Non-linked product short descriptions bad on ecommerce sites?
-
Hi,
I have a question regarding SEO for ecommerce:
Do you guys think it could be a bad thing to display non-linked short product descriptions of products on the home page and category pages? Can that cause cannibalism between different pages and non-optimal keyword targeting?
I have a shop of which it's homepage tend to rank for some unintended phrases.
Thank you,
E
-
Hello mrlolalot (nice name, lol!),
As you already mentioned, Stores Direct has suggested what is about the best way to handle this, which is to not link the short description text, but to use it to improve usability. To that I would add, try to work in a few keyword phrases that are optimized for the page on which the short descriptions appear, which shouldn't be difficult since they are appearing on a category page that is relevant to the type of product they describe. I would also mention one potential downside of showing short descriptions on category pages is that products that live in multiple categories could have their short description showing on more than one page. Still, I think the reward is bigger than the risk as long as you don't have the same products in more than a couple categories. If most of your products are in four, five, six... categories than you're going to have a pretty big duplicate content problem on your hands.
Also as you already mentioned, linking the short description isn't going to do you much good since you're linking the product title above it, which is probably a far-better link to have anyway, keyword-wise. Linking the title of a product is the epitome or relevant anchor text. And I'd stay away from nofollow linking any internal page on the site with the exception of perhaps cart and account type pages, which should be noindexed in the meta tag and/or disallowed in the robots.txt file anyway.
But to answer your question: Yes, it can be a bad thing to display non-linked short product descriptions on the home page and category pages IF you aren't using the keywords for which you want the home and category pages to rank; and IF you are showing that same short description on several pages (i.e. multiple categories and the home page). But I do like short product descriptions to appear on category pages for reasons Stores Direct explained in his first answer. So my advice would be to adjust the keyword use if you can, while addressing the duplicate content problem if that is an issue.
Sometimes with these established sites you'll find the category pages already ranking for the product-level keywords and you may worry that changing the strategy will cause the page to no longer rank. An example:
Your widget category might rank for Small Purple Widget because you have a short description on there for your Small Purple Widget product. The question then becomes: Does your Small Purple Widget page also rank? If not, why not? That is what you, your users, and Google all want to rank. Everyone wants the same thing so it should be simple to fix. And if they both rank, then there really isn't a problem UNLESS - your category page doesn't rank for its own keyword, at which point you should think about adjusting the short description text (if it only appears on that one page) or removing it (if it appears on multiple pages).
As always, testing is key. You can take them out and see what happens. It isn't that difficult to add them back in on most systems.
Let us know if we're not understanding your question correctly.
-
I get your point.
But, since the short description link would be pointing toward the same target as the products name (which naturally comes first) Google won't take that anchor text into consideration for the targeted page. Only the first anchor text counts.
Which means that having the product description link follow or nofollow will make no difference.
-
If you're working with existing short descriptions which contain the keywords the category page is targeting you don't want the short descriptions to link to the product - this is like putting up signposts telling Google that the product pages are all more relevant to the keyword than the category page. The trouble is this raises a usability issue because your site users may like clicking on the short description.
I'm just wondering if there's another way round this - would using "noindex,follow" on the short description links neutralise the cannibalisation issue while retaining usability? My hands on work is more with the content side of things than the technical, so I'm not certain how well this would work.
-
I definitely agree that would be the best way to use short descriptions, and it's definitely the way I would do it if I were to start from scratch.
But the problem that I have now is unfortunately an aged shop with thousands of product and with products short descriptions are fairly rich of (general) keywords.
Do you think I could see improvements by simply linking the short descriptions to the product page?
-
Can it cause cannibalism? It depends on the words you use.
We don't currently use short descriptions but it's a proposal that's on the table. I think that when it's done well it can add real value to site users, with potential to improve click-through from category pages. If we go ahead I won't be keyword stuffing those short descriptions - I'll be using them to differentiate different (but similar) products within a category and trying to work in references to the benefits and advantages of products. It's like the poster campaign for a movie - ideally you want a good image, a memorable title and a catchy strapline that gets you interested in finding out more.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Parsing jQuery Links as Real Links
While trying to diagnose a recent Google penalty I found out that links were being parsed by Google even though they were made using jQuery. I had the linkify plugin on my site and configured it to convert URLs to links on all of my pages. Today I found links to other sites of mine from sites that should not have been linking to them and found that the links came from pages whose links were generated via jQuery. This makes me wonder, how do I know if Google is counting javascript generated links? Is it possible that my native ad widgets are creating links that Google might count? Since I don't own any of the sites that advertise via the widgets I don't know how to tell if they are getting link juice or not. It used to be that Google didn't parse javascript, so you could add as many links to your site via javascript as you wanted without being seen by Google as linking to those sites. Does anyone know of a jQuery plugin that does turn URLs into clickable links that Google won't parse as real links?
On-Page Optimization | | STDCarriers0 -
Ecommerce product page duplicate content
Hi, I know this topic has been covered in the past but I haven't been able to find the answers to this specific thing. So let's say on a website, all the product pages contain partial duplicate content - i.e. this could be delivery options or returning policy etc. Would this be classed as duplicate content? Or is this something that you would not get concerned about if it's let's say 5-10% of the content on the page? Or if you think this is something you'd take into consideration, how would you fix it? Thank you!
On-Page Optimization | | MH-UK0 -
Do javascript pseudo-links dilute link juice ?
Hi, On our ecommerce, we use multiple pseudo-links for the layered navigation (to filter by color, site, etc), so that google doesn't crawl every combination of filters. I know this kind of links don't pass link juice and don't get crawled (provided you hide the target urls in your javascript). But, as there is an "onclick" property, I'm afraid that google could understand that these are links, and treat them the same way as nofollowed links (not following them but diluting link juice anyway). Do you know if this is the case ? Thanks,
On-Page Optimization | | Strelok0 -
The correct way to go from PHP site to HTML site?
I have a website fully coded in PHP and I am doing a re-design over to an HTML site. I searched through the Q&A and there were some conflicting answers. Some said you will need to 301 all the pages. Others said to use the .htaccess to parse all the files as html. What is the correct way I should go about this? Thanks in advance!
On-Page Optimization | | reliabox0 -
Too many links??
Hi mozzers I have a question that I need some feedback on please, I run 2 websites both e commerce retail sites and both doing well with SEO however, Our strongest site and parent site so to speak links to our sister site. Here is the outline. Site1 parent site is hosted on a unique URL and on a VPS. I have 384 links coming into this site from the other sister site. from various pages Site 2 the sister site, has 68,864 links coming in from site 1 as we have a link in the footer on site 1 to the home page of site 2. So far we have had no adverse affects from the Google zoo releases, however I am concerned that this many links will soon get penalized. Thoughts from anyone please? I am considering removing the footer link, thus removing 68,000 + incoming links. Looking for any advice here please. thanks Ryan
On-Page Optimization | | RyanC10 -
Google found bad links delete them or 301 redirect?
we went into our google account and saw about 70 bad links that they found on our site. what's the best thing to do, seo-wise: should we go into the pages that have the bad links and delete them from the html code, or re-direct them in our htaccess script?
On-Page Optimization | | DerekM880 -
Www vs "non" www site addresses and SEO
I first apologize for the lame question title - didn't really know how to word it... I'm having a bit of a conundrum and cannot figure out whats going on, but in the mean time I thought I would ask to see if its hurting my ranking. My site at www.ap-mg.com is built on WordPress using the Thesis them by DIY (just a little upfront info). I am very careful to make sure that all my links are in a particular format i.e. http://www.ap-mg.com - on my site, as well as other sites I have my profile on. My site also used to be hosted on the /home directory until about a month ago. My problem is that when I click on the DA MoxBar link while at my sites homepage, it takes me to Open Explorer, but to ap-mg.com and shows no results - I then add the www to the front of the address and vuala - results. But then the second issue I'm having is then it tells me that my site is redirecting the the /home directory, which its not and I'm still trying to figure that one out. So with all the craziness with my site, www, no www, /home....is this killing any chance of real ranking?
On-Page Optimization | | apmgsmith0 -
Ecommerce
I'm the Marketing Director at a car dealership that is trying to break into online shopping. We have had an internet sales team for about 4 years handling online leads. These leads were generated by forms present on our website. However, I'm trying to step up our production of leads online (we are currently at 1-2%). Here's my problem: The current method that car dealership website developers use, at least the 4 I've utilized, makes all the search pages have duplicate content, and many of the product/car pages have duplicate content (Title, etc.). Is there a way to stop all of these search pages from coming up as duplicate content? My other question is: Our inventory completely refreshes about every two months, what would be the best option for our product web pages? Should I no-index them? 301 redirect to a similar vehicle? Any better options? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | ResslerMotors0