Advice on Duplicate Page Content
-
We have many pages on our website and they all have the same template (we use a CMS) and at the code level, they are 90% the same. But the page content, title, meta description, and image used are different for all of them.
For example -
http://www.jumpstart.com/common/find-easter-eggs
http://www.jumpstart.com/common/recognize-the-rsWe have many such pages.
Does Google look at them all as duplicate page content? If yes, how do we deal with this?
-
EGOL, Everett,
Thank you both for your very useful suggestions. Sounds like we should do something similar to our PDF documents to represent them as the actual/canonical content on the page. And we'll look at our CMS to see how we might implement the unlinked page name in the breadcrumb. We have done some work already in adding structured data with schemas (including aggregate ratings), so that is hopefully yielding some results already.
However, after an encouraging traffic spike that seemed to indicate that we were on the right track, we saw a very worrisome dip last month.... which then led to a lot of worried hand wringing about Panda.
So these suggestions are very helpful ; thanks again and we'll try them out!
-
Thank you, Everett,
Nice to see you posting in Q&A.
Look forward to seeing you regularly.
-
Hello Sudhir,
Those two pages would not be seen as duplicates. Google is very capable of separating the template from the content.
On a side note, you should look into getting the name of the page/game into the breadcrumb, though it doesn't have to be linked like the previous two pages in the path. For example:
You are here: Home --> Common --> Find Easter Eggs
Allowing visitors to review and rate the games would provide useful, keyword-rich, natural content on an otherwise content-sparse page. Once reviews/ratings are implemented you could also use Schema.org markup to enhance your search engine results by showing star ratings next to each game.
Good luck!
-
Google knows how to separate the template of the site from the content. So you have nothing to worry about if most of the code on your pages is the same code that is used on every other page.
I looked at your two sample pages and saw a few things that would concern me...
This page had very little content. If you have lots of pages with such a tiny amount of content you could have Panda problems.
http://www.jumpstart.com/common/find-easter-eggs
You also have pages like this....
http://www.jumpstart.com/common/recognize-the-rs-view
These have very little content.
I have a site with lots of printable content that is mainly images placed in .pdf documents to control the scale of the printing and the look of the printed page. The pages used to present them to visitors and the pdf documents were all thin content and my site had a Panda problem. That cause the rankings of every page on the site to fall and really damaged my traffic. I solved that by noindexing the html pages and applying rel=canonical to the pdf files using .htacess.
I can't say if this will happen to you but I would be uncomfortable if I had a site with such little content on its pages.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Content incorrectly being duplicated on microsite
So bear with me here as this is probably a technical issue and i am not that technical. We have a microsite for one of our partner organisations and recently we have detected that content from our main site appearing in the URLs for the microsite - both in search results and then when you click through to the SERP. However, this content does not exist on the actual website at all. Anyone have a possible explanation for this? I have tried searching the web but nothing. I assume there is something in the set up of the microsite that is associating it with the content on the main site.
Technical SEO | | Discovery_SA0 -
How to protect against duplicate content?
I just discovered that my company's 'dev website' (which mirrors our actual website, but which is where we add content before we put new content to our actual website) is being indexed by Google. My first thought is that I should add a rel=canonical tag to the actual website, so that Google knows that this duplicate content from the dev site is to be ignored. Is that the right move? Are there other things I should do? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | williammarlow0 -
Duplicate content vs. less content
Hi, I run a site that is currently doing very well in google for the terms that we want. We are 1,2 or 3 for our 4 targeted terms, but havent been able to jump to number one in two categories that I would really like to. In looking at our site, I didn't realize we have a TON of duplicate content as seen by SEO moz and I guess google. It appears to be coming from our forum, we use drupal. RIght now we have over 4500 pages of duplicate content. Here is my question: How much is this hurting us as we are ranking high. Is it better to kill the forum (which is more community service than business) and have a very tight site SEO-wise, or leave the forum even with the duplicate content. Thanks for your help. Erik
Technical SEO | | SurfingNosara0 -
Duplicate Content For Trailing Slashes?
I have several website in campaigns and I consistently get flagged for duplicate content and duplicate page titles from the domain and the domain/ versions of the sites even though they are properly redirected. How can I fix this?
Technical SEO | | RyanKelly0 -
How can i see the pages that cause duplicate content?
SEOmoz PRO is giving me back duplicate content errors. However, i don't see how i can get a list of pages that are duplicate to the one shown. If i don't know which pages/urls cause the issue i can't really fix it. The only way would be placing canonical tags but that's not always the best solution. Is there a way to see the actual duplicate pages?
Technical SEO | | 5MMedia0 -
Crawl Errors and Duplicate Content
SEOmoz's crawl tool is telling me that I have duplicate content at "www.mydomain.com/pricing" and at "www.mydomain.com/pricing.aspx". Do you think this is just a glitch in the crawl tool (because obviously these two URL's are the same page rather than two separate ones) or do you think this is actually an error I need to worry about? Is so, how do I fix it?
Technical SEO | | MyNet0 -
WordPress Duplicate Content Issues
Everyone knows that WordPress has some duplicate content issues with tags, archive pages, category pages etc... My question is, how do you handle these issues? Is the smart strategy to use robots meta and add no follow/ no index category pages, archive pages tag pages etc? By doing this are you missing out on the additional internal links to your important pages from you category pages and tag pages? I hope this makes sense. Regards, Bill
Technical SEO | | wparlaman0 -
Canonical Link for Duplicate Content
A client of ours uses some unique keyword tracking for their landing pages where they append certain metrics in a query string, and pulls that information out dynamically to learn more about their traffic (kind of like Google's UTM tracking). Non-the-less these query strings are now being indexed as separate pages in Google and Yahoo and are being flagged as duplicate content/title tags by the SEOmoz tools. For example: Base Page: www.domain.com/page.html
Technical SEO | | kchandler
Tracking: www.domain.com/page.html?keyword=keyword#source=source Now both of these are being indexed even though it is only one page. So i suggested placing an canonical link tag in the header point back to the base page to start discrediting the tracking URLs: But this means that the base pages will be pointing to themselves as well, would that be an issue? Is their a better way to solve this issue without removing the query tracking all togther? Thanks - Kyle Chandler0