Article Marketing - manual vs automated or both
-
Hi Mozzers,
Are services such as Article Samurai or Content Crooner worth the time/effort/money?
On one hand, I cannot see them generating high quality links. But , they may be able to help on the quantity side of the link building equation.
Does anyone have any thoughts or experience with automated article submission?
Thanks,
Peter
-
The problem with all of this is that "automation" can lead to just about anything depending on the service you use. It IS possible to get an effective number of anchor text and contextual links with the right set up, especially if you generate your own link network that only you use, but then you have the problem of dupe content. The RIGHT way to do it is far too time consuming to make it worth your while unless you can find a legit link builder/article writer on odesk that will make the time/cost problem go away, but even then they usually don't speak English as a first language and you end up spending a lot of time rewriting the articles because the grammar and syntax is absurd..
Also what does
"Searching for your exact topic in Google, and finding incomplete resources. Ask them for links" mean? I didn't understand what you meant by incomplete resources. Thanks
-
There are blogs out there on how to use code on Google Docs to pretty much automate most of this process.
-
I think this answer is spot-on and voices one of my deeper concerns that has been lurking in my mind: relevancy. Automated submission does not take this factor into account and non-relevant links will hurt in the long term as it is not a natural link profile.
I think the answer to off-load some work is outsourcing which if performed in proper fashion might be the way to go. All of your answers have helped point me in this direction. If I build a list of potential candidates, write the intro email etc...but outsource the actual sending of requests, this can help give me some extra hours during the week.
Thanks everyone.
-
Much better answer to the actual question!
-
I have a client where 95%+ of their backlinks are from low-quality directories, articles, and automated link-exchanges. They built all of these before I came on board. This has caused long-term damage to their backlink profile and the rankings are not better because of the time/money spent. Their quantity of links is high. Quality LOW. Not only am I building high-quality, legit links to the site, but I've been actively trying to remove some of low-quality links they had previously obtained.
I work with another site that is newer, music related. We do NOT have a high "quantity" of links coming in, but they are all extremely natural and relevant with lots of branded anchor text. We have pages with 25 domains linking in and we're outranking other pages (for very competitive terms) that have 10 times that. We've never done any automated link-building of any kind.
So for me personally and the things I've witnessed, it is a complete waste of time and money to be going for low-quality links.
And when I say "low-quality", I don't mean a low Page Authority or a Google PageRank of zero or only a handful of backlinks pointing in. I'm referring to web pages that have...
SPAM!!
- links that are easy to obtain
- links out to sites having anything to do with sofware stuff, web design, computer whatever, directories, loans, ppc, anything with "ads" in it, employment sites, insurance sites, etc etc
- backlinks based on automated services
But I have to say, if you do go this route, make sure you get plenty of branded anchor text, it will help you in the long run.
This is just my opinion. There are lots of people using automated services. Maybe an SEOmoz member can chime in with a recent success story regarding automated article submission?
-
If you use automatic submission you're faced with a problem. Duplicate content. If you want to get around the duplicate content problem then you're faced with another problem, you have to use article spinning. Both of which are not good. Aside from that, the majority of the sites the auto software's submit to won't end up giving you any links and your article will still read with visibile, non-working html code in it, of the ones that do give you a link it will be either nofollow, or pass zero of anything to you because it's spammed to hell with millions of articles for being one of the few article sites that allow follow links.
Now, there might be a few sites that pass juice, but that will be because of quality levels in what they publish. So submitting to them would have to be manual only, as there's no way any auto software would get your article into a site like that.
-
Thanks Ressler! All good advice in terms of manual submission. Regarding the duplicate content issue, I know Article Samurai guarantees this won't be an issue as they do have a spinning component as part of their service.
I'm just considering this as a way of generating quantity links while I work on the quality links using the methods you listed above.
Nothing's easy in this effort but if I can either automate some of this workload or outsource the quantity aspect of link building, I can maximize my efforts with a little bit of scale.
Thanks again
-
Article submission used to be the bees-knees (is that how the phrase is spelled? Anyway...). However, what you will really generate is a whole bucket load of duplicate content on the web. To make matters worse, it's unlikely your articles will get picked up.
A better use of time is:
- writing fantastic copy, citing sources with followed links (welcome back to high school!).
- Emailing people in, or remotely in your industry (Real Estate Agent - property lawyer, house insurance, home inspector, etc.) and suggesting how useful this article might be to their clients.
- Placing article on Digg, Reddit, Twitter, Facebook hoping some news companies see it, and pick it up.
- Looking on Haro (http://www.helpareporter.com/) to see if anyone is writing about your topic, and needs a source.
- Searching for your exact topic in Google, and finding incomplete resources. Ask them for links
- Make friends in some news departments, try get them to link to you (give them a couple stories every once in a while, and they will help you out).
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Old Spammy Backlinks but No Manual Penalty...No Results
We have taken over a site in which the client had unfortunately hired an SEO consultant who bought bad comment spam links. Webmaster Tools does not show a manual penalty of any kind but clearly this was bad practice from the former "SEO" consultant. I believe we have a good structure of the completely new website we have built for the client but I am not sure of the best way to reduce any negative fallout from the previous actions. I've read conflicting information about submitting disavow report to Google for the comment spam links. In some cases, I have read that it would be irrelevant since there is not a manual penalty. I am fairly certain rankings are being negatively effected from this action and looking for the best way to neutralize the algorithmic penalty. Not sure if this helps or not but I use GWMT "Download Latest Links" and see that the soonest Google discovered one of these links is 4/4/2013. Most of the links were generated some time during 2012. How do you even begin to try to reach out and have comment spam manually removed...when most of the sites that allowed the comment spam to begin with are spam sites themselves?
Link Building | | bluelynxmarketing0 -
Backlink count is WAY high vs. competitors
Hi all! My site was managed by a SEO company that is no longer around. I started to look for a new agency and in the process, found Moz and decided to try out the report. While running the report, found out that my I have 3K links vs 173/1600/6344 links that my three other competitors have. Any simple guidance will be appreciated.
Link Building | | fullerton0 -
Unique Domains vs. Total Links?
At what point is there diminishing returns from getting multiple links from one website? Edit: To clarify, when doing competitor research I come across lots of sites that have say 500 linking domains with 5000 total links. When setting goals and calculating the types of links I should go after, I'm not certain which number is the one actually helping the site to rank.
Link Building | | ErikDster0 -
Page links vs. domain links
Hello all, I am trying to find out how Google weighs page inbound links vs. domain inbound links. I have a domain with about 100,000 inbound links and am adding a new page to my domain which at this time has 0 links. I will be trying to outrank a competitors page that has 6,000 inbound links to the competitors page, but only has 26,000 inbound links to my competitors domain . Is there a formula or a way to know how Google values a page link vs. a domain link?
Link Building | | digitalops0 -
Too many external links vs linking root domains - good or bad?
Hi guys, After the latest Linkscape update, we noticed that our website have 424,671 external links with 4,395 linking root domains, so roughly 100 links/domain. Does Google consider this to be a negative thing or we do not need to worry about it. Many thanks. David
Link Building | | sssrpm0 -
What would you do with unqiue articles?
Hi, If you had 10 articles which are unqiue and around 400 - 600 words what would you do with them? I personally would more then likely put on squidoo, wordpress, blogger, weebly, hub pages etc and orientate the setup of these around my target keyword so the title tags, urls, h1's and content are around the term and then place anchor text links (2 of them) in the content of each one. I would then social bookmark each on the top 10 sites. Because it takes so long for me to write the content I sometimes think would it be best to put on the onsite blog. What would others do with this content, is there something else I could do with it that would have a great impact on rankings?
Link Building | | activitysuper0 -
Links per Site vs. Domain Authority
Here's a quaint one: 1. Posting follow links on another site helps increase one's domain authority. 2. If I post to the same site/forum with followed links each week, would my domain authority reap a domain authority increase benefit? In short, is there any domain authority benefit to continually post links to a site to which I've already posted a follow link?
Link Building | | GreenCupboards0 -
Are "Content Farms" still good for backlinking in articles?
Out of morbid curiosity, are "Content Farms" still a good source to use for backlinking within articles that you share? I have yet to see some results to base an answer off of for myself. Some co-workers are wanting to utilize sites like Suite101, ArticlesBase, etc for sharing articles and gaining the benefit of getting some backlinks from these sites. Is this still a good tactic to utilize? My research is telling me no since the Panda Update... Anyone have any insight on this? Thanks!
Link Building | | TKIGWebTeam0