What to do about endless size pages
-
I'm working on a site that sells products that come in many different sizes. One product may come in 30 sizes.The products themselves are identical, except for the size. There are collections pages that are all of several kinds of product in a particular size and then there are individual product pages of one product the specific size. Collections pages for widgets size 30 is the same content as widgets size 29. A single product page for gold-widget-size-30 is the same content as the single product page gold-widget-size-29.
To make matters worse, they all have the same tags and very little written content. The site is in Shopify. Last month there were almost 400 pages that produced visits on organic, mostly in the 1 to 4 per month range, but all together about 1000 visits.
There are several hundred more that produced no traffic in organic, but are duplicate (except for size) and part of this giant ball of tangled string.
What do you think I should do?
Thanks... Mike
-
Hi Nigel,
Thanks for the message. So, just to cap on this, I've got:
150 pages that got any kind of organic landing last month.
115 of those pages are 1 visit out 13000 visits
525 pages in the sitemap
4300 pages in Google's index
if you were me you would noindex/de-index all but about 50 that either have traffic or am working on it and then noindex/deindex/remove from sitemap 4250 pages?
How would I even get a list of everything in Google's index?
Just wondering about the actual process for fixing this.
Thanks! Best... Mike
-
Hi Michael,
Yes - OK forget the brand pages - I had to make some assumptions from what you had written.
Cut it down and write contextually strong descriptive content 3-400 words at category & Sub-cat level.
I work with a lot of eCommerce sites that have fallen victim to pernicious tags, sizes and colours appending themselves to every version of a page.
It might look great having 50000 pages splattered all over Google but can you honestly say that they provide value and a good UX for the consumer?
Make each page sing for it's supper. Have a keywords or small group of contextually similar content for each page and add the written content and you will nail it.
Use MOZ Keyword explorer to provide you will the closely matched keywords,
I hope that helps,
Kind Regards
Nigel
-
Hi Egol & Nigel,
Egol, I always appreciate your answers over the years - thank you!
The site has a Moz domain authority of 37. It's in a organic/product niche with Amazon, Nordstrom, and about a buzzillion other national brand retailers. It makes and sells only its own products.
When you say, "if you have a weak site and you need highly optimized pages to get the traffic, then I might keep things "as is," I get confused. As it is, we have an endless number of duplicate pages. Shouldn't I just pick my winners (adding content there), noindex/nofollow and de-index?
If so, what do I do about the ones that randomly produce in organic search now? Same thing and suffer the loss?
Nigel, super interesting post... thank you! I'm not sure I totally understood everything. The site is the brand, not a retailer of others brands. In any case, you're saying cut it way down?
Thanks!
Best... Mike
-
Sorry but I think the opposite.
If you are a weak site with few back links and a low domain authority then you need to concentrate as much juice through as fewer pages as possible whilst retaining a strong fairly flat hierarchy. You don't have the option of doing nothing as you are cannibalizing your site in search.
I deduce from what you are saying that you have this problem.
Site/size
Site/Collection-1/Size
Site/Collection-2/Sub-collection-1/SizeSo the size filter can be applied to any part of the site at collection level. You may also have
Site/Brand/Size
Site/Brand/Collection/Size
Site/Brand/Collection/Sun-Collection-1/SizeThen you will have maybe
Site/Sale/Size
Site/Sale/Collection-1/Size
Site/Sale/Colelction-1/Sub-collection-1/SizeOn top of this problem you will have
Site/Brand/Product-1/Size-29
Site/Brand/Product-1/Size-30Etc
I hope I am right!
Solution for Brands and Categories
it is better to have size as a tag and noindex/nofollow the tag group so that none of these extra pages get indexed in Google. This will make an enormous difference to your website slashing the number of pages with skinny content and visits right down.
You simply can not have these pages:
Site/Brand/Size
Competing with the main brand page ie
Site/Brand/
I don't know how many sizes you have but say there are 20, then it's like having 20 duplicates of the brand page, the category page, the category/sub category page.
Solution For Products.
Have one product page:
Site/Brand/Product-1
The sizes can then drop down on the page without changing the URL - the canonical on any size is thus
Site/Brand/Product-1
Some sites will append the tag for size thus:
Site/Brand/Product-1#size30
With the size as an attribute - everything after the # is not indexable as Google does not go beyond a #
It would also be prudent to do this for colour as well otherwise you will get mass duplication at colour level. That should also be treated as a tag or attribute that does not append to every version of a page.
I really do hope I have understood this correctly.
I repeat, You don't have the option of doing nothing as you are cannibalizing your site for search.
eCommerce site structure is core to my business.
Kind Regards
Nigel
-
My answer would depend upon two things... 1) the strength of your website, and 2) the number and strength of your competitors.
If you have a really strong site and weak competition then I would have a small number of pages with a lot of products on each page. It will probably rank well against the competition for even the very specific queries.
However, if you have a weak site and you need highly optimized pages to get the traffic, then I might keep things "as is".
We started out with the first option and that worked great for years. Now the competition is getting fierce and we might go with a larger number of pages to keep holding them off.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is this page low quality?
Hey everyone, I need some help defining a post whether it is low quality or not. I got a post and it's a roundup post having 5 lists of fonts for free download. I actually linked to the sites from where anyone can download the font. The post is driving 300 visits a day but the bounce rate is too high around 90% and the time spent on the post is about 20 seconds on average (I checked it under GA Behaviour > Site Content > Landing pages). Also, I checked the traffic of those sites which I'm pointing in the roundup post and in their referral traffic my website is contributing. Does this mean that people clicking on the post from SERPs then quickly visiting the site to download the font as there are only 6 fonts featured in the post to download (due to six font they are not spending time)? Should I need to improve it or the page is answering query fast? Any thoughts are welcome.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bunnypundir0 -
Google is indexing wrong page for search terms not on that page
I’m having a problem … the wrong page is indexing with Google, for search phrases “not on that page”. Explained … On a website I developed, I have four products. For example sake, we’ll say these four products are: Sneakers (search phrase: sneakers) Boots (search phrase: boots) Sandals (search phrase: sandals) High heels (search phrase: high heels) Error: What is going “wrong” is … When the search phrase “high heels” is indexed by Google, my “Sneakers” page is being indexed instead (and ranking very well, like #2). The page that SHOULD be indexing, is the “High heels” page (not the sneakers page – this is the wrong search phrase, and it’s not even on that product page – not in URL, not in H1 tags, not in title, not in page text – nowhere, except for in the top navigation link). Clue #1 … this same error is ALSO happening for my other search phrases, in exactly the same manner. i.e. … the search phrase “sandals” is ALSO resulting in my “Sneakers” page being indexed, by Google. Clue #2 … this error is NOT happening with Bing (the proper pages are correctly indexing with the proper search phrases, in Bing). Note 1: MOZ has given all my product pages an “A” ranking, for optimization. Note 2: This is a WordPress website. Note 3: I had recently migrated (3 months ago) most of this new website’s page content (but not the “Sneakers” page – this page is new) from an old, existing website (not mine), which had been indexing OK for these search phrases. Note 4: 301 redirects were used, for all of the OLD website pages, to the new website. I have tried everything I can think of to fix this, over a period of more than 30 days. Nothing has worked. I think the “clues” (it indexes properly in Bing) are useful, but I need help. Thoughts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MG_Lomb_SEO0 -
Drop in Indexed pages
Hope everyone is having an Awesome December! I first noticed a drop in my index in the beginnings of November. My site drop in indexed pages from 1400 to 600 in the past 3-4 weeks. I don't know the cause of it, and would like the community to help me figure out why my indexing has dropped. Thank you for taking time out of your schedule to read this.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BSC0 -
How to 301 Redirect /page.php to /page, after a RewriteRule has already made /page.php accessible by /page (Getting errors)
A site has its URLs with php extensions, like this: example.com/page.php I used the following rewrite to remove the extension so that the page can now be accessed from example.com/page RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}.php -f
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | rcseo
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ $1.php [L] It works great. I can access it via the example.com/page URL. However, the problem is the page can still be accessed from example.com/page.php. Because I have external links going to the page, I want to 301 redirect example.com/page.php to example.com/page. I've tried this a couple of ways but I get redirect loops or 500 internal server errors. Is there a way to have both? Remove the extension and 301 the .php to no extension? By the way, if it matters, page.php is an actual file in the root directory (not created through another rewrite or URI routing). I'm hoping I can do this, and not just throw a example.com/page canonical tag on the page. Thanks!0 -
Pages that 301 redirect to a 404
We are going through a website redesign that involves changing URL's for the pages on our site. Currently all our pages are in the format domain.com/example.html and we are moving to stip off the .html file extension so it would just be domain.com/example We have thousands of pages as the site deals with news so building a redirect for each individual page isn't really feasible. My plan is to have a generic rewrite rule that redirects any page that ends .html to the stripped off version of this. A problem I can see with this is that it will also redirect pages that don't exist. So for example, domain.com/non-existant-page.html would 301 to domain.com/non-existant-page which would then return a 404 status. What would the SEO repercussions be for this? Obviously if a page doesn't exist already then it shouldn't show up in the search engine indexes and shouldn't be a problem but I'm a bit worried about how old pages that currently legitimately 404 will be treated when they start to 301 redirect to a 404 instead. Not sure if there any other potential issues from this that I've missed either? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sbb0240 -
A Landing Page Goldmine?
If anyone can take a minute to help me out with this, I'd really love to get some expert opinions. I can produce really strong content like a machine and, over the years, I've had tons of pages on my website that had links pointing to them (didn't know about SEO then) deleted and now I'm starting to dig them up. I have dozens with a moz rank higher than 25. My question is what do I do with these urls, should I rewrite them and get the innerlinking strength or should I do a 301 redirect to a similar page? Considering the incoming links and individual seomoz pr rank of these pages , am I sitting on something valuable?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ksundheim10 -
Duplicate URL home page
I just got a duplicate URL error on by SEOMOZ report - and I wonder if I should worry about it Assume my site is named www.widgets.com I'm getting duplicate url from http://www.widgets.com & http://www.widgets.com/ Do the search engines really see this as different on the home page? The general drift on the web is that You site should look like Home page = http://www.widgets.com And subpages http://www.widgets.com/widget1/ Of course it seems as though the IIS7 slash tool will rewrite everything Including the home page to a slash.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ThomasErb0 -
Multiple URLs for the same page
I am working with a client and recently discovered that they have several URLs that go to the same page. http://www.maps.com/FunFacts.aspx
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | WebMarketingandDesign
http://www.maps.com/funfacts.aspx
http://www.maps.com/FunFacts.aspx?nav=FF
http://www.maps.com/FunFacts.aspx?nav=FS
http://www.maps.com/funfacts.aspx?nav=FF
http://www.maps.com/funfacts.aspx?nav=ffhttp://www.maps.com/FunFacts.aspx?nav=MShttp://www.maps.com/funfacts.aspx?nav=
http://www.maps.com/FunFacts.aspx?nav=FF#
http://www.maps.com/FunFacts
http://www.maps.com/funfacts.aspx?.nav=FF I am afraid this is happening all over the site. So, my question is: Is this hurting the SEO and how? If so what is the best way to go about fixing this problem? Thanks for your help!0