Selecting a new domain name
-
If a two word domain is already taken (e.g. onetwo.com), which of the following is a better alternative?
1. one-two.com
2. onetwo.org
Best,
Christopher -
Hi Robert, thank you.
Indeed, it would be great to have some research to validate the actual answer, if indeed there is a definitive answer.
From reading my original answer and your reply above, it seems that we are both in general agreement that hyphens in domain names tend to have no bearing on SEO. User Experience is key to choosing the better option rather than SEO. We've just gone about explaining the same thing in a different way.
From my experience and knowledge, hyphens in a domain name have Zero Direct Impact on SEO and search rankings, they make no difference either way.
However, there are Usability factors such as User Engagement that do affect SEO; if having a hyphen in a domain name or not affects the click through rate one way or the other, that could well have a small part to play in the overall ranking algorithm, thus in search rankings.
Personally, like yourself, I like to see hyphens in domain names because it does often read better.
So to summarise, I believe there is No Direct Impact when it comes to hyphens in a domain name, however I believe there Is In-Direct Impact through User Experience factors.
With best regards,
Simon
-
Well laid out as usual Simon. Question,
From your response: Having a hyphen/dash in the domain name can cause confusion and memory issues for some, usually without it reads just fine in search results.
From my response: ..._One-Two.com as it is more readable to the searcher or client. _
I found in WMT that hyphen in domain has no bearing on SEO, but after your response I started looking for anything to support you or me. I remember there was a response a while back from someone on Q&A where they put in some non-hyphen domains that when you first read them you actually read them wrong (spelling read exactly for two different names). I could not find that response again (though it too was an educated opinion only).
So, it appears there are two schools of thought. It would be nice to find anyone who had seriously looked at this and found it to be one way or the other. There were a few blogs on the subject claiming to have tested it...and they were split 50/50.
We need to team up with someone strong in test validation and really test it. I am fine with either, would just like to be able to say yes/no with more confidence.
Best to you,
-
Hi Christopher
There are pros and cons to both options.
Really, it's down to factors such as how the actual words read, brand or non-brand preferences, how it's going to be marketed, any surveys carried out...
When talking about your business/website and marketing offline, how would the web address be conveyed; "one dash two dot com" or "one two dot com".
Having a hyphen/dash in the domain name can cause confusion and memory issues for some, usually without it reads just fine in search results.
Some examples:
Well known brands indeed, however the concept of not having to rely on a hyphen/dash can be seen here, it can and does work for some, though granted not for all.
So another option if your preferred choice is taken ( e.g. onetwo.com ) is to choose something else, such as onefive.com if you'd like an option rather than a hyphen/dash.
Obviously this depends on Branding, could be that you really need the words "one two" in there.
Bear in mind that exact match domains don't matter so much for SEO as they once did.
So a tough call, go with what you believe to be best for the combination of both User Experience and your Brand.
Hope that helps,
Regards
Simon
-
Also remember that it's not just about search ranking but getting the click through from the SERPS. Even if hyphens may not be a factor as far as Google is concerned - remember to think about how the human being will think when deciding which link to click in the SERPS.
A long generic, keyword rich URL with no brand identity and lots of hyphens is going to look pretty spammy to me. (It's not JUST about the hyphens!)
That said, for a two word domain the hyphen can really help with readability.
Another thing you may also have to factor in is any brand guidelines or brand consistency requirements. Depending on the customer they may have guidelines that constrain your use of hyphens or what words you can join together or even the order of words/brand names.
-
If the correct spelling is "one two" then one-two is the clear winner. If the correct spelling is "onetwo" i would consider both domains equal, but as Robert pointed out "one-two" is a lot easier to read and therefore "better".
BTW: Get both names and also every combination of "one-two" onetwo and .net .com .org You might even consider plurals and the like.
-
I think that multiple hyphened words in the domain would be considered a spam signal.
-
I would personally choose One-Two.com as it is more readable to the searcher or client. According to Google the hyphen is simply a word separator and has no effect on ranking. There are certainly sites that are helped by having it. As to .org, since there is already a massive bastardization (in that not all .orgs are non commercial as was the original intent) I don't think it adds anything.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
SEO for sub domains
I've recently started to work on a website that has been previously targeting sub domain pages on its site for its SEO and has some ok rankings. To better explain, let me give an example...A site is called domainname.com. And has subdomains that they are targeted for seo (i.e. pageone.domainname.com, pagetwo.domainname.com, pagethree.domianname.com). The site is going through a site re-development and can reorganise its pages to another URL. What would be best way to approach this situation for SEO? Ideally, I'm tempted to recommend that new targeted pages be created - domainname.com/pageone, domainname.com/pagetwo, domainname.com/pagethree, etc - and to perform a 301 redirect from the old pages. Does a subdomain page structure (e.g. pageone.domainname.com) have any negative effects on SEO? Also, is there a good way to track rankings? I find that a lot of rank checkers don't pick up subdomains. Any tips on the best approach to take here would be appreciated. Hope I've made sense!
Technical SEO | | Gavo0 -
Redirects for new website
Hi Moz community,
Technical SEO | | JSimmons17
I'm a fairly new SEO Specialist with a brand new website. We initially had a very basic holding website until the fully functional website was completed. I have to do some redirects as we have both .html and .php files & we don't want to lose SEO value for specific pages (like the index, news, etc). I also want to redirect from a www url to a non-www url. I am trying to accomplish redirects with the following code: RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.mywebsite.com [NC]
RewriteRule (.*) http://mywebsite.com/$1 [R=301,L] RedirectMatch 301 /index.html (.*).(php|html) http://mywebsite.com/index.php RedirectMatch 301 /cupcakes-slideshow/glutenfree-slideshow.html (.*).(php|html) http://mywebsite.com/gluten-and-glutenfree.php RedirectMatch 301 /press.html (.*).(php|html) http://mywebsite.com/news-and-reviews.php Please let me know if I am on the right track. Thanks so much in advance!0 -
We just recently moved site domains, and I tried to set up a new campaign for the new root domain, but it threw an error?
It threw an error saying we cannot access the SERPs of this site? Any reason why? It is an https:// site instead of the http://, but even our older domain had an https://
Technical SEO | | josh1230 -
Should I wory about spam domains linking to me?
A while ago my site had a pharmacy hack done to it and created a ton of spam links. I've since fixed the issues on my site but I'm still showing links from their sites. See screen shot: http://awesomescreenshot.com/0497cc147 I think they are links from the spam site to me and not my site "yakanger" linking to them correct? Do I need to worry about these? Can I get rid of them?
Technical SEO | | mr_w2 -
Preferred domain registrar AU
I need to register a domain in Australia. Does anybody have a trusted domain registrar I can go to? The person in our Australian office gave me a list of registrars she found where she can purchase the domain, but I wanted to see if anyone here had recommendations.
Technical SEO | | spackle0 -
Negative url name?
I have a new client who has the letters "BB" at the start of his url name, bbzautorepair.com. He was told by someone at Google Adwords that the letters "BB" in his url name could hurt him with Google rankings. Reason being that Google red flags anything or website to do with firearms, guns and ammunition. He was told that the letters "BB" could be mistaken or red flagged for "BB Gun". Seems a bit far fetched. Has anyone every heard of such a thing? Thanks
Technical SEO | | fun52dig
Gary Downey0 -
New website with slightly new urls
Hi we recently designed our website in work and changed some of the urls. the old site used to be http://www.example.ie/contact-us.htm now it's is http://example.ie/get-in-touch The problem we are having is with sitelinks (the ones auto generate in the serp) ie: about, contact us, team etc etc. Once cliked on, these OLD links are all going to 404 pages because of the change of url. Help with this would be greatly appreciated - I was thinking of blocking these old sitelinks in google web master.
Technical SEO | | GlenBOB0 -
Redirecting root domains to sub domains
Mozzers: We have a instance where a client is looking to 301 a www.example.com to www.example.com/shop I know of several issues with this but wondered if anyone could chip in with any previous experiences of doing so, and what outcomes positive and negative came out of this. Issues I'm aware of: The root domain URL is the most linked page, a HTTP 301 redirect only passes about 90% of the value. you'll loose 10-15% of your link value of these links. navigational queries (i.e.: the "domain part" of "domain.tld") are less likely to produce google site-links less deep-crawling: google crawls top down - starts with the most linked page, which will most likely be your domain url. as this does not exist you waste this zero level of crawling depth. robots.txt is only allowed on the root of the domain. Your help as always is greatly appreciated. Sean
Technical SEO | | Yozzer0