No Internal Followed Links on My Site?
-
I just ran the Site Explorer on my site (myeyedr.com) and it reported that there are no internal links on www.myeyedr.com or myeyedr.com. However, there were 20 internal followed links on www.myeyedr.com/index.aspx.
I'm guessing this is hurting my SEO. Any suggestions?
-
Thanks for the detailed response. I really appreciate the feedback.
-
I did see your NoFlash content. I'm not certain that all bots see the NoFlash exactly as you expect. For example, since googlebot does try to crawl flash it may not be seeing your noflash content. RogerBot is almost certainly not a good proxy for Googlebot on your site.
I suggest you log in to Google Webmaster Tools: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/ (validate your site if you need to)
Under the diagnostics tab, fetch your page as googlebot, then see if your links are being found.
You also do have a canonical problem on your site. http://www.myeyedr.com/index.aspx#/myeyedr-home and http://myeyedr.com/index.aspx#/myeyedr-home (w/ and w/o the www.) are two different pages in google and look like duplicate content. They are both competing with each other for links. I'd suggest you choose one or the other, and create a 301 redirect from the other. At the very least use a rel="canonical" tag on one version. http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394
You can also specify only one version be indexed in Google Webmaster tools but it's better to solve it on your site, so it's resolved for all search engines.
The index.aspx page you mentioned is redirecting to the myeyedr-home page.
I would still suggest you rethink your flash home page. It simply doesn't have any content on it to signal Google that your are a relevant site to eye exams for example. Outside of your title tag, the keyword "eye exam" doesn't appear anywhere on the site. You have a bunch of keywords in the Meta Keyword field which isn't used by any search engine but does tell your competitors what you are trying to rank for.
Consider a little more content on your home page, with some good semantic markup H1 tags, etc... Alternatively, just don't try to get traffic to your home page, since it isn't designed to rank well. Instead create more keyword specific landing pages, i.e. make https://www.myeyedr.com/request-form.aspx your most compelling page to get clients to book an appointment and then focus your SEO efforts around getting that page to rank well for "Eye Exam".
I know it feels good to build/own a "cool" site, but if I took you into the usability lab and made you watch your prospects try to use your site, you'd likely be very disappointed. Many users will find your unconventional GUI difficult to navigate. To say nothing of users with special accessibility needs, technical issues with Flash, Javascript, etc.. It's particularly ironic for an eye doctors site to be inaccessible to the vision impaired.
At the very least I'd be watching my Google Analytics very carefully. See what percentage of your traffic has flash disabled and/or javascript disabled. Note your conversion rate and bounce rates of those segments vs. your other traffic.
I also happened to notice that your book appointment form is quite extensive. You didn't ask for any forms usability advice but ask yourself if you NEED all that information before the prospect is allowed to walk in your office? Perhaps you'd book more appointemnts with a much simpler form that feels less overwellming. Then you could hand customers an iPad in your waiting room to fill in all that other info.
Good luck!
-
Consider a design that has flash elements and easily spiderable links. Don't leave anything to chance.
-
crvw,
Thanks for the fast response. We actually have an HTML version of the site, which is automatically displayed if Flash is not enabled. This seems to be working quite well, which is why I'm confused. I would expect the spiders to ignore the Flash and pick up the HTML version when it is crawled.
The other interesting thing is that SiteExplorer sees all the links in www.myeyedr.com/index.aspx but not on www.myeyedr.com which is actually displaying index.aspx. Shouldn't the results be the same?
-
Hi Lance,
I took a quick look at myeyedr.com. The whole page is one large flash asset. That's not a great practice from an SEO perspective (or from a Useability and compatibility perspective).
Google and Bing and making some efforts to find links in Flash, so it's possible that the do see your links, but many search engines won't see any links on your page. As you found out, the SiteExplorer bot (RogerBot) Can't see your flash at all.
Don't forget that almost no mobile devices can see your flash site either. Visually impaired users, etc...
It wouldn't be too difficult to recreate your page with HTML/CSS and it would be a lot more SEO friendly.
Sorry to be the barer of bad news.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why would on-site search queries show up as referral traffic?
The site analytics have been set up for over a year and suddenly last month there was a huge spike in referral traffic (1100+ sessions). Upon further investigation, the majority of it was coming directly from internally, either as mysite.com or search.mysite.com and the landing pages from the referrals are all /search.html?query=* This was never an issue before so I'm trying to understand what could have changed. I'm following up with the client to find out if their dev team may have changed anything related to their search engine but I'm wondering if there may be another explanation. A few notes: previously mysite.com / search.mysite.com were not in the Referral Exclusion list. I've added them now but this was never an issue before. Thanks in advance!
Reporting & Analytics | | SEMnMs0 -
UA Codes on Multiple Sites
Someone came in and set up Google Analytics code on one of our clients' sites before we got there and it is showing data from an outside website that the code is also on. Does anyone know the best way to find out what that other site is so we can remove this code from both sites? Thanks as always MOZ friends!
Reporting & Analytics | | ReunionMarketing0 -
Webmaster Tools Suddenly Asking For Verification of Site Registered for 5 Years
Google Webmaster Tools has been successfully installed on my website, (www.nyc-officespace-leader.com) for more than five years. Suddenly, today I have received a request to Verify this Site". This makes no sense. The only possibility I can think of is that this is somehow tied to the following events in the last month: 1. Launch of new version of website on June 4th
Reporting & Analytics | | Kingalan1
2. Installation of Google of Tag Manager
3. Sudden Increase in number of pages indexed by Google. Unexplained indexing of an additional 175 pages. About 625 pages should be indexed, while 800 are now indexed. In the last month ranking and traffic have fallen sharply. Could it be tat these issues are all linked? But the strangest issue is the request to verify the site. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks,
Alan0 -
WMT and 'Links To Your Site'
Anyone else find that there are, almost continually, links added to the 'Links To Your Site' list from years ago that weren't previously reflected? I'm seeing links that were added to directories in 2008 (by whoever was doing the SEO then) only showing in the last week or so when these links weren't in the list a few months ago. I don't suppose there's much I can do - it's just annoying in that it adds to more people to contact to have nonsense removed.
Reporting & Analytics | | Martin_S0 -
Can I view lost links?
Hello! One of the blogs I'm tracking has literally lost like half of the number of external followed links. So, I have two questions really 1) is that common at all? it seems odd that that many would be removed 2) is there a way to see the specific links that were lost? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | yandl
Kevin0 -
Backlinks vs Incoming links
Hi, I've been getting stuck into some SEO analysis for a company I work for and I am a little confused. I've tried a search to get an answer but this has ended up being more confusing. The company has been around for decades and their website since 1996. I read everywhere about 'backlinks'. My SEO toolbar shows ZERO backlinks in Google but 218 in Bing. Google Webmaster tools shows nearly 2,000 incoming links from other sites. Is a backlink the same as an incoming link? Why is this tool showing zero? I am even getting email from SEO spammers saying my backlink count is ZERO. But I can see links everywhere I look to the site. Also, on the link analysis tool with SEOMOZ a competitor is showing 3000 external showing links with 250,000 total links. My site is showing 50 and 470 respectively. I have spent the best part of two years getting the site listed in industry related directories. We have paid for entries in Yahoo and some other high (PR) -ranking directories. Prior to me there was someone else adding the site to directories and getting incoming links from industry related sites. So this has been going on a while. Why are the backlings showing as zero but links from external sites showing over 1800? Thanks TT
Reporting & Analytics | | TheTub0 -
Is the link data from Open Site Explorer in real time or an average?
I just started using Open Site Explorer to track internal and external link data. Is this information given in real time or is it an average over a specified period of time?
Reporting & Analytics | | mequoda0 -
Why is Webmaster Tools not Linking Correctly Google Analytics?
I have a global site with .com as the US site and then /country for all other markets i.e. .com/uk .com/de etc. Each site has it's own WMT profile. Each site has it's own GA profile. Since Google added Search Engine Optimization to the GA interface, I can't track these sites separately under this new feature. It seems to me that it can only be associated with a single WMT profile at a time or rather that WMT can only be associated with a single GA profile at a time. The numbers for the UK and US site are identical, but when I try and link the UK WMT account with GA it removes it from the US profile and vice versa.
Reporting & Analytics | | Red_Mud_Rookie0