Penguin hit Website - Moving to new domain
-
Hey!
I am working on a Penguin hit Website. Still ranking for all brand keywords and blog articles are still being returned in Google SERPs, but the website is showing up for only 3 or 4 money keywords. It is clearly a penguin hit as it was ranked 1st page for all money keywords before latest update (3.0). We already did a link cleanup and disavowed all bad backlinks. Still, the recovery process could take over 2 years from previous experience, and in 2 years, the site will suffer a slow death.
Solution: We own the .com version of the domain, currently being served on the .net. We bought the .com version about 6 years ago, it is clean and NOT redirected to the .net (actual site).
We were thinking about moving the whole Website to the .com version to start over. However, we need to make sure Google doesn't connect the 2 sites (no pagerank flow). Of course Google will notice is the same content, but there won't be any pagerank flowing from the old site to the new one.
For this, we thought about the following steps:
- Block Googlebot (and only googlebot) for the .net version via robots.txt.
- Wait until Google removes all URLs from the index.
- Move content to the .com version.
- Set a 301 redirect from .net to .com (without EVER removing the block on googlebot).
Thoughts? Has anyone went over this before? Other ideas?
Thanks!
-
Thanks so much for listening my tweet and coming in here to drop a few lines Marie
I think i'll do a mix of both techniques. First, an extensive link cleanup. Then follow my first post's steps (adding the noindex meta tags in all pages as you suggested below) and then do the 301 redirect.
Will also add to the mix a redesign, just so the site looks renewed for both users and SE.
Will share insights once we complete the migration.
Thanks again!
PS: will keep an eye for the article on SEW
-
This is risky. The problem is that you can't guarantee that you've cleaned up 100% of the bad links. I personally think that this is one of the reasons why some sites are not recovering from Penguin...because there are unnatural links hidden that none of the backlink checkers can find. I have sites for which I do monthly backlink cleanup and every month I find old links from as far back as 2006.
You may see improvement and then run the risk of seeing a decline with a future Penguin update.
-
Keep an eye on Search Engine Watch this week. I have an article coming out, probably Wednesday that answers your question perfectly. What you are planning to do really should work though. It's important that you wait until the old site is completely out of the index before starting the new.
Rather than just blocking by robots though what I would do is put a noindex tag on all of the pages, do a url removal request for each page and then put the block on. Otherwise, the pages may still remain in the cache and then Google may see the .com as a duplicate of the .net.
-
Thanks Matt. Do you mind if I PM you with some insight questions, just to make sure I get the idea, don't wanna end up burning the other domain.
Thanks!
-
Correct - just do a cleanup, 301 the domain, and treat the new domain like you would a brand new one (but with more authority.)
Be careful not to do much that is negative in the first (month? 3 months? year) after a 301. It has a lot of authority but not as much (there's no word for it) "native" juice of its own so any bit of spam seems to be accentuated.
-
I'm sure this is a Penguin hit, 100%.
Very bad link profile, some cool links, but 90% junk. The traffic drop happened the day Penguin 3.0 was released and the site is not being outranked, it is just not ranking for those money keywords. Content is still working great, lots of hits to the blog and ranking places of the best pieces are steady and haven't change at all. Branding still doing strong too.
-
Thanks Matt,
So you say no robots disallow and no disavow file on new domain and just a 301 after a FULL link cleanup?
-
Are you sure this was Penguin and not Panda? Did you actually get a penalty? I would really make sure you are dealing with a penalty before you put all of this work into something that it doesn't necessarily need.
If you are experiencing a loss in traffic and impressions and keyword rankings without an actual penalty I would run a new SERP analysis and find out what kind of competition is kicking you out of your top spots. With two major updates just rolling out in Sept/Oct there is a chance that your site was not penalized but being outranked by better sites. With the way that Penguin works, you can be suffering from another sites Penguin 2.0 recovery.
Do you update your content regularly? Is what you have on the site truly unique and informative? You said you are going through a disavow right now, that could definitely effect the rankings and search traffic.
Before you decide to completely abandon ship and jump on a whole new site, make sure you are truly dealing with a Penguin penalty and not just mediocre on page SEO coupled with a weak link profile.
If you truly feel moving domains is the solution, then I would select a domain completely unrelated and unattached to any webmaster property that might have a Penguin penalty. Select a domain with some age and that is clear of any nefarious link profiles. Use OSE or Ahrefs to investigate before you buy. Keeping things unrelated will be the best way to ensure you have no negative link juice following you around.
Is it possible that one of your link sources suffered a Penguin Penalty? That could really effect your rankings. 3.0 really targeted link neighborhoods. You could have back links that have terrible link profiles and are now causing you grief. Use OSE or Ahrefs to kind of check your link profiles back links. I would start here if you have no actual penalty.
-
Do a thorough link clean up & disavow on the .net, then 301 redirect over to the .com - you will keep the majority of traffic, get rankings back quickly and when Google connects the two, you're only redirecting a cleaned up domain to your new .com - happens every day.
So clean up first - then do your redirects. We've done this for hundreds of clients and had very quick recoveries that have survived multiple Penguin updates now. Google wants it clean so do it right and don't worry about having to start from scratch.
-
Thank you for your response.
Although starting from scratch kind of hurts, here I think is not a good option. The site is very well known in its niche, with over 100K customers and 20K regulars, so we are trying to keep the same name (also trademarked, DBA, LLC, etc).
Building a new image for the site and new content isn't the problem, however, I wonder how far Google may take their "penalty-flow" if we start a new Website just using the same name, going from domain.net to domain.com (content and design will be different), but a 301/302 or javascript redirect will be placed in domain.net after all pages are deindexed and there are no traces of the new site.
I must add this is an algorithmic penalty, not a manual. There are no manual actions applied.
-
I was hit by penguin years ago due to a company that was not doing the think the right way without my knowlege. All the content were made by me and were a very good content so i was raking first for almost everything.
When i got hit i did not know how and did not understand until i discovered what the company i had contracted were doing due to personal cuts.
I immediatly stop working with them, i tried to recover from the penalty. From more than one year i was sending and recieving email from webmaster tools.
After removing almost every known link i still recieved email from webmaster that there were bad links. And some of them were from competitors that directly copy pages of mine, with my link included on them.
That was when i sadly decided to give up (i had worked personaly on that domain for more then 10 years) was a reference and the first one on the sector.
That was the best decisión. What i did was a litle bit diferent:
1-º I started a new domain with new fresh and added value content (not coping directly from old website, has it had lots of content copied from competitors and i did not want relation)
2- I still mantain for 6 months old website to give me time to create new content and start raking new site (I it very difficult to give up something that you loved and were proud).
The condition of not placing any link from old domain to new domain. And new site were in another server. In the old site i just placed a picture without any link saiyng that the company had a new website.
3- completly prohibited to do any redirection from old domain to new domain, as if i do that you will also pass bad links that you havent discovered or that you dont know that are bad
4- in about one year i manage to achive almost same positions with the new domain that i had before
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Change domain.com to www.domain.com - influence on linkbuilding, seo, etc.
Hello, Do you know what can happen when i change domain.com to www.domain.com? Will it have an influence to my link-building portfolio (external links to domain.com), position on google search, etc. Thank you for help.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Reyzer0 -
301 vs 410 for subdirectory that was moved to a new domain, 2-years later
Hi all, I've read a lot about 301 vs 404 and 410s, but the case is pretty unique so I decided to get some feedback from you. Both websites are travel related but we had one destination as a subdirectory of the other one (two neighboring countries, where more than 90% of business was related to the 'main' destination and the rest to the 'satellite'). This was obviously bad practice and we decided to move the satellite destination to its own domain. Everything was done 2 years ago and we opted for 301s to the new domain as we had some good links pointing to satellite content. (All of the moved content is destination specific and still relevant) Few weeks back we figured out that google still shows our subdirectory when doing specific 'site:' search and looking further into it, we realized we still get traffic for satellite destination through the main website via links acquired before the move. Not a lot of hits, but they still sporadically occur. A decision was made (rather hastily) to 410 pages and see if that will make satellite subdir pages not show in google searches. So 3 weeks in, 410 errors are climbing in GWMT, but satellite subdirectory still shows in google searches. One part of the team is pushing to put back in place 301s. The other part of the team is concerned with the 'health' of the main website as those pages are not relevant for it, and want them gone . What would you do?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | halloranc0 -
I have rebuilt a website on a new domain and followed SEO protocol to maintain authority, but the results and rankings are declining.
We took over an account for a company called knightdoorservices.com who specialize in doors and windows in Edmonton, Alberta. We built them a new website on a new domain: knightdoorsandwindows.com. We did 301 redirects on all of the old URLs so that they now point to the new URLs so most of the authority should transfer over. Additionally, each page has a properly optimized title, h1 tag, a series of pertinent alt tags, and many instances of the focus keyword for that particular page. Additionally, the website loads quickly and has many high authority inbound links pointing to the domain. We have done this for many other companies and have seen their rankings maintain their position or increase. Is there something that I am missing for this company in particular? Thanks so much!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Web3Marketing870 -
Best practice for duplicate website content: same root domain name but different extension
Hi there I have a new client who has two websites: http://www.bayofislandsteambuilding.co.nz
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | turnbullholdingsltd
http://www.bayofislandsteambuilding.org.nz They are the same in every regard apart from the domain extension (.co.nz & .org.nz) which is likely to be causing them issues with Google ranking given the huge amount of duplicate content. What is the best practice approach to fixing this? Normally, if I was starting from scratch, I would set one of the extensions as an alias which redirects to the main domain. Thanks in advance. Laurie0 -
Does Having 3 Websites On Magento Affect Domain Authority?
We have a client who has 3 separate websites targeting the US, Australia, and the UK. Each of them has relevant ccTLD's such as: .com .com.au and .co.uk. Our client wants to use the Magento multi-site function so it combines all the stores (which are the exact same products) and merge it into one through Magento. Will this affect his Domain Authority? Or would they be treated as individual when receiving link value, trust, authority? There doesn't seem a lot information out there about this can anyone help? Thanks, Matt
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | HigherthanSEO0 -
Any way to find which domains are 301 redirected to competitors' websites?
By looking at the work from an SEO collegue it became clear that his weak linkbuilding graph probably is not the cause for his good rankings for a pretty competitive keyword. (also no social mentions where found) I was wondering what it could be, site structure and other on page optimization factors seems to be ok and I don't think there will be exceptionally good or bad user behavior... Finally I looked at the competitors and found that they have more links, better content en better design, so I got a little stuck. The only reason I can think of is that he is doing 301 redirects (or is rel=canonical tags). Is there a way to trace these redirects back to the source in order to include this important variable in your competitor research? thnx
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | djingel10 -
Domains
I am currently working on a huge website which ranks very well receiving 150,000 visitors every day. I have been offered the chance to buy some more domain names which would suit my keywords in the current site. These domains as a keyword also receive huge amounts of traffic. Would it be beneficial for me to do this....if so why? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | wazza19850 -
Best approach to launch a new site with new urls - same domain
www.sierratradingpost.com We have a high volume e-commerce website with over 15K items, an average of 150K visits per day and 12.6 pages per visit. We are launching a new website this spring which is currently on a beta sub domain and we are looking for the best strategy that preserves our current search rankings while throttling traffic (possibly 25% per week) to measure results. The new site will be soft launched as we plan to slowly migrate traffic to it via a load balancer. This way we can monitor performance of the new site while still having the old site as a backup. Only when we are fully comfortable with the new site will we submit the 301 redirects and migrate everyone over to the new site. We will have a month or so of running both sites. Except for the homepage the URL structure for the new site is different than the old site. What is our best strategy so we don’t lose ranking on the old site and start earning ranking on the new site, while avoiding duplicate content and cloaking issues? Here is what we got back from a Google post which may highlight our concerns better: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=62d0a16c4702a17d&hl=en&fid=62d0a16c4702a17d00049b67b51500a6 Thank You, sincerely, Stephan Woo Cude SEO Specialist scude@sierratradingpost.com
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | STPseo0