Is using outbrains legal in Googles eyes?
-
Is using outbrains legal in Googles eyes?
I have been using outbrains and drive 1K traffic each day for 50$ is this something good?
Is using outbrains legal in Googles eyes?
-
As long as the 1k of traffic is strongly engaging with your site, then yes it is good. Alan details the no follow attributes.
-
It's not necessarily a matter of whether Outbrain is "legal" according to Google as a single consideration.
If the code is implemented in a way that doesn't redirect, and if that linking is not nofollowed, then that is in violation of Google policies. That shouldn't happen though.
Where the problem becomes more complex is in how Google's algorithms might process a site that uses Outbrain or Taboola or other similar services, and where the end result is that site's ranking signals decline.
Several scenarios exist that can cause this.
1. 3rd party "hey, here's a bunch of links to other places" widgets can often add heavy page processing delays - especially when there's code bloat, or when at the code level, several server calls go out to that 3rd party server network (and often to multiple different servers in that network), and where bottlenecks can come up over the web eco-system.
2. 3rd party widgets of this type can make it that much more difficult for search algorithms to separate out the on-site content (both visible and within code that isn't seen) from 3rd party, irrelevant, and often absolutely garbage-quality content contained in those widgets. This doesn't always happen, yet it can - and sometimes does cause topical focus confusion, leading to misunderstood topical dilution.
3. Users often click on 3rd party widget links of this type, yet many other users hate it - find it insulting, and downright obnoxious when the quality of those links, and the images they stick in the user's face are grotesque or near-porn in quality. That can sometimes then impact overall User Experience and weaken site quality and trust signals.
It's Outbrain and Taboola who are among the leading causes of ad-blocking now being a major problem for publishers and revenue. The lowest quality ads, especially those disguised as "related content" get geeks and nerds and intellectual site visitors boiling mad. In some ways they aren't as obnoxious as auto-play video ads, or fly-over ads that block reading, yet in quality terms, they are much worse. If the advertising industry doesn't clean up its act with quality, and if publishers don't do the same thing, the battle is only going to grow.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Use 301 or rel=canonical
I have a page on my site that is showing in search results at #9. I created another page on my site with the search term in the url. Wondering if I 301 or rel=canonical. Thank you, Kerry
Technical SEO | | Hydraulicgirl0 -
How Google sees my page
When looking for crawlability issues, what is the difference between using webmaster tools Fetch as google, looking at the cached pages in google index site:mypage.com, or using spider simulator tools.
Technical SEO | | shashivzw0 -
Should I use canonicals? Best practice?
Hi there, I've been working on a pretty dated site. The product pages have tabs that separate the product information, e.g., a tab for specifications, a tab for system essentials, an overview tab that is actually just a copy of the product page. Each tab is actually a link to a completely separate page, so product/main-page is split into product/main-page/specs, product/main-page/resources, etc. Wondering if canonicals would be appropriate in this situation? The information isn't necessarily duplicate (except for the overview tabs) but with each tab as a separate page, I would imagine that's diluting the value of the main page? The information all belongs to the main page, shouldn't it be saying "I'm a version of the main page"?
Technical SEO | | anneoaks0 -
Google is changing the title
Hi! Lately i have seen that Google changed the page titles for some clients, not all... its about 30% of them. For example, the title looks likes this after the Google change: Company name: SEO and Pay per click management But in on that page it looks like this: SEO and Pay per click management - Company name Does anyone know why?
Technical SEO | | DanielNordahl1 -
Ranking on google.com.au but not google.com
Hi there, we (www.refundfx.com.au) rank on google.com.au for some keywords that we target, but we do not rank at all on google.com, is that because we only use a .com.au domain and not a .com domain? We are an Australian company but our customers come from all over the world so we don't want to miss out on the google.com searches. Any help in this regard is appreciated. Thanks.
Technical SEO | | RefundFX0 -
RSS Feed Errors in Google
We recently (2 months ago) launched RSS feeds for the category pages on our site. Last week we started seeing error pages in Webmaster Tools' Crawl Errors report pop up for feeds of old pages that have been deleted from the site, deleted from the sitemap, and not in Google's index since long before we launched the RSS feeds. Example: www.mysite.com/super-old-page/feed/ I checked and both the URL for the feed and the URL for the actual page are returning 404 statuses. www.mysite.com/super-old-page/ is also showing up in our Crawl Errors. Its been deleted for months but Webmaster Tools is very slow to remove the page from their Crawl Error report. Where is Google finding these feeds that never existed?
Technical SEO | | Hakkasan0 -
Google webmaster tools
I have linked webmaster tools to Google analytics account. My question is where can i see Webmaster reports in Google analytics ?
Technical SEO | | seoug_20050