How to remove non-requested, non-desired backlinks
-
Dear Mosers,
Before Penguin update we start a link back profile study about who and why are linking and we found hundred of garbage sites like these:
http://rakeback-blogger.com/links/
and hundred more...
They don't have contact form or email address, so what is the best way to remove our link from there (there are any quick way), these sites are damaging our rank.
Thank you for your help
Claudio
-
If the drop started April 23 then it's not likely to be Penguin. However, it's a tough call because you could have had a natural drop that started on April 23 and then got augmented on the 24th. But, there were Panda refreshes on April 19 and 27th. I'm pretty reluctant to call it either without a real in depth look at your analytics.
Penguin is generally a keyword specific drop, so if you can pinpoint that you have dropped for particular keywords that have been overoptimized in your backlink profile then you could go in this direction. However, the backlinks that you pointed out originally all seem to have your url as anchor text so I have a hard time believing that this is Penguin. (With that being said, I haven't done a full analysis of your site and backlink profile.)
What made me wonder if this was Panda was that your inner pages have very little content above the fold. All of the content above the fold seems to be the same for each page. And then, the content that is below the fold is mostly brief product descriptions - not a lot that Google can recognize as substantial content.
Again, I'd be really hesitant to go removing links in this case. If this were my site I'd do the following:
-have a really thorough look at my analytics to see if the traffic drop can be attributed to one or more particular keywords
-if yes, then I'd start cleaning up links that contained those keywords as anchors.
-if no, then I'd start changing my pages so that there is more substantial content, especially above the fold, for each of these pages. I'd also go looking for other places where I could be violating the quality guidelines on page such as hidden text, etc. Then, once this was cleared up I'd wait for the next Panda refresh to see if I had recovered.
-
Dear all,
I found this history google update doc http://www.seomoz.org/google-algorithm-change
and Penguin starts on Apr 24 and Apr 27 another Panda.
In conclusion (I want to share my point of view coming from your knowledge):
1. Penguin hits our site because, we has a few high quality links and some of them was hitted by Penguin. Possible solution get more links (natural etc).
2. Panda, some of our pages specially categories and sub categories were including repetitive content and canonical problems between them (this issue was partially resolved). I'll continue resolving this.
Finally please give me your opinions about this.
Thank you again for all your help, Im very happy to participate with you in SEOMOz and I think this is a great community!
-
Dear Marie,
Our Drops starts on April 23 to April 30 (500 visitors to 280) you're correct, so it was a Panda hit?
Thank you for all your help
Claudio
-
I would not work to remove them, yet.
I think that you are getting great advice from Marie. I would listen to her opinions.
-
Have a close look to see if your traffic drop coincides with either April 19th or April 27th which are days of Panda refreshes. In looking at your inner pages I'm starting to wonder if this is a Panda issue....
-
I wouldn't go removing links until you know that the links are actually what are causing your drop. The majority of these links are pointing at your home page so it would be weird for your inner pages to drop if they were causing you a problem. If you remove a bunch of links you could possibly do more harm than good!
Can you pinpoint your traffic drop to a particular day? Try looking at your analytics and selecting organic search traffic. If you can pinpoint a particular day then you may be able to determine if this is Penguin related or not. It could be a Panda issue and if that's the case then it's really nothing to do with your backlinks, but rather an onsite issue.
And there are other possible reasons as well! So again, don't go on a massive link removal campaign until you are sure that that's what needs to be done!
-
Dear EGOL,
No warnings from google, only traffic drops -50% (actually our Home page ranks well) but the internal pages not.
I extract from SEOMoz the links and I start sending them emails asking for link removal and no one has responded, and some of them don't have contact form or email details, I'll try contact them via Whois records.
Do you recommends perform this HUGE and slave task with minimal results or only forget and go ahead.
I appreciate your opinions and help
Thank you
Claudio
-
Dear Marie,
Our traffic drops on Apr and May at 50%, and some pages (not home) was performing well (google 3 first positions) and now they are on the 2 or 3rd page.
Honestly Im very worried about that.
I appreciate all your help
Claudio
-
Some of my sites have lots of backlinks from trashy directories and mash-up sites. I had nothing to do with getting these links. They are gifts from people who are making spammy websites.
I think that most websites acquire lots of these links over time - especially if you have a website that ranks well in popular SERPs. If you had nothing to do with placing them then I would not worry about them unless google sends you a warning.
-
This doesn't look like any kind of negative SEO campaign to me. The majority of your backlinks (including the ones that you are asking about) use your url as an anchor. If someone was attempting to try to get you a penguin hit or an unnatural links warning they'd be spamming you with a keyword anchor. (And it's debatable whether that would even work.)
It looks to me like you are still in the index and you are ranking #1 for the term that you are targeting in your home page title.
How do you feel these links are affecting your traffic? If you had an unnatural links penalty then you wouldn't be ranking. If you had a penguin hit then there would be a dramatic traffic drop on April 24 or May 25.
Otherwise I'm guessing there's something else going on. How dramatic is your traffic drop? Is it for all keywords or just specific ones?
It's possible that you lost some link equity because sites that link to you got hit with a penalty. And there are many other possible reasons.
-
No one from here works with backlinks services, I think it can be performed by one competitor, from years til now.
our site is freesharewaredepot.com please take a look and give us your ideas or something that Im mis.
Thank you
Claudio
-
Have you tried the whois info? A site's contact info is USUALLY in there. However, I have found that only a small percentage of website owners actually respond to the emails I have sent via whois info.
Just a question, and not meant to be condemning at all, but how do you think you got hundreds of links like this? It sounds to me like something that would happen after using a backlink service. (You know, the kind that promises hundreds of links for one low price.) I've got a few such spammy links to my site, but not hundreds.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Manual Removal Request Versus Automated Request to Remove Bad Links
Our site has several hundred toxic links. We would prefer that the webmaster remove them rather than submitting a disavow file to Google. Are we better off writing web masters over and over again to get the links removed? If someone is monitoring the removal and keeps writing the web masters will this ultimately get better results than using some automated program like LinkDetox to process the requests? Or is this the type of request that will be ignored no matter what we do and how we ask? I am willing to invest in the manual labor, but only if there is some chance of a favorable outcome. Does anyone have experience with this? Basically how to get the highest compliance rate for link removal requests? Thanks, Alan
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan11 -
Can you explain why a site with loads of keywork anchor backlinks is ranking well?
Hi All, A couple of years ago my site got punished and i kind of figured out it was due to keyword anchor text backlinks. I recently was considering getting a new SEO company and found one that promotes another company in my industry. However, when i look at the backlinks, of the website they do SEO for, via open site explorer - I noticed nearly all of the backlinks are keywords. website in question is http://goo.gl/6nRzLi And if you see the search results here: http://goo.gl/9bXoxY they are ranking on first page with very big brands - and have done for about a year - but nealy all of their backlinks are the keywords in this search... I understood this is the kind of thing that killed my website 2 years ago - are these backlinks ok? should i still consider this SEO company to work on my site, i 100% do not want my site to be penalised again so any advice appreciated. thanks James
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | isntworkdull0 -
Why Doesn't Moz Use Wistia Backlink Embed Feature
I am using Wistia videos for my website and they have an embed feature which gives option to include a backlink to one's site, which I thought was great. I took a random Moz whiteboard Friday video (http://moz.com/blog/what-should-i-put-on-the-homepage-whiteboard-friday) and I do not see the backlink feature if I click on "embed" button below the video. Question: why would Moz not use such feature? Bad SEO or simply because Moz does not need it?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | khi50 -
Is it a good idea to remove old blogs?
So I have a site right now that isn't ranking well, and we are trying everything to help it out. One of my areas of concern is we have A LOT of old blogs that were not well written and honestly are not overly relevant. None of them rank for anything, and could be causing a lot of duplicate content issues. Our newer blogs are doing better and written in a more Q&A type format and it seems to be doing better. So my thought is basically wipe out all the blogs from 2010-2012 -- probably 450+ blog posts. What do you guys think?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | netviper1 -
Backlinks question: High Domain Authority, Lower Page Authority
We have a possibility of contributing guest blogs (with followed backlinks) to a site with very high domain authority (and highly trafficked), but when we've looked at the blog entires they already have, most of them have a much lower page authority. How do relevant links from a page with a lower PA but on a domain with a really high DA end up impacting our overall backlink profile? Can an expert or two give me some advice on what this may mean for us if we choose to go for it? In your opinion, does having lots of relevant links from a site with a much higher domain authority than ourselves (to give you an idea, our domain authority is in the low 60's, this site has a domain authority of almost 90) worth the time/effort/resources unto itself? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | GrowOrganic0 -
Restructuring/Removing 301 Redirects Due To Newly Optimized Keywords
Just to be clear, this is for one unique page on a website. Also, please see my diagram attached. Let's say that a page's URL was originally /original. So, you optimize the page for a new keyword (keyword 1), and therefore change the URL to /keyword-1. A 301 redirect would then be placed... /original > /keyword-1 However, let's say 6 months down the road you realize that the keyword you optimized the page for (keyword 1) just isn't working. You research for a new keyword, and come up with (keyword 2). So, you'd like to rename the page's URL to /keyword-2. After placing a redirect from the current page (keyword 1) to the 'now' new page (keyword 2), it would look like this... /original > /keyword-1 > /keyword-2 We know that making a server go through more than one redirect slows the server load time, and even more 'link-juice' is lost in translation. Because of this, would it make sense to remove the original redirect and instead place redirects like this? /original > /keyword-2 /keyword-1 > /keyword-2 To me, this would make the most sense for preserving SEO. However, I've read that removing 301 redirects can cause user issues due to browsers caching the now 'removed' redirect. Even if this is ideal for SEO, could it be more work than it's worth? Does anyone have any experience/input on this? If so, I greatly appreciate your time! oDvLl.jpg
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | LogicalMediaGroup1 -
301 Redirect - What happens to backlinks
Hello... One of my sites is losing rankings in G. I received the webmaster notification of unnatural links... My question is, should i do a 301 redirect of every page on my site to a new domain? If so, do the backlinks (which i believe are causing my rankings to drop) carry over? How about the good backlinks? Also, what would happen to the rankings i currently have on page 1? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Prime850 -
Help! Why did Google remove my images from their index?
I've been scratching my head over this one for a while now and I can't seem to figure it out. I own a website that is user-generated content. Users submit images to my sites of graphic resources (for designers) that they have created to share with our community. I've been noticing over the past few months that I'm getting completely dominated in Google Images. I used to get a ton of traffic from Google Images, but now I can't find my images anywhere. After diving into Analytics I found this: http://cl.ly/140L2d14040Q1R0W161e and realized sometime about a year ago my image traffic took a dive. We've gone back through all the change logs and can't find where we made any changes to the site structure that could have caused this. We are stumped. Does anyone know of any historical Google updates that could have caused this last year around the end of April 2010? Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | shawn810