undefined
Skip to content
Moz logo Menu open Menu close
  • Products
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Pro Home
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Home
    • STAT
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Home
    • Compare SEO Products
    • Moz Data
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis
    • Keyword Explorer
    • Link Explorer
    • Competitive Research
    • MozBar
    • More Free SEO Tools
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO
    • SEO Learning Center
    • Moz Academy
    • SEO Q&A
    • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Agency Solutions
    • Enterprise Solutions
    • Small Business Solutions
    • Case Studies
    • The Moz Story
    • New Releases
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Products
    • Moz Pro

      Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

    • Moz Local

      Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

    • STAT

      SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

    • Moz API

      Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

    • Compare SEO Products

      See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

    • Moz Data

      Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis

      Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

    • Keyword Explorer

      Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

    • Link Explorer

      Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

    • Competitive Research

      Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

    • MozBar

      See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

    • More Free SEO Tools

      Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO

      The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

    • SEO Learning Center

      Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

    • On-Demand Webinars

      Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

    • How-To Guides

      Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

    • Moz Academy

      Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

    • MozCon

      Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
    Moz API

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

    Find your plan
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Small Business Solutions

      Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

    • Agency Solutions

      Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

    • Enterprise Solutions

      Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

    • The Moz Story

      Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

    • Case Studies

      Explore how Moz drives ROI with a proven track record of success.

    • New Releases

      Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

    Surface actionable competitive intel
    New Feature

    Surface actionable competitive intel

    Learn More
  • Log in
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Dashboard
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Dashboard
    • Moz Academy
  • Avatar
    • Moz Home
    • Notifications
    • Account & Billing
    • Manage Users
    • Community Profile
    • My Q&A
    • My Videos
    • Log Out

The Moz Q&A Forum

  • Forum
  • Questions
  • Users
  • Ask the Community

Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

  1. Home
  2. SEO Tactics
  3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
  4. Pagination parameters and canonical

Moz Q&A is closed.

After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

Pagination parameters and canonical

Intermediate & Advanced SEO
5
6
5.0k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as question
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
  • teconsite
    teconsite last edited by Sep 14, 2015, 7:18 AM

    Hello,

    We have a site that manages pagination through parameters in urls, this way:

    friendly-url.html
    friendly-url.html?p=2
    friendly-url.html?p=3
    ...

    We've rencently added the canonical tag pointing to friendly-url.html for all paginated results.

    In search console, we have the "p" parameter identified by google. 
    Now that the canonical has been added, should we still configure the parameter in search console, and tell google that it is being use for pagination?

    Thank you!

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • dohertyjf
      dohertyjf last edited by Oct 12, 2015, 6:51 PM Oct 12, 2015, 6:51 PM

      Hi Teconsite, this is a great question.

      I would not recommend marketing the "p" parameter in Search Console. Instead, I'd leave it as "Let Google Decide" and use  your pagination SEO implementation to guide the search engines.

      There is still a lot of debate around pagination as it relates to SEO. The way I have always implemented is is:

      • Every paginated page canonicals to itself, because you do not want the search engines to start ignoring your paginated pages which are there somewhat for users, but also for SEO.
      • Use rel next/prev to help Google understand that they are in pagination, which will also help them rank the beginning of pagination for the terms you are trying to rank for.
      • Use noindex/follow on pages 2-N to be sure they stay out of Google's index.
      • Use the numbers showing how long pagination is to drive the search engines deep into your pagination to get all of your products/whatever indexed.  This is often done through linking to page 1, the last page, and the 3-5 pages on either side of the page you are currently on. So page 7 of 20 would like to page 1, pages 5-9, and page 20.

      The reason most people say to canonical pages 2-N to the base page is to preserve any link equity pointing to these pages and help the first page rank. However, I have almost never seen a deep paginated page with links, and if you have architected pagination correctly then the equity going into pages 2-N will also flow to page 1, just like product pages linking to category pages.

      Hope this helps!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Gabriele_Layoutweb
        Gabriele_Layoutweb last edited by Oct 7, 2015, 12:24 PM Oct 7, 2015, 12:24 PM

        In this Moz guide regarding Google webmaster recommendations, it says you should still set the paginated page parameter in Google's Webmaster Tools:

        https://moz.com/ugc/seo-guide-to-google-webmaster-recommendations-for-pagination (search for the part "Coding Instruction for the View-All Option")

        Hope this helps!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • topic:timeago_earlier,23 days
        • anthonydnelson
          anthonydnelson @teconsite last edited by Sep 14, 2015, 12:46 PM Sep 14, 2015, 12:46 PM

          You are sort of in an odd situation. You could tell Google that the "p" parameter is for pagination and they would better understand that. However, the canonical tag usage sort of tells Google that all of your paginated pages are actually duplicates of the first page.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • teconsite
            teconsite @anthonydnelson last edited by Sep 14, 2015, 12:37 PM Sep 14, 2015, 12:37 PM

            Hello Anthony!

            Thank you for your answer. I have been reading about the rel/prev and the canonical, and I found two different points of view about this. I know the recommendation of Google is the one that you have mentioned above, but as the CMS (Prestashop) is managing the paginated results the way I have shown, that is the one I am using.

            The question is, imagine that I have implemented the canonical the way you say before (or the way I did, I doesn't really matter for my question), should I still tell google that "p" parameter is a pagination parameter in Google Webmaster Tools or it's not necessary?

            Thank you!

            anthonydnelson 1 Reply Last reply Sep 14, 2015, 12:46 PM Reply Quote 0
            • anthonydnelson
              anthonydnelson last edited by Sep 14, 2015, 10:20 AM Sep 14, 2015, 10:20 AM

              Typically, if you want to use the Canonical Tag for pagination, you would have it point to a View All style page, such as friendly-url.html&view=all.

              If you have too many products/pages in the pagination series, you might want to consider removing the canonical tag and implementing rel=prev/next. You can get more info here: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/09/pagination-with-relnext-and-relprev.html

              teconsite 1 Reply Last reply Sep 14, 2015, 12:37 PM Reply Quote 3
              • 1 / 1
              1 out of 6
              • First post
                1/6
                Last post

              Got a burning SEO question?

              Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.


              Start my free trial


              Browse Questions

              Explore more categories

              • Moz Tools

                Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

              • SEO Tactics

                Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

              • Community

                Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

              • Digital Marketing

                Chat about tactics outside of SEO

              • Research & Trends

                Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

              • Support

                Connect on product support and feature requests.

              • See all categories

              Related Questions

              • shabbirmoosa

                Rel canonical tag from shopify page to wordpress site page

                shopify wordpress canonical

                We have pages on our shopify site example - https://shop.example.com/collections/cast-aluminum-plaques/products/cast-aluminum-address-plaque That we want to put a rel canonical tag on to direct to our wordpress site page - https://www.example.com/aluminum-plaques/ We have links form the wordpress page to the shop page, and over time ahve found that google has ranked the shop pages over the wp pages, which we do not want. So we want to put rel canonical tags on the shop pages to say the wp page is the authority. I hope that makes sense, and I would appreciate your feeback and best solution. Thanks! Is that possible?

                Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jan 31, 2024, 4:19 PM | shabbirmoosa
                0
              • recbrands

                Sitemap generator which only includes canonical urls

                Does anyone know of a 3rd party sitemap generator that will only include the canonical url's?  Creating a sitemap with geo and sorting based parameters isn't the most ideal way to generate sitemaps.  Please let me know if anyone has any ideas.  Mind you we have hundreds of thousands of indexed url's and this can't be done with a simple text editor.

                Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Dec 2, 2015, 6:58 PM | recbrands
                0
              • YairSpolter

                Block in robots.txt instead of using canonical?

                When I use a canonical tag for pages that are variations of the same page, it basically means that I don't want Google to index this page. But at the same time, spiders will go ahead and crawl the page. Isn't this a waste of my crawl budget? Wouldn't it be better to just disallow the page in robots.txt and let Google focus on crawling the pages that I do want indexed? In other words, why should I ever use rel=canonical as opposed to simply disallowing in robots.txt?

                Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jul 23, 2014, 11:19 AM | YairSpolter
                0
              • Jenny1

                Partial duplicate content and canonical tags

                Hi - I am rebuilding a consumer website, and each product page will contain a unique product image, and a sentence or two about the product (and we tend to use a lot of the same words in different ways across products). I'd like to have a tabbed area below the product info that talks about the overall product line, and this content would be duplicate across all the product pages (a "Why use our products" type of thing). I'd have this duplicate content also living on its own URL's so they can be found alone in the SERP's. Question is, do I need to add the canonical tag to this page, since there's partial duplicate content on the product pages? And if I did that, would my product pages go un-indexed?? I understand how to handle completely duplicated content, it's the partial duplicate that I'm having difficulty figuring out.

                Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jan 7, 2014, 6:18 PM | Jenny1
                0
              • esiow2013

                May know what's the meaning of these parameters in .htaccess?

                Begin HackRepair.com Blacklist RewriteEngine on Abuse Agent Blocking RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^BlackWidow [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Bolt\ 0 [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Bot\ mailto:craftbot@yahoo.com [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} CazoodleBot [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^ChinaClaw [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Custo [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Default\ Browser\ 0 [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^DIIbot [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^DISCo [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} discobot [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Download\ Demon [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^eCatch [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ecxi [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^EirGrabber [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^EmailCollector [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^EmailSiphon [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^EmailWolf [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Express\ WebPictures [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^ExtractorPro [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^EyeNetIE [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^FlashGet [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^GetRight [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^GetWeb! [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Go!Zilla [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Go-Ahead-Got-It [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^GrabNet [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Grafula [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} GT::WWW [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} heritrix [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^HMView [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} HTTP::Lite [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} HTTrack [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ia_archiver [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} IDBot [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} id-search [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} id-search.org [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Image\ Stripper [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Image\ Sucker [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} Indy\ Library [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^InterGET [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Internet\ Ninja [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^InternetSeer.com [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} IRLbot [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ISC\ Systems\ iRc\ Search\ 2.1 [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Java [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^JetCar [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^JOC\ Web\ Spider [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^larbin [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^LeechFTP [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} libwww [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} libwww-perl [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Link [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} LinksManager.com_bot [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} linkwalker [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} lwp-trivial [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Mass\ Downloader [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Maxthon$ [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} MFC_Tear_Sample [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^microsoft.url [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} Microsoft\ URL\ Control [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^MIDown\ tool [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Mister\ PiX [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} Missigua\ Locator [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Mozilla.*Indy [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Mozilla.NEWT [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^MSFrontPage [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Navroad [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^NearSite [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^NetAnts [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^NetSpider [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Net\ Vampire [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^NetZIP [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Nutch [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Octopus [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Offline\ Explorer [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Offline\ Navigator [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^PageGrabber [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} panscient.com [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Papa\ Foto [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^pavuk [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} PECL::HTTP [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^PeoplePal [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^pcBrowser [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} PHPCrawl [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} PleaseCrawl [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^psbot [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^RealDownload [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^ReGet [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Rippers\ 0 [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} SBIder [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^SeaMonkey$ [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^sitecheck.internetseer.com [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^SiteSnagger [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^SmartDownload [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} Snoopy [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} Steeler [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^SuperBot [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^SuperHTTP [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Surfbot [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^tAkeOut [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Teleport\ Pro [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Toata\ dragostea\ mea\ pentru\ diavola [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} URI::Fetch [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} urllib [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} User-Agent [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^VoidEYE [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Web\ Image\ Collector [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Web\ Sucker [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} Web\ Sucker [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} webalta [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebAuto [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^[Ww]eb[Bb]andit [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} WebCollage [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebCopier [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebFetch [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebGo\ IS [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebLeacher [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebReaper [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebSauger [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Website\ eXtractor [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Website\ Quester [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebStripper [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebWhacker [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebZIP [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} Wells\ Search\ II [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} WEP\ Search [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Wget [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Widow [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WWW-Mechanize [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WWWOFFLE [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Xaldon\ WebSpider [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} zermelo [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Zeus [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^(.)Zeus.Webster [NC,OR]
                RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ZyBorg [NC]
                RewriteRule ^. - [F,L] Abuse bot blocking rule end End HackRepair.com Blacklist

                Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Sep 22, 2013, 12:47 PM | esiow2013
                1
              • deskstudio

                How to Remove Joomla Canonical and Duplicate Page Content

                I've  attempted to follow advice from the Q&A section. Currently on the site www.cherrycreekspine.com, I've edited the .htaccess file to help with 301s - all pages redirect to www.cherrycreekspine.com. Secondly, I'd added the canonical statement in the header of the web pages. I have cut the Duplicate Page Content in half ... now  I have a remaining 40 pages to fix up. This is my practice site to try and understand what SEOmoz can do for me. I've looked at some of your videos on Youtube ... I feel like I'm scrambling around to the Q&A and the internet to understand this product. I'm reading the beginners guide.... any other resources would be helpful.

                Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Nov 13, 2012, 4:06 AM | deskstudio
                0
              • Byron_W

                Duplicate Content on Wordpress b/c of Pagination

                On my recent crawl, there were a great many duplicate content penalties.  The site is http://dailyfantasybaseball.org. The issue is: There's only one post per page.  Therefore, because of wordpress's (or genesis's) pagination, a page gets created for every post, thereby leaving basically every piece of content i write as a duplicate. I feel like the engines should be smart enough to figure out what's going on, but if not, I will get hammered. What should I do moving forward? Thanks!

                Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jun 28, 2012, 1:40 PM | Byron_W
                0
              • askotzko

                Does rel=canonical fix duplicate page titles?

                I implemented rel=canonical on our pages which helped a lot, but my latest Moz crawl is still showing lots of duplicate page titles (2,000+). There are other ways to get to this page (depending on what feature you clicked, it will have a different URL) but will have the same page title. Does having rel=canonical in place fix the duplicate page title problem, or do I need to change something else? I was under the impression that the canonical tag would address this by telling the crawler which URL was the URL and the crawler would only use that one for the page title.

                Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Feb 11, 2014, 10:45 AM | askotzko
                0

              Get started with Moz Pro!

              Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

              Start my free trial
              Products
              • Moz Pro
              • Moz Local
              • Moz API
              • Moz Data
              • STAT
              • Product Updates
              Moz Solutions
              • SMB Solutions
              • Agency Solutions
              • Enterprise Solutions
              Free SEO Tools
              • Domain Authority Checker
              • Link Explorer
              • Keyword Explorer
              • Competitive Research
              • Brand Authority Checker
              • Local Citation Checker
              • MozBar Extension
              • MozCast
              Resources
              • Blog
              • SEO Learning Center
              • Help Hub
              • Beginner's Guide to SEO
              • How-to Guides
              • Moz Academy
              • API Docs
              About Moz
              • About
              • Team
              • Careers
              • Contact
              Why Moz
              • Case Studies
              • Testimonials
              Get Involved
              • Become an Affiliate
              • MozCon
              • Webinars
              • Practical Marketer Series
              • MozPod
              Connect with us

              Contact the Help team

              Join our newsletter
              Moz logo
              © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
              • Accessibility
              • Terms of Use
              • Privacy

              Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.