Is building links just to risky to do nowadays?
-
Hi,
How risky is link building nowadays? I have a site which has been left on its own and over time has generated links which is great, its a resource type of site so works well in that department. The reason it picks up links by itself is because I have spent time on it and in the past I could just leave and the links it would pick up would maintain its rankings.
Over the last 6 months a lot of marketers have noticed this large traffic, and have produced 1 page sites going directly for my main term - then putting adsense all over it.
So problem is, my site can't build links by itself as fast as these marketers are doing manually. Don't get me wrong I can do what they are doing but they don't care about their 1 pager as much as I do about my site - a lot of work has gone into it.
Can I link build without running a 'big' risk of having my site hit by Google? how does one build links the way Google is ok with?
Thanks.
-
Most of the content that I write is "evergreen".
However, I often find new information on a topic and update the pertaining pages on my site. Then I promote those pages on my site, through my RSS feed and to my email subscribers. I use Feedburner to collect subscribers and distribute the RSS feed and email updates.
Feedburner gives you links that deliver interested subscribers to a subscription form. You can use that link on small banners on your site, text links, however, you want to promote.
When Feedburner distributes the information about updated articles, I usually get a lot of traffic from subscribers, and places where subscribers have shared. I don't do much to promote my content. I let visitors and subscribers do it for me. I think that is what you have successfully done in the past.
-
Agree totally, im going to stick it out for a bit longer - make my site better and see if that helps. If in 3/4 months nothing changes ill have to start looking at ways of gaining SE exposure again because every position I lose to a one pager or brand with a blog post going for the traffic is affecting my rev stream.
I suppose the only positive is I know how to do SEO, I just don't like having to do it.
-
You're welcome Followuk,
And just so you know, the links above speak to link earning as well as the best ways to go about finding and requesting links that will hold up over time and not put you at risk of a Google penalty.
-
Thanks for the kind words.
Well my pages are better than the one pagers problem is its Q&A type of content.
So 1+1 is always 2 - once they got the answer from either me or a competitor its done and there gone. I just provide the answer better - more indepth with a better design like an actual resource so the sharing on my site is far greater than say the one pagers.
Well I got an even better design coming, responsive, faster load times, more pages so hopefully this helps.
I do have one Question for you though EGOL - how important is freshness? Can content go stale?
-
Thanks Donna for advice and the resource links - much appreciated.
-
I would be inclined to agree with EGOL, though Donna dropped some pretty good resources. The problem with 'link building' is that it will eventually look unnatural, even if one is quite artful. One person's 'good link' is another person's 'spam'.
I've dealt with people that build links for the sake of building links 'Because Link Building LOL!!!'. It never ends well and they're generally left saying; "But we paid a lot for those links!" The irony of that statement never gets old. Actually it does, but it sounds better if I say it never gets old.
It sounds like you ascribe to the concept of Link Earning, which is safer and the recommended course.
It's true enough that absolute crap/lack of content can be propped up by many absolute crap links. That is not a viable long term strategy, however. Pre-Penguin, I somewhat ruined some guy's six figure payday pointing out the same. Within a few months, without reporting the site, I was correct. He had propped up a thin site with a ton of exact match anchors. It didn't end well. (I, and my agency at the time, got called every name in the book over that one.
)
So, if you must 'build links' do so in a way that would drive real traffic to your site. Avoid a preponderance of exact match anchors and try to bring some sort of value wherever you go. But it appears your core competency is adding value to your pages. Maybe you should stick with that.
There's nothing wrong with passive 'link building'.
-
The reason it picks up links by itself is because I have spent time on it and in the past I could just leave and the links it would pick up would maintain its rankings.
Nice work! Very few people are able to do this. Many could do it but they don't have the courage.
If you start putting resources into linkbuilding you will have to take resources away from what you are currently doing so then did you really gain that much?? And if you were going to put resources into linkbuilding above and beyond your current work then why don't you just invest that spend into what you are already doing that is working?
I would not put a lot of faith in the staying power of these one-page sites. I bet their content is crap and people go into those sites and then visit yours. So, I would only give those one page sites serious consideration if that one page is kickass content for what the searchers are looking for or if your traffic is really down only because those one-page sites are taking it from you.
You gotta make up your mind on what you should do.... if it was me, and I might be a fool, but, I am not going to let these one-page site people move me off of my successful course. I'll just work harder on the plan until I know that the plan isn't workin'.
-
Hi Followuk,
Good question. Things have certainly changed making link building much harder than it was not too long ago, but that doesn't mean you should stop altogether. You DO need to follow best practices though.
Where to find best practices?
I have suggestions on where to start:
- The Moz Beginners Guide - Chapter 7 - Growing Popularity and Links;
- the Link Building Category of YouMoz has lots of good and detailed information;
- I also like Point Blank SEO's Link Building Strategies; and
- Digital Current 2014 Link Building Best Practices.
You might also want to think about being alerted to new publications on the topic. Rand did a whiteboard Friday recently that explains how to setup alerts and identifies free and paid tools you can use. I found it tremendously helpful from a variety of perspectives.
Hope that helps.
D
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best competitor analysis tool comparing my links with competitor links?
Hello All, Can anyone tell me best competitor analysis tool comparing my links with competitor links? Tool which define quality of links either low quality or spammy links etc? Thanks!
Competitive Research | | devdan0 -
Historical domain analysis & competitive link analysis
Hi. I have a problem with the analysis of my campaign and specialy with the historical domain and the competitive link. I don't see any upgrade since july. Thank you for your help. A.Reille
Competitive Research | | Alex750 -
How much do internal links help?
So I noticed in Site Explorer that my competitors mostly have internal links all over point to a page with the term I want to rank for, while very little external links. How much do internal links help? Should I have a link somewhere on every page pointing to my target page with the keyword, and then grab some external links? I link internally only when I see relevant, but maybe I'm not doing it enough. Looking forward to replies!
Competitive Research | | endlessrange0 -
Two links with the same quality but different effect
Hi, the website I'm working for is loosing rankings for one specific keyword and since there haven't been any bigger onsite changes I assume it's the back links. The company bought some exact anchor text links in the past, so I went through those. One specific one attracted my attention: It's a site wide link which creates over 80% of the back link profile to the specific website. There was only one catch: part of this bought anchor text campaign is another highly targeted anchor text which is not negatively affected by the rankings. Still I didn't like the feel of this so I ran the seomoz keyword difficulty report. And there I discovered an interesting pattern: For keyword A we are the only ones in the top10 with such a high percentage of exact keyword usage. But for keyword B, which didn't loose rankings our top10 competitor have an even more over-optimized keyword usage or much weaker back link profile. So now I wonder if it could actually be the case, that we loose rankings for keyword A since our competitors have a more natural profile, but for Keyword B it has no negative effect due to the worse competition. Thanks in advance for your help!
Competitive Research | | RomiSverige0 -
Blogging just to manipulate rankings?
Hi, I have been playing with Open Site Explorer for a while and have been trying to figure out how some of our competitors could rank with "not so great" articles. I don't want to sound harsh here but some of the articles outranking us are nothing but 6 images + 200-225 words from a press release and a Video. How exactly does Google justify this by ranking them higher than a 1500 word unique article that has been written in no less than 7 days? According to OpenSite Explorer, about the two pages compared, the difference is the number of LINKS. The sad part is, without 1 exception, all their links are coming from blog pages like *.wordpress.com *.typepad.com etc. I would have been just FINE if their links were NATURAL. You may ask me why I assume those blogs are created by them. Because every single post on those blogs are pointing to their domain... I don't think a normal blogger would keep pointing to the same domain. So what are we supposed to do here? Wait 3 months so people discover our articles and natural links will come? (It happens sometimes but then it may not...) Do what they do? Sorry about the ranting but I have one question if you don't want to read the rant. Is blogging to build links, considered black hat or not?
Competitive Research | | Gamer070 -
Does SEOMoz (or anyone) offer a measurement of "overlapping" links between 2+ domains?
I'm trying to judge how much incremental value we'd see from 301'ing an old domain vs. revitalizing the old domain's content. My gut feeling is that most of the links to the two sites are from the same set of websites so it wouldn't add much value to 301 the old domain. I've seen the opposite of this done with Competitive Link Analysis (e.g show links that you don't have that your competitor does have). Is there a tool available that can take 2 or more sites and tell me for instance - 72% of the inbound links or linking root domains are the same?
Competitive Research | | Jeff_DomainTools0 -
Isn't unfair that Keyword domain Exactly Match just overpowers every domain and page authority?
Im currently doing a research for a low-medium competitive keyword (SEO Moz Keyword difficult Tool it showed 36% competition, its a one word keyword) in my country. That keyword had a Google AdWords Broad Match of 368.000 searchs and a Google AdWords Exact Match of 33.100 searchs in April. The currently number one site for that keyword have an exactly match for that keyword, www.KEYWORD.com and nothing else. Then I ran and advanced report to that keyword and heres the initial result: This number one site has a domain authority of only 11 and a page authority of 25. The second site have the following domain name -> www.companynameKEYWORD.com.br (its in Brasil, so theorically and .br should worth more than a .com domain right?) Anyway the second site have a domain authority of 37 and a page rank authority of 45. So after this link all the others are like that, www.companynameKEYWORD.com and the domain and page authority is according to how it suposed to be (higher domain and page are ranked better). The exactly same thing happen when I search for a more long tail of this keyword (wich are 2 words) happen. The exactly match are ranked 1st with a very low page and domian authority while the others come first. Some more info about that number 1 ranked site- The layout is terrible and not user friendly. The site took more than 10 seconds to load Have not a single inpage SEO optimization. According to alexa the bounce rate is around 50% Now follows the data from Linkscape data between the 1st and 2nd ranked pages Overal Score - 19% x 38% Page mozRank - 2.04 x 3.95 Page mozTrust - 4.92 x 5.45 External mozRank - 2.04 x 3.95 Subdomain mozRank - 1.81 x 3.45 Domains Linkin - 4 x 163 External Links - 8 x 265 So, looks like that only two things should be 90% of the focus from a SEO perspective. Have an old exactly keyword match domain and youre good to go 😄 Edited 1: About the linkbacks to each page The 1st page in rank biggest page authority linking back (dofollow) have an authority of 36 from a domain authority of 49 The 2nd in the rank the highest dofollow linkback have a page authority of 40 and domain of 85 Edit 2: 1st in rank were created in 2000 2nd in rank were created in 2007
Competitive Research | | bemcapaz1 -
Viewing Specific Links in OSE - For a Specific Month
(1) Can I use OSE to see the number of links per month a site acauired over the past year (month by month)? For example, I might be interested if I see a competitor acquired a surprisingly high number of links during December, 2010. (2) Can I use OSE to see the a list of links a site acquired during a specific time, such as December of 2010? For example, if I see a competitor suddenly acquired an unusually high number of links in December, 2010, I'd like to see a list of those links, to figure out how they acquired those links. Thanks!
Competitive Research | | GregMoore0