How does this domain / page rank for this particular term?
-
Hi everyone, I'm wondering whether someone can enlighten me as to how a particular page / domain is ranking for a term that the page appears to be in no way optimised to receive traffic to.
The search engine is Google Australia and the Search Term (albiet low volume) is "Bunbury Builders" the top organic result is the homepage for "Content Living" www.contentliving.com.au/
There is one single mention of Bunbury on the page (as a phone number in the footer of the page). I've disabled javascript, css, and spoofed my user agent as Googlebot and I can't see anything suspect going on here at all.
I also ran the domain through open site explorer and I couldn't find a single anchor text reference to bunbury directing visitors back to this domain.
We haven't yet begun targeting this term, but I was curious to see (for my own education as much as anything else) how they were achieving this ranking position.
Any feedback would be appreciated.
-
Hi Andrew.
When I began looking at this question I did not immediately realize it was a ccTLD of .au so I looked in Google.com and the results are quite different and probably more in alignment with what you would expect. The question is how much of the difference is attributed to the fact Google.com's algorithms are more updated with respect to Panda and other changes (it seems quite a lot), and how much of the difference is due to geographic targeting differences.
When I look at the site if I were to make a case to support the Bunbury association I would point out five items:
-
Bunbury is mentioned on the page
-
Bunbury is not in the footer, but above the actual footer. You could say the site has two footer areas, but clearly the area where Bunbury is located has more value then the smaller footer area below it.
-
Bunbury is in bold. More to the point, the page has no h1 tag, no italics used, no alt tags used, and only a total of 3 words in bold, so this emphasis has a lot of meaning. This isn't a case of a page with 100 attention getting mechanisms are in place with the emphasis weight divided.
-
Bunbury is one of only two locations mentioned on the page, Bunbury and Perth. This isn't a case where a page is trying to stuff 20+ locations to manipulate associations. It seems quite authentic.
-
A phone number is listed right below the Bunbury mention. I have no familiarity with Australian phone numbers but I presume it is a Bunbury number.
With all of the above considered, the question is whether that is enough for Google to associate Bunbury with the page. I understand your position that it isn't much. Google clearly feels it is enough. I would also share it appears very authentic so clearly Google got it right, but the question is how?
Well either the above alone is enough, or there are some external factors influencing the decision. Some external factors are:
-
You are correct the backlinks do not show any use of Bunbury in anchor text, but there are many links which have addresses in the URL linking to the page. These linking pages clearly have a strong association with a particular physical location, and this can definitely be understood by Google.
-
Google could consider the site's contact page which shows only two locations, one of which is Bunbury. In addition to the information from the home page, there is also a Bunbury fax number, a Bunbury physical address and an e-mail to the bunbury office which shows as bunbury@.
-
The domain ownership and hosting records do not show any Bunbury association and there is not any Google Places listing, but Google could also access business records such as business licensing for example. Google's algorithms are a closely guarded secret and we simply do not use what information is and is not used.
-
-
I concur that link two is absolutely spammy (it's not mine, we've not targeted this term yet), but there are other sites in the top 'x' results that have a higher domain authority, page authority, similar moz trust that could easily hold that position. The only thing holding the top 10 together (besides spam entry number 2) is that they all get an 'F' rating for on-site optimisation.
I just thought there would be more to this particular ranking.
Thanks for the response.
-
Low query volume does impact it, but the first site while not screaming Bunbury builders, is a good site with a bunbury office (on the footer of every page and on the contact page with map, etc.)
When I look at site in position two..., sorry, but it says Bunbury builders too many times:
Bunbury House Builders
Home Builders Australia Bunbury page lists Bunbury builders including Bunbury new home Builders, Bunbury unit builders, Bunbury colonial home and timber home builders, Bunbury project home builders, Bunbury renovation builders, Bunbury removable home builders, carpenter builders in Bunbury, Bunbury design and construct or custom home builders.
The first site also has 28 linking root domains versus 1 for the higher domain auth site. This would seem counter intuitive, but it makes sense.
So, content is king, links are king, and when there are a low number of queries it would seem the better site with a few mentions of the keyword will beat out the stuffed site with 100 mentions.
-
Low query volume does impact it, but the first site while not screaming Bunbury builders, is a good site with a bunbury office (on the footer of every page and on the contact page with map, etc.)
When I look at site in position two..., sorry, but it says Bunbury builders too many times:
Bunbury House Builders
Home Builders Australia Bunbury page lists Bunbury builders including Bunbury new home Builders, Bunbury unit builders, Bunbury colonial home and timber home builders, Bunbury project home builders, Bunbury renovation builders, Bunbury removable home builders, carpenter builders in Bunbury, Bunbury design and construct or custom home builders.
The first site also has 28 linking root domains versus 1 for the higher domain auth site. This would seem counter intuitive, but it makes sense.
So, content is king, links are king, and when there are a low number of queries it would seem the better site with a few mentions of the keyword will beat out the stuffed site with 100 mentions.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is my client's site penalized and if not, why are other lesser quality sites ranking with lower metrics than my client's?
Hello, I'm trying to explain to a client, as to why certain websites that appear in the top 50 listings for a keyword are there when they don't have very good backlink profiles, and for this keyword, seems you need a high PA above 20 or DA above 25, just to page for page 2 - 3. Running a full SERPs report, I have seen that backlinks to the page that's ranking seems to be as high of a factor as PA, followed by DA and overall backlink profile. Having a high score in one of these 4 areas seems to increase your ranking. However, going into page 3 and beyond, seems that things kinda take a weird turn. After comparing the client's site to those ranking on page 2 I could see that all of them had better PA and more links to the page ranking for that keyword, so page 2 I understand why we don't rank on yet. However, looking at page 3, I see that the client's site in question has better PA, DA, links to page and overall links to domain. Which leaves me to think we have a penalty that's keeping us ranking 50 or beyond. Since our metrics across the boards for what MOZ is showing as ranking factors. The more odd issue is that looking at the line graph, shows right at the time we implemented sitewide https our ranking for this one keyword dropped, while rankings for our other keywords increased. Am I to assume it's a keyword density penalty? What penalties are there with a outcome of ranking limits?
Competitive Research | | Deacyde0 -
Why are they ranking?
Hi I've been looking at domains which rank well for a particular search term - plastic storage boxes to try and see why they rank. http://www.poundstretcher.co.uk/home-furniture/storage-organisation/plastic-storage ranks particularly well. From what I can see, they have about 6 backlinks, 28 DA, and 11 PA - which isn't that high compared to others ranking on the first page. I can't work out why they rank so highly, they also rank for over 100 other storage terms for this page. Am I looking in the wrong place?
Competitive Research | | BeckyKey0 -
History of Page or Domain Authority...how?
Hi everyone, is there a way (tools) to see the "history" of any given website in terms of Page or Domain Authority? Like if I went to Alexa and typed in www.angieslist.com it tells me the site ranks #**2,691 **Globally and #670 in the USA. But, is there a way to see how the rank has gone up over time, or where it was a year, two or more ago? Thanks
Competitive Research | | co.mc0 -
Majestic gives me a 24 situation and 24 trust flow. Seomoz just a total number of 7\. How come the difference? My ranking is still bad, so is Majestic crawling faster then google?
Hi, my total domain value number on SEOmoz is 7. In Majestic it is 24 situation and 24 trust flow. My ranking is still bad (page2) and my competitors have a lower trust/ situation flow in Majestic. But in Seomoz the're better. Is the conclusion that Majestic is more up to date then Google itself and that Seomoz is more inline with the google crawling? Because Majestic doesnt reflect my ranking. (ps I started with the domain for a month, and I only have some history in registration)
Competitive Research | | remkoallertz0 -
Competitor research: No data / results displaying on Keyword tools, Aexa
Hi there! I'm trying to research a few competitors using various Keyword tools (SEM Rush, Compete, Keyword Spy -- even Alexa for high level insight). While the bulk of the competitors generate expected results through these tools (a smattering of their top organic and paid search keywords, some traffic estimations through Alexa), ONE of these competitors lists "No results" across all categories and all tools: http://www.bgstar.ca Despite this, we know that they invest heavily in search -- and my SEM Rush toolbar indicates that they have a Google PR of 5 (though I recognize that that should be taken with a grain of salt). So I'm stumped! Has anyone encountered this before? Is there something structural that they might be doing, that's blocking not only Google-based platforms, but Alexa too? Thanks for your help!
Competitive Research | | MACJ0 -
Competitor Keyword Rankings
Is there a way within SEOMoz to uncover the keywords your competitors rank for and their respective SERPs? Thx
Competitive Research | | qiherbs.com1 -
Tool for finding what keywords a competitor ranks for?
Does anyone know of any good tools that display what keywords a competitor ranks for? I have many competitors that I know get a lot of traffic, but I'm not entirely sure where the traffic comes from so it would be nice to plug in their url and get a general overview of what keywords they rank for and what positions.
Competitive Research | | shawn810 -
How many Page Rank 8 sites are there?
Anyone have any estimate of how many Page Rank 8 sites are out there? Best, Steve
Competitive Research | | Aggie0