Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Kind of duplicate categories and custom taxonomy. Necessary, but bad for SEO?
-
Hello Everyone! I'm new here!
My husband and I are working on creating a website: https://sacwellness.com .The site is an online therapist directory for the the Sacramento California area.
Our problem is this: In wordpress our category system is being used for blog posts. Our theme is using a custom taxonomy system to categorize different therapist specialties, therapeutic approaches, etc. We've found ourselves in a position where our custom taxonomy and categories are near duplicates.
for example we have the blog categories: ADHD counseling, Anxiety therapy, and Career counseling
our corresponding custom taxonomy/therapist categories are: ADHD, Anxiety, and....(oops) career counseling.
My understanding is that google doesn't see a difference between identically named categories and custom taxonomies and will so choose one to rank and disregard the other, effectively leaving you competing against yourself.
-
is this true in a case like this? Can google maybe understand the difference because of the custom taxonomy and/or URL paths?
-
if this is a problem is it ok to have near duplicates....like ADHD vs. ADHD counseling. This has been our solution so far....but now we're questioning it....derp x_x.
-
I thought about tagging the categories with no index, but I think the archive pages would be useful for people. Essentially we have 2 sets of archives for each keyword. One is for blog posts, and one is for therapists who work with that particular issue along with the 6 most recent blog posts in that category.....because we are putting the 6 most recent blog posts at the bottom of the therapist pages I feel like it wouldn't be as terrible of a loss if we had to noindex the category pages.
....what do you think?
Thank you!
-
-
Roman,
I'm a newbie to SEO and reading this thread along with tons of other material. I just wanted to thank you for taking the time creating all these in-depth answers. They are very helpful!! I've heard all this content before, but haven't fully put it together in my head yet. So this case study is helpful and valuable. Thanks again!
-
....actually, I didn't know about the "page%%" at the end of several of my google snippets.....looks like I messed that up in Yoast too . Thanks for catching that one ^_^
-
Lolol. Roman, I really appreciate all of the work you're putting into this. You are sending me a lot of really useful information. But none of it is answering any of my questions lolol. You're meta answering my question :-p. You're telling me about all of the issues that are caused by my problem, which we are aware of....we just need help with the problem.
I'm aware of the category meta issues and the titles being off. They are like that because I am currently trying to find an answer to the question I am posting this thread for:
The way my site is set up requires me to have categories and custom taxonomy to function. I am using the categories for blog posts and the custom taxonomy for listings. Both need to address the same issues, ie category: ADHD and cust. tax: ADHD.
- Is this a problem for google? Can it tell the difference between a blog archive and a listing archive based on the content rather than the category or cust. tax title?
2)Would it be best for me to just noindex my blog categories even though they contain useful content?
You had suggested noindexing the blog archives, which is what I am thinking too, I just really want to be sure before I do it. I think I just have to come to terms with the fact that my blog has useful content, but the reason I want people to find my site is for listings....does that seem like sound reasoning?
I feel like I should put all of this in context again. My site has only been live for 4 months. It is ranking in the first two pages of google for over 200 of the 900 keywords we're tracking. Our category pages are messed up right now because I am trying to figure out this issue and because I made a big mistake a couple of months ago and noindexed all of the listing archives x_x. Given all of this, I think we're doing pretty well so far.
....I guess one of my other hesitations about noindexing the blog categories is the fact that google has not finished processing my request to fix my noindex mistake. Right now it has only processed 18 of the 80 URLS I submitted for validation a little over a month ago....I'm worried that if I noindex my blog categories right now then I will lose a lot of ranking.....What do you think? if I go this route of noindexing the categories should I wait till google finishes validating the corresponding custom taxonomies?
Thank you for your help!
- Is this a problem for google? Can it tell the difference between a blog archive and a listing archive based on the content rather than the category or cust. tax title?
-
Please read this articles
- https://zyppy.com/site-architecture-seo/
- https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2008/10/importance-of-link-architecture.html
- https://yoast.com/site-structure-the-ultimate-guide/
- https://doyouevenblog.com/seo-category-pages/
Let use a simple search operator --> sacwellness.com "ADHD counseling"
Let's take your own keywords as examples
ADHD counseling, Anxiety therapy, and Career counselingLet use a simple search operator
sacwellness.com "ADHD counseling"And these are the results according to Google ( Please check how bad are these pages 7 of 10 have errors on the title ) So I'm not talking about complex error related to taxonomies or indexability
- https://sacwellness.com/category/adhd-counseling/
- https://sacwellness.com/adhd-counseling/top-ten-fidget-toys/
- https://sacwellness.com/tag/adhd/
- https://sacwellness.com/listing-category/child-counseling/
- https://sacwellness.com/category/suicide/
**Let's take one of the results, check this page, the meta tags have no relation to the content inside the page. The title, description, and content inside. This is how Google actually see your site **
_PTSD and Trauma page%% - SacWellness.com ---> Title _
https://sacwellness.com/category/ptsd-and-trauma/ ----> URL
Aug 2, 2018 - write a guest blog for our site! We will feature it on our front page for a week or two and include it in our social media advertising. footer.Let's use another simple search operator
site://sacwellness.comAnd according to google your most relevant pages are home, blog, and contact. I mean we are talking about a directory. Even worst just take some of your keywords "ADHD counseling" and look for the same category on any other directory
How do you expect rank a page for this keyword **"ADHD counseling" **if even the most basic aspects such as titles and description are wrong? How do you expect that Google recognizes them?
-
I'm wondering if I'm right to assume that google will be able to tell the difference between these two on its own and despite their category titles, will see that one is about a topic and the other is about therapists who work with that topic.
-
Hi Roman, Thanks again for the in depth answer! ^_^...I think I probably should have mentioned in the beginning of my post that I have pretty much been a 20+hour/week SEO for the last 4 years. I'm familiar with crawling and crawl budget. I've just never made a directory before or anything that included custom taxonomy. We have spent a lot of work on our site structure and feel like its pretty good for what we need. The issue is just the conflict between categories and custom taxonomy. I know we really should have a better hierarchy with broader categories and then tags, but we could only really think of 2 possible parent categories: basically diagnoses and not diagnoses....but 98% of our blogging content revolves around diagnoses/therapeutic issues.
- my understanding is that google will choose the page it thinks is most relevant and index that one, not ignore competing pages and list none of them.
2) "As I see you have a blog and also have a listing pages you can use the custom taxonomies for listing and categories for the blog"
-yes. This is what we have done. and this is the problem we are trying to sort out, because our categories and custom taxonomy overlap and/or are similar. We'd be open to canonical tags or redirecting the blog categories to the custom taxonomy pages, but that really feels like we would be losing something. The blog archives and the listing archives offer distinctly different content to users....aside from the fact that listing archives also contain the most recent 6 blog posts in their relevant category.- We've done everything you've mentioned in #3....just not in a super great way because we couldn't really think of parent categories :-p.
so given all of the previous information. Do we need to change things? can google handle the categories and custom taxonomies if one for example is ADHD and the other is ADHD counseling? Do we need to noindex the blog archives?....I can't really think of another solution if this is truly an issue.
.......I mean how do other people do this? lets say you have a shoe store and it contains custom taxonomy for types of shoes for sale, but you also have a blog that needs to talk about different types of shoes.....if you have a blog archive about sneakers and a custom taxonomy for sneakers that you're selling.....how do you distinguish these for google?
-
1) can I have one set of categories and another set that are pretty much the same but with the word "therapy" or "counseling" tacked on and have Google recognize both of them?
Before to talk more in deep about taxonomies I think is important to you get understanding of some concepts
Crawl budget: Crawl budget is the number of pages Google will crawl on your site on any given day. This number varies slightly from day to day, but overall it’s relatively stable. The number of pages Google crawls, your “budget”, is generally determined by the size of your site, the “health” of your site (how many errors Google encounters) and the number of links to your site.
https://yoast.com/crawl-budget-optimization/
- Crawled pages: When Google visits your website for tracking purposes. This process is done by Google’s Spider crawler.
- Indexed pages: After crawling has been done, the results get put onto Google’s index (i.e. web search).
- Keyword Intent: Basically is the goal behind any search
Let me explain with a very basic example, let's take 3 simple keywords
- Dentist Tampa Florida - Volume: 20
- Tampa Dentist - Volume: 20
- Cosmetic Dentist Tampa FL - Volume: 20
So the main point here is, you or any other SEO can try to rank for 1 or 2 or even 3 keywords and does not matter at all, From the Google point of view, all of them have the same intents (and that is a crucial point). So that means for Google hey... There are 60 users looking for a dentist on Tampa Florida and this is the main point for SEO. This is what is really matter on SEO. Google. Will try the give them the best possible result for that intent.
Talking about your case if you have 1 category page using a single keyword and 1 custom taxonomy using a close related keyword probably both of them will be competing for the same intent, so if Google can't decide which one of those pages have value or which one is better well, it will ignore both of them.
2) Would it be better just to no-index my blog categories and keep the custom taxonomy indexed since they hold the 6 most recent posts in a given category? In my opinion that's the best option, there are other options such as add canonical tags or redirect. You need to check your Search Console. If those pages have been indexed you should redirect them. As I see you have a blog and also have a listing pages you can use the custom taxonomies for listing and categories for the blog
3) Is this even a problem at all? Yes, this is a problem and in your case is a big problem mainly because your site is a directory site and the hierarchy of your site is the core for users and crawlers. You have a niche website, so you don't need too many backlinks or social media presence, you just need a good site structure and a good on-page optimization that all you need to rank your site. Your site structure depends on your taxonomies, categories and tags.
How to structure your website
We’ll take you through all the steps of creating a rock solid
structure for your website!1 Create an overview of your pages
2 Organize your content as a pyramid
3 Define a menu
4 Name your sections
5 Add internal links to strengthen the structure
6 Reflect the structure in breadcrumbsThe structure of your website should be like a pyramid. On the top of
the pyramid is your homepage, and beneath the homepage are some
category pages. Category pages bundle your listing or posts in
groups with related content. To create even smaller groups within
your categories you can use tags or subcategories.Once you’ve developed your new site structure correctly, you should
consider how you’re going to connect the sections of this pyramid.
Think of these sections as small pyramids inside your larger pyramid.
Each page at the top of that pyramid should link to all its sub-pages
and the other way around.Since you’re linking from pages that are closely related to each other
content-wise, you’re increasing your site’s possibility to rank. You’re
‘helping’ the search engine out by showing it what’s related and what
isn’t.So the way you config the URL of your site (URL Structure) and the way you connect your pages (Internal links) is the way of how Google determinate which pages are important on your site. Here is where concepts like crawl budget and **indexed pages become important **
If the answer were useful don't forget to mark it as a Good Answer... Cheers and Good Luck
-
Awesome! thanks for doing such an in depth look Roman ^^. Our categories and custom taxonomies aren't ranking right now because I made a mistake and noindexed them on a Yoast update a couple of months ago. lolololol.....it sucks but we've been catching up over the last month ^^. Our 900 keywords tracked in SerpFox went up almost 6,000 rankings in the last 2 weeks.
We did a lot of research before we started and picked our keywords carefully....we just didn't realize the potential conflict presented by dupilicate/similar categories and taxonomies. Our site opened to indexing only a little over 4 months ago, so its going to take some time to rank.
So what do you think? Is my concern an actual problem? In short:
-
can I have one set of categories and another set that are pretty much the same but with the word "therapy" or "counseling" tacked on and have google recognize both of them?
-
would it be better just to noindex my blog categories and keep the custom taxonomy indexed since they hold the 6 most recent posts in a given category?
-
Is this even a problem at all? When we first started the site we were of the thought that google woud be able to tell the difference between blog/adhd and therapists/adhd and rank the two as separate archives related to ADHD. This is the core conflict. Is this an issue or do you think we're ok?
-
-
Ok I took the time to
I took the time to analyze your site
- Screamingfrog to check some technical aspect
- Ahrefs to check your site structure
- Majestic to check your trust-flow and so on
This what I found
- Moz: DA:7
- Ahrefs: UR:9
- Ahrefs: DR:2.1
- 264 Pages according to Screamingfrog
This is my honest point of view
First Point: If you don't know if which is better custom taxonomies or default that means that you didn't a good research or even worst you didn't a research. When you run a research you create your site structure and match all your target keyword with the specific page for that specific keyword. I usually create an excel file with my list of all keywords in collum the specific page for that keyword, I also add the URL, Title, Meta description, canonical etc. So your main problem is not related to custom taxonomies or categories your main problem is the lack of planning.
- So the first step that you need to do is run a **content audit ( basically make an inventory of your content and create a structure that means URL structure and internal links structure and selects your taxonomies and your keywords) **If you do that then you will have a clear idea of which taxonomy is better for your site.
Second Point: I don't know why are focusing on your taxonomies and categories. None of them are even ranking they are not even in the first top 50 pages of your site, why? because you don't have a site structure ( add categories or taxonomy to your site does not mean that you have a site structure)
These are your top 10 pages
- https://sacwellness.com/listing/joe-borders-mft/?lpc_loc=60
- https://sacwellness.com/listing/lindsay-goodlin-lcsw/?lpc_loc=60
- https://sacwellness.com/listing/eunie-jung-ph-d/?lpc_loc=60
- https://sacwellness.com/gender-issues/world-health-organization-to-stop-labeling-transgender-people-as-mentally-ill/
- https://sacwellness.com/listing/the-place-within-counseling-folsom/?lpc_loc=18
- https://sacwellness.com/listing/mike-everson-lmft/?lpc_loc=11
- https://sacwellness.com/listing/joan-druckman-phd/?lpc_loc=18
- https://sacwellness.com/listing/elizabeth-defazio-rn-ms/?lpc_loc=60
- https://sacwellness.com/listing/mitch-darnell-ms-osm-ctrc/?lpc_loc=60
- https://sacwellness.com/listing/william-schneider-laadc-ca-icadc/?lpc_loc=Sacramento
So, in summary, how do you fix this problem
- Create an inventory of all your pages
- Create a keyword research for those pages
- Match your keywords with your pages
- Optimize your URL structure (Dynomaper, Sitebulb, or Semrush can be a good option)
- Create an internal links structure which reflects the hierarchy of your site
- Implement schemas to your site
- Implement amp to your site
As see you are running a directory site that means you will need to have an almost perfect technical SEO, you need to worry about inbound links or social media or stuff like that you need to focus on all your technical aspect in order to rank your site.
If you are interested I can share with you the audit that I made just send a PM
Good luck and have a nice day
-
But that's part of the problem they're both valuable content and different from each other. If I choose one over the other then I'm losing out on some SEO juice and preventing some valuable content from being indexed. It would basically amount to indexing the pages that have therapists on them and the 6 most recent blog posts in that category OR the blog archive pages.
-
In your case, if you have taxonomies and categories competing for the same keyword is pretty easy, select one them and optimize them.
-
Does anybody have any ideas for this one?
-
Yes, we're very familiar with the differences between categories and tags. What do you think about my question?
-
To help you understand taxonomy systems, first let me explain the
difference between categories, subcategories, and tags. Categories are
used to create large groups within your site. They bundle content that
has a similar high-level topic. Products or blog posts on your site
should fall into a category (a shop category or a blog category).
Because categories are hierarchical they can have subcategories.
Sub-categories fall into at least one category. They bundle a smaller
group of products into a category. Subcategories can have
subcategories too, which bundle an even smaller group, and so on.
By creating categories and subcategories you’ll create a treelike
structure.Tags on the other hand just group content on certain topics together.
Tags are not hierarchical. You can see them as an index of your site.
They’ll not necessarily fall into a category. They can apply to
products, but to other site content as well.You can have both a hierarchical and a non-hierarchical taxonomy
system for your website. Ideally, these taxonomy systems are much
alike. For example, you could have a blog on an eCommerce site. In
this case, you’d probably write a lot on topics related to your products.
Maybe about events where you use them, or what to use them for,
how to use them best, comparisons between different products etc.
Therefore, it makes sense that your tags will partly overlap with the
product categories and subcategories of your shop. This is ok. Because
in the end, you’d like to rank with those posts to draw people to the
products you sell. And, if you group products, whether that’s in
categories or tags, it’s easier to make them rank.Category archives are landing pages
Your category archives are more important than individual pages and
posts. Those archives should be the first result in the search engines.
That means those archives are your most important landing pages.
Thus, they should also provide the best user experience. The more
likely your individual pages are to expire, the more this is true. In a
shop, your products might change, making your categories more
important to optimize. Otherwise, you’d be optimizing pages that
are going to be gone a few weeks/months later.Categories prevent individual pages from competing
If you sell boxers and you optimize every product page, all those
pages will compete for the term ‘boxers’. You should optimize them
for their specific brand and model, and link them all to the ‘boxers’
category page. That way the category page can rank for ‘boxer’, while
the product page can rank for more specific terms. This way, the
category page prevents the individual pages from competing.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Default Wordpress 301 Redirects of JS and CSS files. Bad for SEO & How to Fix?
Hi there: We are developers with some digital marketing expertise, but a current issue has us perplexed. An outside SEO firm has asked us to clean up a large number of 301 redirects. Most of these are 'default' Wordpress behavior that relate to calling the latest version of a JS or CSS file. For instance, a JS file is called with this: https://websitexyz.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.1 but ultimately redirects to this: https://websitexyz.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js. We are being asked to prevent the redirect from happening by, presumably, calling the ultimate file to begin with. The issue is that, as far as we know, there's no easy way to alter WP behavior to call the ultimate file to begin with. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Daaveey0 -
Will changing category URLs on site hurt SEO?
Hi Moz Community, We're looking to replace some URLs on our Wordpress site and I want to make sure we won't hurt our SEO with the changes. The site is lushpalm.com When we originally launched our site we created pages (which are linked to in our main menu) to essentially display our categories. We did this as a workaround because we didn’t like the URL to have the word “category” in it. Now we would like to make some changes and we want to make sure we’re not going to hurt our SEO in any way by accidentally duplicating content or otherwise. We want to fix our structure and now link to our category pages from our main menu, BUT we want to change the URL of the category page so that it doesn’t have “category” in it, essentially renaming it the name of the page currently linked to in our main menu. So basically, the category lushpalm.com/category/surf-trips, would be renamed with the URL lushpalm.com/surf-trips and the current page that is at lushpalm.com/surf-trips would be therefore replaced. My questions are: If we did this, would that mean that the previous “lushpalm.com/category/surf-trips” would cease to exist? Or is there some imprint of that out on the web? And if it is then would it re-direct to the new page? Would replacing the current page URL with a category hurt our current SEO in any way? Would this change cause any duplicate pages somehow? Thanks so much for your help!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TaraLP1 -
CDN for SEO (or not)?
Does CDN impact on SEO or not? There seems conflicting ideas as to whether they impact positively or negatively, I realise that if the page loads quicker this is a good thing for SEO and usability of course. Does Google see CDN as just cheating and a get-around for not doing the work from the ground up and using good hosting etc? Do you have any direct experience? All constructive input much appreciated!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoman101 -
Ecommerce: A product in multiple categories with a canonical to create a ‘cluster’ in one primary category Vs. a single listing at root level with dynamic breadcrumb.
OK – bear with me on this… I am working on some pretty large ecommerce websites (50,000 + products) where it is appropriate for some individual products to be placed within multiple categories / sub-categories. For example, a Red Polo T-shirt could be placed within: Men’s > T-shirts >
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AbsoluteDesign
Men’s > T-shirts > Red T-shirts
Men’s > T-shirts > Polo T-shirts
Men’s > Sale > T-shirts
Etc. We’re getting great organic results for our general T-shirt page (for example) by clustering creative content within its structure – Top 10 tips on wearing a t-shirt (obviously not, but you get the idea). My instinct tells me to replicate this with products too. So, of all the location mentioned above, make sure all polo shirts (no matter what colour) have a canonical set within Men’s > T-shirts > Polo T-shirts. The presumption is that this will help build the authority of the Polo T-shirts page – this obviously presumes “Polo Shirts” get more search volume than “Red T-shirts”. My presumption why this is the best option is because it is very difficult to manage, particularly with a large inventory. And, from experience, taking the time and being meticulous when it comes to SEO is the only way to achieve success. From an administration point of view, it is a lot easier to have all product URLs at the root level and develop a dynamic breadcrumb trail – so all roads can lead to that one instance of the product. There's No need for canonicals; no need for ecommerce managers to remember which primary category to assign product types to; keeping everything at root level also means there no reason to worry about redirects if product move from sub-category to sub-category etc. What do you think is the best approach? Do 1000s of canonicals and redirect look ‘messy’ to a search engine overtime? Any thoughts and insights greatly received.0 -
Is tabbed content bad for SEO?
I work for a Theater show listings and ticketing website. In our show listings pages (e.g. http://www.theatermania.com/broadway/this-is-our-youth_302998/) we split our content into separate tabs (overview, pricing and show dates, cast, and video). Are we shooting ourselves in the foot by separating the content? Are we better served with keeping it all in a single page? Thanks so much!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TheaterMania0 -
Quick Question: Is it Bad for SEO to paste from Word to your CMS?
Hey just a quick question I'm having trouble finding a definitive answer to: Is the markup that is transferred from Word docs bad for SEO? We are managing to paste it and it looks fine, but the developers are worried that the extra code will be bad for SEO. Does anyone have solution besides pasting into Text Editor and formatting in the CMS? Is this necessary or can we just leave the extra code? Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | keL.A.xT.o0 -
International SEO - cannibalisation and duplicate content
Hello all, I look after (in house) 3 domains for one niche travel business across three TLDs: .com .com.au and co.uk and a fourth domain on a co.nz TLD which was recently removed from Googles index. Symptoms: For the past 12 months we have been experiencing canibalisation in the SERPs (namely .com.au being rendered in .com) and Panda related ranking devaluations between our .com site and com.au site. Around 12 months ago the .com TLD was hit hard (80% drop in target KWs) by Panda (probably) and we began to action the below changes. Around 6 weeks ago our .com TLD saw big overnight increases in rankings (to date a 70% averaged increase). However, almost to the same percentage we saw in the .com TLD we suffered significant drops in our .com.au rankings. Basically Google seemed to switch its attention from .com TLD to the .com.au TLD. Note: Each TLD is over 6 years old, we've never proactively gone after links (Penguin) and have always aimed for quality in an often spammy industry. **Have done: ** Adding HREF LANG markup to all pages on all domain Each TLD uses local vernacular e.g for the .com site is American Each TLD has pricing in the regional currency Each TLD has details of the respective local offices, the copy references the lacation, we have significant press coverage in each country like The Guardian for our .co.uk site and Sydney Morning Herlad for our Australia site Targeting each site to its respective market in WMT Each TLDs core-pages (within 3 clicks of the primary nav) are 100% unique We're continuing to re-write and publish unique content to each TLD on a weekly basis As the .co.nz site drove such little traffic re-wrting we added no-idex and the TLD has almost compelte dissapread (16% of pages remain) from the SERPs. XML sitemaps Google + profile for each TLD **Have not done: ** Hosted each TLD on a local server Around 600 pages per TLD are duplicated across all TLDs (roughly 50% of all content). These are way down the IA but still duplicated. Images/video sources from local servers Added address and contact details using SCHEMA markup Any help, advice or just validation on this subject would be appreciated! Kian
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | team_tic1 -
How does badly formatted HTML affect SEO?
Our website uses a custom built CMS, but uses a fairly standard WYSIWYG text editor. I've looked at some of the code it produces, and it's not pretty. My gut feeling tells me that this extra bloat is bad for SEO. Am I right in thinking that Google doesn't look kindly upon badly formatted and bloated HTML? Thanks,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | OptiBacUK
James0