New Section On Site Worth It?
-
We have been kicking around this idea for a while now, and I wanted to get the communities honest opinion before we begin building it.
So we create a lot of posts on social media showcasing articles we find on SEO, tips and tricks, reviews, etc. We were thinking rather than always linking out to the other sites, we are going to create a section on our site called "From Around The Web" and have brief breakdowns of what was covered, then provide a link to the full article. Most of these would be between 300-500 words, and be optimized around what we were linking to and writing about.
So since the content would not be "in-depth" would this hurt us in any way? To me, it doesnt not make sense to send people to the other article right away, when we can summarize it and link to the full articles from our site. (Most people dont want to read a 3000 word article on SEO, especially small business owners who just want the breakdown) Thoughts? Think it will help, or not be useful enough to invest labor in?
-
I don't have any problem linking out if I know the site that I am linking to really really well. I don't see anything wrong with your list of "SEO and Marketing Resources" if you want to recommend them to your clients.
I am assuming that you would like to have content on your website that educates your visitors and showcases your expertise. If that is the goal, I would be concerned about finding articles other website and using them as the basis of a short article on my site. All that does is turn your website into a signpost that promotes other people.
I would rather spend a little extra time per article and write a library of articles on my own site that explain mostly evergreen topics. Why? If these resources are being prepared as a knowledge base for current and potential clients then I would want to keep them on information that I produce and control than send them out to other websites where my branding and expertise is lost.
Using articles on other websites might seem like a time-saving effort that saves you from explaining the nitty-gritty - you just link to it. But it doesn't have the same impact as explaining the nitty gritty on your own site and keeping your voice and your branding in the visitors mind.
What happens when the other website deletes that article or goes out of business or starts publishing stuff that you don't agree with? This is going to happen eventually. Then all of the work that you put into that article is gone.
Also, this isn't going to earn you likes, links, tweets and mentions. It is going to earn those things for the other guy. You are simply turning your website and your labor into an advertising effort for other people in your industry.
Why not build a resource for yourself? Write a weekly or monthly original stand-alone, evergreen article service that people can subscribe to, tweet about, mention, link to and like.
That is how I would approach this.
-
I appreciate the advice and detailed response. I have a few questions:
First, if you do not recommend linking out, what about this page then? We have this set up for a user-resource. Most of the links are quality stuff, linking out to search engine land, MOZ, etc.
http://www.webdesignandcompany.com/seo-resources
I noticed that you mentioned putting my name in the URL vs. being generic. Are you saying this due to the possible social media profile interest?
The main reason for doing the short blurbs and linking out is time. We have had a very steady influx of clients this year, and time to work on our own site is a bit low. If we optimize it well, do you see us spending the time to set up being worth the effort and labor? I am estimating at least an hour per article, maybe 2-3 to make sure its "read-worthy".
-
Here is what I would do...
First, I agree that the small biz owner does not want the 3000-word SEO article.
So, instead of writing a rehash of somebody else's article, I would write a simple, basic, 100% stand alone article that explains the topic to a noob. Most of your visitors don't want the 3000-word so don't try to feature the other guy's article. Feature yourself.
Instead of making an "Around the Web" section on the site, I would make a "Small Biz Tips from David-Kley".
You might be inspired by articles written by others, but don't allow them to set your course.
Instead, I would be writing short, clear, EVERGREEN, concepts. That makes you independent of the other guy's content. That keeps the visitor on your site and reading a second and third article from you. Soon you will have a big collection and topics that fall into categories and you can cross-market same-category articles to the visitor, building an impressive resource library that is under your own brand.
Start with a plan of what you want this content to be... answering frequent client questions, explaining basics, addressing stuff that clients don't ask about but really need to know.
Begin with the end in mind and they work towards it.
(I am just going to talk honest stuff here. It might get people's panties in a twist. But, I would not want to be linking out to a bunch of SEO sites. No sir. Not only might they be bad neighborhoods (sorry guys) but I don't know if I am gonna be agreein' with all of the stuff that they wrote in 2011 or what they will write next week. Ain't linkin' to them. No way.)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How long will old pages stay in Google's cache index. We have a new site that is two months old but we are seeing old pages even though we used 301 redirects.
Two months ago we launched a new website (same domain) and implemented 301 re-directs for all of the pages. Two months later we are still seeing old pages in Google's cache index. So how long should I tell the client this should take for them all to be removed in search?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Liamis0 -
Site with both subfolders and subdomains
Hi everyone,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | medi_
I'm working on a website that has a quite extensive subfolder structure for product and multilingual purposes.
domain.com/en
domain.com/it
domain.com/fr
domain.com/en/category
domain.com/it/category
domain.com/fr/category
domain.com/en/category/product
domain.com/it/category/product
domain.com/fr/category/product
domain.com/en/category/product/region
domain.com/it/category/product/region
domain.com/fr/category/product/region
and so on... We will soon be launching a completely different service, which would make the subfolder structure become even more complex. As John Mueller recently stated that Subdomains and Subfolders are treated the same by Google, I am now considering building that new service under subdomains for product reason, and for the sake of clarity. 1- Would my subdomains inherit the authority of my main domain?
2- Do I have to keep the language folders with the subdomain structure?
e.g.:
new-service.domain.com/en
nouveau-service.domain.com/fr
nuovo-servizio.domain.com/it OR
new-service.domain.com
nouveau-service.domain.com
nuovo-servizio.domain.com Looking forward to reading you!0 -
New page not being picked up
Hello, We have created a new page for truck rentals but for some reason it does not seem to be picked up. See this report: http://screencast.com/t/npYqeoa5gq The page is: https://www.globecar.com/en/montreal-truck-rentals but our main site is being pickedup instead vs the competition that has their truck page showing up. Can anyone help me understand? Thanks, Karim
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | GlobeCar1 -
SEO site Review
Does anyone have suggestions on places that provide in depth site / analytics reviews for SEO?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Gordian0 -
Want to merge high ranking niche websites into a new mega site, but don't want to lose authority from old top level pages
I have a few older websites that SERP well, and I am considering merging some or all of them into a new related website that I will be launching regardless. My old websites display real estate listings and not much else. Each website is devoted to showing homes for sale in a specific neighborhood. The domains are all in the form of Neighborhood1CityHomes.com, Neighborhood2CityHomes.com, etc. These sites SERP well for searches like "Neighborhood1 City homes for sale" and also "Neighborhood1 City real estate" where some or all of the query is in the domain name. Google simply points to the top of the domain although each site has a few interior pages that are rarely used. There is next to zero backlinking to the old domains, but each links to the other with anchor text like "Neighborhood1 Cityname real estate". That's pretty much the extent of the link profile. The new website will be a more comprehensive search portal where many neighborhoods and cities can be searched. The domain name is a nonsense word .com not related to actual key words. The structure will be like newdomain.com/cityname/neighborhood-name/ where the neighborhood real estate listings are that would replace the old websites, and I'd 301 the old sites to the appropriate internal directories of the new site. The content on the old websites is all on the home page of each, at least the content for searches that matter to me and rank well, and I read an article suggesting that Google assigns additional authority for top level pages (can I link to that here?). I'd be 301-ing each old domain from a top level to a 3rd level interior page like www. newdomain/cityname/neighborhood1/. The new site is better than the old sites by a wide margin, especially on mobile, but I don't want to lose all my top positions for some tough phrases. I'm not running analytics on the old sites in question, but each of the old sites has extensive past history with AdWords (which I don't run any more). So in theory Google knows these old sites are good quality.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Gogogomez0 -
Why is my site not ranked?
Hey, does enybody have an idea, why my site www.detox.si is not ranked for the KW detox in www.google.si (Slovenia). It is being indexed, but it does not rank and i have no idea why. Best, M.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Spletnafuzija0 -
Any Suggestions For My Site?
I've recently started a website that is based on movie posters. The site has fundamentally been built for users and not SEO but I'm wondering if anyone can see any problems or just general advice that may help with our SEO efforts? The "content" on the website are the movie posters. I know Google likes text content, but I don't see what else we could add that wouldn't be purely for SEO. My site is: http://www.bit.ly/ZSPbTA
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | whispertera0 -
New Site Structure and 404s. Should I redirect everything?
Hi fellow Mozzers, I've recently re-released a site and also took the opportunity to change/clean up the URL structure. As a result of this Google is starting to report many 404s such as below; blog/tag/get-fit/ blog/tag/top-presents/ Most of these 404 errors are from tag or category pages which simply don't exist any more (because they were unnecessary, crap or irrelevant). Although there's also a few posts I've removed. My question is whether it's worth redirecting all these tags and pages to the root directory of the site's new blog (as there isn't really a new page which is similar or appropriate) or just to leave them as 404 errors. Bearing in mind; They don't really rank for anything There's little if any links pointing to these pages Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PeterAlexLeigh0