Re-connect Goggle Analytics to Moz
-
I lost the GA account connection to my moz campaign account.
I am re-connecting now but on the traffic settings, when I am about to disconnect, I get a warning that I will lose the historical data, what is the impact of loosing this data for the campaign?
Thank you
-
Success! So glad you were able to get that hooked up. Have a great rest of your day!
-
Got It after refresh!
Thank you so much for your support Tawny.
-
If the reauthorization worked, you should see a success banner. You may need to refresh a couple of times in order to see the correct profiles and successfully reconnect.
-
Thank you Tawny.
So I am trying to reconnect now, but when I click on "connect another GA account" (because the one it displays in the campaign settings is not the right one) and then I choose the account for GA, and nothing happened after that, and I don't see the success banner. Should I have to wait some time ?
-
That's one of the most common reasons for losing connection to a GA profile, yes. Those tokens expire or are revoked, and as a result we lose access.
Give me a shout if there's anything else I can help with!
-
Thank you for your quick answer Tawny.
The connection was lost so I have not choice but to re-connect again.
I guess we lost the Google token though it surprised me that we may had had more than 25 connections. Is this the main reason why we can lose the connection?
-
Hello there! Tawny from Moz's Help Team here.
So, when a Moz Pro Campaign is connected to Google Analytics during creation, Google allows us to backfill data for 12 data cycles (i.e. 12 days, 12 weeks, and 12 months.) However, if GA is connected after the Campaign is already running, they will only allow us to collect data going forward from the date of the connection.
I'm afraid the only way to see the historical traffic data in a Campaign for this site would be to create a new Campaign and to connect to your GA profile during the set-up process. Unfortunately, we aren't able to transfer data for the other Campaign sections from the Campaign that you currently have running for the site, so the new Campaign would not include the data you have already been tracking historically for the rest of the Campaign.
Feel free to reach out to help@moz.com if there's anything else we can help with!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Moz Trust do not display
Hello, I just see there is some problem in seo moz even pro membership. I can not see Moz Trust to check trust ratio.How I can do it if it is blank. I also do not find a Single Question example for Example Trust Link profile I see there is a similar post by majestic but not in Seo moz. I would like to know similar details like majestic showing the example good site or bad site.Example reference below.
Moz Bar | | rarcntv
https://blog.majestic.com/general/using-majestic-citation-flow-trust-flow-check-quality-link-prospects/ So I see similar example post that is atleast help me to understand the depth of quality link profile and bad link profile point of view from seo moz. Thanks0 -
How does a non-traditional TLD impact Moz's crawl test?
I have a client who moved from a .com to .academy domain 6 months ago, and their current crawl tests are coming back with a universal page authority of 1, along with 0 indexed backlinks. The previous version of the site had an average page authority of 35-40, the site architecture and content are nearly identical, and there are no other errors or red flags in the crawl report that would hold back their organic rankings. In fact, looking at the site's analytics account, I can see dozens of sites that provide current and properly functioning backlinks, non of which are listed on the crawl test. So the question is - is Moz currently unable to properly crawl a .academy (or any other non-traditional TLD) site, or is there some deeper issue with the site's SEO that I'm not seeing? Thanks!
Moz Bar | | ThinkAOR1 -
Should I exclude prepositions in tracked keywords of moz analytics?
I'm new to Moz. Just set up my trial campaign, and it had suggested many keywords. Many of the phrases that were suggested do not contain prepositions. For example, instead of something like "sporting good stores in Chicago" it suggested "sporting good stores Chicago" Today, I looked at the on-page optimization suggestions, which are (of course) suggesting that I remove prepositions from my page to rank well. Well, as you know, that is unnatural to the reader. But I suspect people are searching in higher volume, leaving the prepositions out. I know that if I were to search for a sporting goods store in Chicago, I would probably leave out "in." What should I do? Should I remove all the suggested keywords, and make them readable (which people are less like using in their search?) Do I go back to all my pages and try to optimize it for a keyword that is natural, but does not include a preposition (such as Chicago sporting goods stores) or should I be doing something else?
Moz Bar | | osaka731 -
Does anyone have a good article or video on how to read the SEO MOZ crawl report column by column?
I am trying to find a good how-to on how to read and analyze each column of the SEO MOZ crawl report, specifically, the excel sheet it allows you to export. What I'm really trying to get to the bottom of is what the "Yes" indiciates under rel-cononical. If it says "yes," does this mean that the link in question has been canonoicalized?
Moz Bar | | armcwill0 -
Moz / more changes on the way?
I love Moz and the community and all the tools here. I admit I haven't rolled around in all the new things rolled out a few months ago. I thought there were more changes on the way but I wasn't sure if those already happened and I missed them or if I need to be patient? Affiliate program, client reporting? Thanks for any response. Have a great weekend! Matthew
Moz Bar | | Mrupp441 -
Crawl Diagnostics: Exlude known errors and others that have been detected by mistake? New moz analytics feature?
I'm curious if the new moz analytics will have the feature (filter) to exclude known errors from the crwal diagnostics. For example, the attached screenshot shows the URL as 404 Error, but it works fine: http://en.steag.com.br/references/owners-engineering-services-gas-treatment-ogx.php To maintain a better overview which errors can't be solved (so I just would like to mark them as "don't take this URL into account...") I will not try to fix them again next time. On the other hand I have hundreds of errors generated by forums or by the cms that I can not resolve on my own. Also these kind of crawl errors I would like to filter away and categorize like "errors to see later with a specialist". Will this come with the new moz analytics? Anyway is there a list that shows which new features will still be implemented? knPGBZA.png?1
Moz Bar | | inlinear0 -
Can the Moz tool identify variations of a Chinese language branded keyword?
We've recently started a trial of the Moz Pro service and are tracking a selection of keywords. Our primary band / product name is 功夫英语(Kungfu English), so we've set a rule that any keywords containing those four Chinese characters (功夫英语) should be marked as a branded keyword. However, in the "Non-Paid Keywords Sending Search Visits" section of our traffic report, we see a few variations on our brand name that are not being marked as branded keywords. (See attached Images). Based on our rules, shouldn't these variations also be marked as branded keywords without our needing to manually add them as such? Or have I misunderstood the intent of this rule? For the English text, the brand rule about words containing "kungfuenglish" seems to have resulted in all of "www.kungfuenglish.com", "http://www.kungfuenglish.com", and kungfuenglish being labelled as branded keywords. However, I'm not seeing the same sort of result with variations on the Chinese keyword, 功夫英语. KedTi1D.png z5bcUIt.png
Moz Bar | | PaulCoffey0