4xx (not found) errors seem spurious, caused by a "\" added to the URL
-
Hi SEOmoz folks
We're getting a lot of 404 (not found) errors in our weekly crawl.
However the weird thing is that the URLs in question all have the same issue.
They are all a valid URL with a backsalsh ("") added. In URL encoding, this is an extra %5C at the end of the URL.
Even weirder, we do not have any such URLs in our (Wordpress-based) website.
Any insight on how to get rid of this issue?
Thanks
-
No, Google Webmaster tools do not list an error here.
Its indeed an SEOmoz bug. Ryan, thanks for trying though!
-
My request is for a real link that I can click on and view the page.
In most cases where someone described an issue to me, either a key piece of information was left out or missed. If you cannot share that information, I understand. In the interest of being helpful, I wanted to ask.
It is entirely possible this is a crawler issue, but it is also possible the crawler is functioning perfectly and Google's crawler will produce the same result. That is my concern.
-
Well actualy I did already. The example I gave above is exactly that, only I replaced the real URL with "URL".
In a bit greater detail, the referring page is actually URL1 and this page contains the javascript
item = '
- text';
which produces 404 errors for URL2 in the SEOmoz crawl report.
-
It is entirely possible the issue is with the SEOmoz crawler. I would like to see it improved as well.
I am concerned the root issue may actually be with your site. Would you be willing to share an example of a link which is flagged in your report along with the referring page?
-
Thanks for the tips. After drilling down on the referer, this looks like an SEOmoz bug.
We are using a wordpress plugin called "collapsing archives" which creates LEGAL archive links with a javascript snippet like this:
item = '
- text';
As you can see this is totally legal javascript. But it seems SEOmoz is scanning the javascript without interpretation and picking up the escaped quotation mark ' after the URL and interpreting it as an additional \ at the end of the URL.
Since the plugin is behaving legally and works well - we want to keep using it. What's the chance that SEOmoz will fix the bug?
-
Many people do not realize when you add the backslash character, you change the URL. You can actually present a different web page for the URL with the trailing slash.
A popular cause of the problem is linking. If you check your weekly crawl report, there will be a column called Referrer. That is the source of the link. Check the referring page and find the link. Fix the link (i.e. remove the trailing slash) and the problem will go away on the next crawl. Of course, you want to determine how the link appeared and ensure it doesn't happen again.
-
If I had to have a guess I'd look into any javascript on the page that is perhaps adding or pointing to the URL with backslash.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Difference between urls and referring urls?
Sorry, nit new to this side of SEO We recently discovered we have over 200 critical crawler issues on our site (mainly 4xx) We exported the CSV and it shows both a URL link and a referring URL. Both lead to a 'page not found' so I have two questions? What is the difference between a URL and a referring URL? What is the best practice/how do we fix this issue? Is it one for our web developer? Appreciate the help.
Moz Pro | | ayrutd1 -
Site Crawl Error
In moz crawling error this message is appears: MOST COMMON ISSUES 1Search Engine Blocked by robots.txt Error Code 612: Error response for robots.txt i asked help staff but they crawled again and nothing changed. there's only robots.XML (not TXT) in root of my webpage it contains: User-agent: *
Moz Pro | | nopsts
Allow: /
Allow: /sitemap.htm anyone please help me? thank you0 -
Rogerbot crawls my site and causes error as it uses urls that don't exist
Whenever the rogerbot comes back to my site for a crawl it seems to want to crawl urls that dont exist and thus causes errors to be reported... Example:- The correct url is as follows: /vw-baywindow/cab_door_slide_door_tailgate_engine_lid_parts/cab_door_seals/genuine_vw_brazil_cab_door_rubber_68-79_10330/ But it seems to want to crawl the following: /vw-baywindow/cab_door_slide_door_tailgate_engine_lid_parts/cab_door_seals/genuine_vw_brazil_cab_door_rubber_68-79_10330/?id=10330 This format doesn't exist anywhere and never has so I have no idea where its getting this url format from The user agent details I get are as follows: IP ADDRESS: 107.22.107.114
Moz Pro | | spiralsites
USER AGENT: rogerbot/1.0 (http://moz.com/help/pro/what-is-rogerbot-, rogerbot-crawler+pr1-crawler-17@moz.com)0 -
How Old or How Often does the "Beginners Guide to SEO" Get Updated
Good morning 🙂 Just wondering how often does the intro/beginners guide get updated? I often refer back to this guide for some "back to basics" Regards George
Moz Pro | | Giorgio680 -
Crawl Errors and Notices drop to zero
Hi all, After setting up a campaign in Moz the crawl is successful and it showed the Errors and Warnings in crawl diagnostics (each one had about 40-50), but after a few days the number dropped to zero. Only the "notices" seems to stay normal, with a slight drop since the campaign set up, but not dropping to zero. I set this campaign up in a colleague's account and the same thing happened shortly after set up. I didn't find any Q&A already posted so any insight is appreciated!
Moz Pro | | Vanessa120 -
"Too many on-page links" warning on all of my Wordpress pages
Hey guys, I've got like 120 "Too many on-page links" warnings in my crawl diagnostics section. They're all the pages of my WordPress blog. Is this an acceptable and expected warning for Wordpress or does something need to be better optimized? Thanks.
Moz Pro | | SheffieldMarketing0 -
404 Page/Content Duplicates & its "Warning"
My website has MANY duplicate pages and content which are both derived from the MANY 404 pages on my website. While these are flagged in SEOmoz as "Warnings," should this be of concern to SEO effectiveness?
Moz Pro | | dhk50180 -
Can overly dynamic URLs be overcome with canonical meta tags?
I tried searching for questions regarding dynamic URLs and canonical tags, but I couldn't find anything s hopefully this hasn't been covered. There are a large number of overly dynamic URLs reported in our site crawl (>7,000). I haven't looked at each of these, but most of these either have a canonical meta tag or have are indicated as FOLLOW, NO INDEX pages. Will these be enough to overcome any negative SEO impact that may come from overly dynamic URLs? We are down to almost 0 critical errors and this is now the biggest problem reported by the site crawl after too many on page links.
Moz Pro | | afmaury0