Old proudct pages - eComm Site
-
Hello,
Geeks.com currently has approx. 194k pages in Google index. (approx. 30k suppl.)
We have many thousands of old product urls which have gone out of stock, never to "see the light of day" again. 14 years worth!
Should we be 301'ing all old products pages that go out of stock, if we know for certain we will never carry that SKU again?
If we were to do a "mass" 301 of 30k+ urls how would google or other SE's react to that?
Could there be any negative implications to doing so?
What is considered best practice for eComm sites, as I imagine we are not alone with this type of situation.
Thank you in advance.
Michael B.
-
Mike,
I agree with Alan that it is a serious issue that warrants some attention and planning. Worst case scenario, the expired pages return a 404 and you're missing a big opportunity to boost the rest of the site. Best case scenario, you 301 or link to category or cross-promotional pages to pass PR and visitors to the next most relevant page/category.
The 301 would accomplish this, but like Alan said you run the risk of inadvertently creating redirect loops if there's no long-term planning for potentially thousands of pages and/or categories.
-
if we're talking about thousands of pages falling off, yes, to me, that's a high priority. If you go the 301 route, they should go to the highest page in the chain that product would be associated with that's relevant to the topical intent and relative closeness of match..
So if it's a laser mouse, I wouldn't redirect to the top "desktop computers" or even the "laser mouse" category, but I would 301 it to the mouse optical/trackball category page.
The reason for this is two-fold - it's low enough in the food chain to be highly related, but not so highly related that if the current laser mouse sub-cat disappears altogether that you'd end up in a bad loop of redirects.
That does, then, maintains at least some of the original page authority and boost the parent category.
-
Replied above Andrew - thanks again!
-
Alan and Andrew - thank you for the thought out replies.
- How serious of an issue would you consider this in the first place. Meaning if this were a site you were maintaining would this be high on your list of priorities?
2) If we just did a simple 301 to the highest category from which the product lived within, would that accomplish what you are saying above Alan?
This product below will be out of stock within the next cpl days. There is value here as it's garnered a few root domain links ect....
Is it accurate that once product is out of stock and removed from site navigation these pages are no longer crawled and no longer part of the site's architecure, therefore the rest of the site will no longer benefit from the links they have accumulated over time?
Wouldn't we then want to best to preserve the pages authority and 301 it to boost the parent category?
ex: http://www.geeks.com/details.asp?InvtId=M261VP-R
Hopefully I am not confusing you too much! lol
I look forward to your response.
Thank You,
MB
-
Oh Hey Andrew - great link to Rand's Whiteboard Friday on that. I hadn't seen that one. Looks like he covered both our concepts.
-
Andrew's got one path to consider. I've got another. My own most recent example is with a real estate site that has 100,000 property pages that all currently result in a 404 not found. Yes, that's 100k dead pages. So I too feel your pain.
What I recommend to clients is to 301 based on category level criteria. So for example, whatever the highest level category a product had been in - that old page should 301 to the current category page, if one exists. The 301 should append the new URL with a unique identifier for this situation - something like #NLC (for no longer carried) - the # sign being the key, because you can then have an anchor at the top of the content area of those pages that if the referrer includes that #NLC in it, visitors would see a box communicating that the product is no longer carried, and inviting them to browse your current inventory in that category.
Doing this would also require having a canonical URL tag on each category page - just to cover the bases. While anything after the #sign should be ignored as far as causing duplicate content conflicts, it's still best practices to have the canonical URL there in the header.
When no current category exists, then I'd send visitors by 301 to a uniform page (either a product search page or otherwise) yet with the same #NLC string and message.
Of course, getting either Andrew's suggestion or mine implemented will be up to the skills of the programmers doing the implementation. That's a lot of coding that has to be done accurately and thoroughly tested.
-
I've had several large (100k+ pages) clients with similar issues, and despite all the usual "each case is different" disclaimer, I've seen a lot of success with keeping the out of stock items' URLs active, but replacing the content with a message "We're sorry, but this item is out of stock. Might we interest you in product X or content Y?" type of cross-promotion. Depending on your e-commerce platform's ability to dynamically generate different merchandising options, it may be difficult or easy.
You can choose whether or not to keep these pages in your navigation structure if you like, although I'd recommend removing them from your internal search results pages.
That's just my experience, but there's a great discussion thread on this Whiteboard Friday post (which I refer people to all the time): http://www.seomoz.org/blog/whiteboard-friday-expired-content
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unsolved URL dynamic structure issue for new global site where I will redirect multiple well-working sites.
Dear all, We are working on a new platform called [https://www.piktalent.com](link url), were basically we aim to redirect many smaller sites we have with quite a lot of SEO traffic related to internships. Our previous sites are some like www.spain-internship.com, www.europe-internship.com and other similars we have (around 9). Our idea is to smoothly redirect a bit by a bit many of the sites to this new platform which is a custom made site in python and node, much more scalable and willing to develop app, etc etc etc...to become a bigger platform. For the new site, we decided to create 3 areas for the main content: piktalent.com/opportunities (all the vacancies) , piktalent.com/internships and piktalent.com/jobs so we can categorize the different types of pages and things we have and under opportunities we have all the vacancies. The problem comes with the site when we generate the diferent static landings and dynamic searches. We have static landing pages generated like www.piktalent.com/internships/madrid but dynamically it also generates www.piktalent.com/opportunities?search=madrid. Also, most of the searches will generate that type of urls, not following the structure of Domain name / type of vacancy/ city / name of the vacancy following the dynamic search structure. I have been thinking 2 potential solutions for this, either applying canonicals, or adding the suffix in webmasters as non index.... but... What do you think is the right approach for this? I am worried about potential duplicate content and conflicts between static content dynamic one. My CTO insists that the dynamic has to be like that but.... I am not 100% sure. Someone can provide input on this? Is there a way to block the dynamic urls generated? Someone with a similar experience? Regards,
Technical SEO | | Jose_jimenez0 -
Getting 'Indexed, not submitted in sitemap' for around a third of my site. But these pages ARE in the sitemap we submitted.
As in the title, we have a site with around 40k pages, but around a third of them are showing as "Indexed, not submitted in sitemap" in Google Search Console. We've double-checked the sitemaps we have submitted and the URLs are definitely in the sitemap. Any idea why this might be happening? Example URL with the error: https://www.teacherstoyourhome.co.uk/german-tutor/Egham Sitemap it is located on: https://www.teacherstoyourhome.co.uk/sitemap-subject-locations-surrey.xml
Technical SEO | | TTYH0 -
Blog Page Titles - Page 1, Page 2 etc.
Hi All, I have a couple of crawl errors coming up in MOZ that I am trying to fix. They are duplicate page title issues with my blog area. For example we have a URL of www.ourwebsite.com/blog/page/1 and as we have quite a few blog posts they get put onto another page, example www.ourwebsite.com/blog/page/2 both of these urls have the same heading, title, meta description etc. I was just wondering if this was an actual SEO problem or not and if there is a way to fix it. I am using Wordpress for reference but I can't see anywhere to access the settings of these pages. Thanks
Technical SEO | | O2C0 -
Site's IP showing WMT 'Links to My Site'
I have been going through, disavowing spam links in WMT and one of my biggest referral sources is our own IP address. Site: Covers.com
Technical SEO | | evansluke
IP: 208.68.0.72 We have recently fixed a number of 302 redirects, but the number of links actually seems to be increasing. Is this something I should ignore / disavow / fix using a redirect?0 -
Test site got indexed in Google - What's the best way of getting the pages removed from the SERP's?
Hi Mozzers, I'd like your feedback on the following: the test/development domain where our sitebuilder works on got indexed, despite all warnings and advice. The content on these pages is in active use by our new site. Thus to prevent duplicate content penalties we have put a noindex in our robots.txt. However off course the pages are currently visible in the SERP's. What's the best way of dealing with this? I did not find related questions although I think this is a mistake that is often made. Perhaps the answer will also be relevant for others beside me. Thank you in advance, greetings, Folko
Technical SEO | | Yarden_Uitvaartorganisatie0 -
Testimonial pages
Is it better to have one long testimonial page on your site, or break it down into several smaller pages with testimonials? First time I've posted on the forum. But I'm excited! Ron
Technical SEO | | yatesandcojewelers0 -
Can you 301 redirect a page to an already existing/old page ?
If you delete a page (say a sub department/category page on an ecommerce store) should you 301 redirect its url to the nearest equivalent page still on the site or just delete and forget about it ? Generally should you try and 301 redirect any old pages your deleting if you can find suitable page with similar content to redirect to. Wont G consider it weird if you say a page has moved permenantly to such and such an address if that page/address existed before ? I presume its fine since say in the scenario of consolidating departments on your store you want to redirect the department page your going to delete to the existing pages/department you are consolidating old departments products into ?
Technical SEO | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
SEO Benefit/Liability of changing URLs of a 2 year old site
I sell RV Parts online. Our organization is called The ROUTE 66 RV Network, so we brand everything around ROUTE 66. When we launched our store 2 years ago, we launched it with the domain: parts66.com We have a PR of 2, and we have been doing an SEO linkbuilding campaign ever since it has been around. Our primary keyword that we are trying to rank for is RV PARTS We also own the domain: rvparts66.com My question is: Is there a significant benefit to switching our URL to RVPARTS66.COM? Does having our primary keyword a part of our URL give us an SEO benefit? If so, what is the best way to keep any credit we have built for our original domain? We are in the process of a complete site overhaul which will launch in a couple weeks, so if there is ever a time to switch domains, the time is now. Thanks! jc
Technical SEO | | steve-2886180