Article Marketing - manual vs automated or both
-
Hi Mozzers,
Are services such as Article Samurai or Content Crooner worth the time/effort/money?
On one hand, I cannot see them generating high quality links. But , they may be able to help on the quantity side of the link building equation.
Does anyone have any thoughts or experience with automated article submission?
Thanks,
Peter
-
The problem with all of this is that "automation" can lead to just about anything depending on the service you use. It IS possible to get an effective number of anchor text and contextual links with the right set up, especially if you generate your own link network that only you use, but then you have the problem of dupe content. The RIGHT way to do it is far too time consuming to make it worth your while unless you can find a legit link builder/article writer on odesk that will make the time/cost problem go away, but even then they usually don't speak English as a first language and you end up spending a lot of time rewriting the articles because the grammar and syntax is absurd..
Also what does
"Searching for your exact topic in Google, and finding incomplete resources. Ask them for links" mean? I didn't understand what you meant by incomplete resources. Thanks
-
There are blogs out there on how to use code on Google Docs to pretty much automate most of this process.
-
I think this answer is spot-on and voices one of my deeper concerns that has been lurking in my mind: relevancy. Automated submission does not take this factor into account and non-relevant links will hurt in the long term as it is not a natural link profile.
I think the answer to off-load some work is outsourcing which if performed in proper fashion might be the way to go. All of your answers have helped point me in this direction. If I build a list of potential candidates, write the intro email etc...but outsource the actual sending of requests, this can help give me some extra hours during the week.
Thanks everyone.
-
Much better answer to the actual question!
-
I have a client where 95%+ of their backlinks are from low-quality directories, articles, and automated link-exchanges. They built all of these before I came on board. This has caused long-term damage to their backlink profile and the rankings are not better because of the time/money spent. Their quantity of links is high. Quality LOW. Not only am I building high-quality, legit links to the site, but I've been actively trying to remove some of low-quality links they had previously obtained.
I work with another site that is newer, music related. We do NOT have a high "quantity" of links coming in, but they are all extremely natural and relevant with lots of branded anchor text. We have pages with 25 domains linking in and we're outranking other pages (for very competitive terms) that have 10 times that. We've never done any automated link-building of any kind.
So for me personally and the things I've witnessed, it is a complete waste of time and money to be going for low-quality links.
And when I say "low-quality", I don't mean a low Page Authority or a Google PageRank of zero or only a handful of backlinks pointing in. I'm referring to web pages that have...
SPAM!!
- links that are easy to obtain
- links out to sites having anything to do with sofware stuff, web design, computer whatever, directories, loans, ppc, anything with "ads" in it, employment sites, insurance sites, etc etc
- backlinks based on automated services
But I have to say, if you do go this route, make sure you get plenty of branded anchor text, it will help you in the long run.
This is just my opinion. There are lots of people using automated services. Maybe an SEOmoz member can chime in with a recent success story regarding automated article submission?
-
If you use automatic submission you're faced with a problem. Duplicate content. If you want to get around the duplicate content problem then you're faced with another problem, you have to use article spinning. Both of which are not good. Aside from that, the majority of the sites the auto software's submit to won't end up giving you any links and your article will still read with visibile, non-working html code in it, of the ones that do give you a link it will be either nofollow, or pass zero of anything to you because it's spammed to hell with millions of articles for being one of the few article sites that allow follow links.
Now, there might be a few sites that pass juice, but that will be because of quality levels in what they publish. So submitting to them would have to be manual only, as there's no way any auto software would get your article into a site like that.
-
Thanks Ressler! All good advice in terms of manual submission. Regarding the duplicate content issue, I know Article Samurai guarantees this won't be an issue as they do have a spinning component as part of their service.
I'm just considering this as a way of generating quantity links while I work on the quality links using the methods you listed above.
Nothing's easy in this effort but if I can either automate some of this workload or outsource the quantity aspect of link building, I can maximize my efforts with a little bit of scale.
Thanks again
-
Article submission used to be the bees-knees (is that how the phrase is spelled? Anyway...). However, what you will really generate is a whole bucket load of duplicate content on the web. To make matters worse, it's unlikely your articles will get picked up.
A better use of time is:
- writing fantastic copy, citing sources with followed links (welcome back to high school!).
- Emailing people in, or remotely in your industry (Real Estate Agent - property lawyer, house insurance, home inspector, etc.) and suggesting how useful this article might be to their clients.
- Placing article on Digg, Reddit, Twitter, Facebook hoping some news companies see it, and pick it up.
- Looking on Haro (http://www.helpareporter.com/) to see if anyone is writing about your topic, and needs a source.
- Searching for your exact topic in Google, and finding incomplete resources. Ask them for links
- Make friends in some news departments, try get them to link to you (give them a couple stories every once in a while, and they will help you out).
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Linking out: Follow vs. Nofollow
When linking out to other sites, such as resources on .gov pages, should I use follow or nofollow links?
Link Building | | AHC_SEO0 -
Content Marketing - Getting Webmaster to Link to Article
Hello, We're doing a niche article and we want to do a link building campaign around it. I'm not as interested in being linked to in resource sections - that will happen - but my question is for other links. What types of links am I looking for, is it guest posts - is that the best? If so, how do convince them to allow a guest post around an article? Thanks.
Link Building | | BobGW0 -
Multiple Links from High Ranking Site Vs. Links from Multiple Domains - What's More Important?
I understand it is important to get links from many quality domains. Currently, I do have links from top domains (PR, Trust) and it I can get more from (high rank) pages on these same domains. Would it be better to focus on expanding my reach (find additional domains to link from) or to continue to build links from the current domains I have a connection with? What is weighted more? I realize doing both is important, but trying to figure out how to best use my time. Thanks! David
Link Building | | DWill0 -
Targeting high Page Authority sites vs high Pagerank sites for backlinks?
For many years I've been working on seo/backlinks for my website. When doing analysis in opensiteexplorer I notice that the highest listed backlinks for my site are sites with high page authority and domain authority, rather than pagerank. For example one of the highest backlinks for my website has page authority/domain authority of 72/96 but the site itself is only a PR2, while my other backlinks have PR4, 5, or 6 with lower page authority. For a while I've been trying to partner with websites for backlinks from high pagerank sites, as I've always believed this is the #1 metric in relaying link juice. But OSE's metrics seem to not follow that train of thought -- it believes page authority/domain authority is a more important measure. Is it? Should I change my strategy to try to partner with websites that have high page authority rather than focusing so much on pagerank?
Link Building | | DiamondJewelryEmpire0 -
If I write an article that contains a link back to my site, should I post in only one place or can I post it several times?
If I write an article that contains a link back to my site, should I post in only one place or can I post it several times?
Link Building | | dad7more0 -
Mass article submission
I'm quite new to SEO and initially I was learning from the wrong sources who suggested to submit content to as many article directories as possible and the same with website submission to other web directories. Most of the directories they had suggested were low quality, with the only quality ones being made for a niche, which was not my websites niche. They also recommended other bad on-page techniques such as spinning/scraping other websites content - not that I followed this method anyway. Anyway, after educating myself more on how SEO and the search engines themselves work, I know that this is not the best practice. My website initially benefited from having all of these links but now has dropped off ranking for the keyword entirely. It still ranks on the front page for other long tail keywords and the actual domain name, but not the primary keywords. I'm worried that Google has in some way blacklisted my website for the main keywords, which were also used in all of these articles, but not the others if that's possible. At the moment I'm restructuring my website by increasing the amount of content and especially the quality of content so that I can submit it to better directories such as DMOZ and other niche specific directories and websites. Will Google look past the links from the low quality directories if my website is included in DMOZ and other high quality, niche specific directories? Is it better to just abandon my current website and start fresh? Thanks for any answers and/or advice in advance.
Link Building | | Max_powers0 -
Natural vs UnNatural Links: How to Understand It?
Today, I was reading one help article on Google webmaster tools help regarding Google friendly sites. I found that, Natural links can give us more benefits compare to Unnatural links. So, I have search on Google regarding Natural vs Unnatural links and come to know about great video. But, I am still confuse with exact understanding. I am trying to create external links on different websites. So, is it natural or not? How can I justify value of external website before creating link over there.
Link Building | | CommercePundit0 -
Article Submission Best Practices
We are starting an article submission project for our company and had a very basic question. Will submitting the same article to different sites create any potential issues? If the article gets published on various sites, will this be considered duplicate content?
Link Building | | irincon0