Google Places Question: Two Businesses, Same Address
-
I am working with a client who runs a personal training business. He shares a fitness studio with another personal trainer to minimise costs. My issue is that the other guy has 'taken' the Google Places listing address as his business, rather than my client's. The gym itself is not a business, it is simply a shared workspace by two personal trainers - in the same way as a shared office space might be the address of several businesses. This presents a bit of a problem with Google Places verification.
Is it best to:
'Alter' the address slightly so it appears to be a separate premises (e.g. 51 Something Street --> 51A Something Street) then use that address in all my citations
Leave the address itself the same, but rely on the fact that there are separate domains, phone numbers and business names
Any thoughts on this?
-
Has the "other guy" converted the current page to Google+ Local? If not, you could just "overclaim" it onto Google+ Local, take control of it, and be done with it.
Also, for the medical field Google allows doctors/dentists/etc. to have a "personal" business listing, and a "practice" listing, if there's multiple doctors/dentists/etc. at the same practice. This is so people looking for their provider by name can find them, as well as someone searching for the name of the practice. I don't see why fitness (health) would be any different.
If Google doesn't allow practice/personal business listings for fitness, you could create a page with the name of the studio using exact address/phone and then report the current page as a duplicate.
Hopefully this helps!! If you aren't sure how to tell if he converted it to G+ Local you can pm me
-
Personally, I would alter the address slightly by including a different office/suite number. As long as you're not being deceptive about it, I don't see an issue. I'm incredibly paranoid about merged listings, though, so someone else may have different input.
I'd probably steer away from using 51A or similar, as, to me, that denotes a completely separate location.
I'm sure you've read the guidelines http://support.google.com/places/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=107528 and unfortunately they don't provide much guidance in terms of using a suite number, aside from telling you to use it on Address Line 2.
Another gotcha that I ran into with a Real Estate agent in a similar situation was that a common address, along with the format "Agent Name, RE/MAX City" in the business name (The city name is part of their legal business name) was that the listings merged across multiple agents. So, hopefully your client doesn't need to share a common gym name?
-
You should go the 51A / 51B route. Here is a similar question/response from Miriam that covers everything you need.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Places Tools To Find Duplicate Listings?
Hey guys, Any recommended tools - paid or processes to find duplicate listings for Google Places? Cheers.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | wickstar0 -
Optimising for two countries
I have a UK-based client, with a global product, who wants his website optimised for the same keywords in Google US and Google UK. Should I treat this as two separate jobs in any way or does it make no difference? I'm particularly wondering about link building and onsite optimisation
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | markwes0 -
Google Indexing of Images
Our site is experiencing an issue with indexation of images. The site is real estate oriented. It has 238 listings with about 1190 images. The site submits two version (different sizes) of each image to Google, so there are about 2,400 images. Only several hundred are indexed. Can adding Microdata improve the indexation of the images? Our site map is submitting images that are on no-index listing pages to Google. As a result more than 2000 images have been submitted but only a few hundred have been indexed. How should the site map deal with images that reside on no-index pages? Do images that are part of pages that are set up as "no-index" need a special "no-index" label or special treatment? My concern is that so many images that not indexed could be a red flag showing poor quality content to Google. Is it worth investing in correcting this issue, or will correcting it result in little to no improvement in SEO? Thanks, Alan
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan10 -
Domain and Sitemap Question
Hi - I am hoping you can help me with this issue we are currently trying to solve. We are hosting our mobile site's content on a different domain than what the URL of the site is, though owned by same company. In Google Webmasters tool we have the mobile sitemap under "sitemaps.xyz.com", however the URL of the site is "m.xyz.com". We have submitted 60MM pages in the mobile sitemap, but only 1MM pages have been indexed. Do you think this set up causes confusion with the bots? Does this affect the crawlability of the site? Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ladylana
Eva0 -
How To Internationalize - Big Question
Hi all, Here is a big question. We have a long-established good content website with a .co.uk domain. The site is UK focussed. However, we are planning a new feature which will be UK and worldwide. So do we: 1. Keep it all on our .co.uk ? 2. Put the non-UK parts on a .com domain ? We don't have any content as such for a separate domain, and are not planning any. But, we are not sure if for example US users would be unimpressed with a UK domain. We could fudge it with "co.uk/us" etc. (Notice how we have not mentioned Google. Fed-up chasing big G the whole time. We just want to concentrate on our users and the service we provide to them. But G remains the elephant crapping in the corner of the room.) Also, we are asking this question before we let our developers and designers get to work. Basically we value Moz community opinions over and above theirs. Realise this is a big question, but you have big brains. Please chip in.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | dexm100 -
Google omitting some entries
Hi, I used this tool to test some domains. The tool can be found at http://www.virante.com/seo-tools/duplicate-content I have no questions about the other checks but with the similarity check. My question is how do i get Google not to omit some entries very similar to the top 1000 pages on my site? Will appreciate your answers, thanks. Suleman
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | esuleman0 -
Architecture questions.
I have two architecture related questions. Fewer folders is better. For example, www.site.com/product should rank better than www.site.com/foldera/folderb/product, all else constant. However, to what extreme does it make sense to remove folders? With a small site of 100 or so pages, why not put all files in the main directory? You'd have to manually build the navigation versus tying navigation to folder structure, but would the benefit justify the additional effort on a small site? I see a lot of sites with expansive footer menus on the home page and sometimes on every page. I can see how that would help indexing and user experience by making every page a click or two apart. However, what does that do to the flow of link juice? Does Google degrade the value of internal footer links like they do external footer links? If Google does degrade internal footer links, then having a bunch of footer links would waste link juice by sending a large portion of juice through degraded links, wouldn't it? Thank you in advance, -Derek
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | dvansant0