Should I disavow spammy links that are showing in Open Site Explorer but not showing in Google Webmaster Tools?
-
Howdy Mozzers,
After carrying out a backlink audit for a client, Open Site Explorer shows a range of outrageously spammy links for guys wanting a bit of assistance in the bedroom area, and so on.
Hopping over to Google Webmaster Tools, there is no reported trace of said spammy links (for either of the www/non-www versions of the site). There are also no manual webspam actions found on the www/non-www Google Webmaster Tools accounts for this website.
So my question is: do I carry out a pre-emptive strike and go down the disavow process of requesting removal from the spammy sites, and then submit a disavow request to Google after allowing a suitable period of time for the junky/compromised website to (not) respond?
Or do I just leave it alone?
Thanks in advance for your wise words of wisdom and pearls of clarity.
-
Thanks for your feedback Ryan - much appreciated.
-
You're welcome Sara. I'm leaning towards no penalty associated currently, but you'll want to use your judgment. Things like percentage of spam to reputable links, whether or not the client is showing up for branded searches, number of pages listed via the 'site:' search, and so on. If they don't appear to be penalized and are competing about where to be expected then these links likely aren't affecting them.
GWT doesn't guarantee showing all backlinks, so yes, it is a possibility that you won't find them there. You can use other backlink checking tools like Majestic and Ahrefs to compile an even larger list, while a site like https://www.rmoov.com/ can help with speeding up the cleaning process.
Finally, it'd probably be instructive for you to run several sites through OSE and see how much spam is common place so that you can start to get a feel for it. Much is from content scrapers that are linking unintentionally, things of that nature. Google knows to ignore them for the most part.
-
Thanks for your response Ryan.
So do you think that if the links haven't been flagged yet, then perhaps Google is already ignoring them, with no penalty associated?
If there's a possibility of a penalty (even a minor one that isn't big enough to be listed as a manual webspam action), then I'd probably pick the disavow route, however is it possible to disavow links that aren't showing up in GWT?
-
That those links aren't showing up in your GWT profile is a pretty good indicator that there's already some awareness on Google's end about the quality of the domain and/or pages with those links. And it sounds like you've already read through their official guide on disavow here: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/2648487 as well as reading up in other places (The history of spam page is kind of neat: http://www.google.com/insidesearch/howsearchworks/fighting-spam.html). It mostly comes down to a work / insurance cost measurement.
- High effort: Finding contact information and emailing each spam link. Reward: None, until a manual action is initiated and the contact efforts are requested. Risk: Minimal, but you are emailing a spammer.
- Medium / Low effort: Finding contact information on the top ten offenders, and emailing them. Reward: Again, none until a manual action takes place, but at least you can show some effort on your part from YYYY-MM-DD date (insurance). Risk: Same.
- Medium / Low effort: Creating a disavow list per Google's instructions and sending it in. Reward: Little to none. Your rankings and site appear to be fine at the moment. Risk: The list deletes something Google doesn't consider spam and your rankings suffer, or some other issue related to using the tool.
Hopefully that helps with some clarity. If your site is growing well in referral traffic and links from legitimate sites and that's the biggest percentage of your link profile, you're probably fine.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Links not showing
Hi, we have been putting links to our website www.caffeinemarketing.co.uk from other sites we are connected to. Although these sites are up and running and have been crawled, the links are not showing up on mot. What else do I need to do? Is it anything to do with whether I put http://www. or just www. Please can someone advise.
Link Building | | Caffeine_Marketing
Thanks0 -
Links in other language than site's language
I have a quick question regarding usage of links in my articles or website. As I already told in my last night question, I drive 2 french blogs. I'm wondering if putting on english sites links in my articles or pages to add complimentary infos on a particular topic would be useful or messy for my SEO. In other words, will Google be misled by the fact that I write in french and that I put english links ot ressources in my texts even if they are on a related topic
Link Building | | MarcoBernard0 -
Free tool which includes a link back to my site
On one of my sites I provide a free tool to other webmasters to use that allows them to copy some code to use the free tool on their website and under the tool on it says "Powered by: mysite.co.uk" with a link to "mysite.co.uk". Now I have no real control over which sites can come and use this free tool (a tool to test how fast an internet connection is), on the whole though it is aimed at a specific niche but a range of sites do use it which means good or crap sites can pick up the free code to place into their sites. The link to mysite.co.uk is now always mysite.co.uk as the anchor text, I used to use the websites name (which is the actual name of the URL - link to site at end of post) so the links were keyword rich but only to my sites genuine name, however I now just leave it as the URL to my site. I am not aiming to do anything untowards with the linking other than to get the acknowledgement that it was provided for free by my site, however I'm wondering if google etc will be able to tell they are natural and not dodgy? My site is: http://bit.ly/MsNQwS (n.b. a new improved test is being created before anyone says it's not accurate). 🙂
Link Building | | Wardy0 -
Why is OSE not showing Google+ bio link in backlink profile?
Hi fellow mozzers I wonder why opensiteexplorer (ose) isn't showing Google+ bio links in backlink profile reports of websites that get a link from the "about" page of a Google+ account (+ contributor link). Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Jacob
Link Building | | Jacobe0 -
How long does it take for new links to show up?
Hi all, We just kicked off our first infographic to start a content marketing strategy: I'm wondering how long it will take for SEOMoz to add this to our link profile, and I suppose more importantly, how long it will take Google to recognize the links that have been generated from it. The response has been pretty good and I'm excited to see the results. Thanks!
Link Building | | Kibin0 -
Is a no-follow link/sponsored link a good editorial link?
Ok maybe this is a dumb question. I really need some better, more quality backlinks pointing to my site. There is a site that has domain authority of 72, page rank 5 that is offering me a sponsored blog post. Do sponsored posts count as a good editorial link? Also what if they are no-follow (and how would I find out ahead of time), does that still give me link juice?
Link Building | | tutugirl0 -
Is there a tool that looks at an existing domain and scores how spammy its link graph is?
We are building a report for a customer and want to do an independent analysis of the domain to see if it is sketchy. Where sketchy is defined by artificial content, link building activity, etc?
Link Building | | greg360 -
Link Building: Asking for links versus building links
I am currently delving into link building for SEO having started out from a social media marketing side. From that angle, it was always my belief building high quality links came from engaging targeted bloggers and sites in my market and related verticals for product reviews and/or providing expert advise and opinion for posts they are creating. As I am learning more the "technical" side of SEO, I've read a lot of posters on here talk about asking from links from websites. While I get the concept from a strategic stand point, are links really asking for or is better to continue to pursue the long term investment of pitching to get coverage from well known bloggers and sites?
Link Building | | joshuaopinion1