SEO Terms for Internal Vs External
-
Hey there!
I am writing up an SEO plan for our company and wanted to get the groups input on the use of some SEO terms. I need to organize and explain these efforts to nonSEO people.
I usually talk about, SEO in terms of "Internal" vs "External" efforts.
Internal SEO efforts being things like
Title Tags, Description Tags, Page Speed, Minimizing errors, proper 301 redirect, content development for the site, internal linking and anchor, etc.
External SEO efforts being things like
Link building, social media profile setups and posts (FB Twitter Pinterest, YouTube), PR work.
-
How do you split these out? What terms do you use?
-
Do you subdivide these tasks? What terms do you use?
For example, with Internal, I sometimes talk about "Technical SEO" that has do to with making sure that site speed is working well, 301s are setup correctly, noindex tag etc are all used properly. These are things that different versus "On Page" efforts to use keywords properly etc.
I will also use the term "Site Visibility" for non SEOs to explain the technical impact. For example, if your site has the wrong robots.txt, if you have 500 errors everywhere and a slow site, if you are sending spiders down a daisy chain of 301s, it is difficult for the key parts of your site to be found and so your "Visibility" to the engines are poor. You have to get your visibility up, before you begin to then worry about if you have the right keywords on a page etc.
Any input or references would be appreciated.
-
-
Aw, thanks. Glad you found some value in my comments. And, thanks for raising an interesting point for discussion
Good luck!
-
Thanks everyone, especially Andrea.
Andrea, you are right, the issue here is about how best to talk to the rest of the company, from developers to marketers to editors to executives. I like the points about how developers tend to be very literal and specific so the wrong choice of words can throw them off. #semantics is key when you deal with the rest of the group.
I had been thinking about this for the past day and ran across Rand's excellent whiteboard friday on the SEO pyramid
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/whiteboard-friday-the-seo-fundamentals-pyramid
He set this up as a hierarchy of needs (a la Maslow) and I liked it. I think it helps me to organize and also talk about these items. He gives the following levels from the bottom up.
-
Accessible, Quality Content (Unique Text, Bot Accessibility, URL Structure, etc)
-
Keyword Research and Targeting (Keyword research, on page targeting of tags, h1s, text)
-
Link Building (Link requests and content link strategies)
-
Social (on site user engagement, social media, viral)
It is setup so if you do not do 1 and 2 right, you will not be able to really benefit from 3 and 4.
This got me thinking. I am going to talk about this to my team in terms of a pyramid slightly tweaked from Rand's order above, but still bottom up.
Is your website:
-
Crawlable? Can the search engines find and crawl your website optimally? When the search engine bots and users come to your site does your server respond like a Ferrari or a Yugo?
-
Rankable? Have you selected the right keywords that your users are search for and that convert on your goals. Did you optimize for these keywords within your HTML and page content? To a search engine and to your users, does your site read like Shakespeare or more like a 3rd grade essay on "What I did on my summer vacation"?
-
Linkable / Likeable / Tweetable / Pinable? - Is the quality of your content good enough that people want to talk about it, share it, link to it, tell others to visit it. Is it so compelling to your audience that when you ask them to link to your site, they do it happily and then ask others to do the same?
-
Useable? When you spend all this time making your site fast, highly ranked on the optimal key words and highly regarded by others, do people get to your site and then become confused? All the traffic in the world is useless if they can't figure out how to convert into an action on your site. Is your messaging clear to the user?
Generally, here is why I put this in these types of groups / names
Crawlable - IT folks get the concept of optimized coding. They are already interested in that and understand not wanting to waste the bot's time. When I mention bloated slow spaghetti code, they get it. Nobody likes to look at that, why would a bot want the equivalent of that with crummy HTML code and slow server response? They also tend to think of steps 2 and 3 as too much art and so do not want to get into that part.
Rankable and Linkable - Editors and marketing gets this. They can see how using the right key word makes a difference and also appreciate quality, interesting stuff. When I show them how the title and description are used within a SERP result, they get that too, more so that how it impacts ranking per se.
Useable - I wanted to change the top of the pyramid a little bit as we are working to include the designers and marketing as a part of this process internally. Want to leverage how they fit into this process and so it makes sense to them if you do not have a clear message (like with any marketing item) you do not get conversions. Having the useable step built on top of the others, explains why I need to have certain phrases worked in to the copy etc.
Cheers!
-
-
Or on-site / off-site
#semantics
-
Ah, the fun of semantics! It's amazing what a difference it can make, though, when trying to convey messages to a non-SEO or Web group.
I traditionally use "on site" and "on page" SEO for the "internal" items you have. That's partly driven by the fact we have some people working on internal search on our site so people get confused with those projects if I use the term "internal."
I do use the term "external" or "site SEO" for the projects you list as "external." I try to differentiate what' specific to a page and what's specific to the overall site to help people understand there's different layers. And to help educate that because you optimize one page doesn't mean you've done SEO
I also like to educate on "technical" SEO so my team understands it's not just about keywords, but site performance and other things that can mean developer and IT resources. I learned fast that there was a perception that if you just put the keywords in the right place, revenue would come.
As for more social related information, I use buckets for social sharing but also make sure I hammer home the need for "in bound" marketing. There's a difference between those as you need the content to drive in bound but you use social to help give it visibility. And I think it's a more comprehensive element of marketing.
I would argue though that visibility isn't segregated by how you mentioned in. The technical build as well as the keywords selected can both play into visibility. You may not have any 500/404 problems, but if you picked keywords only a small audience cares about, you also limit your visibility.
For me, part of my terminology is dictated by our own internal jargon and how to map back to it so more people "get" it...while I talk about complicated things out of their wheelhouse that can end up confusing them anyway!
-
onpage / offpage
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Personalized Content Vs. Cloaking
Hi Moz Community, I have a question about personalization of content, can we serve personalized content without being penalized for serving different content to robots vs. users? If content starts in the same initial state for all users, including crawlers, is it safe to assume there should be no impact on SEO because personalization will not happen for anyone until there is some interaction? Thanks,
Technical SEO | | znotes0 -
Google Does not find Internal links
Hi guys I involved in difficult situation. in google webmaster tools -> internal links some important pages doesn't have any links from all pages. for example home page just have 9000 internal inks but there are 29000 indexed pages by google and some not important pages have 27000 internal links.(more than home page) Site made by angular v1 Is there anyone can help me why google could not find all internal links?
Technical SEO | | cafegardesh0 -
Can a CMS affect SEO?
As the title really, I run www.specialistpaintsonline.co.uk and 6 months ago when I first got it it had bad links which google had put a penalty against it so losts it value. However the penalty was lift in Sept, the site corresponds to all guidelines and seo work has been done and constantly monitored. the issue I have is sales and visits have not gone up, we are failing fast and running on 2 or 3 sales a month isn't enough to cover any sort of cost let alone wages. hence my question can the cms have anything to do with it? Im at a loss and go grey any help or advice would be great. thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | TeamacPaints0 -
International Site Links In Footer
We have several international sites and we have them linked in the footer of our main .com site . Should we add "nofollow" to these links? Our concern is that Google could see these sites as a network?
Technical SEO | | EwanFisher0 -
Internal linking with Old Content
Hello, I have a sports website in which users write their opinions about the sporting events that take place every day throughout the year. Each of these sporting events generates a new page or URL indicating the match with date. For example: www.domain.com/baseball/boston-v-yankees-04-24-2012-1234.html The teams face several times a year, and each match creates a different URL or page. I would like to link old pages to new pages and vice versa. How would you recommend these pages to be linked? Linking them to each other or linking old pages to new pages that are generated or otherwise? I would appreciate your orientation and help in this case. Thank you.
Technical SEO | | NorbertoMM1 -
Does HTTPS Only make a impact on SEO?
Hi. I run a site that's SSL only. (Using a 301 redirect to redirect traffic from http:// to https://). This might be a stupid question but i can't seem to find any conclusive answers to the question by searching. Does this negatively affect the search engine ranking of the site? Regards,
Technical SEO | | Host1
Eivind1 -
Managing SEO during web site migration
We have an old web site which currently has good traffic and search ranking. However, the old design is not helping us convert traffic into customers and we have decided to re-design the web site. Due to challenges resolving 4XX issues in the current setup, we will be moving the site to a new CMS and hosting provider. The domain will remain the same. The plan is to create exactly the same pages in the new CMS, as what we have today. And to use the same URLs for each page. Content will remain the same in step one. We will only apply a new layout and design. Besides keeping the URLs the same as in the old system. What else should we be aware of when doing a web site migration, that might impact our search ranking?
Technical SEO | | petersen0