undefined
Skip to content
Moz logo Menu open Menu close
  • Products
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Pro Home
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Home
    • STAT
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Home
    • Compare SEO Products
    • Moz Data
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis
    • Keyword Explorer
    • Link Explorer
    • Competitive Research
    • MozBar
    • More Free SEO Tools
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO
    • SEO Learning Center
    • Moz Academy
    • SEO Q&A
    • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Agency Solutions
    • Enterprise Solutions
    • Small Business Solutions
    • Case Studies
    • The Moz Story
    • New Releases
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Products
    • Moz Pro

      Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

    • Moz Local

      Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

    • STAT

      SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

    • Moz API

      Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

    • Compare SEO Products

      See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

    • Moz Data

      Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis

      Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

    • Keyword Explorer

      Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

    • Link Explorer

      Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

    • Competitive Research

      Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

    • MozBar

      See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

    • More Free SEO Tools

      Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO

      The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

    • SEO Learning Center

      Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

    • On-Demand Webinars

      Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

    • How-To Guides

      Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

    • Moz Academy

      Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

    • MozCon

      Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
    Moz API

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

    Find your plan
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Small Business Solutions

      Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

    • Agency Solutions

      Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

    • Enterprise Solutions

      Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

    • The Moz Story

      Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

    • Case Studies

      Explore how Moz drives ROI with a proven track record of success.

    • New Releases

      Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

    Surface actionable competitive intel
    New Feature

    Surface actionable competitive intel

    Learn More
  • Log in
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Dashboard
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Dashboard
    • Moz Academy
  • Avatar
    • Moz Home
    • Notifications
    • Account & Billing
    • Manage Users
    • Community Profile
    • My Q&A
    • My Videos
    • Log Out

The Moz Q&A Forum

  • Forum
  • Questions
  • Users
  • Ask the Community

Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

  1. Home
  2. SEO Tactics
  3. International SEO
  4. "Duplicate without user-selected canonical” - impact to SERPs

Moz Q&A is closed.

After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

"Duplicate without user-selected canonical” - impact to SERPs

International SEO
canonical international seo
4
6
6.4k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as question
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
  • Alex_Pisa
    Alex_Pisa Subscriber last edited by Oct 26, 2021, 11:18 AM

    Hello, we are facing some issues on our project and we would like to get some advice.

    Scenario
    We run several websites (www.brandName.com, www.brandName.be, www.brandName.ch, etc..) all in French language . All sites have nearly the same content & structure, only minor text (some headings and phone numbers due to different countries are different). There are many good quality pages, but again they are the same over all domains.

    Goal
    We want local domains (be, ch, fr, etc.) to appear in SERPs and also comply with Google policy of local language variants and/or canonical links.

    Current solution
    Currently we don’t use canonicals, instead we use rel="alternate" hreflang="x-default":

    <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-BE" href="https://www.brandName.be/" />
    <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-CA" href="https://www.brandName.ca/" />
    <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-CH" href="https://www.brandName.ch/" />
    <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-FR" href="https://www.brandName.fr/" />
    <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-LU" href="https://www.brandName.lu/" />
    <link rel="alternate" hreflang="x-default" href="https://www.brandName.com/" />
    

    Issue
    After Googlebot crawled the websites we see lot of “Duplicate without user-selected canonical” in Coverage/Excluded report (Google Search Console) for most domains. When we inspect some of those URLs we can see Google has decided that canonical URL points to (example):

    User-declared canonical: None
    Google-selected canonical: …same page, but on a different domain

    Strange is that even those URLs are on Google and can be found in SERPs.

    Obviously Google doesn’t know what to make of it. We noticed many websites in the same scenario use a self-referencing approach which is not really “kosher” - we are afraid if we use the same approach we can get penalized by Google.

    Question: What do you suggest to fix the “Duplicate without user-selected canonical” in our scenario?

    Any suggestions/ideas appreciated, thanks. Regards.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • ezkrt
      ezkrt last edited by Aug 15, 2023, 6:17 AM

      The issue of "Duplicate without user-selected canonical" refers to situations where there are multiple identical or very similar pages on a website, but a canonical tag has not been explicitly set to indicate which version should be considered the preferred or original version by search engines.

      The impact of this issue on search engine results pages (SERPs) can be negative for several reasons:

      Keyword Dilution: When search engines encounter multiple versions of the same or similar content, they might have a hard time determining which page to rank for a particular keyword. This can lead to keyword dilution, where the authority and relevance of the content is spread across multiple pages instead of being concentrated on a single page.

      Page Selection Uncertainty: Without a canonical tag to guide search engines, they may choose to index and display a version of the page that is not the most relevant or valuable to users. This can result in users landing on less optimal pages from their search queries.

      Ranking Competition: Duplicate content can cause internal competition between your own pages for rankings. Instead of consolidating ranking signals onto one page, they get divided among duplicates, potentially leading to lower overall rankings for all versions.

      Crawling and Indexing Issues: Search engine bots may spend more time crawling and indexing duplicate content, which could lead to inefficient use of their resources. This might affect how often your new or updated content gets indexed.

      To address the "Duplicate without user-selected canonical" issue and mitigate its impact on SERPs:

      Implement Canonical Tags: Set up canonical tags on duplicate or similar pages to indicate the preferred version. This guides search engines to consolidate ranking signals and direct traffic to the correct page.

      301 Redirects: If possible, redirect duplicate pages to a single, canonical version using 301 redirects. This not only consolidates ranking signals but also ensures that users are directed to the most relevant content.

      Consolidate Content: Consider merging similar pages into a single, comprehensive page. This helps avoid duplication issues and improves the overall user experience.

      Use Noindex Tags: If some duplicate pages are not crucial for SEO or user experience, you can add a noindex meta tag to prevent search engines from indexing those pages.

      Monitor and Update: Regularly audit your website for duplicate content and ensure that new content is properly canonicalized to prevent future occurrences.

      By addressing the "Duplicate without user-selected canonical" issue, you can help improve the clarity and accuracy of how your content appears in SERPs, potentially leading to better rankings and a more effective SEO strategy.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jeffmoore121
        jeffmoore121 @GeorgeJohn727 last edited by Aug 14, 2023, 9:57 AM

        @GeorgeJohn727
        Duplicate without user-selected canonical

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jeffmoore121
          jeffmoore121 last edited by Aug 14, 2023, 7:20 AM

          Understanding 'Duplicate without user-selected canonical' is crucial for optimizing SERPs. This issue can lead to content duplication concerns, potentially affecting search engine rankings. Just as addressing this matter ensures streamlined search results, exploring the 'best online betting sites in India' exemplifies how selecting the right canonical source enhances visibility and credibility in the online domain.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • topic:timeago_earlier,2 years
          • Alex_Pisa
            Alex_Pisa Subscriber @GeorgeJohn727 last edited by Nov 14, 2021, 9:24 PM

            @georgejohn727

            1. Even if this error occurs it doesn't mean Google ignores the pages - it can and in our case they appear in SERPs.
            2. Duplicate pages carry value in sense that there is a slight alteration for local market - contact info, different pricing, etc. So 90% of the page is same on national
              domains, but only slight part differs.
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • topic:timeago_earlier,15 days
            • GeorgeJohn727
              GeorgeJohn727 Banned last edited by Oct 30, 2021, 6:53 PM

              @alex_pisa
              The error "Duplicate without user-selected canonical” indicates that Google found duplicate URLs that are not canonicalized to a preferred version. Google didn't index these duplicate URLs and assigned a canonical version on its own.

              How to fix this issue

              Should these pages even exist? If the answer to this is no, simply remove these pages and return a HTTP status code 410.

              If these pages have a purpose, then ask yourself whether they
              carry any value:

              • If yes, then canonicalize them to the preferred version of the URL. Need some inspiration where to canonicalize to? See which URL Google finds most relevant using the URL Inspection tool(opens in a new tab). If Google's listing PDF files for your site, canonicalize them through the HTTP header.

              • If these pages don't carry any value, then make sure to apply the noindex directive through the meta robots tag or X-Robots-Tag HTTP Header.

              Alex_Pisa jeffmoore121 2 Replies Last reply Aug 14, 2023, 9:57 AM Reply Quote 0
              • 1 / 1
              1 out of 6
              • First post
                1/6
                Last post

              Got a burning SEO question?

              Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.


              Start my free trial


              Browse Questions

              Explore more categories

              • Moz Tools

                Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

              • SEO Tactics

                Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

              • Community

                Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

              • Digital Marketing

                Chat about tactics outside of SEO

              • Research & Trends

                Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

              • Support

                Connect on product support and feature requests.

              • See all categories

              Related Questions

              • shabbirmoosa

                Rel canonical tag from shopify page to wordpress site page

                shopify wordpress canonical

                We have pages on our shopify site example - https://shop.example.com/collections/cast-aluminum-plaques/products/cast-aluminum-address-plaque That we want to put a rel canonical tag on to direct to our wordpress site page - https://www.example.com/aluminum-plaques/ We have links form the wordpress page to the shop page, and over time ahve found that google has ranked the shop pages over the wp pages, which we do not want. So we want to put rel canonical tags on the shop pages to say the wp page is the authority. I hope that makes sense, and I would appreciate your feeback and best solution. Thanks! Is that possible?

                Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jan 31, 2024, 4:19 PM | shabbirmoosa
                0
              • GAnalytics

                Dynamic Canonical Tag for Search Results Filtering Page

                canonical indexation search page categorization search results crawl

                Hi everyone, I run a website in the travel industry where most users land on a location page (e.g. domain.com/product/location, before performing a search by selecting dates and times. This then takes them to a pre filtered dynamic search results page with options for their selected location on a separate URL (e.g. /book/results). The /book/results page can only be accessed on our website by performing a search, and URL's with search parameters from this page have never been indexed in the past. We work with some large partners who use our booking engine who have recently started linking to these pre filtered search results pages. This is not being done on a large scale and at present we only have a couple of hundred of these search results pages indexed. I could easily add a noindex or self-referencing canonical tag to the /book/results page to remove them, however it’s been suggested that adding a dynamic canonical tag to our pre filtered results pages pointing to the location page (based on the location information in the query string) could be beneficial for the SEO of our location pages. This makes sense as the partner websites that link to our /book/results page are very high authority and any way that this could be passed to our location pages (which are our most important in terms of rankings) sounds good, however I have a couple of concerns. • Is using a dynamic canonical tag in this way considered spammy / manipulative? • Whilst all the content that appears on the pre filtered /book/results page is present on the static location page where the search initiates and which the canonical tag would point to, it is presented differently and there is a lot more content on the static location page that isn’t present on the /book/results page. Is this likely to see the canonical tag being ignored / link equity not being passed as hoped, and are there greater risks to this that I should be worried about? I can’t find many examples of other sites where this has been implemented but the closest would probably be booking.com. https://www.booking.com/searchresults.it.html?label=gen173nr-1FCAEoggI46AdIM1gEaFCIAQGYARS4ARfIAQzYAQHoAQH4AQuIAgGoAgO4ArajrpcGwAIB0gIkYmUxYjNlZWMtYWQzMi00NWJmLTk5NTItNzY1MzljZTVhOTk02AIG4AIB&sid=d4030ebf4f04bb7ddcb2b04d1bade521&dest_id=-2601889&dest_type=city& Canonical points to https://www.booking.com/city/gb/london.it.html In our scenario however there is a greater difference between the content on both pages (and booking.com have a load of search results pages indexed which is not what we’re looking for) Would be great to get any feedback on this before I rule it out. Thanks!

                Technical SEO | Aug 16, 2022, 11:12 PM | GAnalytics
                1
              • fJ66doneOIdDpj

                Multilang site: Auto redirect 301 or 302?

                redirect 301 redirect 302 international seo

                We need to establish if 301 or 302 response code is to be used for our auto redirects based on Accept-Language header. https://domain.com
                30x > https://domain.com/en
                30x > https://domain.com/ru
                30x > https://domain.com/de The site architecture is set up with proper inline HREFLANG.
                We have read different opinions about this, Ahrefs says 302 is the correct one:
                https://ahrefs.com/blog/301-vs-302-redirects/
                302 redirect:
                "You want to redirect users to the right version of the site for them (based on location/language)." You could argue that the root redirect is never permanent as it varies based on user language settings (302)
                On the other hand, the lang specific redirects are permanent per language: IF Accept-Language header = en
                https://domain.com > 301 > https://domain.com/en
                IF Accept-Language header = ru
                https://domain.com > 301 > https://domain.com/ru So each of these is 'permanent'. So which is the correct?

                International SEO | Oct 11, 2022, 2:10 AM | fJ66doneOIdDpj
                0
              • muzzmoz

                How to avoid duplication across multiple country domains

                Here's the scenario: I have a client currently running one Shopify site (AU) They want to launch three more country domains (US, UK and EU) They want each to be a standalone site, primarily so the customers can purchase in their local currency, which is not possible from a single Shopify site The inventory is all from the same source The product desscriptions will all be the same as well Question: How do we avoid content duplication (ie. how will canonical tags work in this scenario)?

                International SEO | Dec 7, 2016, 12:22 PM | muzzmoz
                0
              • ALLee

                International hreflang - will this handle duplicate content?

                The title says it all - if i have duplicate content on my US and UK website, will adding the hreflang tag help google figure out that they are duplicate for a reason and avoid any penalties?

                International SEO | Jan 7, 2016, 1:15 PM | ALLee
                1
              • MartijnHoving82

                Upper case or/and lower case in rel="alternate" hreflang

                Hi Mozzers, I have a question about the rel="alternate" hreflang tag, with an example. When I use two subfolders for two different countries/languages, for instance www.domain.com/nl-nl/ and www.domain.com/nl-en/ (for the English version) and I want to use the rel="alternate" hreflang tag, do I need to follow the ISO standards concerning Uppercase country code and Lowercase language code (en-NL)? Or is it okay to use the Lowercase country and language code (en-nl), since we also use this in the URL of the Subfolder. What does Google prefer? Thanks in advance.

                International SEO | Feb 22, 2013, 9:38 PM | MartijnHoving82
                0
              • HMK-NL

                How to fix the duplicate content problem on different domains (.nl /.be) of your brand's websites in multiple countries?

                Dear all, what is the best way to fix the duplicate content problem on different domains (.nl /.be) of your brand's websites in multiple countries? What must I add to my code of websites my .nl domain to avoid duplicate content and to keep the .nl website out of google.be, but still well-indexed in google.nl? What must I add to my code of websites my .be domain to avoid duplicate content and to keep the .nl website out of google.be, but still well-indexed in google.nl? Thanks in advance!

                International SEO | Oct 3, 2012, 10:49 AM | HMK-NL
                3
              • theLotter

                Redirecting users based on location

                My site is available in EN, DE, SW, SP, FR, IT, CH and JP. However, the EN sites ranks much better than the other languages, and even when searching in another language the EN homepage is normally the result that appears. Would it be worthwhile to automatically redirect users to the site in the same language they are searching in or country they are searching from? If so, how do I go about this? Thanks!

                International SEO | Jan 5, 2016, 6:07 PM | theLotter
                0

              Get started with Moz Pro!

              Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

              Start my free trial
              Products
              • Moz Pro
              • Moz Local
              • Moz API
              • Moz Data
              • STAT
              • Product Updates
              Moz Solutions
              • SMB Solutions
              • Agency Solutions
              • Enterprise Solutions
              Free SEO Tools
              • Domain Authority Checker
              • Link Explorer
              • Keyword Explorer
              • Competitive Research
              • Brand Authority Checker
              • Local Citation Checker
              • MozBar Extension
              • MozCast
              Resources
              • Blog
              • SEO Learning Center
              • Help Hub
              • Beginner's Guide to SEO
              • How-to Guides
              • Moz Academy
              • API Docs
              About Moz
              • About
              • Team
              • Careers
              • Contact
              Why Moz
              • Case Studies
              • Testimonials
              Get Involved
              • Become an Affiliate
              • MozCon
              • Webinars
              • Practical Marketer Series
              • MozPod
              Connect with us

              Contact the Help team

              Join our newsletter
              Moz logo
              © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
              • Accessibility
              • Terms of Use
              • Privacy

              Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.