How can I make use of multiple domains to aid my SEO efforts?
-
About an year, the business I work for purchased 20+ domains: sendmoneyfromcanada.com sendmoneyfromaustralia.com sendmoneyfromtheuk.com sendmoneyfromireland.com The list goes on, but you can get the main idea. They thought that the domains can be useful to aid http://www.transfermate.com/ . I can set up a few micro sites on them, but from that point there will be no one to maintain them. And I'm, honestly, not too happy with hosting multiple sites on one IP and having them all link to the flagship. It is spammy and it does not bring any value to end users. I might be missing something, so my question is - Can I use these domains to boost my rankings, while avoiding any shady/spammy techniques? P.S. I had this Idea of auctioning the domains in order to cover for the domain registration fees.
-
I was just thinking about this very thing this morning, get to the office and bang... there's the exact question. What if the "secondary domain", the other ones I own, what if their url's are more keyword rich than my primary domain name. Your answer seemed the most intuitive and beneficial to long term goals... pouring time into a "dummy site".
Should we just be using these as vanity urls for tracking specific campaigns. I'd have to admit... some of the urls I own are a little easier to remember and focused on a specific service (ex. seowhatever .com), than my primary domain name, which is my name! They've got to have more value... some are pretty darn good urls... the kind where you tell your buddy you bought it and he says, "THAT WAS AVAILABLE!!!!".
-
The realistic side of me says there's nothing wrong with having and owning multiple domains
I agree. Nothing wrong with it. One guy is allowed to own ten toy stores on the same street in the same tiny town.
But they compete with one another.
For sales, for resources and for the owner's time. it's inefficient.
all your eggs in one basket.
I agree. My defense against that is a very high quality site. Much higher in quality than I would have if I was creating six sites in that same niche. I have the very best on that one site and it isn't doing manipulative linking with other sites that I own.
My diversity is in other sites - but in different related niches. So the sites don't compete with one another. I think that is superior to having six sites in the payday loan niche.
-
I'm on the border with this topic. The realistic side of me says there's nothing wrong with having and owning multiple domains but I can also see the benefit you discussed when you said, “all of your efforts and all of your content and all of your links focused on one single site.”
Sure, you're always going to have one primary website that you will ultimately have the most success with and that's fine. However, what if your primary domain gets hit by the Google Bot (also known as Black Death)? What would you do then? I have a great example of one company's intention to not focus all your efforts into site.
I've been following the "loans" space for about 4 years now: car loans, mortgage loans, payday loans, cash advances, personal loans, etc. If it's a loan I've tested it.
Below is a list of websites that are all owned by the same person who is obviously using the "more is better" online strategy. If you type in the major keywords for any loan type (Examples: car loans, auto loans, personal loans, etc.), you will see that this person is successfully trying to position their sites to be anywhere on the first five pages of the results. I talked to the owner of these sites and his logic is that you don’t want to put all your eggs in one basket.
It’s not hard to realize that all these sites are owned by the same person and from the rankings I'm seeing, this person is doing very well.
-
Yeah, that would definitely work. If you can get good content on each of the domains and develop them to be great sites, then you will have some nice leverage in your niche, in many markets.
-
I believe that you will do best when you have all of your efforts and all of your content and all of your links focused on one single site.
You want all of the the content there to impress the pants off of any visitor - and thus earn natural links. That impressive content will also earn trust, sales and clients because you look like an authority.
You want all of the links hitting there to give the domain max authority. One site with 50 links will outrank 50 sites with one link each.
And, you want to put all of your effort into one site to make it the best possible site in your niche.
Smart generals have always used the "divide and conquer" principle in battle. Building multiple domains divides your forces for the enemy.
-
I was agains purchasing that many domains simply to have some content on them. I'm now trying to make the best of it. We have a few good graphic designers on staff, so I think of going with the infographics. Then again, the infographics might do better on the main site.
-
If you could "manufacture rankings" by tossing up a thousand domains then everybody everywhere would be doing it.
It doesn't work.
The links on these "manufactured domains" are worth very very little to nothing.
The only way to get true power is to get links from outside of your own network of websites.
These extra domains have no external links of their own and that gives them no power to pass on to your main site.
And, if you can get links into these extra domains then you should instead have those links hit straight into you own website. Passing them through these extra domains is like trying to kill a rabbit with a ricochet.
Google is too smart to allow this to work.
-
Not a bad idea. We used to work with a few Filipino guys. I might be able to get a guy to do it in my home country for a little more than what you mentioned. Nothing too fancy, just an article every now and then. I try to steer away from that option. I guess I will need to take some time and come up with and idea where it is easy to maintaing the sites and give some useful information.
I was thinking about putting some infographics on them. Each will cover the theme related to the domain name. It can turn out ok. Don't you think so?
-
You've already invested in the domains, my as well leverage them. What these would be good for is to rank for the "exact matches" as exact match domains still to this date do well in the SERPs. I would hire a Filipino or someone for around $200 USD/month. Train them a little bit, then let them install wordpress, maintain the sites, build backlinks, etc. This would be my suggestion for the domain usage. You can also most likely buy more IPs from your hosting provider. So in essence, just try and get these sites ranked for the exact match terms and funnel the people to your "money site". Lastly, if you are really worried about the "spammy" look, add "nofollow" to the links.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Buying domains for the backlink profile: Still a white hat strategy?
There's a DR 51 domain we'd like to buy, with a quality backlink profile. We'd like to 301 redirect this domain to our DR 46 domain, and possibly setup something to make the user experience smooth for people expecting the old domain. Is this still a white hat strategy? How would you calculate the value/what kind of offer to make?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | catbur0 -
SEO companies that own linking properties
Hi everyone, I do some SEO work for a personal injury attorney, and due to his profession, he gets cold-called by every digital marketing company under the sun. He recently got called by a company that offers packages that include posting in multiple directories (all on domains they own), creating subdomains for search listings, and PR services like writing and distributing press releases for distribution to multiple media outlets. The content they write will obviously not be local. All this and more for less than $500 a month! I'm curious if any of you have any experience with companies like this and whether you consider them black hat. I realize I'm asking you to speculate on a very broad description of what they offer, but their linking strategies sound risky to me. What experiences have you had with companies like this? Do you know anyone who has ever gotten a penalty using these tactics? Thanks, in advance, for sharing your thoughts.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | ptdodge0 -
Can a domain name alone be considered SPAM?
If someone has a domain that is spammy, such as "http://seattlesbestinsurancerates.com" can this cause Google to not index the website? This is not our domain, but a customer of ours has a similar one and it appears to be causing issues! Any thoughts? Thanks for any input!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Tosten0 -
Do you choose PA/DA over PR when purchasing expiring domains?
Hey guys, So a lot has been said about private blog network. I have but only 1 question: Do you choose PA/DA over PR when purchasing expiring domains or PR is most critical? Thanks a lot!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | nicenike0 -
Alltop good for SEO?
Are there any negative effects on getting your blog posted on alltop? Good SEO value or not?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | DemiGR0 -
Dust.js Client-side JavaScript Templates & SEO
I work for a commerce company and our IT team is pushing to switch our JSP server-side templates over to client-side templates using a JavaScript library called Dust.js Dust.js is a JavaScript client-side templating solution that takes the presentation layer away from the data layer. The problem with front-end solutions like this is they are not SEO friendly because all the content is being served up with JavaScript. Dust.js has the ability to render your client-side content server-side if it detects Google bot or a browser with JavaScript turned off but I’m not sold on this as being “safe”. Read about Linkedin switching over to Dust.js http://engineering.linkedin.com/frontend/leaving-jsps-dust-moving-linkedin-dustjs-client-side-templates http://engineering.linkedin.com/frontend/client-side-templating-throwdown-mustache-handlebars-dustjs-and-more Explanation of this: “Dust.js server side support: if you have a client that can't execute JavaScript, such as a search engine crawler, a page must be rendered server side. Once written, the same dust.js template can be rendered not only in the browser, but also on the server using node.js or Rhino.” Basically what would be happening on the backend of our site, is we would be detecting the user-agent of all traffic and once we found a search bot, serve up our web pages server-side instead client-side to the bots so they can index our site. Server-side and client-side will be identical content and there will be NO black hat cloaking going on. The content will be identical. But, this technique is Cloaking right? From Wikipedia: “Cloaking is a SEO technique in which the content presented to the search engine spider is different from that presented to the user's browser. This is done by delivering content based on the IP addresses or the User-Agent HTTP header of the user requesting the page. When a user is identified as a search engine spider, a server-side script delivers a different version of the web page, one that contains content not present on the visible page, or that is present but not searchable.” Matt Cutts on Cloaking http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66355 Like I said our content will be the same but if you read the very last sentence from Wikipdia it’s the “present but not searchable” that gets me. If our content is the same, are we cloaking? Should we be developing our site like this for ease of development and performance? Do you think client-side templates with server-side solutions are safe from getting us kicked out of search engines? Thank you in advance for ANY help with this!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Bodybuilding.com0 -
Link Building using Badges
In light of penguin update, is link building using badges(like "I love SEOMOZ" badge) still considered a white hat tactic? I have read old posts on SEOMOZ blog about this topic and wondering if this method is still effective. Look forward to feedback from MOZers.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Amjath0 -
Google Panelizes to much SEO
I just read this interesting article about a new Google Penalty that will be up in the next upcoming weeks/months about Google making changes to the algorithm. The penalty will be targeted towards websites that are over optimized or over seo'ed. What do you think about this? Is this a good thing or is this not a good thing for us as SEO marketeers? here's the link: SEL.com/to-much-seo I'm really curious as to your point of views. regards Jarno
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | JarnoNijzing0