Gah, unfairly hit by massive google penalty :/
-
Hi Guys,
We're the folk behind http://wpmu.org and have just been hit by a massive fall in google referrals, see attached
There's no reason in webmaster tools for this, were not engaging in any spammy or dodgy practices and are a massively established and well staffed news *& tutorial site for WordPress (one of the biggest, in fact!)
We've upgraded WP, and requested a referral, but without actually knowing what's going on it's extremely hard to figure out what to do
Maybe we're a wrong hit regarding this: http://www.webmonkey.com/2012/04/googles-new-search-algorithm-to-crack-down-on-black-hat-webspam/ ?
At the moment pretty much the only thing I can think of is one of our authors being dodgy, but I don't think they would be, and I don't know how to go about finding out.
Anyway, if you guys could take a look and let us know anything you think might be up, and share any advice that'd be super super appreciated!
Cheers, James
-
@Georg, tanks for that!
@Boodreaux, ugh, that's shocking service, wasn't like that back in the day
-
James,
If you want more responses you may need to post a new discussion question with your latest information you found out. Your question is far down the list now and only a 4 people are in this thread.
-
Hi James,
your are not alone. Our site lost 50% traffic...
Here is our thread: http://www.seomoz.org/q/lost-50-google-traffic-in-one-day-panic
-
Still looking, it looks like it could be victim of our own success / couple of minor errors around http://edublogs.org
Essentially we tried to remove all links from blogs there to wpmu.org back in the day, but missed, literally, about 3.
And then there's been a lot of splogging on edublogs of late that we're really working hard to clamp down on.
And they are choosing the theme with the wpmu.org links on it.... so 2+2 it coudl be that.
We've now removed all links and are splogging like crazy, using http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/anti-splog/ (one of our plugisn too).
And have p[ut in another request.
Would love to hear from a Mozzer too, given our 4+ year membership here (in which time we've asked like 4 questions
-
Ouch...great looking site. Very scary. Hope to hear back from you on what the issue was in your being dropped so low.
-
Thanks guys.
@Kevin on edublogs it's only the homepage that links to wpmu.org, sub blogs only link to WPMU DEV (separate site) which hasn't been impacted.
Given the prominence of our other sites in the WP space, and the relevance of the topic, I'm not sure if removing links from them to wpmu.org would necessarily be the best approach?
Thanks for other link and we'll go and post in the wbmaster forums now too.
@stubby yes, no paid links, only footer links are from themes (like the 'Powered by Wordpress MU' ones and at least 3+ years old), not at all odd for a WP provider either.
Open to other thoughts / ideas!
-
I have an opinion that many of the other sites that I have seen recently have one of a few things going on.
Either -
- They have crappy links that were bought on blog networks (which I didn't see in your case)
- They have footer links that they installed when people used their services (as in "designed by ABC web Design),
- They have footer links that were installed when people used their software (Powered by Wordpress MU)
The net result that I see from any of these scenarios is that the site in question gets lots and lots of anchor text links from lots of unrelated sites all over the place, which makes the "designed by" or "powered by" links look like an unnatural build, or possibly even look like paid links.
This is just my opinion and it could be wrong - but I am seeing it more and more.
-
I would cut down the sitewide links, in particular the ones on other domains you own. I see the edublogs "main site" has a image link to wpmu.org; too lazy to check the user blogs. Other than that, I don't see anything that would get you hit by the penguin update.
You might have better luck if you posted in the Webmaster product forums at google.
They also just release this form for people who think they've been wrongly affected.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dEVxdmdRWFJRTjRoLWZVTHZkaTBQbkE6MQ&ndplr=1
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Ecommerce, Product Content & Google Metrics
Hi I know Google has many different variations of what they consider to be thin content. I wondered if anyone has an idea of the best metric to determine what content you need to improve on your site? I work on a large e-commerce site so there are a thousands of product pages - all with product descriptions similar [but not duplicate] to competitors. I guess in terms of quantity, these pages don't have huge amounts of written content, so I'm wondering what Google classes as 'thin' on a product page: 1. Does Google just expect a conversion to deem that product page useful? And if not, what's the best metric to identify what works vs. what doesn't on product pages in Google's eyes. 2. If adding lots of product pages on mass is bad and will decrease overall authority? The content isn't duplicate, but may be fairly similar to other sites selling the same thing. I'm trying to get our reviews added directly to product pages rather than in a pop up to improve the unique content and I'm starting to write guides, FAQ's and I'll work towards getting video started - however, I'm the only SEO & we don't have much resource so this all takes time. If anyone else has any advice on steps to take that would be great 🙂
Reporting & Analytics | | BeckyKey0 -
Question re Google Analytics and its more accurate alternatives
Hi guys There are two main issues we have with Google Analytics, and I'd really appreciate if anyone has the time to give an answer to that. We completely miss organic traffic data before 7/22/2013 although our account is active since 2005. Any thoughts on that? Is it the not provided move that swiped out all data or something else? Even for the data we do have there is lots of inaccuracies, and we are thinking on switching or at least adding a new analytics software, any recommendations? (FYI, it turns out we do not keep access logs on the server for more than 2 months, and we might fix that for future references, but now we are looking for external solution). Any help will be much appreciated Thanks Lily
Reporting & Analytics | | wspwsp0 -
Google Webmaster. Backlinks
GWMT only shows that there are 3 domains pointing to a site of mine. I'm looking under "Links to site". But this can't be true because the site is pretty old and I know there are hundreds of domains that point to this one. What would explain this discrepancy? And is there some other free tool that will show all the backlinks? I've used Opensite explorer but that tool isn't close to comprehensive as GWMT usually is (based on other sites I've analyzed)
Reporting & Analytics | | priceseo0 -
Setting up Google Analytics for Subsites
I currently have one main .com site and am planning on launching geo-location subsites .co.uk, .com.au, .ru, etc... Traffic will flow between both sites and some of the content on the subsites will be duplicate and therefore include a canonical tag to the main site. I want to set up GA to capture who is going to the subsites and vice versa and correctly capture crossover traffic. Any advice on implementing advanced analytics directly (or links to sources that will direct me the right direction for this project)
Reporting & Analytics | | theLotter0 -
Google Analytics - In-Page Analytics
I had a strange thought waking up this morning, and was curious to hear other people's opinions on it. In Google Analytics, under Content > In-Page Analytics, Google shows what links on your site pages get clicked and how many times plus other metrics. Do you think they use that data for ranking back links so-to-speak? What I mean is, say I had a back link to my site on example.com, and example.com had google analytics installed. Google can see through google analytics whether my link has been clicked on. Say that my link gets no clicks, do you think that Google would use that metric against my site deeming it "not popular" or "not a good resource", even if example.com was a very popular site? And it could work the other way. Say my link got thousands of clicks on example.com, do you think that Google might use that to promote my site? I couldn't find any other discussion on this anywhere, so am not sure if people have already thought about this.
Reporting & Analytics | | THB0 -
How do I unlink my Google Analytics Account from SEOmoz?
Hi, I am new to the community and have a very basic question concerning the internal settings for SEOmoz. How do I unlink the Google Analytics Account from SEOmoz. I am sure there is an easy answer to this. Thanks for helping!
Reporting & Analytics | | sandoery0 -
Google parameter
All Welcome! In the old interface, Google Analytics, you can find rare queries (organic traffic) in such a setting: ^ ([^] +) {5.50} [^] + $ (where 5.50 - spaces between words). As an option to use the new interface Google Analytics? This option does not work there?
Reporting & Analytics | | meteorr0 -
Looking for a Google Analytics expert
Looking to hire a Google Analytics expert for a project. Dealing with trying to track traffic across multiple domains and then work with the Ecommerce options. Contact Jeff Logan @ Avelient with costs and time frame for work. [personal information removed by editors. please contact via private message system to exchange information]
Reporting & Analytics | | Avelient0