Competitors in directories according to OSE, should I submit for the same?
-
Hey Mozers!
I have just began my link building process, firstly creating unique and quality content and looking at my competitors. I have found that much of my competitors are in listed in many directories. Some are paid and some are not. I noticed the paid ones had higher DA which seems appealing, however I'm stuck to think wether or not it is relevant to my site and if my audience will go there to search my services. But then I'm thinking well if my competitors are there then why is it so? etc
Does anyone know if this is something I should look at? My site has been live since november last year and we only have 1 backlink at the moment according to moz...We are on the writing wagon to filter our content and make sure were writing good engaging content however I'm seeing this obviously not the only way. I have also read the beginners guide to backlinks via moz and researched and read other interesting ways, including blogger outreach within my niche.
Any advice around this approach?
-
Thats so much Daniel! A directory approached me the other day to tell me how much traffic I would get if I listed in their astrology category and that they receive so much traffic to that category a month looking for my services. If i listed there they would give me a 20% discount taking it to around $400 a year. So I was sitting here thinking is it the more expensive the more human-edited and non-generic the directory is?
I also read their guidelines and they consisted of quiet a lot. For eg: they don't list websites with spam content, broken links etc
Thanks for the information regarding the manual outreach, I will take a look into the buzzstream as iv seen this floating around but didn't quiet understand the actual intent behind it, now that im looking into link building it all makes sense.
What do you think of SEO agencies that offer to build your backlinks? I'm a little skeptic around it but in saying that not my place to comment as i have not been there yet. I have had an seo guy work with me in the beginning who i found out was giving me all sorts of nonesense advice after discovering moz.
cheers
-
I wouldn't hold out for dmoz to approve your submission. It's really the only generic web directory still worth submitting to these days but it can take months before you get approved. If and when it does get added though, it's certainly worth the 2 minutes it takes to submit.
Manual outreach is just a way to contact people directly whether that be bloggers, journalists and editors, contributing articles to industry websites etc. You can reach out by email but I find that contacting people via LinkedIn and Twitter has a much better success rate. Here is a good article to introduce you to the topic - http://www.buzzstream.com/blog/essential-guide-effective-link-building-outreach.html - which also features Moz's own Follerwonk tool.
When I say about directories which are not human-edited, I mean directories which don't even have an approval process and therefore allows anyone to "build a link" straight away. You will normally be able to spot this in a directory's "submission guidelines" and they will normally be the directories which require a small fee upwards of $50.
-
great, thanks for that John, will do and see how I go
-
The first thing is a bit tragic and may be frowned up - you need to set up a female address sarah@brandname.com. I find if you ask for a link as a male you receive a low response rate. If the email comes from a female - then the response rate is reasonable. A personal choice.
However that is for generic link building.
Of the 75 URL's you have collected I would create a strategy for each one - they are that important! A phone call, begging, swapping services - whatever you need to do.. it is actually good fun, you will meet some great people. If you get a chance drop into their office. Do free psychic readings... whatever it takes.
Each of those links has great SEO value. The reality is it is just hard work but play to your strengths you know what they are.
-
Hey John,
Wow again you have such great information to share!
I like your recommendation for the first 75 URL's that appear in the SERP. My main keyword is "psychic readings" I know some competitors who definitely won't, but your idea of looking into the pages that are not is a great idea.
I have 3 top level domains co.nz (NZ) com.au (AUS) and .com (USA) but I'm really pushing for the Australia and USA, as after running PPC, NZ was pretty dead.
So I will gather these domains. I do have a question, how would you go about approaching some of the 75 pages?
Thanks so much again for your awesome advice.
Cheers
-
Awesome advice Alick300, again will def look into spam score
-
Wow thanks so much Daniel, you bet this helped me so much! I have submitted to dmoz, but I don't know if I have been approved as I have not heard anything back... Do you know how to get in touch with them at all?
What is manual outreach? I know what blogger outreach is and I'm trying my first ~ using some of Rands tips.
How can you tell if directories are not human edited? I'm assuming that you can take control over the listing or have some form of control over the listing, rather then filling out a form?
Thanks again for your insights
-
I will not comment on the directories discussion as the boys have canvassed it well.
On link building the first suggestion or step I recommend is to capture the first 75 URL's that appear in the SERP for the most important keyword you are targeting. Then strategize how to get a link to each of the URL's - yes some are competitors so they are no good. Many are not competitors. Links from these pages have high SEO value. Be relentless in pursuit of these websites for backlinks.
After I have maximised my efforts on the aforesaid I then look elsewhere.
Good luck, let me know if you need any help.
-
Hi Justin,
I would just like to add to the above responses, that you should be careful copying a competitors' backlink profile. These directory links could be something of the past that they put in several years ago when it worked. They could very well since have been disavowed; there's no way to know that.
There might still be some value to get from directories, but I wouldn't just get in one because my competitors are there. If they are human edited and are niche relevant (dmoz.org being the exception) then go for it. If not, then I would take a long hard look at whether or not it is worth it to go there.
-
Hi Justin,
Many SEO experts thinks that links from directories are generally low quality links and they don't want to submit in directories.
In this case my simple question is If directory links didn’t work then why Google deindex few hundreds directories in 2012 ?
Links from the right directories can still do wonders for your site. So you should check spam score of those directories and if spam score is
& directory is relevant to your website you can go for it.
Thanks
-
Hi Edward,
With your competitors seemingly not having the most up-to-date or high quality link profile, this provides you with a massive opportunity! Where they have links from generic directories, you can earn links from high authority websites which are relevant to your niche.
It's always good to analyse and compare competitors' link profiles; I would only use this process to find a few main directories within your niche (free or paid) and bear in mind that they could also bring some referral traffic if the directories are popular. Otherwise, stay away from:
- generic directories (organic and paid) except for dmoz.org
- any directories which are not "human-edited" ie, there is a no editorial control of which sites go into the directories
You said that you have been actively writing content. Producing content is great but you need to promote it if it is going to earn links. The best way I have found to earn the most authoritative links is via manual outreach, in which blogger outreach could be included of course. Contact the editors and webmasters of sites within your niche (but certainly try to think creatively to find opportunities which are outside your niche too), show them some examples of that great content you've been producing and ask them about the opportunity to create some exclusive content for them or even to collaborate on a piece of content together.
Hope that helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Good vs Bad Web directories
Hi this blog post Rand mentions a list of bad web directories - I asked couple of years ago if there is an updated list as some of these (Alive Directory for example) do not seem to be blacklisted anymore and are coming up in Google searches etc? It seems due to old age of the blog post (7 years ago ) the comments are not responded to. Would anyone be able to advise if which of these good directories to use? https://moz.com/blog/what-makes-a-good-web-directory-and-why-google-penalized-dozens-of-bad-ones
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | IsaCleanse0 -
Competitor website, how come they get away with it?
Hi we have been looking at competitors websites do see how we can improve, this website jumped out at me straight away as spammy gateway pages where 3 words was the only difference on all of the pages. Why does google give them so much weight still and rank them so highly? I thought this is what G was trying to avoid? Am I missing something here in terms of great SEO opportunity? A checked for noindex or canonical and I cannot see any. Love to hear some feedback. Cheers
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | PottyScotty0 -
Are link directories still effective? is there a risk?
We've contracted a traditional SEO firm, mostly for link building. As part of their plan they want to submit our site to a large list of link directories, and we're not sure if that's a good option. As far as we know, those directories have been ineffective for a long time now, and we're wondering if there is the chance of getting penalized by google. When I asked the agency their opinion about that, they gave me the following answer - Updated and optimized by us - We are partnered with these sites and control quality of these sites. Unique Class C IP address - Links from unique Referring Class C IP plays a very important role in SEO. Powered by high PR backlinks Domain Authority (DA) Score of over 20 These directories are well categorized. So they actually control those directories themselves, which we think is even worse. I'm wondering what does the Moz community think about link directory submission - is there still something to be gained there, is there any risk involved, etc. Thanks!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | binpress0 -
Google is giving one of my competitors a quasi page 1 monopoly, how can I complain?
Hi, When you search for "business plan software" on google.co.uk, 7 of the 11 first results are results from 1 company selling 2 products, see below: #1. Government site (related to "business plan" but not to "business plan software")
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | tbps
#2. Product 1 from Palo Alto Software (livePlan)
#3. bplan.co.uk: content site of Palo Alto Software (relevant to "business plan" but only relevant to "business plan software" because it is featuring and linking to their Product 1 and Product 2 sites)
#4. Same site as #3 but different url
#5. Palo Alto Software Product 2 (Business Plan Pro) page on Palo Alto Software .co.uk corporate site
#6. Same result as #5 but different url (the features page)
#7. Palo Alto Software Product 2 (Business Plan Pro) local site
#8, #9 and #10 are ok
#11. Same as #3 but the .com version instead of the .co.uk This seems wrong to me as it creates an illusion of choice for the customer (especially because they use different sites) whereas in reality the results are showcasing only 2 products. Only 1 of Palo Alto Software's competitors is present on page 1 of the search results (the rest of them are on page 2 and page 3). Did some of you experience a similar issue in a different sector? What would be the best way to point it out to Google? Thanks in advance Guillaume0 -
Does the SEOmoz Suggested Directory List Need to be Updated?
So, since Google updated their link schemes page (http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66356) with avoid using "Low-quality directories", I've been thinking a lot about what makes a directory "low-quality". Obviously, this is important, or Google wouldn't have mentioned it. I was wondering if someone could explain to me how some of the directories suggested by SEOmoz at http://www.seomoz.org/directories are NOT low-quality, specifically some of the ones marked "General". The page lists stuff like busybits.com, for instance. One that I guess many are aware of, and yea it has a high home page PageRank, and it's got some history, and it's human-edited, ok great. But does it actually add any value to anyone that's not just looking to get a link? A page like http://busybits.com/Business/Others/2/ having (dofollow) listings like "Phone cards, Calling cards" "Insurance in Canada" .... ect. It just looks like an SEO backlink hub. No value at all to a user trying to discover new sites/content. Anyway, back to my main question, how is something like this NOT "low-quality"? Thank you
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | MadeLoud4 -
Ethical question about setting up a local business directory...
I've just launched a local business directory that allows the small businesses in my local area to get noticed by a very targeted audience. People such as self-employed builders, painters and decorators and the like. As well as helping them out, they'll be helping me out by testing the waters of local keywords and seeing just how difficult and how much traffic they'll get. Kind of like spreading myself across 100's of keywords without the need for domains etc. All the links on there are nofollow, but what are the ethics behind letting my clients have a dofollow link from it? I wouldn't use this directory as a marketing tool for my self and my business, but if I acquired a client from my website or other source, but they would benefit from a dofollow link?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | jasonwdexter0 -
Is widgetbait no longer valid at all according to the new quality guidelines?
Google recently updated their quality guidelines. I found this example of something that was against the guidelines very interesting: "Links embedded in widgets that are distributed across various sites, for example:
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | MarieHaynes
Visitors to this page: 1,472
car insurance" So, what do you think? Are the links against the guidelines? Or the fact that the link is using an anchor texted keyword? I personally don't see the problem with producing a great widget and putting a link on the bottom saying, "Provided by example.com", but then again it's sort of a self made link. On the other hand it's not completely self made because a webmaster has to like the widget enough to embed it. Thoughts?1 -
Is a directory like this white hat? Useful?
This is one of my competitor's backlinks: http://bit.ly/mMPhmn Prices for inclusion on this page go from $50 for 6 months to $300 for a permanent listing. Do most of you guys do paid directories like this for your SEO Clients? My gut is telling me to run away...but I don't want to miss a good opportunity if I should be taking it.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | MarieHaynes0