Site hacked in Jan. Redeveloped new site. Still not ranking. Should we change domain?
-
Our top ranking site in the UK was hacked at the end of 2014.
http://www.ultimatefloorsanding.co.uk/
The site was the subject of a manual spam action from Google. After several unsuccessful attempts to clean it up, using Securi.net and reinstating old versions of the site, changing passwords etc. we took the decision to redevelop the site. We also changed hosting provider as we had received absolutely no support from them whatsoever in resolving the issue.
So far we have:
- Removed the old website files off the server
- Developed a new website having implemented 301's for all the old URL's (except the spam ones)
- Submitted a reconsideration request for the manual spam action, which was accepted.
- Disavowed all the spammy inbound links through Webmaster Tools
- Implemented custom URL parameters through Google to not index the SPAM URLs ( which were using parameters)
Our organic traffic is down by 63% compared to last year, and we are not ranking for most of our target keywords any longer.
Is there anything that I am missing in the actions I have taken so far? We were advised that at this stage changing domain and starting again might be the way to go. However the current domain has been used by us since 2007, so it would be a big call.
Any advice is appreciated, thanks.
-
Hi Kate,
Thanks for your message:
SPAM was identified in October 2014, so we asked our hosting provider to re-install a clean backup of the site. We didn't have a clean offline version, so we were using automatic backups stored on the server. We changed FTP and CMS passwords.We did this on 3 separate occasions in October, but the issue remained.
In November, we subscribed to Securi.net and had them scan and clean the site. They did this twice, but the spam remained.
By January 2015, all the content keywords for the site were showing as Chinese, so we took the decision to re-develop the site on a new CMS and move hosting, as our hosting provider had provided no assistance whatsoever.
The new site launched in March 2015 - we did all the 301s etc. that are required when re-developing a site.
The Manual SPAM action was also applied in March. There is no user-generated content on the site.
We submitted the reconsideration request on 4th of April and it was accepted on April 17th.
I started to disavow the links and work with parameters to ask Google to no-index the URLs using parameters at the start of May and removed the old files from the old server on 3rd of June.
At the end of August, I went through all the remaining records for SPAM URLs returning 404s and amended the robots.txt to disallow the remaining SPAM directories. I also ran the google Site:ultimatefloorsanding.co.uk search and added all the remaining SPAM URLs to the robots.txt and Google URL removal tool.
I'm really not sure what else I can do. So we are thinking of starting again, but are reluctant to do so. Is there anything else you can think of that I can do.
All advice would be gratefully received.
Thanks
Sue
-
I actually wouldn't change the domain unless you are doing it for another reason. It's been around since 2007 and I am reluctant to tell you to dump it in favor of a new one. Changing your domain sets everything fresh and you'll most likely seen a bigger loss in organic traffic.
When was the reconsideration request accepted? Can you give us a timeline of everything that happened?
-
Hi Matt,
We are leaning towards changing domain. I can't find anyone to argue towards keeping it. However, I did find some URLs that still haven't been removed from the index, through the site:ultimatefloorsanding.co.uk Google search function. I was going to use the URL removal tool in search console to address that.
Do you think I should wait a while after doing that to see if it has any impact or go ahead and start from scratch?
Any thoughts are welcome, it's good to get a few opinions before deciding.
Sue
-
Hi galwaygirl!
Did everything get sorted out?
-
Hi galwaygirl.
I'm going to be PMing you my thoughts as I've taken a bit of a peek at your backlink profile and my advice is specific only to your scenario and might be taken wrong and applied to others incorrectly if anyone else read it.
Dave
-
Hi Dave,
Thanks for your message.
The manual notice that we got was 'Hacked Site' and the notice applied to spam rather than Malware.
-
Which manual action notice did you get? I'm assuming from what you noted that it's the user-generated spam notice but thought it better to check before replying. The only other one I can guess might apply was the unnatural links penalty. If it was the unnatural link penalty then you'll have to wait for the next Penguin update but if you can confirm the penalty I'm happy to look into it further.
Regards.
Dave
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Page Speed or Site Speed which one does Google considered a ranking signal
I've read many threads online which proves that website speed is a ranking factor. There's a friend whose website scores 44 (slow metric score) on Google Pagespeed Insights. Despite that his website is slow, he outranks me on Google search results. It confuses me that I optimized my website for speed, but my competitor's slow site outperforms me. On Six9ja.com, I did amazing work by getting my target score which is 100 (fast metric score) on Google Pagespeed Insights. Coming to my Google search console tool, they have shown that some of my pages have average scores, while some have slow scores. Google search console tool proves me wrong that none of my pages are fast. Then where did the fast metrics went? Could it be because I added three Adsense Javascript code to all my blog posts? If so, that means that Adsense code is slowing website speed performance despite having an async tag. I tested my blog post speed and I understand that my page speed reduced by 48 due to the 3 Adsense javascript codes added to it. I got 62 (Average metric score). Now, my site speed is=100, then my page speed=62 Does this mean that Google considers page speed rather than site speed as a ranking factor? Screenshots: https://imgur.com/a/YSxSwOG Regarding: https://etcnaija.com
Technical SEO | | etcna0 -
Site Hack In Meta Description
Hey MOZ Community, I am looking for some help in identifying where the following meta description is coming from on this home page - https://www.apins.com. I have scrubbed through the page source without being able to locate where the content is being pulled from. The website is built on WordPress and metas were updated using Yoast, but I am wondering if an installed plugin could be the culprit. On top of this, I have had a developer take a look for the "hack" and they have assured that the issue has been removed. I have submitted the URL in GSC a couple of times to be re-indexed but have not had much luck. Any thoughts would be much appreciated, the displayed description is below. The health screening plays http://buyviagraonlineccm.com/ a significant and key role in detecting potentially life-threatening illnesses such as cancer, heart ...
Technical SEO | | jordankremer0 -
1 multilingual site, 2 domains in different languages.
My client wants a multilingual site: English and Spanish but with a domain name in both languages: jorgewantstofight.com And jorgequierepelear.com Is it possible? To have 1 site with both domains pointing each one to its version? and how this affects SEO?
Technical SEO | | Trazo1 -
Robots.txt & meta noindex--site still shows up on Google Search
I have set up my robots.txt like this: User-agent: *
Technical SEO | | RoxBrock
Disallow: / and I have this meta tag in my on a Wordpress site, set up with SEO Yoast name="robots" content="noindex,follow"/> I did "Fetch as Google" on my Google Search Console My website is still showing up in the search results and it says this: "A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt" This site has not shown up for years and now it is ranking above my site that I want to rank for this keyword. How do I get Google to ignore this site? This seems really weird and I'm confused how a site with little content, that has not been updated for years can rank higher than a site that is constantly updated and improved.1 -
Should we re-use our old re-directed domain for a new wesbite ?
Hi One our clients has an old domain that has been redirected to another website of his. Now he is asking us to build a new website for that domain and direct it back. This is new website will be very relative to it's own old content and where it has been re-directed recently. I guess the only benefit of this would be taking advantage of the age of this domain. Do you recommend doing that or getting him a new domain ?
Technical SEO | | Dynamo-Web0 -
My site goes from ranking at #7 to #18 back and forth, daily
I am using a anonymous browser to check this, or different computers. Each day it changes from #7 on page one, to #18 on page two. This has been going on daily for two weeks. Anyone know why would this happen? thanks
Technical SEO | | vansy0 -
Changing Domain Registrars have an affect on rankings?
So, I just wanted to move my domain from GoDaddy to NameCheap. I am still thinking about the move as I am not sure what affect it will have on my rankings. Has anyone here done it before? Did you see any drop in rankings? Also, while I was at it - I was thinking maybe I can add WhoisGuard too. I am not too paranoid about people getting my info from WhoIs, but does having a private Whois have an affect on ranking?
Technical SEO | | uzair0 -
Changing preferred domain
My company has an international website, and because of a technical issue visitors in one of our main countries cannot visits the "www" version of our site. Currently, the www version is our preferred domain - and the non www redirects to that page. To solve this problem, I was thinking of proposing the following and would greatly appreciate any feedback! (Note: If you answered my www vs. non www question, thanks - this is a follow up) 1. Set non www site as the preferred version 2. Redirect from www to non www 3. Contact our current links and ask them to change to without “www” 4. Change canonical URLs to without “www”
Technical SEO | | theLotter0