Regards
Krishna Rungta0 -
Google Sitemap - How Long Does it Take Google To Index?
We have changed our sitemap about 1 month ago and Google is yet to index it. We have run a site: search and we still have many pages indexed but we are wondering how long does it take for google to index our sitemap? The last sitemap we put up had thousands of pages indexed within a fortnight, but for some reason this version is taking way longer. We are also confident that there are no errors in this version. Help!
Technical SEO | | JamesDFA0 -
Why am I getting rel= canonical?
I'm getting 14 rel=canonical tags on my site. Could someone offer me an insight as to this is happening? http://cool-invent.com Thanks, Lorraine
Technical SEO | | coolinvent0 -
Change in how Google displays SERPs
Hi All, Recently our SERPs have changed in Google results to show product prices from our pages rather than the meta description. This just started to happen in November with no change (that we know of) on our side. I have attached a from and to SERP image if that helps. Does any one have any ideas as its starting to effect our rankings? Thanks, Tony. Tkeou,6jg6Q Tkeou,6jg6Q#1
Technical SEO | | tstauntonwri0 -
How a google bot sees your site
So I have stumbled across various websites like this: http://www.smart-it-consulting.com/internet/google/googlebot-spoofer/ The concept here is to be able to view your site as a googlebot sees it. However, the results are a little puzzling. Google is reading the text on my page but not the title tags according to the results. Are websites like this accurate OR does Google not read title tags and H1 tags anymore? Also on a slighly related note. I noticed the results show the navigation bar is being read first by google, is this bad and should the navigation bar be optimized for keywords as well? If it did, it would read a bit funny and the "humans" would be confused.
Technical SEO | | StreetwiseReports0