Are these good backlinks?
-
I am trying to understand how to build good backlinks. I've read or been told that anchor text is bad (understood), websites with unrelated subjects is bad (understood), paid-for links are bad (?), "submitted" and article to get the link is bad (?), or it is a link/farm directory are bad (?). This is actually really confusing to me! Please bear with my silly questions, I am an engineer with an MBA, stay-at-home/homeschooling mom that helps run my husbands business. My brain gets full fast! Ha!
I thought maybe if I post some of the links we have built, someone could look at them and tell me if they are good or bad. This way I can go forward understanding better.
Articles... I thought that writing articles was a GOOD thing! Now I see that submitting articles isn't? So what about these two articles where my husband, as an expert in his field, wrote an article for a popular mag/blog.
http://coastalanglermag.com/red-snapper-season/ (they did the hyperlink wrong and I am trying to get the publisher to fix it)
http://www.bdoutdoors.com/article/shark-encounter-capt.-gregg-rapp/ (this is a pretty funny story if you read it)
Blog stories... what about when someone copies your blog post as a story on their website? Or someone scrapes your content?
http://jeremyrymill.tumblr.com/
http://www.bdoutdoors.com/article/heart-pressure/
http://www.sportfishermen.com/board/showthread.php?t=2627767&p=3294972 (we post fishing reports and they get copied)
Un-related Directories...
http://www.mobileresources.net/mobi/Glowing_Deep_Sea_Fish/ (I didn't create this!!! I guess they just crawl and link?)
Related "farm" Directories
http://www.sportsmansresource.com/ffishtarpon.htm
Other directories/citations such as yellow pages, city search, etc. These are okay right?
Local hotels and what not... concierge's link to me, I don't even ask them to
http://laquintacocoabeach.com/things-to-do/index.cfm
Paid - I pay for MOZ Local! Isn't that paying??? AND, I paid for a whois listing on enom... is that bad too?
NOW FOR THE BAD.... these are bad right?
http://darman.niniyoo.com/Sea-Leveler-Sport-Fishing-Charters-Inc-FL.html (I have no idea how this got there)
http://teensnow.comwww.whoisbusinesslistings.com/Other/10/23490/Sea-Leveler-Sport-Fishing-Charters.html (what the heck is this??? how can they even append a website on a website?)
http://forums.gq.com.au/member.php?u=1813973 (I think this was created on my behalf by my part-time SEO)
If you have read all the way down to here, my sincerest thanks! Thank you for your time!
-
Thank you, all! Your answers are what I thought was okay to begin with. When I started reading Penguin articles, it was seeming that many things I thought were okay were not and it was really confusing. I did read that Point Blank article several months back and made a strategy to employ many of the concepts in there.
I have around 14% anchor text that isn't just my company name and is some kind of keyword phrase. Is that okay? The rest is some form of my website or company name.
-
The most important thing about a good link building strategy is making sure the links look natural and relevant. Keep your link building consistent and moderate. Find the best quality linking sources over the higher quantity link sources (like link farms). Build a strong social strategy and make sure you are sending valuable social signals. That means engaging your audience.
Link farms and other "paid for links" are the sources that do nothing but build quantities and quantities of link regardless of the root domains or the DA of the sources. This is bad because you don't know what or where these links will be. any kind of link building strategy that involves too much of one thing will look unnatural.
When you work on your strategy you have to make the decision of what kind of website you want Google to think of you as. Your link profile is the path that connects you to other sources and tells Google what kind of crowd you belong too. When you think of it like that, you can make the decision that points you to a better strategy. You don't want Google to think you are fast and loose, because then you aren't trustworthy. If you build high quality links, to related, reputable websites you will look like an authoritative member of your industry that can be trusted. Write good content that will make others want to link to you, send valuable social signals and strive for the best quality links, not the highest quantity of links.
-
I have to agree with Justian. You seem to have a few things so confused that it may not make sense for us to try to unravel all of them in a short Q&A but start with this:
Not all anchor text is bad, just way spammy & overdone anchor text. If you check a tool like Ahrefs and you're over say 20%, you're in a danger zone. Over 50% you may as well forget it. THAT is bad anchor text.
Not all paid for links are bad - if you can get traffic off a link, pay for it. If you want to be super-SEO friendly, no follow the link. But it's not bad to have the link if the traffic is good.
Unrelated directories - yes, I would stay away from non-niche pages. But "link directory" isn't bad if you're in the right ones. For instance, Trip Advisor at some level is a directory with links. I'd still put every single travel client ever on there.
Writing articles can be a great source of links - just don't overdo any one tactic. I had a client who wrote maybe 100 guest blogs in 4 months. THAT is bad. (Thanks for telling me, by the way! #disavow)
Anyways, just a few thoughts. Make sure you read http://pointblankseo.com/link-building-strategies and http://pointblankseo.com/prioritize-link-opportunities
And if you really want to learn more, Paddy Moogan's Link Building Book.
-
I don't know where you got all this information (where you read it or who told you) but IMO you have been mislead or only been told half of the story
Anchor text isn't bad.. its actually a good thing.. BUT if all the links pointing to you site have exact match anchor text, that might look pretty suspicious.
websites with unrelated subjects isn't a bad thing.. If the link is relevant in the context it has been written.
about submitted articles or guest blogging.. in general links that you influences/have control over in one way or another won't help you all that mush.. but the links that you have no control over will help you.. in other words; if someone refers to your site in some way that's a link that you have "no control" over - so to speak
Instead of thinking of building links, you should think of making outreach to people that might have an interest in your product or brand.
make content that people would want to link to or share.. that's a mush better approach.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is it good practice of keeping all our pages at second level?
While defining the site structure we thought of having all pages at second level only. i.e. domain.com/services domain.com/city domain.com/services-in-city please let us know the pros and cons of having this as architecture.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fabogo_marketing0 -
Is Building a Local Directory of Businesses on a Subdomain Good SEO?
Hello Fellow Moz'ers: I own a small digital shop in a major US city. We had a marketing idea which I'd like some input on the soundness of. We are creating a professional services directory of 'digital professional services providers' in our hometown. The directory's membership will only be open to firms located within our city limits. The directory will be curated and maintained, ongoing, by us. Our motivation is 75% selfish and 25% benevolent. The idea is that, by building the directory on our subdomain, we hopefully will collect links, which ultimately will enhance search visibility. But I'm concerned about the devaluation directories have incurred in recent years and I've even seen advice given to the effect that listings in some directories might be harmful to a site's link profile. It is not our intention to harm those who might list in our directory. Any thoughts on this matter would be greatly appreciated!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Daaveey0 -
Do Google webmaster tool and other backlinks analysis tool ignore the disavow data ?
Hello, Lots of site i have disavow so if i download backlinks of my site from google webmaster so google will ignore the disavow data and give me backlinks other than disavow data? Same if i use backlink tools like moz or semrush or ahref etc for checking backlinks of my site or competitor site so will this tool ignore the disavow data? If such tools not aware of disavow then it is worthless to check competitor links? Thanks! dev
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | devdan0 -
Couple questions: backlink bartering and getting backlinks in less developed markets.
How do you guys go about getting sustainable links from high authority sites? In some markets, like say SEO, it can be as easy as writing great content and "people will share it" because there are a ton of SEO websites on the internet and all of them are talking about SEO and want to share with you great SEO content. But as you guys know there are markets that aren't as well developed online - where do you look for backlinks for these markets? I'm working on a project and I'm trying to put together a good backlinking strategy. Part of it will be chasing backlinks from University websites (relevant to my market). What I'm wondering here is if its OK by Google to barter for links. Say you have an online store and you give the University a "student's discount" in exchange for a link (I don't know if this would be appealing enough but is it fair game as far as Google is concerned)?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mack-ayache0 -
Site-wide Image Backlinks - Are they bad?
Hey guys, A little help required. We are potentially taking on a new client who has over 5,000 image backlinks (4,000 of those from one site) from around 7,000 total backlinks. Would this be a problem? It's been noticeable recently that both footer and blogroll links seem to be getting targeted by Google. Would this be the case for images links too? Especially considering the top-heavy nature of the link profile? Thoughts welcome. Cheers.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Webrevolve0 -
Updating existing content - good or bad?
Hi All, There are many situations where I encounter the need (or the wish) to update existing content. Here are few reasons: Some update turned up on the subject that does not justify a new posy / article but rather just adding two lines. The article was simply poorly written yet the page has PR as it is a good subject and is online for quite some time (alternatively I can create a new and improved article and 301 the old one to the new). Improving titles and sub titles of old existing articles. I would love to hear your thoughts on each of the reasons... Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeytzNet1 -
Creating 100,000's of pages, good or bad idea
Hi Folks, Over the last 10 months we have focused on quality pages but have been frustrated with competition websites out ranking us because they have bigger sites. Should we focus on the long tail again? One option for us is to take every town across the UK and create pages using our activities. e.g. Stirling
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PottyScotty
Stirling paintball
Stirling Go Karting
Stirling Clay shooting We are not going to link to these pages directly from our main menus but from the site map. These pages would then show activities that were in a 50 mile radius of the towns. At the moment we have have focused our efforts on Regions, e.g. Paintball Scotland, Paintball Yorkshire focusing all the internal link juice to these regional pages, but we don't rank high for towns that the activity sites are close to. With 45,000 towns and 250 activities we could create over a million pages which seems very excessive! Would creating 500,000 of these types of pages damage our site? This is my main worry, or would it make our site rank even higher for the tougher keywords and also get lots of traffic from the long tail like we used to get. Is there a limit to how big a site should be? edit0 -
Natural Backlink
What is a natural backlink? is it a backlink that someone gave a site for their great content? (this is what my common sense tells me) and this is what someone else's opinion is: No, quality backlinks are the one which are highly relevant, is from a high <acronym title="PageRank">PR</acronym> page. However, a natural backlink is the one which is within the body of the page, which is surrounded by relevant text, you can also call it a contextual link. Except links which are placed on a resource page which have no content in it and links which are placed under blogroll etc. this dosent even make sense to me : )
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SEODinosaur0