How best to deal with www.home.com and www.home.com/index.html
-
Firstly, this is for an .asp site - and all my usual ways of fixing this (e.g. via htaccess) don't seem to work.
I'm working on a site which has www.home.com and www.home.com/index.html - both URL's resolve to the same page/content.
If I simply drop a rel canonical into the page, will this solve my dupe content woes?
The canonical tag would then appear in both www.home.com and www.home.com/index.html cases.
If the above is Ok, which version should I be going with?
- or -
Thanks in advance folks,
James @ Creatomatic -
It certainly does help, many thanks Paul - hugely appreciated.
-
In this situation, using a canonical to point to the primary is a workaround, but the correct way to handle it is with a 301 redirect. Canonicals are to be used when both versions of the page need to be indexed, but all the influence is to be directed to a single URL.
In this case, there is no functional reason why you would want both URLs to remain in the index and be reachable by the two different addresses because they are the exact same page. Therefore the correct solution is to 301 redirect the /index.html URL to the primary URL. (This will also be cleanest to maintain, will pass maximum amount of authority, and is best for usability)
ASP sites are hosted on Microsoft IIS servers. IIS does not use or recognize .htaccess files. Instead, you will need to use the URL Rewrite Module. It should be preinstalled on most IIS servers, or you can request that your host/server admin add it. (If the server's older than IIS 7, you'll need a 3rd part ISAPI Rewrite module instead of Microsoft's own module)
Here's a TechRepublic article on using the Rewrite Module to perform the same sorts of functions as .htaccess on Apache servers. http://ow.ly/fXSAB In many ways, its basics are easier than .htaccess.
Note you should also be redirecting the non-www version of the site to the fully qualified domain name as well if you haven't already
Hope this helps?
Paul
-
That's correct - they are the same page.
To better explain, this is all done old-school via FTP, so any edits or changes I make to the file/page "index.html" apply to the following URL's
Is there any harm in telling search engines that the Canonical version of a page IS the same page?
(Actually, there were LOADS more but I've got fixes in place for most of these)
-
Adam, unfortunately the method you link to won't work, because the two URLs in question here are actually the same page. If this were handled this way, you'd be creating an infinite redirect looping in on itself.
Paul
-
Hi James,
First, run a crawl on your site. Is the /index.html getting picked up in the crawl? If so then it is being linked to internally. Check the navigation bar(s) to see if the link to 'Home' is linking to /index.html. Once you have found all the internal links linking to /index.html, you will then need to change these to point to the home page without the filepath (e.g. http://www.example.com/).
The second step would be to implement a canonical tag on both pages that point to the home page without the filepath. So in your example that would be as follows:
That is one way of solving any duplicate content issues without using 301 redirects via .htaccess. However, I believe there is a way to do this via .asp but you would have to search around for this. I did a quick search and found this page that might be of help.
Hope that helps,
Adam.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
SEO advice on ecommerce url structure where categories contain "/c/"
Hi! We use Hybris as plattform and I would like input on which url to choose. We must keep "/c/" before the actual category. c stands for category. I.e. this current url format will be shortened and cleaned:
Technical SEO | | hampgunn
https://www.granngarden.se/Sortiment/Husdjur/Hund/Hundfoder-%26-Hundmat/c/hundfoder To either: a.
https://www.granngarden.se/husdjur/hund/hundfoder/c/hundfoder b.
https://www.granngarden.se/husdjur/hund/c/hundfoder (hundfoder means dogfood) The question is whether we should keep the duplicated category name (hundfoder) before the "/c/" or not. Will there be SEO disadvantages by removing the duplicate "hundfoder" before the "/c/"? I prefer the shorter version ofc, but do not want to jeopardize any SEO rankings or send confusing signals to search engines or customers due to the "/c/" breaking up the url breadcrumb. What do you guys say and prefer from the above alternatives? Thanks /Hampus0 -
How can I best find out which URLs from large sitemaps aren't indexed?
I have about a dozen sitemaps with a total of just over 300,000 urls in them. These have been carefully created to only select the content that I feel is above a certain threshold. However, Google says they have only indexed 230,000 of these urls. Now I'm wondering, how can I best go about working out which URLs they haven't indexed? No errors are showing in WMT related to these pages. I can obviously manually start hitting it, but surely there's a better way?
Technical SEO | | rango0 -
Why is our page not visible in Google-ranking? www.loseweight.com.
using Wordpress as platform. Using the URL gets into the site,- but seems to be non-existent for public... No comments at all, seems to be "invisible"?
Technical SEO | | gewi0 -
Smart phone shows both mobile & desktop version of www.innoviafilms.com
Good morning from 2 degrees C mostly cloudy wetherby UK, Image this situation... Ive got two versions of a website: A desktop version & a mobile version, here are their respective urls: Desk top: http://www.innoviafilms.com Mobile: http://www.innoviafilms.com/m/home.aspx With blackberry bold in hand I type in via google search "Innovia films" i click on the search snippet and it renders the desktop version. But when i type the url directly in my Blackberry bold 9700 it returns the mobile version 😞 This confuses me. Having read this: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/02/making-websites-mobile- friendly.html I thought the desktop version would render in smartphones which the balckberry bold is. So my question is... "Why does the the mobile version only appear when you type in www.innoviafilms.com on a blackberry (and iphone 4) and the desktop version appears only when you enter "Innovia films" via google search" Any insights welcome 🙂
Technical SEO | | Nightwing0 -
What is the best method to block a sub-domain, e.g. staging.domain.com/ from getting indexed?
Now that Google considers subdomains as part of the TLD I'm a little leery of testing robots.txt with something like: staging.domain.com
Technical SEO | | fthead9
User-agent: *
Disallow: / in fear it might get the www.domain.com blocked as well. Has anyone had any success using robots.txt to block sub-domains? I know I could add a meta robots tag to the staging.domain.com pages but that would require a lot more work.0 -
Www vs non-www
We just had our site redesigned. Previously, it was indexed under www.suss.net, but now the developer has it at suss.net with www.suss.net 301 redirecting to suss.net. Is this bad for SEO?
Technical SEO | | kylesuss0 -
How to see a theme ‘/wp-content/themes/’
HI I'm still plugging away at getting to grips with my companies personalized blog. I've been trying for the past two days to upload a theme to my own test Wordpress blog, in order to correct a bug in the companies theme that makes formatting in the Post disappear. The code in the themes CSS file seems to be fine. Anyhow what I assumed would be a simple step has given me hours of hassle. I have finally got to the point of uploading an unzipped version of the theme intot ‘/wp-content/themes/’. Now try as I might my Wordpress admin is completely blind to the fact. Any attempt at using the Upload facility (which is what I attempted many hours ago) fails. There seems to be no place to say, look out there at my directory - a new original theme - unzipped and ready to go. Am I missing something very obvious?
Technical SEO | | catherine-2793880