Blog on a subdomain vs subfolder?
-
Hi,
Does anyone have data to show that a subfolder is better than a subdomain for a blog? From what I've read, it sounds like both are a viable option but you choose subdomain if you want to build your blog as a distinct entity. Do you get ranked more quickly with a subfolder? Do you see X% more lift? Has anyone tested or seen tests around this subject?
Any input is appreciated! Thanks in advance.
-
Thanks for the insight, I appreciate the well-thought response.
-
A subdomain is viewed as a separate domain. A subfolder is viewed as your existing domain.
If you owned "domain.com" you could sell a subdomain to others for any and all possible combinations. This is basically what wordpress.com does, for example. When you make yoursite.wordpress.com, you don't get any the benefits of wordpress' domain authority.
From a SEO perspective, there isn't much difference between yoursite.wordpress.com and www.yoursite.com. It's a different domain. It's really difficult to say if Google has any extremely minor boost in any way to a subdomain, but I am not aware of any.
When you offer a blog in a subfolder, it is part of your site. It inherits your DA, and any links to the blog can add to your site's overall DA.
The bottom line is, if this blog is directly related to your site and will be focused on the same topics as your site, you would most likely prefer it to be a subfolder. If this blog is not related to your site, or will discuss off-topic issues, then you would prefer it as a subdomain.
This topic has been discussed many times and Google is your friend (in this case). You can take a look at the SEOmoz article: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/understanding-root-domains-subdomains-vs-subfolders-microsites or use Google to search the many articles on this topic: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=blog+subdomain+vs+subfolder
Do you get ranked more quickly with a subfolder?
Your site's ranking would be based on your DA factors. The higher your DA, the more important your site's content is to Google, the more often you should be crawled. The subdomain would be seen as a brand new site. Even to submit a sitemap for it you would have to first verify it as a new site with Google. Based on these factors I would say Yes, if you had an established site your blog would be ranked faster as a folder on the existing site as opposed to a new subdomain.
Do you see X% more lift?
That is the definition of DA. How likely pages on your existing site are likely to rank well. If you have an established site with good DA, and you add a blog then yes your pages should rank better on the main site when compared to the same article on a newly created subdomain.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Personalized Content Vs. Cloaking
Hi Moz Community, I have a question about personalization of content, can we serve personalized content without being penalized for serving different content to robots vs. users? If content starts in the same initial state for all users, including crawlers, is it safe to assume there should be no impact on SEO because personalization will not happen for anyone until there is some interaction? Thanks,
Technical SEO | | znotes0 -
301 vs 500 Errors for discontinued products
I have a client that has a around 15 "products" (they are pages containing details of the products rather than e-Commerce products) that have been discontinued. The client has suggested 301s but unless the alternative products are replacement products am I correct that we should be using a 500 error?
Technical SEO | | MentorDigital0 -
Getting mixed signals regarding how Google treats subdomains
All the posts I've read here and elsewhere regarding subdomains come to a similar conclusion, avoid using them because they are treated as a separate site -- and everything that goes along with that. But on my site we have a subdomain on a separate server and it's treated as internal. Also this from Hubspot - "**Use a subdomain of your website like Blog.HubSpot.com. **This is a great idea and this is what we do currently at HubSpot. Many companies have their blog on a subdomain, and it seems to be starting to be somewhat of a standard. The search engines are treating subdomains more and more as just portions of the main website, so the SEO value for your blog is going to add to your main website domain." Any help clarifying this would be greatly appreciated!
Technical SEO | | titleist1 -
Wanted to shift a blog from sub domain to sub directory but...
Ok, I have a client who has their blog up and running on blog.website.com and they are planning to shift the blog to sub-directory www.websire.com/blog. The only problem is that the blog and website are hosted on two different servers so is there any way we can shift the blog to sub directory without shifting the blog to the similar server?
Technical SEO | | MoosaHemani0 -
Which is better Title length vs. keywords?
We run a jobboard. The title tag on a page for a job is often over 70 characters. An example of one would be: " Supplier Quality Inspector (Electrical Manufacturing) Job in Orlando, FL 32809 at Pro Image Solutions | Orlando Jobs!" The company name 'Orlando Jobs!" comes at the end but is also a really good keyword e.g. 'Orlando' and 'Jobs' I am interested in suggestions as to how to make these titles better. For example take off the company name when we go over 70 characters? Move the company name to the front of the title because the company name is also good keywords? I am looking for the best way to handle the issue is all. Thanks.
Technical SEO | | JobBiz0 -
Noindex vs. page removal - Panda recovery
I'm wondering whether there is a consensus within the SEO community as to whether noindexing pages vs. actually removing pages is different from Google Pandas perspective?Does noindexing pages have less value when removing poor quality content than physically removing ie. either 301ing or 404ing the page being removed and removing the links to it from the site? I presume that removing pages has a positive impact on the amount of link juice that gets to some of the remaining pages deeper into the site, but I also presume this doesn't have any direct impact on the Panda algorithm? Thanks very much in advance for your thoughts, and corrections on my assumptions 🙂
Technical SEO | | agencycentral0 -
Is a shorter subdomain better?
For example, consider the two subdomains below: learn.bluelinkerp.com learnmore.bluelinkerp.com Would there likely be an appreciable difference between the two based on length alone? Also, would it be better to use a term that relates to our product in general such as "software.bluelinkerp.com"? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | BlueLinkERP0 -
On-Page SEO of the SEOmoz Blog Section
Hey Everyone My brain isn't working (only had 1 cup of coffee so far - #2 on it's way) this morning and I could use some help. We're creating a blog on a site for a client of ours and I've been looking at the SEOmoz blog for best practices when it comes to the implementation of pagination, canonical tags and noindex. My questions: There is no use of the canonical tag on the main blog page or any of the paginated pages but it is being used on blog post pages. Why not use it on the main blog pages as well? I'm assuming because the blog pages are always changing with different content there is not much point? Paginated pages in the category sections i.e. http://www.seomoz.org/blog/category/1?page=2 are noindexed but paginated pages in the main blog section i.e. http://www.seomoz.org/blog?page=2 are not. Is this because of a duplicate content concern since the posts in the category sections are in the main blog section as well? If that's the case, why wouldn't the main category page i.e.http://www.seomoz.org/blog/category/1 be noindexed as well? What's the reason for noindexing the "Show # Posts" pages i.e.http://www.seomoz.org/blog?show=5 ? I'm assuming another concern of duplicate content? Any insights into these questions would be greatly appreciated and would help with the implementation of our clients blog. Thanks, Ken
Technical SEO | | noBulMedia0