Microsite campaign good or bad idea for SERP
-
I have a group of microsites for renters insurance, mostly geo long-tails. I wrote some content and have a GREAT back-end through Kemper. First 4 weeks they all did great. It looks like Panda went through on June 25 and by the 27'th they got moved totally out of the SERP. I have 67 microsites. All have unique contact (about us, why us, benefits...). I post to them often; not all of them but i put up about 10 new posts / week. Havent done much SEO, no link building or anything that could be spammy or causeing trouble. I have them in webmaster tools and no messages about problems. If i've been penalized or if something is seriously wrong i'd like to know. I know that Google can see 67 websites all on 1 ip but i'm not trying to fool or trick Gbot so not interested in using proxies or specialty hosts with many ip's.If there is no critical flaw, next i'm just going to continue writing content, buy traffic, and build quality backlinks. Your comments are appreciated. Not one site is in top 1000 as far as i can see, and all were in top 30 by week 4. Banned on week 5, today is week 12.http://onlinerentersinsurance.orgIf you want to see the other 66, click on the 'renters insurance' link on the right. Its a random link through the micronetwork.
-
Thought I'd throw in my 2 cents and experience...
My experience: Built a network of about 50 microsites, SEOed them to the max, built some strong links to them and boom, week later was getting some real traffic. Time goes by, new algorithms released and the sites start to lose their rankings. In fact, the only thing they rank for is their EMD terms (which you don't have). Granted, you seem to have a better upkeep of them but the SERPs trend is not in your favor.
I agree with the others, you should focus on building 1 powerful site vs many microsites. Microsites were the shit back in the day several months back, but today its the big dogs that rank. First page results are filled with brands (usually multiple listings per domain) and microsites are trending down. Quality > quantity, for both links and sites.
My suggestion is to combine all those microsites into one super site that is most easily branded + contains all or a portion of your target keyword in the URL. Just copy/paste all the articles from the microsites to the one site and 301 redirect to the new respective pages.
Also, make sure you do a search before you jump to conclusions about keyword traffic. "life quotes" returns results about life related quotations. Trying to rank for insurance with that keyword is an uphill battle.
If you go through with the transferring all content to one site and 301ing the pages, be sure to post your results here!
Cheers,
Oleg
-
Never mind Donnie,
It looks like you used Google keyword tool, exact...
-
Hey Donnie,
I was reviewing your suggestions and have a quick question: what is the number after the keyphrase you listed here:
online renters insurance - 210
Disability quotes - 480
consumer insurance guide - 58
life quotes - 301,000
renters insurance illinois - 46
e health insurance - 2,400
-
Penguin bait? We have a handful of professional writers in house putting up GREAT content at ConsumerInsuranceGuide.com, and have done this before--successfully. The last time we made this 'Penguin Bait' we sold it to QuinStreet for 16 million. http://www.elliotsblog.com/insure-com-sells-for-16-million-7361 The value was in the 7,000 authorative articles and their respective pagerank and backlinks. Like you say good content beats SEO every time.
Do you really think its 'penguin bait'????
What specifically (or generally) is wrong there??? Initially i wasnt posting question about ConsumerInsuranceGuide.com but now that you mention it i'm VERY interested--especially since we have several hundred thousand dollars spent there already on high-quality original content.
-
I also own ConsumerInsuranceGuide.com and have 1000 articles published in many insurance verticals. But I thought it was too vague.
I would call this Penguin bait.
I would attack this with one site, 20 articles that are best-on-the-web for their topic and all of my remaining resources would go into getting editorial links into those 20 articles.
If you are targeting "renters insurance in statename" then those articles would target the 20 states with highest renter value. That might be units*household income.
These articles would not be yada yada yada renters insurance yada yada yada. They would be kickass stories that people would link to and share on facebook.
-
I work 8 minutes on all 300 sites and get as much done as most people can in 40 hours!
I know that is efficient. I use a similar method. But that is only good for the factory work part. To win in this niche you gotta promote the site and have at least one page of great content on each domain.
You put one page of great content on each of your domains and I'll put all 300 on mine. I am going to win.
When that is done you still have just 8 minutes per week to promote your sites and I still have 40 hours.
-
Tell that to Dick Portillo, millionaire owner of Portillo's hot dogs chain, one of the best in Chicago. He makes more money than Jean and Georgettis (best steak house in Chicago).
Anyway, this rhetoric isnt helpful to any of us. I'm looking for opinions based on working knowledge of microsite campaigning vs. single site. Obviously your hunch is that a microsite is a 'losing battle'. I get it. Where ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise.
By the way, all 300 sites are build dynamically from 1 page of code using Wordpress as CMS. I work 8 minutes on all 300 sites and get as much done as most people can in 40 hours!
-
@EGOL lol/lmao.. @lifeQuotes I would focus on one site and add the SEOmoz blog feed to your RSS for some ideas : )
It's challenging but not impossible.
-
On the right nav (middle) if you click 'renters insurance' it randomly goes to one of the 67 live sites. Click and look at the domain
-
Anyway, i asked google for a list of the next 300 best 'renters insurance' keywords and bought ALL 300 exact-match domains.
speechless
These types of battles are not won in a factory. They are won using content, smarts, and solid promotion. The more competitive the niche the more solid promotion will be needed.
Your niche is pretty competitive.
You build your armada of hotdog stands and I'll build a single website. I'll work 40 hours a week on my site and you work 8 minutes per week on each of your 300 sites. I know that I am going to win.
One of the main strategies of battle is to "divide and conquer". The hotdog stand strategy plays to defeat.
=============
Full disclosure... I used to own an armada of hotdog stands... then build a big site that kicked all of their asses - and their competitor's too!
-
I clicked on the renters insurance tab however I don't see the 67 links. However I see the quick links to instant quotes which link to external sites like lifequotes.com.
I've never really heard of a microsite campaign however in my opinion yes it's bad because it's spread out.
I do know that having a URL structure of www.brandname/keyword allows you to build a brand rather than a bunch of micropages. Google wants to rank sites that will help their users.
-
I see,
However these are not exact match domains.
An exact match domain must be exact:
If I wanted to rank for cars and I had cars.com or cars.net those would be exact.
These are you links...
- Auto Insurance
- Business Insurance
- Disability Insurance
- Health Insurance
- Home Insurance
- Renters Insurance
- Life Insurance
- Travel Insurance
- Long Term Care Insurance
These are your URLs:
online renters insurance - 210
Disability quotes - 480
consumer insurance guide - 58
life quotes - 301,000
renters insurance illinois - 46
e health insurance - 2,400
You have a gold URL out of all of these...
I would forget all the other URLs and invest all my time on lifequotes.com
You can still have lifequotes.com/auto-insurance and that counts as having the keyword in your URL. In fact Lifequote is your brand name in this case and all your anchored text which are [exact] will also look natural.
-
Hey Donnie,
Duplicate content: Thats just my footer (same in all 67). Should i block that from the bot(s)???
Also: the microsites were an effort to target long-tail keywords with exact-match domains.
OK: blocked s of 4:30 pm 8-24. I get a clean copyscape now
-
All have unique contact (about us, why us, benefits...).
Unique means exclusive one of a kind...
Type the URL you provided into: http://copyscape.com/ Seems like you have some duplicate content.
Also, I don't understand why you built soo many microsites.. You're better off having one quality website with all of the targeted keywords. It's easier to get ranking to a page that also has some Domain Authority.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
A good experiment to test keyword/vertical difficulty?
I'm trying to rank a brand new client site but getting nowhere for our main keyword/s - this after 6 months. We have built lots of good links and literally tried everything to fix this. What's a good way for me to test the keywords on a different page / domain to be certain the problem isn't with the vertical/keyword? I'd love to have some advice on this vs. how to fix the problem, which I've asked about here before. I'm assuming buying and trying to rank a new domain is a bad idea since sandboxing etc. could make it very difficult. Perhaps sending some links to a Tumblr page that's optimized for the main keyword or something similar? Would love to hear some suggestions - thanks a lot.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | zakkyg0 -
AddThis good or bad for SEO - Urgent
I have heard rumours that AddThis isn't good for SEO is that correct? Just thinking about adding it to my site.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoman100 -
Are pop-unders bad for SEO?
Hi all, I run a travel site that specializes in hotel bookings. We're working with a third-party advertiser to launch a pop-under unit when someone searches for hotels on our site. (This unit is of the "also try your search on these competing sites" variety.) I'm worried, however, that this might affect our SEO, especially in light of this on their site: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/2721313?hl=en Would Google even see these pop-unders? (Are pop-unders treated the same as pop-overs?) And, if so, would G see them as unwanted and treat them as a nuisance? Could it lead to negative SEO consequences? Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks! Tom
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TomNYC0 -
Reversing the bad effects of a problematic 301 redirect
I have a previously very strong ranking page that is now omitted from the SERPs, but only for one specific keyword phrase. I think I found the reason, which I'll explain, and I hope I can hear some confirmation of my theory and a way to correct it. Let's use the following made up domain and keywords: Political blog SiteA.com had a few news articles about "Blue Widgets" (like 10 out of 10,000 pages). They became exceedingly popular, so on SiteA.com we created a reference-type page about "Blue Widgets" and in the news articles we already had about Blue Widgets we added rich anchor text (Blue Widgets) links that pointed to this new About Blue Widgets page. (long before we wised up about keyword rich anchor texts and Google!) After seeing how much traffic was coming to the About Blue Widgets page, we created a whole new site, SiteB.com, which was about Widgets (not just Blue Widgets), a page for each color of widget, and other pages about widgets. SiteB.com has an important and popular page, SiteB.com/blue-widgets, which is about Blue Widgets. We then 301 redirected the SiteA.com's About Blue Widgets page to SiteB.com/blue-widgets. This page in SiteB.com ranked very high (like #2, #3) for years. Two weeks ago SiteB.com/blue-widgets fell out of the SERPs, but only for the phrase "Blue Widgets". The page still gets lots of traffic from other queries, and even the "Blue Widgets" query will bring up other pages on SiteB.com. So, the only thing hit is the specific query "Blue Widgets" for the specific page SiteB.com/blue-widgets. It seems obvious to me that Google took the combination of a) a site that it probably no longer liked since we sold it (SiteA.com) since it's gone downhill, b) the rich keyword anchor text on SiteA.com pages pointing to the SiteA.com page optimized for that keyword, and c) then being 301 Redirected to a SiteB.com Blue Widgets page optimized for that same anchor text. I only discovered the SiteA.com redirects last week, which I had completely forgotten about, and had them removed right away. My question is, 1) if this indeed was the issue, now that the redirects from SiteA.com to SiteB.com are gone will my ranking eventually go back to normal? and 2) is there anything I can do to get Google to notice the change and have it go back to how it was?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bizzer0 -
How do you get these sitelinks in the SERPs?
How do you get these to appear - http://imgur.com/xV5LA6E Does a website have any control over what appears?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EcommerceSite0 -
Is all duplication of HTML title content bad?
In light of Hummingbird and that HTML titles are the main selling point in SERPs, is my approach to keyword rich HTML titles bad? Where possible I try to include the top key phrase to descripe a page and then a second top keyphrase describing what the company/ site as a whole is or does. For instance an estate agents site could consist of HTML title such as this Buy Commercial Property in Birmingham| Commercial Estate Agents Birmingham Commercial Property Tips | Commercial Estate Agents In order to preserve valuable characters I have also been omitting brand names other than on the home page... is this also poor form?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SoundinTheory0 -
Wrong page in serps
Hi
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | niclaus78
I've been working with a law firm's website for a couple of years and we've encounter a problem. The pages were divided to target employers and employees separately. For the very targeted keywords mentioning either employees or employers everything was good but for broader less targeted keywords e.g unfair dismissal keywords chooses either one or the other which is a problem. Now I created this ''bridge'' pages where all the topics are explained and then users are directed to and then they will chose where to go. the problem is a lot of off page was created during this years either targeting on or the other. What I plan to do is: -Create a new site map and changing the priority, so the new pages will have a priority 1 and the others less. - bookmarks, articles, etc will be targeting now to the new pages. I place the new pages linked from the home page so that they get the link juice of the home page and they are also now more a category page in the map, so a level up comparing to the previous ones. Questions: 1- Is it worthwhile adding a rel canonical tag to the new pages and rel alternate to previous pages, or if its not a question of duplicate content it shouldn't have an impact? What other things should I take into consideration? Thanks a lot. nico0 -
Taking up the entire serp
Hey guys, I tried to search across the q&a for an answer but came up with nothing for this. I'm competing well for our keyword rankings with 20 keywords, 13 of which on the first page and 9 in the top 3. Which is great! But what we are interested in doing is taking over the rankings. Currently competitors reside around us in the serps taking up the remainder of traffic. We are considering creating new websites and competing on the same keywords to rank and eventually take over the google rankings for our products. So that if you were to look to buy 'purple buttons' the top 5 websites sell these but are owned by ourselves. The question is. Has anyone else done this? What are googles views? Are there any traps that we could run into? As far as I see it the only real issues we could run into are with google on a moral basis. Thoughts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AdenBrands0