Moved brand's shop to a new domain. will our organic traffic recuperate?
-
Hello,
We are a healthcare company with a strong domain authority and several thousand pages of service related content at brand.com. We've been operating an ancillary ecommerce store that sells related 3rd party products at brand.com/shop for a little over a year. We recently invested in a platform upgrade and moved our site to a new domain, brandshop.com.
We implemented page-level 301 redirects including all category pages, product detail pages, canonical and non-canonical URLs, etc.. which the understanding that there would not be any loss in page rank. What we're seeing over the last 2 months is an initial dive in organic traffic, followed by a ramp-up period of if impressions (but not position) in the following weeks, another drop and we've steady at this low for the last 2 weeks.
Another area that might have hurt us, the 301 redirects were implemented correctly immediately post launch (on a wednesday), but it was discovered on the following Monday that our .htaccess file had reverted to an old version without the redirect rules. For 3-4 days, all traffic was being redirected from brand.com/shop/url to brandshop.com/badurl.
Can we expect to recover our organic traffic giving the launch screw up with the .htaccess file, or is it more of an issue with us separating from the brand.com domain?
Thanks,
Eugene -
Here we go again. The problems with technicalities...
Ok, here it is - 301 does NOT lose any link equity passed through it. It's known and that's what the linked post and tweets are talking about.
What me and @effectdigital are talking about is "downtime" after 301-redirecting from one domain to another. The value of domain IS affected.
If you would redirect a page from your own domain to another, on your own domain, sure, there wouldn't be any loss in link equity, but there would be loss in page authority for the new page. Think about it like this - google ranks a page, because it "knows and trusts" it. All of the sudden, that page is not there, and just sends google to another page. Google needs time to make sure that it's the same page, about the same stuff, with the same quality. It never takes away the link equity, but the "trust factor" is not there for a bit. When it happens within the same domain, Google understands that it could be simple content move or URL change. When it's cross-domain, the reasons could be much different. From hacking to selling the website etc. So that's why the rankings and usually traffic goes down, but, after Google realizes that it's all the same, and all good, they recover.
Hope this helps, and sorry for the confusion earlier.
-
Thanks for your responses Dmitrii Kustov and effectdigital, to restate the quoted information, our uderstanding was that there would be a downdraft period of at least several weeks, maybe longer, but that we would eventually recuperate our page rank. I had referenced somewhat recent articles stating that 30x redirect no longer dilute pagerank, whereas in the past there could be 10-15% dilution.
https://searchengineland.com/google-no-pagerank-dilution-using-301-302-30x-redirects-anymore-254608
effectdigital, to answer your questions:
- Yes, the full site has moved to brandshop.com as of early last month
- The new site is somewhat of a re-build but 95% the same in terms of pages and content. To clarify, the contents within brand.com/shop and brandshop.com are nearly the same
- We have not shed a lot of content. Just a handful of products were disabled (in a catalog of thousands of products).
- No, we did not benchmark rankings or put any attention into SEO for that matter. I came on board pretty late into the project, and without making excuses, my time was prioritized in other aspects of the business. We did not do a "one-size fits all" redirect, we mapped out all old category to new category URLs and wrote redirect rules, page-to-page redirects in several instances where URLs had changed, and an analysis of top 500 pages to check for outliers.
- I wouldn't call this a hunch migration. From an SEO perspective, I solely focused on getting the redirects in place, and perhaps didn't put enough thought into whether or we should have moved to a new domain from an SEO perspective and whether the cons outweighed the other business decisions behind the move.
-
"the understanding that there would not be any loss in page rank" - the prior response from Dmitrii Kustov hit the nail on the head here. This was terrible information. It's well known that although 301 redirects insulate the most possible equity, it's not a sure-fire thing and there usually is down-turn (sometimes significant). The information upon which you were acting was bad.
Redirects also decay over time, so if they have pumped much of the initial equity-bonus into dead, defunct pages which were never meant to exist, you won't get all of that back (even if you fix the redirects). 3-4 days in this probably won't hit you like a sledgehammer (if you fix things NOW this second) - but you will feel it a bit.
Considering that not all PageRank is transferred through 301 redirects, you probably won't recover to your former strength in terms of rankings on redirects alone. If you have made other positive movements (switching to HTTPS, faster page-loading speeds on the new site, better site design, promotional links work for the new domain) then you may recover quickly and even begin to exceed prior performance. If you have literally just changed domain and done nothing else, expect a bit of a rough ride.
If your old domain is no longer in use and is purely a platform for redirects now, it will begin to lose its authority. Google doesn't rank 'doorway' pages. Google doesn't like to rank URLs which then redirect somewhere else! As such, if you have killed your old domain off then you need to be making movements to boost the new domain's authority, so that when the old domain fully decays (and the 301s along with it), you're not left in a hole.
You say "We are a healthcare company with a strong domain authority" - that's an incorrect statement. Domain authority is attached to a domain, not to a company. You **had **strong domain authority, it may now be decaying with some amount being transferred to your new site.
Where you write:
"is it more of an issue with us separating from the brand.com domain?" - there's a whole barrel of worms there. This implies that the old domain is carrying on in some form without your individual part of the business! As such, that domain authority will belong to 'them' and your new site will **only **receive a maximum of equity relating to the 'part' of the site that moved, not the site in its entirety. You won't perform the same as the main / parent site, if you're just a tiny extract. That's an unreasonable expectation! Authority divides it doesn't multiply
Depending on your situation the outcomes could vary wildly. If the old site is completely shut down and turned into a redirect farm, with the kinds of cited muck-ups I'd expect to maybe see 75-80% performance if everything is handled perfectly from ... well, from right now. If you're just an extract of the parent site and they're retaining the 'bulk' of their SEO ranking power, you can't expect to be on that same level. Otherwise SEOs would just recommend all clients to turn their sites into 10 sites and they would all rank equally well (that demonstrably does not work and is not the case)
The main Questions are, has the full site moved? What is the nature of the new site, is it a re-build or just a tiny extract being separated out? Has the site shed a lot of content? Did you benchmark which URLs held the most, and most lucrative rankings before moving - or did you just do a dev-based one-size fits all redirect catch based on logic (but not data)? Did you do a 'hunch' migration? If so, expect to feel the sting
-
Hi there.
First, "...the understanding that there would not be any loss in page rank" - where did you get that info? 0.o It's well-known fact that there always be a downdraft with a period of recovery.
To answer your question - yes, you'll recover (assuming all 301s were done correctly). But it will take time. The problem is that your shop initially had the power and authority of your main domain (when it was brand.com/shop/blabla). Now, it's a brand new domain, with no history. And yes, even though you have redirects, it's still much closer to starting new domain, rather than redirecting domain completely.
Think of it as instead of building second story on top of existing house, you have to build brand new building with foundation and all, using some materials from your existing house. Who suffers? - both. You are taking away from existing place, and it will take longer and more resources to build up new place. Is it beneficial? - Sure, after both buildings are built - you'll have 2 great places to live in.
Hope this makes sense
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Decreased organic traffic but increased Webmaster Tool Queries
We have a client who has had a significant decrease in organic traffic this last month (about 20%) but in Webmaster tools it tells me there was an increase in impressions and clicks. How can these both be accurate?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jfeitlinger0 -
HTML5: Changing 'section' content to be 'main' for better SEO relevance?
We received an HTML5 recommendation that we should change onpage text copy contained in 'section" to be listed in 'main' instead, because this is supposedly better for SEO. We're questioning the need to ask developers spend time on this purely for a perceived SEO benefit. Sure, maybe content in 'footer' may be seen as less relevant, but calling out 'section' as having less relevance than 'main'? Yes, it's true that engines evaluate where onpage content is located, but this level of granular focus seems unnecessary. That being said, more than happy to be corrected if there is actually a benefit. On a side note, 'main' isn't supported by older versions of IE and could cause browser incompatibilities (http://caniuse.com/#feat=html5semantic). Would love to hear others' feedback about this - thanks! 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mirabile0 -
We sold our site's domain and have a new one. Where do we go from here?
We recently sold our established domain -- for a compelling price -- and now have the task of transitioning to our new domain. What steps would you recommend to lesson the anticipated decline from search engines in this scenario?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | accessintel0 -
How would I be able to move content from one domain to another?
I have a client that wants to migrate some of his site's content to a new domain, not all of the content, just some of it. This is not an address change. He wants to continue actively using the domain name where all this content currently resides, so it's not a matter of notifying search engines of an address change. The first thing that comes to mind is the use of the canonical tag, but it's not making sense. Any recommendations? Thanks in advance.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | UplinkSpyder0 -
Google's serp
Hello Guys ! I will appreciate if you will share your thoughts re the situation i have. The homepage for one of my sites is one last page of google's serp, although internal pages are displayed in the top 10. 1. Why ?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Webdeal
2. What should I do to correct the situation with the homepage ? regards0 -
301 many smaller domains to a new, large domain
Hi all, I have a question regarding permanently redirecting many small websites into one, large new one. During the past 9 years I have created many small websites, all focusing on hotel reservations in one specific city. This has served me beautifully in the past, but I have come to the conclusion that it is no longer a sustainable model and therefore I am in the process of creating one large, worldwide hotel reservations website. To not loose any benefit of my hard work the past 9 years, I want to permanently redirect the smaller websites to the correct section of my new website. I know that if it is only a few websites, that this strategy is perfectly acceptable, but since I am talking about 50 to 100 websites, I am not so sure and would like to have your input. Here is what I would like to do: (the domain names are not mine, just an example) Old website: londonhotels.com 301 to newdomain.com/london/ Old website: berlinhotels.com 301 to newdomain.com/berlin/ Old website: amsterdamhotels.com 301 to newdomain.com/amsterdam/ Etc., etc. My plan is to do this for 50 to 100 websites and would like to have your thoughts on if this is an acceptable strategy or not. Just to be clear, I am talking about redirecting only my websites that are in good standing, i.e. none of the websites I am thinking about 301'ing have been penalized. Thanks for your thoughts on this.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | tfbpa0 -
How long does it take before URL's are removed from Google?
Hello, I recently changed our websites url structures removing the .html at the end. I had about 55 301's setup from the old url to the new. Within a day all the new URL's were listed in Google, but the old .html ones still have not been removed a week later. Is there something I am missing? Or will it just take time for them to get de-indexed? As well, so far the Page Authority hasn't transfered from the old pages to the new, is this typical? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SeanConroy0 -
Hundreds of thousands of 404's on expired listings - issue.
Hey guys, We have a conundrum, with a large E-Commerce site we operate. Classified listings older than 45 days are throwing up 404's - hundreds of thousands, maybe millions. Note that Webmaster Tools peaks at 100,000. Many of these listings receive links. Classified listings that are less than 45 days show other possible products to buy based on an algorithm. It is not possible for Google to crawl expired listings pages from within our site. They are indexed because they were crawled before they expired, which means that many of them show in search results. -> My thought at this stage, for usability reasons, is to replace the 404's with content - other product suggestions, and add a meta noindex in order to help our crawl equity, and get the pages we really want to be indexed prioritised. -> Another consideration is to 301 from each expired listing to the category heirarchy to pass possible link juice. But we feel that as many of these listings are findable in Google, it is not a great user experience. -> Or, shall we just leave them as 404's? : google sort of says it's ok Very curious on your opinions, and how you would handle this. Cheers, Croozie. P.S I have read other Q & A's regarding this, but given our large volumes and situation, thought it was worth asking as I'm not satisfied that solutions offered would match our needs.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sichristie0