Should we use 'disavow' if we dramatically dropped serps after Oct 5th, but did not receive a warning?
-
We dramatically dropped serps after Oct 5th, but did not receive a warning about bad links on google webmasters.
Is it a good idea to find and collect the worst links and disavow them? As there was no warning we can only guess links were the problem, but it seems likely. However we do not want to send any requests to google if no warning was sent.
Can disavow be used in this way, or should we do more manually?
(We are hoping remove links + increase very solid links + optimize for key words will help revive serps)
Many thanks.
James
-
Hi James,
Everyone has their own view of Google and what interacting with them might mean.
My personal view is that anyone who thinks they are clever enough to fly under the radar when everything they do is aimed at making themselves visible in Google is probably mistaken.
often people have said that this just raises an alarm bell to google if not totally necessary?
If you are seeing keywords that have dropped below page 100 in the SERPs, I would think those alarm bells have long since rung.
Sha
-
Thanks Sha,
We will definitely look into removing links where possible ourselves.
One thought though, if the site is not necessarily 'penalised' but instead the bad links have just been demoted, would it make more sense to not send a reconsideration request? often people have said that this just raises an alarm bell to google if not totally necessary?
And if not sending a recon request, then should we not also send a disavow?
I think this a kind of dilema that many people face when seeing drops but not being sure of an actual manual penalty.
James.
-
Hi James,
I would start out with cleaning up damaging links first, then lodge a reconsideration request. It is important not to appear to be trying to get out of a situation without making any real effort. That could put you on the back foot if you need to make future requests.
Keep in mind that some links may be totally within your own control to remove - I recently cleaned up links from more than 160 sites for a client by getting hold of a list of login information from a previous SEO vendor. I was then able to log into all those sites and either delete bogus profiles (where that was an option), or delete over-optimized body text and signature links that had been created within them.
Over-optimized links from article directories and syndicated content are another area that is usually within the site owner's control. I am stunned how many people I see sending email to the owners of Article Directories asking them to remove links when they could just log into the account and fix the problem themselves.
Once you have removed all the links that you can, you can use the Disavow Tool to inform Google of any links that you have not been able to clean up, then lodge a reconsideration request and include a link to the information in the Disavow list that you uploaded.
Hope that helps,
Sha
-
Hi, thanks for the answer, so the best thing to do, even if we have had no warning, is to 1st send a reconsideration request, then regardless of what they say, manually try to remove 'bad' links,
After this use disavow for the remaining bad links, then send a new reconsideration request explaining what we did manually to try to help the site. (if they confirm a manual penalty) or do not send a request again if they did not confirm a penalty?
Would this be a logical method?
-
Hi James,
Google's Disavow Tool is not a first line of defence, but the last.
Matt Cutts made it quite clear when releasing the tool that Google still expects webmasters to make a "good faith effort" to remove as many links as possible before using the Disavow Tool.
If you read Dr Pete's post using the link that Smart Lock Solutions provided in their post you can see this. If you have not seen the video from Matt Cutts about the Disavow Tool, you can watch it and read some views on the release of the tool here.
The only way to confirm whether a manual penalty has been applied is to lodge a reconsideration request. The webspam team will respond to a request, either advising that there is no manual action in place, or that a penalty exists because the site violates their search quality guidelines.
Hope that helps,
Sha
-
Hi I agree, I am assuming we have been hit by some sort of penalty, but don't know the best way to deal with it.
For example should we disavow bad links, then send a reconsideration request, or is it enough to just disavow, beef up strong relevant links (like Vikas said - with less keywords) and hope for the best. Some of our sites crept back one one or two pages, but the other all dropped below page 100.
Is the reconsideration request required in people's experience?
Many thanks!
James
-
Hi James,
My immediate response would be DO NOT place any reliance on the presence or absence of an unnatural links warning from Google!
I have clients who never received an unnatural links warning of any kind and were actually suffering impact from a manual penalty. The penalty was not revealed until I decided that we needed to lodge a reconsideration request because something more than Penguin was going on there. Sure enough, the message that came back from the webspam team was that the site had a manual spam action in place.
Since our company developed the rmoov tool, I have been responsible for customer support and spent many hours talking to site owners who are trying to clean up their backlink profiles. During that time I have heard from many, many other site owners that have big problems with no unnatural links warning message received. A number of these have also found on lodging a reconsideration request, that they have a manual penalty applied to their site.
Basing your assessment of what is happening on whether or not you have received a message from Google is a big mistake, and unfortunately one that is being made by way too many people
Hope that helps,
Sha
-
Should we use 'disavow' if we dramatically dropped serps after Oct 5th, but did not receive a warning?
Not necessarily, here is a good read on who should use this tool: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/googles-disavow-tool-take-a-deep-breath
-
there was a minor Google update in Oct 5 called Penguin #3 which impacted 0.3 % of queries. However main update was released on sept 27 which targeted exact match domains. If your url is all about keywords then you might have got hit because of that.
I recommend removing bad links manually. Use URL itself as anchor text. Get links from blogs.
If things still doesn't work then try changing titles for low competition keywords. Also optimise the site copy for the same. Don't use keywords as anchor text for link building.
Hope that helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google isn't crawling my website page
I have been trying to get indexed my inner page's title tag but still I cannot see this. It has been almost a week. I have done "Fetch as Google" even though I cannot see this. What can be the reason?
Link Building | | ksmith880 -
Should i disavow yellowpages.com. Webmater tools shows 656 links coming from it.
We do not have any manual penalty warnings but I am still concerned that Google will see this as unnatural and be penalizing us to a lesser degree.
Link Building | | Jason_C0 -
Started linkbuilding, traffic drops
So I have a couple 3 year old projects I left intact for the last 2 years. Lately I tried to revigorate them. I started to build links to pages that used to be in Google top ten, but the more links I build, the more I lose out on traffic. The main keywords stay around the same position, I suppose the loss in appearances and traffic that can be seen in webmaster tools is mainly due to long tails I do not check the rankings for. I want to ask you guys if anybody have experienced similar data? I suppose it might be due to the exact anchor tags that I have used 3 years ago, so I already started removing those to see if it has a positive effect. I wanted to ask you, maybe somebody has experienced the same and already knows the reason and a solution for this phenomenon?
Link Building | | snetface0 -
Why my domain authority is dropping
Hi, I think I've been doing every right here. I just got a lot of nice backlinks from relevant sites ( pr 5 and higher), I also have been doing guest blogging for weeks. But suddenly, my domain authority dropped from 35 to 33. Traffic from searches also dropped a little bit. I didnt do anything blackhat yet so I dont know what is the reason why this happen. I update my site regularly, get more and more natural backlinks, do guest blogging. Or perhaps it was because I give links to my friends' affiliate sites and got penalized?
Link Building | | brian.jerimy0 -
Penguin,No warning message from Google
I'm losing traffic & I have been since April. I'm pretty sure it's Penguin but I have not received any messages from Google. Should I proceed with the disavowal tool to remove some of the spammy directory links? PS Submit Edge is owned by the Devil
Link Building | | KrisPhoto0 -
How Are Competitor's With Zero Links (According to SEOmoz) Ranking Highly?
Hey everyone! This is my first post in the community after just signing up for SEOmoz. I've already got a ton of value from this community so I'm looking for to giving back as much as possible. The keyword gets 8000+ monthly searches on Google. Not so many, but the keyword indicates high buying intention. The funny thing is that the top ranking page has 0 backlinks (according to OSE). It seems as though there are some black hat tactics being used, as I doubt that they are ranking solely with on-page optimization. Any idea what's going on? Have you guys/gals seen this before?
Link Building | | EdLeo0 -
What's Angela/Paul link profile?
Hi, Very new to this and appreciate your time to read and answer my question. What's Angela/Paul link profile? and what should I look out for if someone is offering to provide this type of link building to me?
Link Building | | nojan0 -
Is it ever the case that a link isn't worth having?
We have been asked to provide a link on our website to a website which provides us with recycled computers to use (our company brand is based around recycling). They have agreed that we will get a reciprocal link back to our site. However the comparisons show that - perhaps this isn't worth it? Our page authority: 39, theirs 26. Our domain authority: 41, theirs 14. Our linking root domains: 41 theirs 7. Finally their links are in the # [li] list [/li] # format I guess my question is threefold: 1 - Will they get significantly more out of this linking opportunity than we will? 2 - Is it worth having the link anyway? (Can it hurt us in any way?). 3 - Does having links in the # [li] list [/li] # format effect the power of the links contained? Thanks.
Link Building | | Benj250