SeoMoz crawler giving false positives?
-
SeoMoz crawler indicated a few times that my site has a duplicate home page error (http://mysite.com and www.mysite.com)
I eliminated the the couple remaining internal links that pointed to http://mysite on a couple pages (all other internal links point to http://www.mysite.com)
I ran the crawl again and it said no errors this time. I naturally thought the duplicate page error problem was fixed.
However this morning I got the regularly scheduled crawl report from SeoMoz that said again I have those duplicate error pages. No changes were made to any of my site's pages between the crawls.
That makes me wonder if the crawler is providing false positives at times or was wrong when it said on the crawl a couple days ago that I don't have any errors (no duplicate page error).
Now, I don't know what to think.
-
Hey,
Our crawler actually requests the page http://mysite.com first but then finds all your links to www.mysite.com
You will want to contact the person responsible for hosting or developing your site in order to make these changes.
Have a great day!
Kenny
-
Thanks for the explanation. Could you answer a couple questions?
1 - If all internal site links go to www.mysite.com (none link to http://mysite.com), how does a duplicate page even happen? I don't understand how this happened to begin with if I don't have any such internal link to http://mysite.com.
2 - Can you recommend a service who can fix the htaccess page for me to create the 301 redirect? I'm not sure I want the hosting service doing it and making a mistake.
Thanks!
-
Hey,
That third campaign is actually a subdomain setup to crawl non-www. No duplicate content errors were presented because there are not any links to follow since all the links contain the subdomain www in them.
Root domain campaigns are distinguished with an astrick before the domain name.
-
Thanks - I initially thought that was it.
But if you see my 3rd campaign of the crawl, it runs it for the root domain and it shows no duplicates.
-
Hey,
I just looked into the issue that you are experiencing with our crawler. The reason the the discrepancy is because you actually have two separate campaigns running for the same site. One is set to crawl the root domain and one the subdomain.
The root domain campaign actually still presents these errors and has week over week but the sub-domain campaign is setup for the www version of your site and that's why these errors are not present, because the crawler won't even attempt to crawl off of www.
It is advisable to perform a 301 redirect as the other commenters mention.
Hope that helps!
Kenny
-
My point is the inconsistency in the SeoMoz crawler reports.
I got two SeoMoz crawl reports today - one was the regularly scheduled one which said I have duplicate home pages (as noted) and the crawl I started a couple hours ago said there are no errors.
So...how do you tell which one is right? Both cannot be since there were no changes to my website pages between the crawls.
thx
-
Hi,
If needed - this is the .htaccess code to help fix this issue; (Make sure and back up .htaccess before making any chages)
Options +FollowSymLinks
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^yourdomainhere.com [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.yourdomainhere.com/$1 [L,R=301]
The above code would redirect all traffic from non www to www version of your site fixing dup content issues in that regard
Source ;http://www.webconfs.com/how-to-redirect-a-webpage.php
PS Spaces between lines not needed (funky formatting here)
Hope this helps
-
You need to redirect one of your home pages to the other. www.mysite.com is different to the crawl robot as my site.com. In addition to having the issue with seomoz, you are losing serp value for your home page because you are dividing up the SEO value. Do a 301 redirect from one to the other and voila....problem solved.
Please make sure you give me the thumbs up for the help!! Thanks
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Redirect Impact - Moving From SEOmoz to Moz
Hey Guys, This has been on my mind ever since the big announcement, so today I did some searching around for some posts/talk about what the impact of their full site redirect has been for them and didn't find anything. Have they posted on this or are there any threads that I'm missing out on? I'd love to hear more about what the impact has been or any general thoughts/insights people may have. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | TakeLessons
Jon1 -
Suddenly Many 301 Redirects captured by SEOMOZ
On April the 7th SeoMOZ captured 6000 301 redirect on my site, but I cant seem to understand how SEOMOZ finds these links Example http://www.iphonegadget.dk/dk/apple-tilbeh-r-36/ipad-tilbeh-r-219/bilholder-239/index-2-4a.html Makes a 301 Redirect to the following page beneath SEOMOZ says http://www.iphonegadget.dk/dk/apple-tilbeh-r-36/ipad-tilbeh-r-219/bilholder-239/index-2.html The weird thing is that both urls work, but if i browse my site in a normal matter this link will never be created i that way. The -4a in the end os the link is not the normal link structure on the site and has never been like that before. So how does SEOMOZ Create that link? http://www.iphonegadget.dk/dk/apple-tilbeh-r-36/ipad-tilbeh-r-219/bilholder-239/index-2-4a.html Also google only has the right one that are this one beneath http://www.iphonegadget.dk/dk/apple-tilbeh-r-36/ipad-tilbeh-r-219/bilholder-239/index-2.html People would normal come to the category with this url http://www.iphonegadget.dk/dk/apple-tilbeh-r-36/ipad-tilbeh-r-219/bilholder-239/ And page 2 would be http://www.iphonegadget.dk/dk/apple-tilbeh-r-36/ipad-tilbeh-r-219/bilholder-239/index-2.html AND NOT http://www.iphonegadget.dk/dk/apple-tilbeh-r-36/ipad-tilbeh-r-219/bilholder-239/index-2-4a.html Can anyone find out what is going on?
Technical SEO | | noerdar0 -
Has any positive or negative effect for the SEO results if the domain contains desired keyword?
Helo! Has any positive or negative effect for the SEO results if the domain contains desired keyword? Thanks for the answer.
Technical SEO | | Brainsum0 -
I am using SEOmoz pro software and my blog tags are bringing up 404 errors.
After checking they do bring back a 404 page, so i am wondering what to do. Do i remove all the blog tags? We use a Drupal cms system.
Technical SEO | | AITLtd0 -
Do FB Likes, Tweets, +1s etc give weightage to a page
Lets say I publish a PR with two anchor links (keywords) to a particular website. Will these backlinks get more weightage in the eyes of Google if manage to get this page 100s and 1000s of FB Likes, tweets, +1s etc? Does this strategy really work?
Technical SEO | | KS__0 -
Loss of search engine positions after 301 redirect - what went wrong?!?
Hi Guys After adhering to the On Page optimisation suggestions given by SEOmoz, we redirected some of old urls to new ones. We set 301 redirects from the old pages to new on a page by page basis but our search engine ranking subsequently fell off the radar and lost PR. We confirmed redirection with fiddler and it shows 301 permanent redirect on every page as expected. To manage redirection using a common code logic we executed following: In Http module, using “rewrite path” we route “all old page requests” to a page called “redirect.aspx? oldpagename =[oldpagename]”. This happens at server side. In redirect.aspx we are redirecting from old page to new page using 301 permanent redirect. In the browser, when old page is requested, it will 301 redirect to new page. In hope we and others can learn from our mistakes - what did we do wrong ?!? Thanks in advance. Dave - www.paysubsonline.com
Technical SEO | | Evo0 -
How can I prevent sh404SEF Anti-flood control from blocking SEOMoz?
I'm using sh404SEF on my Joomla 1.5 website. Last week, I activated the security functions of the tool, which includes an anti-flood control feature. This morning when I looked at my new crawl statistics in SEOMoz, I noticed a significant drop in the number of webpages crawled, and I'm attributing that to the security configurations that I made earlier in the week. I'm looking for a way to prevent this from happening so the next crawl is accurate. I was thinking of using sh404SEFs "UserAgent white list" feature. Does SEOMoz have a UserAgent string that I could try adding to my white list? Is this what you guys recommend as a solution to this problem?
Technical SEO | | JBradySD0 -
Problems with seomoz profile section
Is anybody else having problems adding or changing their profile on seomoz? I make the changes it comes up saving then logs me out?
Technical SEO | | francesco270