How does CTR relate to SERPS Position?
-
I'd always though that CTR would increase with SERPS position but my data doesn't really seem to show that.
I used google analytics/acquisition/SEO/Queries and looked at the top 1800 queries. Then I filtered those with a CTR of 0 and for branded keywords.
The result was as shown - a big glob with no real pattern other than a long tail of keywords with a 100% CTR
Does this tell me anything useful or am I just wasting my time?
Its probably worth stating that only 12 of my keywords had over 1000 impressions and none over 10,000 (all in top 10 though) - but thats a function of my industry sector
-
Hi Zippy-Bungle,
If your rankings improve then your CTR is likely to improve too. To affect CTR you can use the meta description and title tags - the more compelling your meta des the more likely it'll get clicks. I sometimes use high performing ad text for this if it's relevant.
As to whether an increase in CTR would relate to an increase in rankings - I don't really know. However, I did notice that our CTR dropped slightly and then our listings dropped a little too - whether this is a coincidence or not I couldn't tell you.
I think it would be very difficult for Google to use CTR, time on site and bounce as ranking signals. For example, if someone just wants my company's phone number, they may do a brand name search, find the number at the top of our pages and call us but analytics/google would count this as a bounce! So, we've been 'useful' but we've not encouraged the visitor to click into deeper pages (they found what they were looking for on the first page they visited) - so how does google know when a page has been 'useful' or not? (obviously I know links play a role here, I'm just speaking from a data perspective).
So, I suspect google doesn't use these signals, because it seems pretty darn difficult to determine what is a real bounce and what isn't (as in a real bounce would be where the site you click on is useless for the query). As for time on site... well, if you follow google's instructions and make your site faster (we halved our site speed in April) then time on site will inevitably reduce (ours did!) so, again I don't know how google would use this (unless it was in conjunction with site speed). As for CTR - that only tells one half of the story, so again, not sure how google could use it. I know they use it for adwords, but it's in their best interests for the most likely to be clicked ad to be highly prominent and any reduction in cpc as a result is easily mitigated by the fact that it gets more clicks (stack 'em high, sell 'em cheap)
However, I do think google probably uses a metric similar to bounce, when users use the back button to immediately leave a page they've just landed on and end up back on the same serp as they started from. This is just my theory, and the reason I think they use something like this is because if I was them I would. I will probably get shouted down here by everyone else, and this is just my opinion so do with it what you will!
-
Hi Tom, yes that's what I meant,. Never thought about it the other way round so I'm glad for the confusion as I learned something that I hadn't expected to learn.
Ive ve still got the issue with the data blob though not seeming to correspond with what other sources show. Is it a function of low search volumes or something else?
-
Beg your pardon, I think I misinterpreted your initial question. My answer addressed "Would an increase in CTR result in an increase in rankings" (No), but I think you meant "Would an increase in rankings result in an increase in CTR" (Usually yes)
Sorry about that, was that what you meant?
-
Thanks. That's good to know. I thought there was a case a few years ago where some Yahoo data got into the open and it showed that there was a correlation.
Checking on that I discovered this Moz article (which is more recent) which seems to imply that there is a relation - or have I misunderstood your answer, the article or both?
-
Your data shows you what is generally accepted - there is no relation between CTR and organic search.
Certainly with what Google tells us it has no baring at all - although we should always take what they say with a pinch of salt, my own tests and most other people I know agree with this. Some people think the time on site/bounce rate may have an affect, but again I don't think this is the case either.
The only time where CTR comes into play is for PPC, where it can affect your cost-per-lick and quality score.
For SEO, it's widely agreed that there is no relation.
Hope this helps.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does Search Console data include GMB traffic? Branded CTR is 37.8%- Good or Bad?
Hey all, Per Search Console our branded keyword CTR is 37.8%. But when that keyword is searched our GMB listing shows up on top of the #1 result. For the same 90 day period GMB shows another 35% visits to our GMB (based on the number of impressions and visits to our GMB page) listing when the same keyword is searched. My question is this. Does Search console data include clicks that came from our GMB listing or not? My thinking is like this: If GMB traffic is not calculated in search console then it means that 72.8% of people looking for our brand will end up on our site on way or another 9organic #1 result plus GMB listing visits) We are also doing PPC for this very keyword that has gets almost 20% of the remaining traffic. So after adding all up we are loosing about 8% of our branded traffic to people who are doing adwords. When you search our brand you normally see 2, 3 competitor's adwords ads. Does anyone know how this works exactly? And if you don't mind sharing your branded keyword CTR's, so I can compare to ours please. I would love to compare to a site that actually has a GMB listing ranking for the same keyword Thanks in advance, Davit
Reporting & Analytics | | Davit19850 -
Website Essentially Delisted and Top SERPS Removed
So what a morning.... Did a search for our website and looked to see how we were doing with a couple of search terms and it turns out our website is GONE. I mean not a slap down or fluctuations in positioning but we are literal gone. I see that the contact page is pulls up on page 8 but effectively we dont exist. This is so odd and strange that i feel that this is a dream. The fact that we dont pull up on any search terms anymore is of a concern that this is something more than a penalty. What on Earth could have caused this? This is fluke? Can i call Google? Seems that index page has been removed from the search results Website www.catdi.com Catdi Printing Search Terms Houston Printing Houston Direct Mail EDDM Printing EDDM Help! C
Reporting & Analytics | | CatdiPrinting0 -
Webmaster Tools Average keyword position
Hello! For the last month i have notices a drastic change in Avg.position for a keyword on my clients site http://livoart.lv keyword: "kapu pieminekļi". According to webmaster tools it went from 13 to 4-2. The problem is that in orgranic search i keep seeing the keyword on the second page and the CTR of the keyword did not change at all. Why would webmaster tools show false data?
Reporting & Analytics | | AlexElks0 -
New GSC Search Analytics report: position mixes web and image
Dear all, I am auditing a site in Google Seach Console (GSC, formerly Google Webmaster Tools) and find the Position data in the new Search Analytics report very, very improbable. I suspect that even if you filter by "SearchType = web", the Position data does count the ranking of images in the Image search widget as a search position. Has anybody observed this as well? Here is the case: the site targets a quite broad search query in the bath room domain. I have made a number of searches with private browser sessions, different browsers, alternative IP address via a VPN, etc, and the look of the search result in the relevant geographical market is consistently the following. Three Adwords ads #1 organic result Images universal results widget #2-10 organic results The site’s first page ranks consistently around #15 of the organic results, hence on the second SERP. But it also consistently has an image in the Images universal results widget (usually #2 or #3). This is consistent with the data I have in Moz Analytics. Yet, the GSC Search Analytics report shows 2.2 as average position with the default SearchType=Web setting. I have done the search over and over, and never has a PAGE of the site ranked that high. Is there any public information how exactly the position is calculated? I mean, something more precise than the very general information on https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6155685?hl=en Is there any way to get the correct position/ranking? Thanks for sharing your experience!
Reporting & Analytics | | QRN0 -
Rising in Bing and Yahoo SERP's, but falling in Googles?
We've dropped rankings across the board in Google, not severely but 1 and 2 spot drops and yet increased in rankings in Bing and Yahoo on the same keywords (basically all of them). Is this the sign of a new bad incoming link?
Reporting & Analytics | | absoauto0 -
I have few similar job forms that were created for different positions. SEOMoz says, its "duplicate pages". So how do I resolve it? I want my jobs to be searchable in Search Engines.
Hi There, I have few similar job forms that were created for different positions. SEOMoz says, its "duplicate pages". So how do I resolve it? I want my jobs to be searchable in Search Engines. Thanks !
Reporting & Analytics | | pointstar0 -
SERPS different based on location of search even with non-personalization
Hello Mozzers, Our agency's website, www.kenta.ro - ranked for a long time at #1 for "ann arbor seo" and similar keywords. For the past several (4-5) months we've been sitting around #5. My guess was that this was Google playing around with the results but I'm not sure why we have been at this position for such a long time. I have a vpn that I use for checking rankings overseas and if I connect to a server in Chicago, LA, Ontario, etc we show up as #1 - only when you search for "ann arbr seo" in our area do we get a lower ranking. All rank checking programs including seomoz show us at the #1 position because of this. What this means for us is that all of the traffic we target with this keyword sees the poor result, while the rest of the world sees the great result (should they search for it). How can we ensure that our target market finds us at #1 like the rest of the world does? Thank you in advance. weabi.png
Reporting & Analytics | | kentaro-2569290 -
Google vs Bing/Yahoo SERP results?
I see large differences in Google and Bing/Yahoo SERP results for many keywords. Google shows many of our primary keywords in their top ten, while Bing/Yahoo rank the same one 40-50 or above. Do you have any insight on their differences that might account for this variation? We are legitimate, long time, white hatters at a small manufacturer that is one of the leaders in our industry. The only thing I can think of that might describe this issue is PPC advertising. Their algorithms wouldn't be that inconsistent would they? (We do much more paid advertising on Google) But generally this should have no affect, right? Thanks, George...
Reporting & Analytics | | rhawk0