Remove Old Poor Quality Links Proactively?
-
I'm working with an ecommerce site where various predecessors have created 5 Wordpress.com blogs containing 5 links on each back to the site. Should I disavow those links and take down those sites if I can get access?
Should I close a second YouTube channel and Google Plus account under another name set up to create links back to the site?
No penalties yet.
Advice much appreciated.
-
Great advice. Thank you very much for helping me think this through.
-
Oh that does make a significant difference - yes, in that case I think it might be best to take them down, especially if they 404. I was operating on the assumption there was originality in the blogs.
With copied content there is no penalty but you are not gaining the benefits that original content would provide you. This may change in the future as algorithms are altered but for now there is no penalization for copy/pasting content like that. I have an ecommerce client that previously used this strategy and it didn't "hurt" them, per-say. However, when we adjusted with updated, original content, their rankings jumped considerably.
If you have control of/access to these blogs, it still might be more useful to your cause to update with new content and build up the links' authority. However, if you do not want to put the time and effort into creating a legitimate fix on the issue, then disavowing is probably a better option - just as long as you are aware that you are likely to suffer some short-term ranking drops.
In order of preference, I would say:
- Build up blogs to create relevance
- Disavow links
- Ignore problem
You might also take a middle route and disavow broken/404 links and continue with others - in the grand scheme of things if your link profile is generally strong, this shouldn't hurt you too much either way.
-
Thanks for your thoughtful comments. Let me clarify. Each piece of "content" is single product photo and copied product descriptios. Products may even be out of stock so links may 404. Could links like this hurt, as they are so blatantly linking strategies? Is there any reason to keep these sites? Just ignore ? Or disavow?
-
Hello Peg,
For best results, here is what I would do:
- Retain Wordpress.com blogs and build them up with new content to generate further links and traffic - closing them will only hurt you unless the links or content are poor quality and likely to be penalized in the near future. If you are on a large budget, try boosting them simultaneously. If not, try working on one at a time per month until they are each built up. This will help you more than disavowing them, which will land you back at square one.
If they are producing traffic and are quality content/link producers, keep them.
- Close one of the YouTube accounts unless both are generating fair amounts of traffic. Consider the value of a YouTube channel and if only one (or neither) are generating any value, then you only need one active. The same goes for the Google+ Accounts - if both are successful in generating leads/clients, then keep them (there is no penalty associated as long as they are under separate names). If only one is successful, remove the other. If neither is successful, then remove either one.
This isn't too big of a deal - there won't be huge penalties either way. However, you do stand to gain if you build on the previous work, assuming it was well-conceived and structured.
Hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unnatural Links To Your Site — Impacts Links warning, Should I do something?
Hi, I got: "Unnatural Links To Your Site — Impacts Links Google has detected a pattern of unnatural artificial, deceptive, or manipulative links pointing to pages on this site. Some links may be outside of the webmaster’s control, so for this incident we are taking targeted action on the unnatural links instead of on the site’s ranking as a whole. " I don't see any dropping at rankings, could the best solution here to be, just to leave everything as it is and be more careful with the link building in the future? Or is there a danger that Google gives further penalties if I don't act on this one do something? I am little afraid that if I start removing links, my rankings will drop, even though they have remained same if don't do anything? Any help is appreciated.
Link Building | | pok3rplay3r0 -
Spammy links
Hi I was reviewing a clients link profile and found a lot of the links they have pointed at their domain have the anchor text "Buy Viagra" or "buy viagra online" and similar. Now the website has absolutely nothing to do with this kind of business so no doubt these links are spammy. To my knowledge the website has not been penalised by Google so far. Is it best to disavow or just leave alone? Kind Regards
Link Building | | TheZenAgency0 -
Loads of quality content but not getting links!! What should I do?
Hi I have been working hard and creating valuable content for 2 years now, we create a weekly news letter with around 10 articles and all our customers love it. But still we are unable to get links to our sites. There are no active bloggers or sites for our industry and content is highly technical and scientific. My competitors have thin content with bad links and they still rank better than us............. Please help me by answering the questions below - Should we start submissions to directories? If yes which directories should we submit to? What else can we do to build links?
Link Building | | Rajaindiain0 -
Why Links from Top Level Domains doesn't Pass Link Equity?
Hello, I have a doubt about Equity-Passing links report of OpensiteExplorer.org According to Sam Weber http://moz.com/community/users/432678 links which pass value from one page to another including followed 301 and Meta refresh links are under Equity-Passing links. I am surprising after looking at the links report generated by opensiteexplorer.org. Most of the article and directory links which have low DA and PA are under Equity-Passing links. Whereas websites like EzineArticle or Articlebase which have good DA and PA are not found in either Equity-passing links or under only nofollow category. Please suggest me if the report of Opensiteexplorer is not good enough or the links from the site like Ezine Article doesn’t pass the link equity. Thanks.
Link Building | | TopLeagueTechnologies0 -
Link exchanges
I have quite a few legal clients and 90% of my clients top competitors are doing 1:1 link exchanges and they have been doing it for years. Other industries Dont seem as prevalent. I am just boggled every time someone says link exchanges don't work, will get penalized, or value is not passed. Its been working for my competitors....Legal SEO's seem to focus heavily on link exchanges. I have yet to do link exchanges, but am about to get started with a resourceful directory of local businesses on my clients site. Some will be linking back, but not all. Fear of penalization is lurking in my mind. Does anyone have any real data on this? Does anyone have an example of doing this properly and an example of how not to do it? I appreciate any feedback you can give. Thank you,
Link Building | | waqid0 -
JavaScript is crawled by search engines, isn’t it? Does it mean that links embedded in JavaScript pass link juice?
I wonder If links embedded in JavaScript from an external Website pass link juice to the linked page and thus have a positive effect on google rankings. I read that JavaScipt is craweld. Does it mean that also the link juice is passed? I'm looking forward to your answers.
Link Building | | Tabea0 -
Too many external links vs linking root domains - good or bad?
Hi guys, After the latest Linkscape update, we noticed that our website have 424,671 external links with 4,395 linking root domains, so roughly 100 links/domain. Does Google consider this to be a negative thing or we do not need to worry about it. Many thanks. David
Link Building | | sssrpm0 -
Link building
I have two separate websites on different servers and was wondering that since reciprocal links effectively eliminate each other, I'm curious if this link strategy will keep the links counting. Here's the strategy: I will have someone link to my site A and if i link to their site from my site B in a three way link strategy, will the links count even though both my site A and B have me listed as the Whois so Google knows that both sites are owned by me? Or will the links be discounted as reciprocal? Thanks in advance for your feedback! Take care, Ron
Link Building | | Ron100