Duplicate content issue with trailing / ?
-
Hi ,I did a SEOmoz Crawl Test and found most pages show twice, for example:
A: www.website.com/index.php/dog/walk
B: www.website.com/index.php/dog/walk/
I've checked Google Analytics and 90% of organic search traffic arrives on the URLs with the trailing slash (B).
Question 1: Can I assume I've a duplicate content problem?
Question 2: Is it best to do 301 redirects from the 'non trailing slash' pages to the 'trailing slash pages'?
Question 3: For some reason every web page has a '/index.php' in it (see A&B) above. No idea why. Should it be a SEO concern?
Kind regards and thank you in advance
Nigel
-
Hi Nigel
You only need to 301 one of the pages, 301 is indicating a permanent move, so in the case you outlined above,
I would 301, A to B the decisions to use B was based soly off the value of the url you indicated. If for any reason you prefer the url's not use trailing slash then use A.
It also would not hurt to add a canonical tag to B
To be clear here, whether you use
website.com/index.php/dog/walk
or
website.com/index.php/dog/walk/
Does not matter as far as SEO is concerned, I would make my decision based off of which url has the highest position in Google, and be consistent with this method throughout my site.
Hope that helps,
-
Hi Irving
Thank you for your reply. You mention a good point regarding the sitemap.xml!
If I was to 301redirect pages A & B to a new page eg www.website.com/dog/walk/ then how would I also canonical A & B to the new page?
Surely once I have 301'd the A & B pages will be dead and redirecting traffic to the new page.
Kind regard and my apologies for any confusion.
Nigel
-
Yes, index.php should never show so 301 that plus the trailing slash to remove it
Ddefinitely canonical all of the pages to have the URL without the trailing slash
Make sure your sitemap xml files and internal linking structure does not have the trailing slash. if they do,, then fix them to reflect the proper URL
-
Thank you Highland & Donford.
Re my 3rd question, can I just clarify, should I now 301 redirect both A & B URLs to a new URL say www.website/com/dog/walk ?
Many thanks!
-
Question 1: Can I assume I've a duplicate content problem?
-YesQuestion 2: Is it best to do 301 redirects from the 'non trailing slash' pages to the 'trailing slash pages'?
-Yes 301 is best, barring that use rel="canonical" on the page you want to indexQuestion 3: For some reason every web page has a '/index.php' in it (see A&B) above. No idea why. Should it be a SEO concern?
-Yes, this is a concern, use the same method to deal with the problem. Directories on the server side are usually assumed to have an index, if not the server can choose what to display, this can be very bad sometimes. As such most CMS content management systems fix the problem by generating content for the index.php or .html pages. However, there can be duplicate content issues since there are 2 urls with the same content, use 301 to get rid of the index.php at directory levels, or use canonical tags.
Hope that helps,
Don
-
1. Google can generally tell the difference between pages that have syntactically similar URLs but it's considered a best practice to not make any engine do any guesswork whenever possible.
2. I would 301 one version just for uniformity but you should be fine as-is right now.
3. There's nothing wrong with that being in the URL. Google sees it as part of the URL and nothing more. I don't consider it aesthetic or user friendly but that's a different matter.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does duplicate content not concern Rand?
Hello all, I'm a new SEOer and I'm currently trying to navigate the layman's minefield that is trying to understand duplicate content issues in as best I can. I'm working on a website at the moment where there's a duplicate content issue with blog archives/categories/tags etc. I was planning to beat this by implementing a noindex meta tag on those pages where there are duplicate content issues. Before I go ahead with this I thought: "Hey, these Moz guys seem to know what they're doing! What would Rand do?" Blogs on the website in question appear in full and in date order relating to the tag/category/what-have-you creating the duplicate content problem. Much like Rand's blog here at Moz - I thought I'd have a look at the source code to see how it was dealt with. My amateur eyes could find nothing to help answer this question: E.g. Both the following URLs appear in SERPs (using site:moz,com and very targeted keywords, but they're there): https://moz.com/rand/does-making-a-website-mobile-friendly-have-a-universally-positive-impact-on-mobile-traffic/ https://moz.com/rand/category/moz/ Both pages have a rel="canonical" pointing to themselves. I can understand why he wouldn't be fussed about the category not ranking, but the blog? Is this not having a negative effect? I'm just a little confused as there are so many conflicting "best practice" tips out there - and now after digging around in the source code on Rand's blog I'm more confused than ever! Any help much appreciated, Thanks
Technical SEO | | sbridle1 -
Duplicate Content Issues on Product Pages
Hi guys Just keen to gauge your opinion on a quandary that has been bugging me for a while now. I work on an ecommerce website that sells around 20,000 products. A lot of the product SKUs are exactly the same in terms of how they work and what they offer the customer. Often it is 1 variable that changes. For example, the product may be available in 200 different sizes and 2 colours (therefore 400 SKUs available to purchase). Theese SKUs have been uploaded to the website as individual entires so that the customer can purchase them, with the only difference between the listings likely to be key signifiers such as colour, size, price, part number etc. Moz has flagged these pages up as duplicate content. Now I have worked on websites long enough now to know that duplicate content is never good from an SEO perspective, but I am struggling to work out an effective way in which I can display such a large number of almost identical products without falling foul of the duplicate content issue. If you wouldnt mind sharing any ideas or approaches that have been taken by you guys that would be great!
Technical SEO | | DHS_SH0 -
Duplicate Content issue in Magento: The product pages are available true 3 URL's! How can we solve this?
Right now the product page "gedroogde goji bessen" (Dutch for: dried goji berries) is available true 3 URL's! **http://www.sportvoeding.net/gedroogde-goji-bessen ** =>
Technical SEO | | Zanox
By clicking on the product slider on the homepage
http://www.sportvoeding.net/superfood/gedroogde-goji-bessen =>
First go to sportvoeding.net/superfood (main categorie) and than clicking on "gedroogde Goji bessen"
http://www.sportvoeding.net/superfood/goji-bessen/gedroogde-goji-bessen =>
When directly go to the subcategorie "Goji Bessen" true the menu and there clicking on "gedroogde Goji Bessen" We want to have the following product URL:
http://www.sportvoeding.net/superfood/goji-bessen/gedroogde-goji-bessen Does someone know´s a good Exetension for this issue?0 -
Wordpress categories causing too many links/duplicate content?
I've just added categories to my wordpress site and some of the posts show in several of the categories. Will this cause me duplicate content problems as I want the category pages to be indexed? Also as I add more categories I'm creating more links on the page. They can't be seen to the user as I have a plugin that creates drop down categories. When I go to 'view source' though all the links are there so google will see lots of links. How can I fix the too many links problem? And should I worry about duplicate content issue?
Technical SEO | | SamCUK1 -
Duplicate Content Issue with
Hello fellow Moz'rs! I'll get straight to the point here - The issue, which is shown in the attached image, is that for every URL ending in /blog/category/name, it has a duplicate page of /blog/category/name/?p=contactus. Also, its worth nothing that the ?p=contact us are not in the SERPs but were crawled by SEOMoz and they are live and duplicate. We are using Pinnacle cart. Is there a way to just stop the crawlers from ?p=contactus or? Thank you all and happy rankings, James
Technical SEO | | JamesPiper0 -
I am Posting an article on my site and another site has asked to use the same article - Is this a duplicate content issue with google if i am the creator of the content and will it penalize our sites - or one more than the other??
I operate an ecommerce site for outdoor gear and was invited to guest post on a popular blog (not my site) for a trip i had been on. I wrote the aritcle for them and i also will post this same article on my website. Is this a dup content problem with google? and or the other site? Any Help. Also if i wanted to post this same article to 1 or 2 other blogs as long as they link back to me as the author of the article
Technical SEO | | isle_surf0 -
Duplicate content
I am getting flagged for duplicate content, SEOmoz is flagging the following as duplicate: www.adgenerator.co.uk/ www.adgenerator.co.uk/index.asp These are obviously meant to be the same path so what measures do I take to let the SE's know that these are to be considered the same page. I have used the canonical meta tag on the Index.asp page.
Technical SEO | | IPIM0 -
Duplicate content
This is just a quickie: On one of my campaigns in SEOmoz I have 151 duplicate page content issues! Ouch! On analysis the site in question has duplicated every URL with "en" e.g http://www.domainname.com/en/Fashion/Mulberry/SpringSummer-2010/ http://www.domainname.com/Fashion/Mulberry/SpringSummer-2010/ Personally my thoughts are that are rel = canonical will sort this issue, but before I ask our dev team to add this, and get various excuses why they can't I wanted to double check i am correct in my thinking? Thanks in advance for your time
Technical SEO | | Yozzer0