SEO threats of moving from [.com.au] domain to [.com] domain for a 15yr old SAAS company.
-
Hey Guys.
I work for a 15 yr old SAAS company which originally started with a country-specific [.com.au] domain and later got a [.com] domain as the business grew. The AU website has a DA:56 while the [.com] has as DA: 25. Now we are looking to have everything migrated to the [.com] domain.
But, my concern is that we might lose the SEO value of the AU domain. I was wondering if anyone has any experience in this or recommend a case study on this topic.
Thanks!
Allan
-
Very useful answer Mike Tekula
-
Hi Allan,
A lot of this depends on what else will be changing in this process outside of the domain name.
Probably the best and most detailed case study of such a domain migration was featured here at Moz: https://moz.com/blog/domain-migration-lessons
Individual experience varies and is always anecdotal (what happened in one or even 10 examples doesn't necessarily predict what will happen with your site). I've seen both cases where this goes fairly smoothly and cases where Google seems to ignore some portion of the link equity acquired to the old domain resulting in a net loss of traffic.
There is plenty to look out for here, but if your site platform, information architecture, content, etc are all remaining static during the domain change (recommended), primarily you're going to want to ensure you don't lose any link equity in the process by setting a global page-level redirect with 301 response codes and that all of your tracking and configurations in platforms like Google Search Console are set up properly for the new domain. On that note, you'll also want to use the "Change of Address" tool within Search Console when you make this change.
This post from Builtvisible provides some helpful detail on how to approach the redirection process - but as above, if the site is otherwise remaining static, you should be able to handle this with a global patter-matched redirect (vs the painstaking process of setting page-to-page redirects).
Where possible, if you can have links pointing to your site (on other sites) updated to reflect the new TLD, that'd be ideal.
After the migration, I'd recommend you pull a list of your top linked pages from Moz Link Explorer, AHREFS or similar, crawl the full list and ensure that the redirects are firing properly (301 response codes, single-hop redirects and the final destination URL is valid/live on the new site).
Overall, this is one of those gray areas in SEO - it's a sensitive process and I would expect a period of traffic drops as Google crawls and indexes your new pages and attributes PageRank to them properly.
Best of Luck,
Mike -
Based on my experience I can tell you that you minimize the drops in traffic and visibility but you can not avoid it. There are many site migration types. It all depends on the nature of the changes that take place.
- Site location changes
- Platform changes
- Content changes
- Structural changes
- Design changes
Your case is a site location or domain migration. Google’s documentation mostly covers migrations with site location changes, which are categorized as follows:
- Site moves with URL changes
- Site moves without URL changes
First, need to prepare a migration plan. First of all, need to run an audit for your site, in my opinion, Screamingfrog or Raven Tool are the best options to perform this task.
- Site structure
- Content
- Internal Links
- Search Console, Google Analytics and Tag Manager
**_Split your move into smaller steps. _**I recommend initially moving just a piece of the site to test any effects on traffic and search indexing. After that, you can move the rest of your site all at once or in chunks. Also keep in mind that while moving just one section is a great way to test your move, it's not necessarily representative of a whole site move when it comes to search. The more pages that you move, the more likely you'll encounter additional problems to solve. Careful planning can minimize problems.
**Time your move to coincide with lower traffic **If your traffic is seasonal or dips on certain weekdays, it makes sense to move your site during traffic lulls. This lowers the impact of anything that breaks and also dedicates more of your server’s power to helping Googlebot update our index.
Expect temporary fluctuation With any significant change to a site, you may experience ranking fluctuations while Google recrawls and re-indexes your site. As a general rule, a medium-sized website can take a few weeks for most pages to move in our index; larger sites can take longer. The speed at which Googlebot discover and process URLs largely depends on the number of URLs and your server speed. Submitting a sitemap can help make the discovery process quicker, and it's fine to move your site in sections. If it involves a URL change, you might consider an A/B test or trial run.
A quick tip that nobody will mention. Starts to build links to your new domain before the migration.
- Search Console Migration https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/83106?hl=en
- Google Analytics Migration https://torpedogroup.com/blog/post/google-analytics-changing-domains
Regards and Good Luck
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Any recent updates from Google or community on sub domains vs sub directories?
Hi all, This has been a debate for years and I have noticed most of the SEOs suggest to go or switch to sub directories instead of sub domains. Still is this the same or any new updates from Google or SEO community? We have moved a sub domain to sub directory last year. The result was sub directory content started ranking good; but no change in website rankings. Because of moving sub domains to sub directories, will the linkjuice/PR of the website gets diluted as the number of pages increases which will takeaway soe authority? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Using Brand value for SEO: Can we use keyword with brand name?
Hi Moz community, I am curious to know this. Let's say there is a brand value for a company. It has it's own popularity that it's been mentioned across the internet and social media directly with brand name without their service or industry keyword. Now if the company started promoting themselves like keyword along with their brand name, will it help them to rank for that keyword. For example, Moz is already famous, now they want to rank for "SEO" and related keywords, so they started calling themselves on internet "Moz SEO"; will this fetch them in ranking for keyword SEO? My ultimate question is, using primary keyword along with brand name will work out in ranking for that primary keyword or not? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Is it bad from an SEO perspective that cached AMP pages are hosted on domains other than the original publisher's?
Hello Moz, I am thinking about starting to utilize AMP for some of my website. I've been researching this AMP situation for the better part of a year and I am still unclear on a few things. What I am primarily concerned with in terms of AMP and SEO is whether or not the original publisher gets credit for the traffic to a cached AMP page that is hosted elsewhere. I can see the possible issues with this from an SEO perspective and I am pretty sure I have read about how SEOs are unhappy about this particular aspect of AMP in other places. On the AMP project FAQ page you can find this, but there is very little explanation: "Do publishers receive credit for the traffic from a measurement perspective?
Algorithm Updates | | Brian_Dowd
Yes, an AMP file is the same as the rest of your site – this space is the publisher’s canvas." So, let's say you have an AMP page on your website example.com:
example.com/amp_document.html And a cached copy is served with a URL format similar to this: https://google.com/amp/example.com/amp_document.html Then how does the original publisher get the credit for the traffic? Is it because there is a canonical tag from the AMP version to the original HTML version? Also, while I am at it, how does an AMP page actually get into Google's AMP Cache (or any other cache)? Does Google crawl the original HTML page, find the AMP version and then just decide to cache it from there? Are there any other issues with this that I should be aware of? Thanks0 -
What is your experience with markups (schema.org) in terms of SEO and best practice learnings?
Hi, I am looking to implement schema markups into a variety of websites and currently wondering about best practices. I am working on energy providers, building material, e-retailers, social association among others. While I understand every single one of these is an individual case, I could do with some advices from you, guys. Which markups would you consider key for search engines? I would have naturally chosen markups to highlight the business name, location and products but there is so much more to schema.org! Thanks,
Algorithm Updates | | A_Q0 -
Yoast SEO plugin and Weak Links
The plugin has what I thought was a great feature. My main site is often scrapped and I thought 'well at least we're getting a Link out of it' - due to the RSS feature of Yoast's Wordpress SEO plugin (you can add a link to the bottom of your RSS feeds). Now Google is talking about Links from weak/crap sites and how they may impact your rankings. So - with this in mind.. Do we want links from scrappers? Are we now better off discontinuing the usage of this feature? I imagine there may be varying opinions on this so I'll open it as a discussion... thanks
Algorithm Updates | | TheHockeyWriters0 -
Another Domain ranking instead of my Domain
Hi My Domain name is Replicahause.net, 2 weeks ago my server had an outage for 3 days and my rankings dissappeared in google entirely, however i also noticed that when i typed in my domain name "replicahause" or "replicahause.net" , i would see abhishekyadav.com appearing on #1 in google which does a 301 into Replicahause.net I was able to convince the owner of Abhishekyadav to remove the 301 but my site Replicahause.net's Rankings still does not appear to have come back to google, is there something i'm missing here ? We were ranked #1 to #10 for at least 40 keywords, they've just seemed to dissappeard after the server downtime we had and the 301 from AbhishekYadav.com Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | jansimon0 -
SEO updates and rank changes
We have been updating page titles and meta descriptions for a client (not changing ANY links and the content we are replacing is "fluff," no major keywords or any relevant information) yet in the past few weeks, rankings have plummeted. I used the SEOMoz grader to check and make sure we have the keywords in there, in the right places for the updated page source info, and we're getting A's yet for those same keywords, the website is nowhere to be found. For example for the phrase "organic t shirts," we get an A for this page: http://greenpromotionalitems.com/organic-t-shirts.htm but when searching organic t shirts, no Green Promotional Items... Ideas?
Algorithm Updates | | laidlawseo0