Crawl Diagnostics Error Spike
-
With the last crawl update to one of my sites there was a huge spike in errors reported. The errors jumped by 16,659 -- majority of which are under the duplicate title and duplicate content category.
When I look at the specific issues it seems that the crawler is crawling a ton of blank pages on the sites blog through pagination.
The odd thing is that the site has not been updated in a while and prior to this crawl on Jun 4th there were no reports of these blank pages.
Is this something that can be an error on the crawler side of things?
Any suggestions on next steps would be greatly appreciated. I'm adding an image of the error spike
-
This would be another issue. I would need to look at the code to give you more insight. But off the bat I assume that this is an issue regarding mislabeling the rel=next and rel=prev. They can be kind of tricky to work with on a broad based update due to the fact that they are intended to refer to specific pages. If you do not have the end page labeled Google says :
"When implemented incorrectly, such as omitting an expected rel="prev" or rel="next" designation in the series, we'll continue to index the page(s), and rely on our own heuristics to understand your content."
I would look into this first. If the answer is still elusive to you the next option would probably be finding a different set of eyes on the code to see if there are any minor oversights that you may have overlooked.
-
One last thing;
It seems that I have a game plan for addressing this issue, but as I think about this one thing has me concerned in the way Roger crawled the site.
The site has maybe a total of 100 articles, which would account for ?Page=10, but what I'm seeing is errors on ?Page=104. When you look at that page its a blank. Where is Roger coming up with that parameter?
Do you think this is a Roger issue or something else?
-
Makes sense
-
Unless you have some super secret page that is buried somewhere deep down in your site that you can ONLY get to from those pages, it wouldn't make sense to have them follow the links. All that will happen is they land on the next page, scrape it to the noindex tag and move on. They won't index and this just waste your sites bandwidth and slows everything else down. If it's a noindex it should usually be a nofollow unless you are looking to track conversions or some other specific only navigable through those pages.
-
Hey Jake;
Whats your option of using "nofollow" vs "follow" on the pages i'm blocking from indexing? Is there a reason to prevent them from following the links on these pages?
-
Cool glad we could help!
if you want to clean up your code and are posting site wide for them I would recommend the none tag
Accounts for both
noindex, nofollow
-
Thank you again for the input, the goal here is not provide accurate reporting and ensure that the site conforms to the search engines requirements.
Currently the "?page=" parameter is not blocked through . it sounds like this maybe the issue.
I will update the code to address that and see what kind of results we get with the next update. I think this is best addressed at the code level, rather then the robots.txt.
Thanks
-
Rodger crawls like the Google bot and takes his hints from the robot.txt file. So whatever Rodger is seeing is usually what the other spiders are seeing as well. From time to time I have encountered slight glitches to the SEOmoz crawler as they change and update their algorithm.
When it comes down to it, Google examines a link profile through a microscope akin to the Large Hadron Collider. where as we have to examine it through a magnifying glass from 1935.
The wonderful people here at SEOmoz are always trying to give us a better view, but it is still imperfect. I would say if all else fails and this report continues to show errors in moz then get your reports for your clients directly from webmaster tools.
-
** How do I tell Roger no to crawl these blank pages?**
Any easy solution is to block roger in robots.txt
User-agent: rogerbot
Disallow: [enter pages you do not wish to be crawled]
But a better solution would be to fix the root problem. If your only goal is to provide clean reporting to your client the above will work. If your goal is to ensure your site is crawled correctly by Google/Bing, then Jake's suggestion will work. You can help Google and Bing understand your site by telling them how to handle parameters.
I would prefer to fix the root issue though. Do the pages which are being reported as duplicate content have the "noindex" tag on them? If so, you can report the issue to the moz help desk (help@seomoz.org) so they can investigate the problem.
-
Hey Jake;
Thanks for your feedback, i did make some changes to the code (posted in the reply to Jamie). I'll take a closer look at the webmaster tools to make sure things are OK on that end.
FYI: The "rel=prev / rel=next tags" are implemented
I added code to manage
to pages that are accessed through
- /Blog/?tag=
- /Blog/category/
- /Blog/archive.aspx
As a secondary concern, with Roger now reporting all these issues in SEOMoz, I provide these reports to my clients and thus having 16k errors is not a good PR thing. How do I tell Roger no to crawl these blank pages?
-
It looks like Rodger found his way into your variable URLs!
This could definitely cause a problem if the engine crawlers are seeing this path as well. Have you made any changes to the code on your site or the URL structure lately?
Regardless, you might want to examine in your Webmaster Tools for both Google and Bing.
For Google you will want to check the blocked URL's under the Health menu. This will give you the information on what pages are and are not blocked. If you notice that the Head Match term you are looking to exclude is not listed make sure that you upload the term to the robots.txt file on your site. Other fixes for this include canonicalisation tagging or the implementation of the rel=prev / rel=next tags. There are a few other ways that are more complicated and I recommend avoiding unless absolutely necessary.
But good news everyone! Google has a few ways to go about fixing the indexation.
Bing is a little Different but just as easy. In the Bing Webmaster Tools under the Index tab, there is a tool called URL Nor<a class="cpad Subject message-low-priority-icon marginleft5 bold">malization</a> you can tell the crawlers to exclude a portion of the query string without changing anything on your database. It also automatically finds and suggests <a class="cpad Subject message-low-priority-icon marginleft5 bold">query parameters for normalization as well. This is a recent change for Bing and could account for the sudden jump in warnings.</a>
I hope this helps and you keep being awesome!
-
Hey Jamie;
In an effort to block crawling of pages on the blog that are essentially duplicating content I added coded (on (4/16) to insert :
to pages that are accessed through
/Blog/?tag=
/Blog/category/
/Blog/archive.aspx
I did not do this for
/Blog/?page=
There were no changes to the robots.txt
There were no updates to canonical tag
There were no updates to pagination
Thanks for your prompt reply
-
Can you share what changes have been made to the site? A few ways this can happen are:
-
a change to the robots.txt file
-
a change to your site's template either removing a canonical tag, a noindex tag, or altering your pagination in any way such as modifying paginated titles
-
resolving an onsite issue which prevented crawling of these pages
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Shopify crawl issues
Hi Moz'ers, I am a total newcomer to this level of seo. Recently I transitioned to Shopify and I'm puzzled by why I'm getting 803 errors - incomplete crawl attempts due to server timing out. Wouldn't this have to do with Shopify? How would I go about fixing it? I'm also getting 804 - SSL issues, but I assume that will go away. Any advice? Thanks! Sharon
Moz Pro | | Sharon2016
www.ZeldasSong.com0 -
5XX (Server Error) on all urls
Hi I created a couple of new campaigns a few days back and waited for the initial crawl to be completed. I have just checked and both are reporting 5XX (Server Error) on all the pages it tried to look at (one site I have 110 of these and the other it only crawled the homepage). This is very odd, I have checked both sites on my local pc, alternative pc and via my windows vps browser which is located in the US (I am in UK) and it all works fine. Any idea what could be the cause of this failure to crawl? I have pasted a few examples from the report | 500 : TimeoutError http://everythingforthegirl.co.uk/index.php/accessories.html 500 1 0 500 : Error http://everythingforthegirl.co.uk/index.php/accessories/bags.html 500 1 0 500 : Error http://everythingforthegirl.co.uk/index.php/accessories/gloves.html 500 1 0 500 : Error http://everythingforthegirl.co.uk/index.php/accessories/purses.html 500 1 0 500 : TimeoutError http://everythingforthegirl.co.uk/index.php/accessories/sunglasses.html | 500 | 1 | 0 | Am extra puzzled why the messages say time out. The server dedicated is 8 core with 32 gb of ram, the pages ping for me in about 1.2 seconds. What is the rogerbot crawler timeout? Many thanks Carl
Moz Pro | | GrumpyCarl0 -
No follow links also been reported in SEOmoz crawl diagnostics
Hi, Why does SEOmoz reports links which has been marked as 'nofollow'. I am getting 'Overly-Dynamic URL' reports on links which I have designated as nofollow which means Google will discount them. So why does SEOmoz still report them. Thanks.
Moz Pro | | malpani0 -
SEOMoz reports and 404 errors
My SEOMoz report shows a 404 error, found today for this url: http://globalheavyhaul.com/google.com i do not have this anchor text anywhere on my website. How did Roger figure out that somebody looked for that page? Do I need to worry about 404 errors that are the result of user mistakes, instead of actual bad links?
Moz Pro | | FreightBoy0 -
90% of our sites that are designed are in wordpress and the report brings up "duplicate" content errors. I presume this is down to a conical error?
We are looking at getting the Agency version of SEOMoz and are based in the UK Could you please tell me what would be the best way to correct this issue as this appears to be a problem with all our clients websites. an example would be www.fsgenergy.co.uk Would you also be able to suggest the best SEO plugin to use with SEOMOz ? Many thanks Paul
Moz Pro | | KloodLtd1 -
How can i get seomoz to crawl a campaign on demand
hi how can i get seomoz to crawl a campaign on demand instead of on a weekly basis? For example i have corrected some error warnings and on page elements and would like it to re crawl the site sooner to see how the corrections have worked? thanks
Moz Pro | | Bristolweb0 -
Lots of site errors after last crawl....
Something interesting happened on the last update for my site on SEOmoz pro tools. For the last month or so the errors on my site were very low, then on the last update I had a huge spike in errors, warnings, and notices. I'm not sure if somehow I made a change to my site (without knowing it) and I caused all of these errors, or if it just took a few months to find all the errors on my site? My duplicate page content went from 0 to 45, my duplicate page titles went from 0 to 105, my 4xx (client error) went from 0 to 4, and my title missing or empty went from 0 to 3. On the warnings sections my missing meta description tag went form a hand full to 444. (most of these looking to be archive pages.) Down in the notices I have over 2000 that are blocked by meta robots, meta-robots nofollow, and Rel canonical. I didn't have any where near this many prior to the last update of my site. I just wanted to see what I need to do to clean this up, and figure out if I did something to cause all the errors. I'm assuming the red errors are the first things I need to clean up. Any help you guys can provide would be greatly appreciated. Also if you'd like me to post any additional information, please let me know and I'd be glad to.
Moz Pro | | NoahsDad0 -
On the Crawl Diagnostics Summary, its reporting over 100 "Title Missing or Empty" issues, but they all check out fine?
Wondering if there Is a bug with the crawler or known timeout issues? Site speed is fast, but we do run a couple of large cron jobs out of hours, which may be the cause of any timeouts, but shouldn't the crawler report that, rather saying no title tags on 100 pages, when there are? SEOmoz newbie, so still finding my feet 🙂
Moz Pro | | sjr4x40