Frequently tempted by the dark side - need reassurance!
-
I'm a DIY seo with a video production company - our website has been given some solid foundations by an SEO friend and we are climbing nicely up the rankings..
Everyone and their dog constantly warns of not straying into black hat - and I totally understand and appreciate the reasonings.. my issue is - pretty much ALL of the competitors use what I would perceive to be pretty shady web directories.
These directories seem to account for 80% of each of my competitors inbound links (according to open site explorer)
If all the front page of google for "corporate video" are submitting to all these directories - should I?
Cheers
AC
-
that's a cracking article - many thanks
-
Don't forget: Just because they have a link, it doesn't necessarily follow that it is helping them.
I know a couple of SEOs who use directories mainly to obscure their more valuable links. Questionable tactic, but the same happens naturally: When you look at a competitors backlinks it is human nature to assume they are all working, even when the truth might be quite different.
Assume that the 80% is doing almost nothing and start looking closely at the other 20.
That said, I would call low quality directory submission black hat. It's not great (either in terms of effectiveness or feeling good about your work), but it doesn't harm in the same way as other methods can.
-
Mmm... even though it is totally correct to go for authoritative links, remember that they are not enough in order to obtain the desired rankings... and it is not just me saying this, but people like Wil Reynold, who surely a link building authority.
-
When I read the question I was imagining something like: I am ready to do some well craft cloaking and, why not, injecting links in my competitor sites...
To submit you site to directories, if they are relevant to your industry, doesn't have their PR cut (easily to check if you confront the mozRank with the PR... if the PR is - let's say - 3 and the mozRank says 6.4, then that directory has been penalized by Google), and the page your site will be listed is regularly crawled... then it is licit. Remember, a link profile should look "normal" to Google eyes... and it is normal that as site is listed in directories too.
On the other hand, being yours a video company, I can only imagine the infinite opportunities you could have in order to create a smashing inbound campaign... I suggest you to read this amazing post published just yesterday in the SEOgadget blog:
Why You Should Supercharge Your Video Strategy & How to Do It
which surely may give you great ideas.
-
It is a trade off, you do have to balance the return on investment when it comes to link-building. Try and think about the longer term rather than trying to get quick results.
Don't worry that things have to go viral to deliver any benefits. Don't think in terms of hits, or rankings - think about your conversion rate, how many visitors you need to make a 5k investment seem like a good idea...
-
but i'm nervous about marketing it coz spending 5k and the video only getting 300 hits and not going viral would suck!
You can't hit a homerun if you never step up to the plate.
I think that it would be totally honest to have several videos on your site with only a fraction of them going viral. If you tell everyone that you hit a homerun every time that is not a good way to control client expectations.
-
i totally agree...
and we do a reasonable (not enough) of stuff for our site.. of course need to do more..
it's a bit of trade off - im happy to invest time and money on making cool viral stuff for our site - but i'm nervous about marketing it coz spending 5k and the video only getting 300 hits and not going viral would suck!
-
I don't think I'd bother with the type of directory you've used as an example. You'd be much better off getting the kind of high quality links that your competitors aren't going to be able to get near just by getting directory entries.
If your customers would expect to find you there, it would be a different matter.
See EGOL's response for the kind of things that would really make a difference.
If you're still climbing up the ranks then it's not time to give up and succumb to the dark side!
-
I don't have any problem with a person submitting his website to a few directories... but if I want to beat my competitor, I will not mimic his methods. Instead I will do something clearly superior and kick his butt properly.
If I was the boss at a video production company a good portion of the production staff's time would be spent making videos for our own website.
Video production companies are where webmasters often go when they need some awesome linkbait for their own websites. Not only does it serve as great linkbait but it is also a great way to "strut your stuff" for anyone who visits your website.
Perhaps you don't make that type of video but maybe it would be beneficial to consider. It could open a whole new line of business for you.
-
There is a reason why your climbing the rankings nicely, because the link profile of your competitors by the sounds of it are poor.
Increase your MozTrust by getting links on Auth websites, Increase your MozRank by gaining more links and this should increase your PA - PA I think is more important then DA.
Those competitor DA stats are not that great.
-
What do you mean by "Shady" web directories?
Are these directories relevant to your niche (corporate video) or a broader but relevant market (corporate services?).
I would say that if there is a reasonable expectation for a normal human being, your prospects, to find you listed in the directory, (alongside your competitors) and the directories aren't involved in anything that clashes with Google's guidelines then I don't see that there is a problem.
That said, I would wonder how much the link from the directory is actually work and whether it would be better to spend the time to get better quality links elsewhere that would beat your competitors anyway?
How does your site stack up against the competitors in Open Site Explorer? Is your domain authority way off?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Back links do I need my keyword in them to rank? If so creative way to accomplish this?
The first question is pretty self explanatory. If I do need my keyword I'm trying to rank for in my link example: Looking for a cool skateboard (cool skateboard) is my keyword. Can anyone on here help me come up with some creative ways for me to get folks to post backlinks to my site with that key word in it? Unfortunately my sites url does not have the keyword in my domain.
Link Building | | mr_w0 -
Need Expert Footer Link Advice
We have a sister company that provides online administrative services to .EDUs. The administrative site has thousands of pages, with good pagerank, excellent trust, and a clean bill of health from Google, as does our corporate site. We have the ability to put footer links on every page back to our corporate website. Options: 1. Do nothing for fear of getting penalized by Google 2. Footer Link: Web Design by Logo, with "Web Design" being the anchor text. 3. Footer Link: Web Design by XYZ with "Web Design" and "XYZ" being the anchor text for link diversity. 4. Footer Link: Web Design by Logo with "Web Design" and the Logo (Alt Text "XYZ Corp") being anchors for link diversity. 5. Put up a page (or 2) about web design on the administrative site, have all of the footers link to that page, and have that page link back to our corporate site. We really aren't doing anything wrong here, but both sites have a clean bill of health and the Google spam police have me paranoid. Our corporate site has an excellent link profile with hundreds of links from .gov, .us, and .edu. The links have commercial value, and can drive traffic to our site. Looking for your thoughts before we make a move.
Link Building | | CsmBill0 -
Need Directories list
I need free high page rank directories list. I know about this list http://www.seomoz.org/directories/+ need more sources. Thanks
Link Building | | GM0070 -
How can a not so passionate subject get links? Need ideas?
Our client owns a very big pest control site. They are competing with pestmall, orkin, terminex to name a few. Almost all of there competitors are spamming like crazy. For some of their competitors it is working. They get natural links very slowly. Maybe 1 natural link every week. How can a not so passionate subject get links? Here was my ideas. Offer a tool to pest control sites for a link in return. The flaw is most pest control company owners are not tech savy and if they are they have hired it out. I just really need some ideas. Thank you.
Link Building | | OxzenMedia0 -
SEOs and web developers frequently leave links to their site in the footer of their clients' sites. Does this negatively impact the site with the links?
Does this provide any SEO value to the receiving site? Has anyone experienced problems doing this?
Link Building | | KatMouse2 -
Links - In need of ideas
Hi there! I have tried my best to get quality back links to my http://www.petmedicalcenter.com site but I feel like I have hit a wall. I have searched my competition to see what links they are getting and have been successful with some. Some websites just don't respond. Are there any valuable resources I am missing? Or ideas? My biggest concern is ranking well for the search term "vet las vegas" and "las vegas veterinarians". So far I have managed to get to the second page on Google. Thanks in advance for your help!
Link Building | | PMC-3120870 -
Need help interpreting Ranking Factors.
Trying to see DA vs. mozrank and why things don't match the definitions given by seomoz. I'm comparing my site www.taxproblem.org w/ www.unclefed.com I have more root sites linking to me and more links. I can see that the mozrank for me is 4.96 which is higher. But their mozrank is higher. How are they more popular based on how the domains, rather than the pages link to each other. That is real confusing? Please help me understand what this means, and yes i know that right now they have better quality links, but that's not what the definition says. I'm I not understanding the definition? mozRank of the page www.unclefed.com/ mozRank shows how popular a page is on the web. The more links to a page, the more popular it becomes. Links from important pages increase your popularity, and your mozRank, even more. 4.64 out of 10 4.64 Links to the page www.unclefed.com/ The total number of links to this page, counting links from www.unclefed.com and links that don’t increase the mozRank. 606 links 2 Root domains linking to the page www.unclefed.com/ The number of different websites with links to this page. When compared to the number of links to this page, it can reveal how the links might be distributed across the web. 279 domains 5 mozRank of the subdomain www.unclefed.com Domain mozRank is a link popularity score based on how the domains, rather than just pages, link to each other. It is an indicator of a how popular www.unclefed.com is among domains 5.12 out of 10 5.12
Link Building | | joemas990 -
Other than the homepage, what other pages need linkbuilding TLC?
With my linkbuilding efforts, I know what keywords I want to target but my homepage ranks for most of my keywords. The other pages were written and built for specific keywords, but do they need linkbuilding TLC? They don't rank in the SERPs much anyway (if not at all) and the homepage is by-far the strongest in the SERPs.
Link Building | | Bill4Time0