Ecommerce SEO with 130 keywords
-
Hello everyone,
My name is Davys and I'm what you call a newbie...so the question may sound stupid....But where we go.
In this campaign I will be targeting around 130 to 150 keywords to my store. So here is the technical question.
What is the right way of indexing 150 keywords?
Should I attempt to have all 150 going to www.mysite.com or should I break it down into smaller pages if I can put it that way. Like www.mysite.com/pages/bikiniwax for example. Even if I break it down, what is the right amount of keywords that I should SEO per page? Or do 150 pages?
Please helppppppppppppppppppppp....
Thanks a lot for your help.
-
Legal, sempre brinco que sou um carioca que adora SP. Caso queira conversar mais sobre SEO, meu twitter é: j0a0vargas
Falar de SEO não me cansa : )
Abração
-
Sao Paulo, Capital...Mas moro aqui em Dallas a 11 anos.
-
Yes i am. hshshs. Are you from here to?
-
Thanks guys.
Joao Vargas? Are you from Brazil?
-
Just my experience here - unless you've got an already existing highly ranked site with massive amounts of content, your best bet is to limit assigning two or at most three highly related keywords to any single page. You can then include two or at most three secondary phrases to that page but where those additional phrases are only mentioned on the page - this all goes to support the primary phrases.
And you'll only be successful even with that work if all other optimization factors are implemented properly.
Another concept - don't worry about long tail phrases - if you write quality content unique to each page well enough, long tail phrases will take care of themselves. But at the same time, don't shoot initially for 1st page Google for the most competitive phrases in your market if your competitors have hundreds or thousands of well established pages. Find the balance.
-
Hello, you can be very difficult to optimize all keyword with only one page. What I suggest is that you have pages for each product type and obviously an optimized page for each product. The title, url, h1, h2 and h3, interfere much in the rankings primarily on long tails. First I suggest you sort your e-commerce categories, create an optimized page for each of these categories. And each product page should also be optimized.
Another good tip is you separate the sitemap for these categories in time to submit to Google webmaster tools, in tests I did, it indexes more quickly.
You must also link products to share the juice. When you start linkbuilding strategy, think of the home and also in those categories created. So you earn linkjuice at home and in the categories. Which in turn shares for the products.
Also be very careful about duplicate content, do not file the same product in different categories, if necessary, use canonical tag or 301 redirect, to always be only a product page.
I hope it help you.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Optimized filename management for SEO
Hi, I'm currently undertaking a project to manage better my images and to rank for image searches. My site uses mod_pagespeed to optimises images, therefore image urls are changed to a pretty seo unfriendly url or even sometimes inlined within my page. On top of that I generally resize all my images by passing the desired file dimension within the image url in order to optimise the loading time of my site. Is there a way to provide a hint to google that I have a much better quality image with higher dimensions and better name? Can i specify within my image sitemap an image that actually does have different dimensions and a different within the page it serves? Are there better tricks to achieve that? Thanks in advance
Technical SEO | | mattam0 -
Magento technical SEO issues
Hi This is lots of questions and don't expect full answers but if anyone can help or put me in touch with some who can that would be great so here are 3 issues we have from some auditing our site Firstly on pages like https://www.tidy-books.co.uk/shop-with-us/sort-by/price/sort-direction/desc so any pages where there is a sortby the cananoical link doesn't seem to be working correctly. So for here it is https://www.tidy-books.co.uk/shop-with-us/sort-by/price/sort-direction/desc"/> but should be https://www.tidy-books.co.uk/shop-with-us"/> secondly with have a lot of duplicate title tags mainly caused from the blog and the above problem see-> http://prntscr.com/b2t9xe but regarding the blog we have an issue where 2 canonical appearing for example this page
Technical SEO | | tidybooks
https://www.tidy-books.co.uk/blog/page/19/ there are 2 canonical links appearing https://www.tidy-books.co.uk/blog/page/19/"/> we want it to be this
https://www.tidy-books.co.uk/blog/"/> Thirdly
Our mobile usability issues have gone up a lot see- > http://prntscr.com/b2tado
I can see what the issue is that this folder https://www.tidy-books.co.uk/skin/frontend/tidybooks/default/images/ was being crawled by google and contains lots of 'index of' pages. I've disallowed directory in robots.txt as shown here -> http://prntscr.com/b2tbc5 is that correct? any help would be great Just to let you know we use magento v1.7 we use SEO suite ultimate extension and we use fishpigs wordpress extension thanks0 -
Keyword in URL vs organization
I have a jobs site that currently has the following structure for jobs: www.site.com/jobs/openings/1234.html Categories used to be listed this way: www.site.com/jobs/openings/accounting But we changed it to: www.site.com/jobs/category/accounting Does it matter? Is one better than the other? The page title, heading, and description also have the word "openings" or "opening" in them.
Technical SEO | | cmp1010 -
Keyword Cannibalization?
I am not quite sure I totally understand the concept of keyword cannibalization. I have seen the SEO Moz Snowboard example... I tried to apply the concept but the on-page ranking sees a category page of mine with KW cannibalization. By the way, I still get an A for the targeted KW. I have an e-commerce site, one category page targets 'wool sweaters' and a product page for example is : 'chunky-knit wool turtleneck sweater' (there are 8 products total in this category all are flagged Cannibalizers). I didn't think KWC would be an issue...ranking seems to be effected judging ranking for other category pages w/o KW cannibalization issues. So, my question I guess is KW cannibalization really a big deal? What is taken into account when judging KW cannibalization. Title Tags? URLs? Thanks in advance
Technical SEO | | IOSC1 -
Do keywords in url parameter count?
I have a client who is on an older ecommerce platform that does not allow url rewrites in anyway. It would cost a ton of money to custom dev a solution. Anyways right now they have set up a parameter on their product urls to at least get the keyword in there. My question is, will this keyword actually be counted since it is in a parameter? An example url is http://domain.com/Catalog.aspx?Level1=01&Level2=02&C=Product-name-here Does this 'product-name-here' count as having the keyword in the url according to google?
Technical SEO | | webfeatseo0 -
SEO for Wordpress
I am sure you have been asked this many times... What is the BEST Wordpress Plug-in for SEO - Easy to Title Page, Meta Tags, etc... ?? Thanks
Technical SEO | | tab540 -
Buying new domains to help with SEO
Hi, Does buying new keyword related domains and 301 redirect them to my site have any seo benefit?
Technical SEO | | Socialdude0 -
When to SEO optimize a blog post?
Hi there, Here's our situation: there are two people working on the blog. person 1) writes the posts person 2) SEO optimizes the posts I know this is not ideal but it's the best we can do and it's a whole lot better than no blog. 🙂 I'm the fellow optimizing the posts. I've found that my best SEO efforts usually slightly undermine the readability of these posts -- not in an extreme way, I'm not going overboard with keywords or anything. Rather, things like a sexy & enticing article heading may have to be dummed down for search engines... Because of this dumming down, I like to wait a couple of weeks to SEO optimize our posts, the logic being that we get the best of both worlds: a happy regular readership on topic articles that are clearly described for (and aligned to the terms used by) our search engine visitors What I'm wondering is, Generally: can you see any problems with this setup? would you do it differently? Specifically: does Google (et al) punish this sort of backwards re-writing? and, does it somehow amount to less SEO mojo when done retroactively? Thanks so much for your time! Best, Jon
Technical SEO | | JonAmar0