Drupal SEO - Concerns about cloaking
-
It appears that core Drupal includes a CSS style that automatically generates an
tag for any* or
> ## Main menu This uses the CSS to create a 1px1px header with that text that is absolutely positioned in the top left hand corner. Essentially, hidden and unreadable to humans and presumably also useless to even screen readers. There is some discussion of the reasoning for including this functionality as standard here: [http://drupal.org/node/1392510](http://drupal.org/node/1392510 "http://drupal.org/node/1392510") I'm not convinced of its use/validity/helpfulness from an SEO perspective so there's a few questions that arise out of this. 1. Is there a valid non-SEO reason for leaving this as the default rather than giving ourselves full control over our ## tags? 2. Could this be seen as cloaking by creating hidden/invisible elements that are used by the search engines as ranking factors? Update: http://www.seobythesea.com/2013/03/google-invisible-text-hidden-links/ Google's latest patent appears to deal with this topic. The patent document even makes explicit reference to the practice of hiding text in ## tags that are invisible to users and are not proper headings. Anyone have any thoughts on what SEOs using Drupal should be doing about this?
-
Thanks Mike.
We're going to run with it for a while on one of our sites and see how it performs. I'll try and post any meaningful results here at a later date.
-
I was really concerned when I started developing in Drupal 7 and noticed that many themes had this programmed in.
Although I have not performed any specific split test on taking this out I had not noticed any misfortunes or penalties by having it in the template as you have stated. I also crawl my sites many times over with different tools and I have not received warnings etc.
Nonetheless I moved over to the Omega Theme, which is responsive, and the semantic programming is much better for my taste.
-
Thanks Corey.
It's certainly something that had us a bit worried.
The maximum number of hidden H2s on our Drupal pages is something like 2-3, and in each case the H2 serves to provide a description for the following ul/ol HTML tags (which it can be argued is just good semantic markup). If this is the case, could it still be penalised for cloaking? Essentially, is cloaking seen as an absolute practice in the eyes of the Search Engines or is it more subjective? Is a site penalised for appearing to use cloaking methods in a black and white sense and in lines with certain criteria or do they rate this by degrees?
(I realise they are questions we might not be in a position to know the answer to.)
I'm still in two minds about seemingly wasting 2-3 H tags by having them wrap around "main menu" content on seemingly every page. As it stands, they are automatically generated around our breadcrumb and our main menu buttons at the top of the page and are used to simply describe the menus on the page.
My worry is that even if this is not having a negative impact re: cloaking it is still a waste of H2 tags. If we have these 2-3 just describing the menus (that are global) and a further 1-2 describing the actual content of the page, then this is not really ideal from an SEO point of view.
In our case, I wonder if it might be worth sacrificing semantic structure for the SEO benefit?
Thanks.
-
These topics are always a little subjective, but here's what I'm seeing.
1. Screen readers (used by the blind) do like 'H tags'. And Google does give preference to sites better that are more likely to be handicap accessible. From what I see, this isn't an ideal use though. For example, if you can end up with 200 x H2 tags on a page, I'd say this is wrong.
Keywords placed in 'H tags' are also given more weight in a page's ranking. So, if the # of H tags is abused, and your page provides near nothing but H2's, it's not unreasonable to suspect that Google thinks you're stuffing keywords into the second-most powerful tag that can go into . It seems that Google does more to go after these kinds of possibly manipulative practices than they do to award the positive: far more often people shoot themselves in the foot. And this seems to, at very least, make that a lot easier to do. A page should generally have a single H1 at the start, and a small handful of relevant headings marked H2 - H6.
2. I'd again be a little wary. Text in the source that's not visible to the user is the definition of cloaking. As AJAX has gotten more popular, you do see more prestigious sites hiding content with JavaScript, and very slowly (that is, much slower than mainstream development), Google seems to adapt to these kinds of evolutions. But hiding everything by default in a CSS class? I'd personally avoid that, and if I saw it on a client's site, it would sit high on my list of things to tweak and test.
Hope something solid gets sorted, and then extensively A/B tested in production. Drupal is a good application; it still blows my mind that people still need to write SEO plugins / hacks for literally every application out there. It gives us SEO's a little more job security that these technical problems are almost never fully tackled at the source.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Advice on estate agent website SEO next steps
Hi everyone, I have been working on the SEO for this website for a while now and have had a good amount of success increasing the traffic and rankings. However our main hurdle is improving conversions on the actual website - we want to encourage more people to book a valuation. Does anybody have any suggestions on how we can improve this? The website is www.richardkendall.co.uk Thank you
Web Design | | sophiecrosby970 -
/index.php/ What is its purpose and does it hurt SEO?
Hello Moz Forum, I am still in the process of cleaning up the lack of attention to detail and betrayal set by our soon to be ex-SEO company. You can see a previous question I ask regarding betrayal SEO. I am analyzing every page on our website and i am noticing this /index.php/ in most of our URLs. We want to leave our expression engine cms and convert to wordpress. I have been reading about index.php but most of it is over my head for now. What does concern me is the "layman's" findings i am seeing through analytics. Our main domain has two URLs. one that ends in .com and the other ends in .com/index.php/ The one that ends in .com has a higher page rank than the ladder. And there are other internal pages with the same two variations. Can someone please explain to me what is /index.php/ ? what are the benefits of it? what are the cons? What will happen to my site once we move to wordpress? As always, your comments and suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Web Design | | CamiloSC0 -
Having a second homepage for a site would affect my SEO?
Hello guys, One of our clients is planning to have a new landing page for any users hitting the site for the first time. (returning users will still see the current homepage based on cookies ... in other words, the site would technically have 2 home pages). According to this client, they are planning to do something like this: https://www.websitename.com/ (for returning visitors) https://www.websitename.com/newuser (for first time visitors) Our instinct is that is not great to have 2 home pages (that would affect the SEO campaign we are managing for this company) and we are not sure how to handle this. That's why we would appreciate your opinion regarding this topic: From an SEO perspective, do you think this is a good idea? If not, what would you guys do differentiate first-time visitors vs returning visitors without affecting SEO? Maybe just a pop-up? Thanks in advance for your help !
Web Design | | Robertnweil10 -
Will keyword optimization for a landing page impact SEO for subsequent pages?
For example, if I optimize keyword “pleurx” really well on our landing page, I'd like to know if subsequent
Web Design | | Todd_Kendrick
pages linking back to that landing page will rank higher than before for “pleurx”
even if “pleurx” wasn't optimized on the subsequent pages. Thanks! -Andrew0 -
SEO Issues From Image Hotlinking?
I have a client who is hotlinking their images from one of their domains. I'm assuming the images were originally stored on the first domain (let's call it SiteA.com) and when they were putting together SiteB.com, they decided to just link to the images directly on SiteA.com instead of moving the images to Site B. Essentially hotlinking. Site A is not using the images in any way and in essence is just a gateway for their other sites and in this case a storage for their images. It doesn't use those images at all, so it really doesn't get any benefits of the images being referenced since I read that Google sometimes counts that hotlinking as a "vote" for the original image. But again, since ite A doesn't use the images that are being hotlinked at all, there's no benefit for Site A. My concern is that it's affecting their SEO for Site B because it makes it look like Site B is simply scraping data by hotlinking those images from Site A. Their programmer suggested creating a virtual directory so that it "looked" like it was coming from Site B. My guess is that Google can see this, so then not only will it look like Site B is scaping/hotlinking images, but also trying to hide it which may send up red flags to Google. My suggesstion to them was to just upload the images correctly into their own images directory on Site B. They own the images, so there's not any copyright issue, but that if they want proper SEO credit for that content, it all needs to be housed on the correct server and not hotlinked. Am I correct in this or will the virtual directory serve just as well?
Web Design | | GeorgiaSEOServices1 -
Changing from All-in-One SEO to Yoast SEO
I am currently using, and have always used the All-in-One SEO plugin for my website, but I have have heard time and again that the Yoast SEO plugin is superior. How do I transfer to this plugin instead? Do I need to deactivate the all in one seo plugin? What happens to all the tags that are already there for the thousands of pages, including the main page, that is functioning from the all in one SEO plugin?
Web Design | | dtlalaw0 -
Self hosted or YouTube Hosted Videos for SEO?
I am trying to plug holes in my site and the one thing that is lacking is unique videos. I was wondering what is the best way to go about videos for seo purposes? Should I just post onto a youtube channel and then embed into my site or should I look to just place videos on my site with software or should I use any of the other venders out there like Vimeo? Not sure which is the best route. Any tips?
Web Design | | bronxpad0 -
I have a button that repeats it self many times on same page, what can i do so button name does not affect my SEO?
I have a shopping car button named "Add to car" but it repeats on many pages on my website, is this affecting my seo? If yes.. What should i do so it does not affect? Should button appear on hover? Thanks
Web Design | | SeMeAntoja0