Canonical issue in open site explorer
-
When I look at my back links in OSE, I see two landing pages on my site that are really the same page. www.mysite.com/ and www.mysite.com/(affiliate code here)
These show different inbound link characteristics and page authority.
The page in question has a rel=canonical tag.
Am I doing something wrong?
-
Thank you. I was concerned I might have split my juice between two versions.
"OSE will also calculate redirected metrics into calculating scores such as MozRank and Domain Authority, and I believe there are plans (if they haven't been implemented already) of including canonical metrics into these calculations."
This is interesting. If I understand this correctly, this tells me that when you have inbound links with affiliate codes and such attached to the URL that MozRank is not calculated correctly; it is split between two "versions" of the same page.
-
Hi Eugene - It sounds like you are doing things right.
Open Site Explorer diplays Link Metrics for every single page in it's index as if it is independent - even if it 301 redirects or points a canonical link towards another page.
For example we can see that the inbound link metrics for the SEOmoz.org/blog differ from the metrics for SEOmoz.org/blog/ (note the extra backslash).
One advantage of this method is that we can see if our external links are pointing to the right page, and correct them if necessary. At this time, OSE will notify you if the URL you are checking 301 redirects to another page, but doesn't tell you if it has a canonical. OSE will also calculate redirected metrics into calculating scores such as MozRank and Domain Authority, and I believe there are plans (if they haven't been implemented already) of including canonical metrics into these calculations.
But back to you - what you really need is a way to make sure you've implemented your canonical tags correctly. You can check the duplicate title/duplicate content and the canonical reports in the SEOmoz PRO platform. You can also use the MozBar to check canonical tags, or a tool like URI valet to make sure your canonical tags are pointed to the right URL.
This is important because you want to avoid canonicalization errors that can lead to a loss of rankings and search engine visibility. That said, from your brief description, it sounds like you're doing everything right.
-
I do have access to the page. I am slightly confused by your reply. I was thinking that this was a reporting issue with the OSE. I shouldn't need to use a 301 when a
rel="canonical" href="http://www.example.com" />
is in the header
-
I would contact my server administrator to have them force your 301, and pages www.example.com/(client code)
If that you dont get support from, I will have my Hosting administrator help you further with this question. Cause if you dont have access to the Default home page, all your main pages utilize the code for, it will be over looked.
Let me know
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why my site not crawl?
hi all me allow rogerbot in robots.txt but rogerbot can't crawl my site my site: toska-co.ir
Moz Pro | | jahanidawodi0 -
Cleaning Up Bad 301 External Links From Old Site
A relatively new site I'm working on has been hit really hard by Panda, due to over optimization of 301 external links which include exact keyword phrases, from an old site. Prior to the Panda update, all of these 301 redirects worked like a charm, but now all of these 301's from the old url are killing the new site, because all the hyper-text links include exact keyword matches. A couple weeks ago, I took the old site completely down, and removed the htaccess file, removing the 301's and in effect breaking all of these bad links. Consequently, if one were to type this old url, you'd be directed to the domain registrar, and not redirected to the new site. My hope is to eliminate most of the bad links, that are mostly on spammy sites, that aren't worth linking to. My thought is these links would eventually disappear from G. My concern is that this might not work, because G won't re-index these links, because once they're indexed by G, they'll be there forever. My fear is causing me to conclude I should hedge my bets, and just disavow these sites using the disavow tool in WMT. IMO, the disavow tool is an action of last resort, because I don't want to call attention to myself, since this site doesn't have a manual penalty inflected on it. Any opinions or advise would be greatly appreciated.
Moz Pro | | alrockn0 -
Open Site Explorer CSV export limit?
Hi! Something has been puzzling me. I've filter down a few things within open site explorer to produce some links of interest to me - around 500 records are showing When I try to export it via CSV however, only 25 links appear? Anyone know why and how I can get the rest?? David
Moz Pro | | rejigdigital0 -
Open Site Explorer WAY Off in Terms of Link Profiles?
Hey, One of our websites is www.inspireeducation.net.au. I have noticed although tools like Raventools capture our links well, Open Site Explorer is doing a terrible job... For example the following page >>> http://www.inspireeducation.net.au/courses/training-and-assessment-courses/certificate-iv-in-training-and-assessment/ has many many more than 8 root domains linking, however Open Site Explorer only presents 8? We are finding the same problem for almost any page we review through Open Site. Does anyone have any idea why the numbers would be so out? The new links are NOT fresh links. Many are well-established (been there for years), and even many newer ones have been there for more that 60 days. I find the same thing when reviewing competitor sites.. is Open Site Explorer working properly at all at the moment?
Moz Pro | | love-seo-goodness0 -
Moving from a dynamic site to nopcommerce
Hi, First question since becoming a member so be gentle with me ;o) We are moving from a site using a dynamically generated ecommercetemplate to a nopcommerce site. I have two questions about this I know that 301 redirects are the best way to pass "link juice" but with the site being dynamically generated a lot of these links will simply disappear when we move to nop, meaning that they wont actually be there in order to add a 301. Any advice on this would be appreciated. How can i get a list of the pages on my current site which have the best rank in order to create the redirects. Unfortunately due to some technical issues we had with google analytics we were unable to install it so dont really have any analytics to give us some extra info. I was hoping that there would be somewhere within seomoz where i could be directed. Many thanks Chris
Moz Pro | | cjhamill0 -
Open site explorer showing zero backlinks
My new website: http://www.thelifesciencesreport.com/ is showing zero backlinks in Internet Explorer and I know of dozens that have posted our links: to name a few: http://www.pharmainfo.net/merck-news/02/10/2012/platform-technologies-promise-big-payoffs-juan-sanchez http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/296320/20120210/pharmaceuticals-pharma-medicine-platform-technologies-neurobiology-parkinsons-disease.htm http://www.google.com/finance/company_news?q=NYSE:MRK#
Moz Pro | | StreetwiseReports
http://www.businessinsider.com/platform-technologies-promise-big-payoffs-juan-sanchez-2012-2 http://www.traderwise.com/content/platform-technologies-promise-big-payoffs-juan-sanchez http://silverspotprice.com/
http://www.ihavenet.com/merck.html http://www.wallstreetwindow.com/aggregator/categories/1 any reason this is happening?0 -
Anyone having issues with OSE?
Everytime i try to access the tool i get the following error: "Error 310 (net::ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS): There were too many redirects."
Moz Pro | | Anest0 -
Do crawl reports see canonical tags?
Greetings, I just redesigned my site, www.funderstanding.com, and have the old site pointing to the new site via canonical URLs. I had a new crawl test run and it showed a large amount of duplicate content. Does the SEO Moz crawl tool validate canonical urls and adjusts the duplicate content count or is this note considered? FYI, I sent from no duplicate content to having 865 errors since the redesign went up so that seems suspicious. I would think though that assuming the canonical tag were used properly, and I hope it is?, that this would not be a problem?? All help with this is most appreciated. Eric
Moz Pro | | Ericc220