Which is more important? Branding or SEO?
-
If one day Google close shop! What will happen then?
-
what patrick said
-
Hi there
In my opinion, it's far more important to build brands. Being able to analyze data, target your audience, develop valuable content, and engage your audience based on their needs, puts you light years ahead of just simply having a SEO friendly website. Websites that are successful know how to utilize the information above to create an experience. You could have the most SEO friendly site on the planet but that doesn't mean your work is done nor does it stop users from trusting brands that take the time to listen to and hear them.
SEO is a bullet point in a job description. What I mean by that is web developers build SEO friendly websites and marketers/content writers create content in a SEO friendly fashion. Out of the gate, a new website should be built with SEO elements in mind. Knowing how to structure your website in a SEO friendly fashion is an extremely valuable asset, but it's not an asset that guarantees success solely by itself.
SEO are foundational elements that websites should just have at this point - clean design, relevant titles, easy to use navigation, proper markup, local listings and citations, responsive, etc. If your sole job is based on search engine rankings and performance at the basic SEO level, you're not going to be in business long. The reason being, the elements I just listed above, while extremely helpful, do not mean success - they don't build brands or user trust.
Search engines trust brands. They want to return the best websites to their users in search results - more often than not, those are websites that are making a concerted effort to provide a great user experience, valuable/relevant/timely content to their users, active on social media, engaging their audience, etc. - aka, creating a brand with substance. That being said, those websites usually are SEO friendly as well, but again, that's just the basics for search engine success - they didn't become a "brand" because they had a SEO friendly website.
Merely creating a website that's SEO friendly and crossing your fingers hoping for the best isn't enough anymore. You need to be investing in developing a loyal audience and embracing change as it happens in your audience / industry. Brands are successful at these sorts of things, and will be rewarded because they pay attention at multiple levels.
Make sure you check out Rand's new Whiteboard Friday called Is Brand a Ranking Factor? as well.
Final thought - brands developed and lasted long before SEO was even a flicker of a thought - if Google ever went away, brands will be around long after SEO is gone as well.
Let me know if this makes sense or if you have questions - good luck!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Drop in Organic Traffic for Homepage and Branded terms but Steady in Rankings and According to WMT.
I am stumped. I have been researching for over two days now. Our homepage organic traffic YoY is down approx. 25%. However, rank has not changed according to Conductor, Bing and Google WMT. Impressions have gone up according to both search engines and we rank now for more keywords in top 3 than we did last year. Both WMTs' present a pretty healthy picture. No insignificant indexing issues, Error URLs & blocked resources are down, daily page crawls are higher than ever, etc. I drilled into Google Analytics from a few different view points. The closest I got to an answer was I saw huge out-liars YoY in browsers and browser versions. We saw significant differences in organic traffic YoY from IE 11, 9 ,10, 8 and 7. Android Browser 31, 32 and Safari 6 and 7. I tested our homepage and search results in all of these, and found no issues. Yet, GA reports 50K+ differences YoY. My only thought is it is perhaps a GA attribution error? And/or browsers defaulting organic traffic to direct or other? Yet, our direct traffic is up but does not correlate with as much as we are down. Any tips on where to look next would be extremely helpful!
Algorithm Updates | | lunavista-comm0 -
How do I code SEO for a secondary site without impacting the main site?
We have a secondary site for our online magazine, how do I code the SEO so I don't steal links from the main site?
Algorithm Updates | | gacwebteam0 -
Branded vs non-branded query
So there's an obvious difference between a branded and non-branded search term, but I'm interested in the SERPs that are shown as a result. Branded search only results in 7 listings on the first page - obviously because branded search is generally more navigational in nature and the lower results get minimal CT. Are their any technical differences beyond this? Also, how does google define a branded search term? Because a search for Vodafone or Dell show reduced results, but Coca Cola does not. Thanks guys 🙂
Algorithm Updates | | underscorelive0 -
.htaccess and SEO
Hey Everyone, New to SEOMOZ and I have an important question: We launched a new version of our site about 6 months ago and had a TON of redirects in our HTCaccess file due to a change in our permalink structure (over 2000 easily). Anyways, recently we went back in and took 2000+ lines of individual htaccess redirects and consolidated them into a RegularExpression for the ones where we could find a pattern for and the others (30 or so) are just the actual redirect link. Since doing that, it appears our search engine traffic has dropped a bit. It's not crazy, but it's definitely noticeable. I'm not an SEO expert, so my question is this the reason why? How long will we see this decline before we're back at normal levels? We're seeing a lot less crawl errors since doing this, so I think it's a good thing. But I just wanted to check and see. The site is http://thetechblock.com if you want to take a look. Any help would be really appreciated.
Algorithm Updates | | willwade260 -
SERP and SEO Moz ranking
Until a couple of months ago the predicted SEO Moz ranking for a specific keyword was fairly close to what I actually experienced with my website. However, since then the correlation has not been good. For example, according to SEO Moz I am ranked #1 for a specific keyword with google.ca and google.com yet my site actually shows up consistently at #3 for that keyword. Has anyone else noticed this divergence?
Algorithm Updates | | casper4340 -
Big site SEO: To maintain html sitemaps, or scrap them in the era of xml?
We have dynamically updated xml sitemaps which we feed to Google et al. Our xml sitemap is updated constantly, and takes minimal hands on management to maintain. However we still have an html version (which we link to from our homepage), a legacy from back in the pre-xml days. As this html version is static we're finding it contains a lot of broken links and is not of much use to anyone. So my question is this - does Google (or any other search engine) still need both, or are xml sitemaps enough?
Algorithm Updates | | linklater0 -
Is DMOZ listing important
I have heard a variety of thoughts on the importance of directories such as DMOZ. Any thoughts on this subject from the perspective of google search rankings?
Algorithm Updates | | casper4340 -
SEO Test: Domain Hyphenation [Update]
In May I announced test results for domain hyphenation but after a 3 month followup the results have changed and the hyphenated domain now wins on what seems to be the first link instance advantage. I was unable to discover any other factors which may have influenced this test but if anyone has any ideas I would like to hear about it. Here are the details of the SEO test and revealed URLs.
Algorithm Updates | | Dan-Petrovic1