Organization name as text vs. as a picture with alt text + Schema.org markup
-
I'm looking for some feedback to implement best practice for the markup of our header/navigation at the top of our site.
Our organization name and a tag line is at the top of every page on the left, then our logo, then our navigation to items like "Topics" "FAQs" "About us" etc is to the right along the top.
Our organization name includes the most frequently searched keyword for what we want to rank on, and our organization name is our domain name.
A couple other background items: we're a non-profit startup and no code is public yet -- hence, I'll be explaining what we're going for. We're coding in straight html/css, not using Wordpress or anything like that.
When we originally DIY coded our draft homepage and a few landing pages, we put the organization name and tag line into the markup as text, to look like this:
Organization name | Pretty | Navigation items over here
Explanatory fun tag line | Cool |
--------------------------------------- | Logo | ---------------------------------------------------------Then we outsourced the markup of two more landing pages to a company that does on-demand orders for responsive markup, based on png's we sent of the designs. The company's code renders a fabulous looking version of our design, and important for usability, it is responsive. The company also did something else I'm not so sure of. They made one big image out of our organization name, tag line and logo ... because? The indenting and different font sizes of the Organization name and tag line was too hard to code in? Or is it just best practice for html standards, SEO, etc. to make it one big logo??
Now, as part of an overall effort I'm working on to reconcile our different code ... I'm mulling right now specifically on reconciling the different approaches we each took and incorporating new best practices for the header ... based on what I'm reading online about headers, including debates about whether to use h1 for your company name, whether using an image for the name is fine, advice about including Schema.org markup for logos, etc.
Given all this, which of these two options look better to you? Do they seem equally good to you? What would you change about the one that looks better to you? What do I have wrong in them? Or would you code this entirely differently to hit all best practices? What do you think about using h1 for organization name vs. is there a better tag to use for the organization name to code it in as text? (Note: we have other h1's on our pages for the actual article/content titles of each page, which maybe we should, maybe we shouldn't be having those as h1's?)
Option 1 -- using text for our name and tag line:
<header id="top" class="brandfont brandcolor">
[# Organization nameExplanatory fun tag line](/)
{navigation code here}
</header>Option 2 -- name, tag line and logo all as one big png image:
<header id="header" class="container">
{navigation code here}
</header> -
Well, thank you so much, I appreciate it. No need to apologize about WordPress man everybody has their own thing. Be pretty boring if everyone had the same tastes.
I think I added this reference twice but not intentionally, however, it's fantastic for schema. I also threw in a copy of one of my favorites the perfect website launch
- https://builtvisible.com/the-future-of-seo-structured-markup/
- https://pantheon.io/sites/default/files/perfect-website-launch-pantheon-ebook_0.pdf
I do believe there are huge positives to sites without databases or decouple WordPress installs are getting exciting.
I thought you might want to check it out as it is a best of both worlds use any code including and HTML and the CMS is utilized as the backend only. Decoupling the perfect blend of CMS and pretty much your choice of languages.
- https://pantheon.io/blog/decoupled-architecture-wordpress-and-drupal
- https://pantheon.io/wordpress/wordpress-enterprise-six-reasons-why
All the best,
Tom
-
Wow, you've put together a wealth of information! Thank you so much. For the community as well, this is a great collection of info about schema.org markup. It is great to get all the links, and it is great to know that you think option 2 is the better option, and it is great to get the additional examples of other schema.org markup. Apologies if I'm a little prickly about Wordpress -- I do use it for some things, but not using it here, so it is fabulous to be able to talk markup in detail with you
-
Okay, I was not trying to imply anything negative when I asked about a CMS.
You can do quite a bit with cookie-cutter WordPress you have tens of thousands of developers working on your side.
because everyone has their opinion so I wish you the very best with your site and I have added something that is great for SEO's of all levels I think it will be helpful.
- https://moz.com/beginners-guide-to-seo
- http://www.seobythesea.com/category/semantic-search/ ( Probably the foremost expert in structured data)
- http://blog.teamtreehouse.com/using-microdata-to-markup-structured-data
- https://clarknikdelpowell.com/blog/google-schema-support-for-logos-and-what-that-means-for-css/
- http://blog.teamtreehouse.com/writing-semantic-microformats-amp-microdata-in-html-markup
- https://builtvisible.com/the-future-of-seo-structured-markup/
- https://builtvisible.com/the-future-of-seo-structured-markup/
- http://tools.ranksider.com/rich-snippets
Knowledge graph important if you want that real estate to the right-hand side of your URL whenever it's queried.
[organization name]
![]([logo image url])
[Website]([website url])
Follow us on [Twitter]([profile url]), [Facebook,]([profile url]) [Google+ and]([profile url]) [LinkedIn]([profile url])."In a site design where your company/org name and logo is at the top of every page on your site, is it better to have your organization name (which contains your most important keyword) and tag line in an h1 within the header than it is to have it in an image file which gives the organization name and tag line as alt text? Or does that not matter to SEO?"
It does not matter except for being aesthetically pleasing. The H1 tag and the logo have two different roles and if there on the site H1 preferably used once with proper keywords. The logos an image, so the alt text is all Google gets in addition to indexing the image naturally. Brand awareness is important, but the logo in the left-hand corner and the logo is attractive to the end-user
"Is there some other tag that's better to use on your organization name in your header other than h1? Better for SEO and/or better for html standards and semantics?"
Use the title tag to reference your organization's name as end-users will see it before they click on your site. This is vital, and I have seen great results combining the title tag with the H1 you can use structured data as well.
"-Is putting your organization name, tag line and logo all together into one big image a best practice? I did not send the developer that as one big png. Only the logo itself was in the png I sent, and I was expecting our organization name and tag line to be coded using css styling to have the tag line indent, not for them to make a new png."
Normally yes that is the best way to do it. I cannot speak for your designer however it sounds like you are asking a designer to create CSS when you are a developer that prefers to hand build. You are going to have to work that one out with them. site speed is always affected when you add numerous CSS files. Combine them and minify them.
To answer your question between the two examples for search engine purposes there is realistically almost no difference. They are both going to function very similarly I would personally check out some generators or some sites from developers you admire. The way that your code looks is not as important is the way it functions. I think these examples have if I had to make a choice I would go with number two however you definitely want to check out schema.org
"Option 1 -- using text for our name and tag line:
<header id="top" class="brandfont brandcolor">
# Organization name
### Explanatory fun tag line{navigation code here}
</header>"
or
"Option 2 -- name, tag line and logo all as one big png image:
<header id="header" class="container">
{navigation code here}
</header>"
It’s as easy as including the following code in your website (with the correct file names and locations, of course):
[Home](http://www.yourcompany.com/) ![](http://www.yourcompany.com/logo.png) " data-snippet-id="ext.8ba7444c005a97ebcfda9fb38f150bdc" data-snippet-saved="false" data-codota-status="done"> `[Home](http://www.yourcompany.com/) ![](http://www.yourcompany.com/logo.png)`
- Best practices suggest that your logo should be a stand-alone file (not part of a banner image), visible on your home page, and should not be animated.
- If your site doesn’t use image tags to display your logo, but rather uses CSS to place your logo, you can use meta tags in your code, like this:
# [Your Company](http://www.yourcompany.com/") meta itemprop="logo" content="/images/logo.png" /> " data-snippet-id="ext.2b48ae5fa74df60ff44da6954bb1f3c2" data-snippet-saved="false" data-codota-status="done"> `# [Your Company](http://www.yourcompany.com/") meta itemprop="logo" content="/images/logo.png" />`
- Or, if your site uses JSON-LD or another supported programming syntax, you can use this code, which was added by Google last month:
{ "@context": "http://schema.org/", "@type": "Organization", "url": "http://www.yourcompany.com/", "logo": "http://www.yourcompany.com/logo.png" } " data-snippet-id="ext.c765c0f8ab5d485846e742be74338714" data-snippet-saved="false" data-codota-status="done">
Whichever code you use on your site, be sure to test it with Google’s Rich Snippets Testing Tool before going live.
What does the Schema.org markup do?
It simply tells the search engines that the image located at “http://www.yourcompany.com/logo.png” is the logo file they should use when they display it in search results.
so I would pick something a little bit more like this.
<title itemprop="name">Article's Web Page Title</title> <header> # The Article's Headline <time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="1990-11-12">November 12, 1990</time> By [Author Name](#author-profile.html) </header> Summary of the article. This could be the lead, excerpt, abstract, or introductory paragraph. The main body of the article goes here. <footer> This article was updated on <time itemprop="dateModified" datetime="2015-03-01">March 30, 2015</time> ## Related Articles [A Related Article](#related-article.html) [Another Related Article](#related-article-02.html) </footer> "> `<title itemprop="name">Article's Web Page Title</title> <header> # The Article's Headline <time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="1990-11-12">November 12, 1990</time> By [Author Name](#author-profile.html) </header> Summary of the article. This could be the lead, excerpt, abstract, or introductory paragraph. The main body of the article goes here. <footer> This article was updated on <time itemprop="dateModified" datetime="2015-03-01">March 30, 2015</time> ## Related Articles [A Related Article](#related-article.html) [Another Related Article](#related-article-02.html) </footer>`
http://codepen.io/blueprintmrk/pen/XKqwgk
I hope this helps,
Tom
-
No, we are not using a CMS. And there are no plans to start using a CMS.
If we do start using something, it would be something to manage the code, not the content. We will not be using Wordpress. We loathe Wordpress, and it is not a fit for our content to have a cookie cutter looking Wordpress site. We enjoy writing html and css, and the company I outsourced some of the html and css coding to -- the LOOK of what they delivered and its responsiveness is excellent.So we will have complete control over all the code/markup, and Wordpress won't be coming in to make our code choices redundant.
I guess the basics of my questions are -- in terms of SEO and overall best practice in your site's html:
-In a site design where your company/org name and logo is at the top of every page on your site, is it better to have your organization name (which contains your most important keyword) and tag line in an h1 within the header than it is to have it in an image file which gives the organization name and tag line as alt text? Or does that not matter to SEO?
-Is there some other tag that's better to use on your organization name in your header other than h1? Better for SEO and/or better for html standards and semantics?
-Is putting your organization name, tag line and logo all together into one big image a best practice? I did not send the developer that as one big png. Only the logo itself was in the png I sent, and I was expecting our organization name and tag line to be coded using css styling to have the tag line indent, not for them to make a new png.
-Are these two code options doing the schema.org markup correctly?
-
I will respond to this in full do you mind if I ask a quick question? Are you using a CMS
Because there is going to be a lot that you cannot necessarily control. You're asking about structure when you're talking about navigation and coding so you are going to need to develop the site with a good developer and they will most likely suggest a CMS something like WordPress I assume. This will many times make the format either redundant or not worth it. If you could break your question down into parts I would really appreciate it.
I don't see anything wrong with either one of them just remember the micro data is for end-users and Google open graph is normally what you see around the header of the website JSON-LD is completely invisible to the end-user but used by Google extensively.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How does ARIA-hidden text appear to search engines
I'm having trouble getting my accessibility team to add alt text to our site's images for SEO benefits as they feel some of it would add additional noise for screen readers. They proposed using ARIA-hidden attributes to hide the text but I'm wondering if will that be interpreted as a cloaking tactic to search engines? Also, I'm wondering if it the alt text will carry the same weight if ARIA-hidden is used. Has anyone had any experience with this? I'm having trouble finding any research on the topic.
Web Design | | KJ6001 -
Text hidden in tabs on desktop
Hello, Is it still devaluated by google ? It seems that on mobile it isn't anymore but what about desktops ? Thank you,
Web Design | | seoanalytics0 -
AMP vs Responsive Design? Mobile SEO
Hello !! We are developing a new website with responsive design. As is recommended, the idea would be to have a unique site for mobile and desktop, with same content and same url for both devices, using responsive design to adapt the layout depending on the device. My doubt in here is about the AMP pages? If my website has responsive design, perfectly optimized for mobile do I need somehow AMP pages? As far as I understand, these amp pages would be useful if I had different pages for mobile, but this is not the case. Am I correct or am I missing something? Thanks for your help :
Web Design | | AutoEurope1 -
Using Button Links vs Sidebar Menu
I have a services page with a lot of rich text and a slideshow of images. Currently, I am using a column of buttons to various services, and am wondering if a sidebar menu would be more effective for Google to crawl and rank?
Web Design | | cinchmedia0 -
Can the website pages have the site name like Title of the page | Sitename.com
Hi, Can the website pages have the site name like Title of the page | Sitename.com I have a site with 50K pages and all pages have | Sitename.com mentioned would that be a good practice or bad? Thanks Martin
Web Design | | mtthompsons0 -
Blog vs. News/Editorial Layout?
We're in the coupon blogging space & saw that one of the larger coupon sites move away from the more traditional blog layout: http://thekrazycouponlady.com they now have more of an editorial type layout. Here is another site which is more similar to our layout: http://hip2save.com. So here are my questions: Which layout type do you feel better serves their visitors & why? How does the affect the SEO of the site? How does it affect the advertising revenues? Which layout do you prefer? Is there strategy in this move for the coupon blog, or is this just a preference on how they now display their content? We're making some updates to our design soon & I wanted to get some feedback on the overall direction we take.
Web Design | | seointern0 -
One big page vs. multi-step pages
Hi mozers! Brand new to SEO and LOVING it! Having several key questions that I don't see answered yet, but I'll start with one we've been very curious about. Consider this guide we have for Forming a Delaware Corp.
Web Design | | Mase
https://www.upcounsel.com/Free-Legal/Guide/17/Form-A-Delaware-Corporation This is our overview page, giving you a breakdown of what this process involves. We love this page, but (Question1:) does it lack better real "content" rather than lots of links to the guide process itself? Then, you can start to walk through the guide beginning with step one, where each step has crowd sourced answers to it. But as you see, the step pages are all very similar, except for the answers and step info. (Question 2) Would it be better to put all our answers into the one overview page and skip having separate pages for each step? We like the process and simplicity of seeing one step at a time, but then these pages don't seem to have enough unique content on them. Related, at what point (if any) is a page too big with too much content and considered bad for SEO? We're recovering from a big hit from Google, and slowly recovering by nailing down various SEO mistakes. We DO have great, unique and valueable content - now we just need it to rank!0 -
Flat vs. Silo Site Architecture, What's Better
I'm in the midst of converting a fairly large website (500+ pages) into WordPress as a content management system. I know that there are two schools of thought regarding site architecture: Those who believe that everything should be categorized, I.E.- website.com/shoes/reebok/running People who believe that the less clicks it takes from the homepage the better. As it stands, our current site has a completely flat architecture, with landing pages being added randomly to the root, I.E.- website.com/affordable-shoes-in-louisville-ky I'm beginning to think that there is a gray area with this. I spoke to someone who says that you should never have a page more than 2 categories/subfolders deep. But if we plan on adding a lot of content doesn't it make sense to set the site up into many categories so we can set a good foundation for adding massive amounts of content. Also, will 301 redirecting to the new structure cause us to lose rankings for certain terms? Any help here is appreciated.
Web Design | | C-Style0