Free Media Site / High Traffic / Low Engagement / Strategies and Questions
-
Hi,
Imagine a site "mediapalooza dot com" where the only thing you do there is view free media.
Yet Google Analytics is showing the average view of a media page is about a minute; where the average length of media is 20 - 90 minutes.
And imagine that most of this media is "classic" and that it is generally not available elsewhere.
Note also that the site ranks terribly in Google, despite having decent Domain Authority (in the high 30's), Page Authority in the mid 40's and a great site and otherwise quite active international user base with page views in the tens of thousands per month.
Is it possible that GA is not tracking engagement (time on site) correctly?
Even accounting for the imperfect method of GA that measures "next key pressed" as a way to terminate the page as a way to measure time on page, our stats are truly abysmal, in the tenths of a percentage point of time measured when compared with actual time we think the pages are being used.
If so, will getting engagement tracking to more accurately measure time on specif pages and site signal Google that this site is actually more important than current ranking indicates?
There's lots of discussion about "dwell time" as this relates to ranking, and I'm postulating that if we can show Google that we have extremely good engagement instead of the super low stats that we are reporting now, then we might get a boost in ranking.
Am I crazy? Has anyone got any data that proves or disproves this theory?
as I write this out, I detect many issues - let's have a discussion on what else might be happening here.
We already know that low engagement = low ranking.
Will fixing GA to show true engagement have any noticeable impact on ranking?
Can't wait to see what the MOZZERS think of this!
-
Question, as it was entirely clear in the original question (or I missed it) and I think addressed later ... but if people are coming in and viewing the video without clicking anything (think youtube) then leave, then the time on site and page are not going to register. Is that happening here?
Now to the questions of if engagements rate get better in GA, if that can impact ranking. I have seen no studies on that and I highly doubt Google ties things in your GA account to ranking. Too many people mess up implementations for that. But I have not seen proof either way.
Now, Dwell, or whatever you want to call it, the instance where a user clicks on a result and within a relatively short period of time (as I think it depends on the query) goes back to the same SERP, I think that is taken into account, or is being investigated. That's Google's own data and totally possible to use. Do they? I am not sure and have seen no proof.
-
Thanks for your thoughts.
Been through it all, been doing a thorough site audit for the last couple of months. (that's what I do!)
Ghost and referral spam is somethign that I am very familiar with but it is well less than 1% of all hits.
Fortunately, on this site, it is well in the minority. I see it on other sites and it is nasty there but not an issue here.
I've been solving canonicals, dead ends, low engagement pages, improving pages (many) etc. And with this site there are indeed thousands of issues to deal with, for sure - but this is not the largest site I've worked on, not by a long shot.
This one has been fun. Been doing it for over 10 years on dozens of sites of all sizes.
Time on site is up strongly (generally), as is conversion and general engagement figures.
But those long form media items are still showing extremely poor engagement despite low bounce rates. and I know the system is not tracking them as I am one of my own "customers". I've been actually viewing this content for several months myself, and where I know I'm viewing 30 + 60 minute media for sure, GA is still only recording 2 or 3 minutes each time - and I can clearly see this in the GA data.
Let me give you another clue - many of these items have a zero bounce rate and a zero time on page and 100% exits - (keep in mind the media is many minutes long) what do these telling numbers suggest to you?
...yet despite all this I'm doing, ranking is simply staying near norms - although it is starting to fluctuate more widely than prior norms it is still where it is - and I'm tracking ranking for thousands of terms using 3 different systems.
Normally, I'd be seeing a fairly solid increase after all I've done.
Love to see if we can actually answer the original question if at all possible.
Can poorly configured GA cause low engagement in such a way that if it is fixed, might higher engagement figures drive increasing ranking??
Didn't DWELL get discussed here quite thoroughly?
for backgrounders, this cites Dr Pete.
http://www.searchenginejournal.com/understanding-impact-dwell-time-seo/108905/
-
Hello, my friend.
Have you heard about referral spam and ghost hits? This might be your answer to unreal numbers. Here is a post about it: https://moz.com/blog/stop-ghost-spam-in-google-analytics-with-one-filter
Also, as it was mentioned above, good DA/PA doesn't mean or guarantee rankings. What about 10000 other things SEO is about?
Also, is time on page the only problem child? everything else is fine? It sounds that you need good analysis of google analytics data.
-
I understand the inverse relationship and there is no question that in reality, there are few that would engage for tens of minutes, just due to the nature of behavior - and the averages bear that out.
But when looking very carefully at this only segment, I would expect more than fractions of a percent to spend more than a mere minute.
Your example shows a 10% view rate (like what we see) and 1800 minutes total use.
In our case, in this exact scenario, GA is only showing about 6 minutes total use.
I think that GA is undercounting dwell time by a reasonably large margin.
That said, stating the question more clearly:
Could it be possible that insufficient or incorrect information regarding actual dwell time on the site might be a factor in the abysmal ranking of this site?
-
There are a few different points here that I think are prudent to make:
-
Having a good/great domain authority has no bearing on the actual quality of the content regarding users. I would be hesitant about making decisions based on two non-correlative data points. Quality in this context refers to the value the average user perceives that content to have.
-
As such, here's an example: Say I have a page hosting a video that's 90 minutes. If 1,000 people visit the page, let's say that 100 came there with an actual interest specifically in that video. Of those 100, maybe 20 will watch the entire thing. So, 20 out of 1,000 people getting to 90 minutes isn't going to give you a high average. This is obviously an abstract example, but it makes the point that video length means nothing as a metric without any insight into these other key numbers.
-
That said, yes, Google is imperfect and won't measure anything perfectly. But a general rule for content of any type is to expect only a certain percentage (usually not very high) to be highly engaged. It's an inverse curve structure in terms of graphical representation.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Since implementing GDPR, has anyone seen website traffic plummet?
On December 1 and 2, I implemented a cookie banner on 5 of my Wix sites (https://www.sanitationsolutionsinc.com is one example) in order to be in compliance with GDPR, CCPA, and LGPD. Since then my traffic according to Wix Analytics and Google Analytics has plummeted. Anyone else have the same issue? How did you fix it?
Reporting & Analytics | | Jason_Taylor0 -
High Bounce Rate on traffic generating area of our site
Hi, Our eCommerce site currently includes a blog section known as Igloo which we have filled with unique and helpful content that is useful to a fair few people, not just customers of ours. It currently attracts a large number of visitors (more than the actual eCommerce side of the site in actual fact) organically who aren't currently customers of ours. Very few of these turn in to paying clients so it's not really a money spinner but it has worked quite well from a linkbait perspective / traffic generation perspective and undoubtedly a few of these people do end up making a purchase on the actual shopping end of our site. We're look at ways to encourage these people finding help on this free resource to take a look at our homepage and hopefully make an order but in the meantime I am worried that there may be a few downsides to us creating this content: Google may see us more as a help site than a shopping site. Since selling products is where we make our money this could ultimately be a bad thing. Our bounce rate is REALLY high (I'm talking around 94%) on the help site versus around 20% on the eCommerce site. I guess people land on the article they want, read it and then disappear. Would this bounce rate skew our entire site stats and ultimately result in decreased performance in the SERPS. I would appreciate your opinions and, in the event you do feel it may be hurting us overall perhaps some suggestions on how to mitigate the effects? Many thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | ChrisHolgate0 -
How Am I Linked to These Sites?
I was going through Google Analytics, specifically looking at the Channels under Acquisition. I found a number of sites that Google is giving credit as sources of traffic.
Reporting & Analytics | | TowerMarketing
When I went to the sites, however, and searched the page source for links to my site, I could not find any. My site is www.towermarketing.net. The sites being listed by GA are:
blackhawkhardware.com
musicas.baixar-musicas-gratis.com If anyone can tell me how Tower is getting traffic from these sites, and what I can do to fix it - because at this point I am considering them spam - I would appreciate it. Thanks!0 -
Verifying Site Ownership & Setting Up Webmaster tools for clients who use Hubspot
We are a Hubspot partner agency. I'm trying to find the best route for managing Google's tools as an extra resource for insight, not the primary basis for marketing effort. I also want to explore adwords in more depth. Finding a lot of our clients don't have one or the other or both Analytics/Webmaster tools in place. Can I verify site ownership to set up webmaster tools simply by having admin access to their analytics account or will that require ownership of the analytics account? With Google merging things together these days I'm not sure of the best approach to take. Usually clients have their site hosted somewhere and built on some platform and ADD a Hubspot blog and the landing pages/cta's, Hubspot tools on a subdomain hosted by Hubspot. Hubspot has tools in it's website settings for adding google analytics (actually it's just a field to add code to the header area). If a client has universal analytics on their primary domain do I still need to go and add a separate analytics property for the subdomain and go through Hubspot's tools to install it on the subdomain? Or just use the same code from their primary domain and add it to the Hubspot header? What is the best route? Any additional thoughts on this subject are welcome - with so much updating and changing coming from Google (and Hubspot as we implement 3.0 - COS) I'm trying to avoid wasted effort, outdated methods, etc. Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | rhgraves651 -
Direct Traffic Source?
Hi all, Having some trouble figuring out a metric I'm dissecting. We have a large amount of traffic going to deep pages and I'm looking at the traffic source and an alarming amount are coming as Direct traffic. The thing is this can't type in or bookmarked traffic, so what else could it be? We have numbers like 80% and 60% for direct traffic, which judging by our previous efforts, that just can't right. Anyone can figure out what I may be missing out? Deeper pages should usually not get as much Direct traffic, so what can it be?
Reporting & Analytics | | William.Lau0 -
If a site has 301 redirect - Will the Analytics of the target site show it as a referral or as the traffic source it came from?
Lets say I have a site www.abc.com and I rederect that site to www.xyz.com. If ABC.com is still ranking for keyword X and orgnically someone searches for X and they click on the ABC.com listing - In the XYZ site analytics (which is the target site) does it show as organic or referall, direct? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | M_80 -
Reg Ex Question about Rewrite Rules
In this redirect rule, what does the "$1" mean? RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(oldsiteaustin|www.oldsiteaustin) [NC] RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://austin.newsite.com/$1 [R=301,L]
Reporting & Analytics | | SEOteamfl0 -
I made 18 websites and the traffic keeps going down over 3 months
I made 18 websites, and have used a analytics web app called piwik. You can google it, but basically it is like google analytics. I have done nothing for the websites no links, no updates. I did do the onpage optimization extremely well. At first I had daily traffic over all the websites at about 200, then like a month went by and it was at 100, then another month has gone by it is hovering around 30 visits -- This is total traffic across all the websites. In addition my websites were ranking much better and alot of them were coming up together in the results in a single google query, now this is no longer true, only one or maybe two come for the same google query and they come up lower in the serp ranking ie. before it was 1st place now 3rd for example, so traffic has decreased respectively. Anybody can tell me what I can do, to regain the positions and traffic I had before.
Reporting & Analytics | | mickey110